University of New Brunswick: Power Quality-Pq Professor Dr. Adel M. Sharaf. P.Eng. UNB-ECE Dept Canada
University of New Brunswick: Power Quality-Pq Professor Dr. Adel M. Sharaf. P.Eng. UNB-ECE Dept Canada
POWER QUALITY-PQ
1
What is Power quality ?
Definition : “Power quality problem is any power problem manifested
in voltage, current, or frequency deviation that results in failure or
misoperation of customer equipment”.
Power quality can be simply defined as shown in the interaction
diagram:
•Blackouts/Brownouts
Voltage Power •Arc Type
Current
•Transient Quality Quality
Quality •Temporal
•Converter Type
•Inrush
Nonlinear Loads •Saturation Type
•Overcurrent
Industrial/Commercial/Residential
•NLL-Analog/Digital
•Flickering Consumers
Switching
2
Why are we concerned about PQ
The Main reasons behind the growing concern about
PQ are:
North American industries lose Tens-of-Billions of Dollars every year in
downtime due to power quality problems. (Electrical Business Magazine)
Load nonlinearities in rising and is expected to reach 50 to 70% in the year
2005 (Electric Power Research Institute) [Computers, UPS, fax machines,
printers, fluorescent lighting, ASD, industrial rectifiers, DC drives, arc
welders, etc).
The characteristics of the electric loads have changed.
Harmonics are continuous problem not transient or intermittent.
3
Power Quality Issue and Problems
4
Power Quality PQ Issue
I
2
n
PF
1
DPF
THDi n2
1 THDi2
I1
5
SYSTEM MODELS
Electric
Electric System+Transformer+Feeder Equivalent
Utility (Plant) Load
Transformer
Load Bus
Vs Rs Ls VL
6
Nonlinear Load Models
Vs Rs Ls VL
Volt-Ampere (VL – IL)
is
D1 D2
E1
E2 Arc Nonlinear
Load/ Cyclical
Symmetrical R1 R2
Asymmetrical
E1 different from E2
R1 different from R2
Arc Type
iS Ls Rs
iL
RL
Vs Nonlinear
Load
LL
Cyclical
Load
Z s ( stator )
iS Ls Rs iL Rs Ls istator ist
ir
irotor
imagnetizing im
VL1 VL2 Lr
Vs Lm Z r (rotor)
Rr
VL
Zm
Industrial
( magnetizin g )
Motorized
Load
Alpha: Slip Measure of Loading
Cyclical Motorized
Id
Lf
Vs is Rs Ls Rac
Vd Rdc
Lac
Modulated
Converter- Fanning
Modulated Loadt
Rectifier Modulated Rectifier Circuit Xac
Effect
Modulated Rac
8
Nonlinear Load Models
Volt-Ampere (VL – IL)
SMPS-Computer Netw ork
Diode-
Bridge L1
Vs is Rs Ls
idc
C1 Vc R1
Limiter
Type
Switch Mode Power Supply (SMPS)
Fluorescent Lamp
iS Ls Rs
iL Ballast
Starter L
RLamp
Vf eeder Magnetic Saturation-
VL Transf ormer
Vs type Nonlinear Load FL-Starter
Ballast
Nonlinear
9
Nonlinear Load Models
Nonlinear Load
Volt-Ampere (VL – IL)
Adjustable Speed Drive
VLL
Pin
Vs PCC
is Rs Ls
C M
PCC:point of common coupling AC Motor
Rectifier Inverter
10
Switched Modulated Power Filters and Capacitor
Compensators
A N
VF
VF VF (Vn)
iF2 iF1 iF GTO or (IGBT
C2 w ith bridge) C1
C1 VF
C
Cf Cf
L2 L1 C1 C2
L
C2
R2 R1
L1 L2 R
R S2
Lf S2=S1 L
R1 R2
S1
S Rf
on/of f or
PWM
S1 S2 Parameters: (Cf, Lf, Rf) S
V >0 V <0
SPF/SCC
TAF Dual-Tuned-
Arm Filter ATAF TAF + Static C-Type
Tuned-Arm
Capacitor
Filter (TAF) Asymmetrical Tuned- C-Type
Compensator
Arm Filter (ATAF) Filter
L CT M1
Motorized Inrush Loads
S2=S1
CL • Water Pumps
To Load
CS
•A/C
S2
•Refrigeration
M2
N
I(k)
RMS
Detector
I(k-1)
Delay
ihref 0 e Vc iF iS
Kp + K i /s PWM Filter
PI
ih
Notch
Abs
Filter
Reject 60Hz
Ts/w
ton ton switch S1 0
Vc To GTO
PWM
S2=S1 SSR/Triac ton ts
NOT
Controller
0 S2 TS/W
0<t on<T s/w
Ts/w=1/f s/w (b)
15
Switching Devices – PWM Circuits
(1)
(2)
16
Concept of Modulated Power Filters (MPF)
VF v
u(t)
IF
C
VF
-u(t-to) t
L to
TAF
u(t)-u(t-to)
R
on/of f or PWM to t
GTO, MOSFET,
Triac, IGBT
17
Modulated Tuned Arm Filter (Sym. & Asym.)
Load is either: VL
iL-total
iF
•Adjustable Speed Drives VF
•Asymmetrical Arc-type C
L1
~ C
R1
L
Dynamic Controller: R1= constant or variably
sw itched
R Sample SMPS Load
-Min. effec. Power
-RMS current tracking
-Min. Harmonic Content
19
Modulated Asymmetrical Tuned-Arm Filter
Utility Transf ormer
R T LT Vs Rf Lf VL
f eeder iL
Rs=RT+R f
Ls=LT+Lf
iF VL
iL
VF iL1 iL2
DA DB
Without (THD=42%) With (THD=14%) D1 D2 R1 R 2 R1 (1 )
C1 C2
E1 E2 E1 (1 )
Nonlinear
L1 L2 Asymmetrical
(ATAF) Load
R1 R2
( S 2 S1)
S2 dual-
S1 complementary
ton2
ton1 sw itching
G
With (THD=7%)
Without (THD=18%)
Nonlinear Temporal Load Parameters:
R1=R01+R11sin(wr1*t); E1=E01+E11sin(wr2*t);
R2=R02+R22sin(wr1*t); E2=E02+E22sin(wr2*t);
Dynamic Controller: Dual loop of RMS current tracking R2= R1(1+) R01=8 R02=12 R11=2 R22=6 wr1=15
and Min. Harmonic Content E2= -E1(1+) E01= 46 E02=70 E11=12 E22=35 wr2=5
20
A Low-cost Voltage Stabilization and Power
Quality Enhancement Scheme for a Small
Renewable Wind Energy Scheme
Introduction
System Description
Novel PWM Switching Control Scheme
Modulated Power Filter Compensator
Simulation Results
Conclusion
22
Introduction
23
Introduction
24
System Description
26
Novel PWM Switching Control Scheme
27
Novel PWM Switching Control Scheme
Objective:
To stabilize the voltage under random load and
wind speed excursion
Maximize power/energy utilization
28
The Functional Model of MPFC
The capacitor bank and the
RL arm are connected by a
6-pulse diode to block the
reverse flow of current.
29
Proposed MPFC Scheme and Its Functional
Model
30
Simulation Results
31
System Dynamic Response Without MPFC
32
System Dynamic Response With MPFC
33
Error plane of the dynamic error driven
controller
Ep*r
0
-1
2
1
0 0
Ev*r -2 -1
Ei*r
34
Conclusions
The digital simulation results validated that the
proposed low cost MPFC scheme is effective in
voltage stabilization for both linear and nonlinear
electrical load excursions.
35
Reference
[1] A.M.Sharaf and Liang Zhao, ‘A Novel Voltage Stabilization Scheme
for Standalone Wind Energy Using a Facts Dual Switching Universal
Power Stabilization Scheme’, 2005
[2] M.S. El-Moursi and Adel M. Sharaf, 'Novel STATCOM controller for
voltage stabilization of wind energy scheme', Int. J. Global Energy
Issues, 2006.
[4] A.M. Sharaf and Liang Yang, 'A Novel Efficient Stand-Alone
Photovoltaic DC Village Electricity Scheme’, 2005
36
Reference
[5] Pradeep K. Nadam, Paresk C. Sen, 'Industrial Application of Sliding
Mode Control', IEEE/IAS International Conference On Industrial
Automation and Control, Proceedings, pp. 275-280, 1995
[7] Edward Y.Y. Ho, Paresk C. Sen, 'Control Dynamics of Speed Drive
System Using Sliding Mode Controllers with Integral Compensation',
IEEE Transactions on Industry Applications, Vol.21, NO.5, pp 883-892,
September/October 1991.
37
A FACTS based Dynamic Capacitor Scheme
for Voltage Stabilization and Power Quality
Enhancement
38
Abstract
Power Quality voltage problems in a power system may be either at
system frequency or due to transient surges with higher frequency
components.
39
Introduction
The growing use of nonlinear industrial type or inrush type electric
loads can cause a real challenge to power quality for electric
utilities around the world, especially in the current era of the
unregulated power market where: competition, supply quality,
security and reliability are key issues for any economic survival.
Solid state AC controllers are widely Solid state AC controllers are widely
used to convert AC power for feeding number of electrical loads such as
adjustable speed drives, arc furnaces, power supplies etc.
The paper presents a new low cost FACTS based dynamic compensator
scheme (DCC) for improving the voltage stability and enhancing power
quality for hybrid linear/nonlinear and motorized load.
41
The System under study
Fig.1 (a) depicts the single line diagram of the sample radial 138 kV (L-L) AC Power System.
42
MATLAB Sim-Power System Model
Fig.1 (b) shows the MATLAB block diagram.
43
The MATLAB Sim-Power System functional
model of the hybrid (linear, non linear and
motorized) load is shown in Fig.2.
44
New Dynamic Capacitor Compensator (DCC) scheme
comprising a switched power filter
45
Controller Design
Fig.4 shows the proposed novel Tri-loop (PI) Proportional plus Integral, dynamic
error driven sinusoidal SPWM switching controller.
46
Cont. / Controller Design
The Tri-loop dynamic controller is used to stabilize the load bus voltage
by regulated pulse width switching of the two IGBT solid state switches.
The three regulating key loops are:
Loop 1 – the main loop for the dynamic voltage error using the RMS
voltage at the load bus; this loop is to maintain the voltage at the load
bus at a reference value by modulating the admittance of the
compensator.
Loop 2 – the dynamic error is using RMS dynamic load current. This loop
is an auxiliary loop to compensate for any sudden electrical load
excursions.
Loop 3 – the Harmonic ripple loop is used to provide an effective
dynamic tracking control to suppress any sudden current ripples and
compensate the AC system power transfer capability even under
switching excursions.
47
The following Figures show the load voltage, current, and active
power, reactive power, the active vs. reactive power, and the
transmitted power loss; without the proposed low cost FACTS
Dynamic Capacitor Compensator (DCC).
48
The following Figures show the load voltage, current, and active
power, reactive power, the active vs. reactive power, with the
proposed low cost FACTS Dynamic Capacitor Compensator (DCC).
49
Conclusions
The paper presents a low cost FACTS Based Capacitor Compensator (DCC)
for a radial 138 kV L-L sample test system. Digital simulation and comparison
between without and with figures validated the following:
The receiving load bus voltage without the FACTS Based Capacitor
Compensator (DCC) was about 0.66 pu when reaching steady state. Using
the FACTS (DCC) compensator it is increased to about 0.96 pu (which is
acceptable -5% from 1 pu).
The receiving load bus current is increased from 0.36 pu to 0.62 pu with the
FACTS Based Capacitor Compensator (DCC).
The received active power at the hybrid load bus is increased from 0.36 pu
to 0.95 pu.
The received reactive power at the hybrid load side is decreased from 0.2 pu
to -0.5pu.
The receiving end power factor is also increased from 0.832 lag to 0.95 lag.
The transmitted power loss is decreased from 0.042 pu to 0.017 pu (about
40% less).
50
References
[1] Guile, & Paterson, Electrical Power Systems: vol.2, Pergamon international
library of science, 1977.
[2] A.M.Sharaf, “Harmonic interference from distribution systems”, IEEE Winter
Meeting, New York, 1982.
[3] A.M.Sharaf, H.Huang, “Flicker control using rule based modulated passive
power filters”, Electric Power System Research Journal 33 (1995) 49-52.
[4] A.M.Sharaf, C.Gua, and H.Huang, “A Smart Modulated Filter for Energy
Conservation in Utilization Network”, IACPSS, April 6-8, 1997, Al-Ain, UAE, pp 211-
212.
[5] A.M.Sharaf, S.S.Shokralla and A.S.Abd El-Ghaffar, “Efficient Power Tracking
using an Error Driven Modulated Passive Filter”, AEIC’ 95, AL-AZHAR Conference,
December 16 – 19, 1995.
[6] A.M.Sharaf, P.Kreidi, “Power Quality enhancement and harmonic reduction
using dynamic power filters”, ELECTRIMACS 2002. Montreal, Quebec, Canada,
August 18-21, 2002.
[7] A.M.Sharaf, P.Kreidi, “Power Quality enhancement using a unified compensator
and switched filter “, ICREPQ’ 2003, Vigo-Spain, April 9-11, 2003.
[8] Uzunoglu, M., Kocatepe, C. and Yumurtaci, R. (2004) “Voltage stability analysis
in the power systems including non-linear loads”, European Transactions on
Electrical Power, January–February, Vol. 14, No. 1, pp.41–56.
[9] B.Singh, V.Verma, A.Chandra and K.Al-Haddad, “Hybrid filters for power quality
improvement”, IEE Proc.Gener.Transm.Distrib., Vol. 152, No.3, May 2005. 51
A NOVEL MAXIMUM POWER TRACKING
CONTROLLER FOR A STAND-ALONE
PHOTOVOLTAIC DC MOTOR DRIVE
Introduction
System Model Description
Novel Dynamic Error Driven Self Adjusting Controller
(SAC)
Digital Simulation Results
Conclusions
Future Work
53
Introduction
54
Maximum Power Point Tracking (MPPT)
55
I-V and P-V characteristics of a typical PV array at a fixed ambient temperature and solar irradiation condition
56
The performance of any stand-alone PV
system depends on:
57
System Model Description
Key components:
PV array module model
Power conditioning filter:
♦ Blocking Diode
♦ Input filter (Rf & Lf )
Storage Capacitor (C1)
Four-Quadrant PWM converter feeding the
PMDC (Permanent Magnet Direct Current)
motor (1-15kW size)
58
Photovoltaic powered Four-Quadrant PWM converter PMDC motor drive system
59
Novel Dynamic Error Driven Self Adjusting
Controller (SAC)
60
Dynamic tri-loop self adjusting control (SAC) system
61
The global error signal (et) comprises
3-dimensional excursion vectors (ew, ei, ep)
62
The loop weighting factors (γw, γI and γp)
and the parameters k0 and β are assigned to
minimize the time-weighted excursion index J0
where
N= T0/Tsample
T0: Largest mechanical time constant (10s)
Tsample: Sampling time (0.2ms)
t(k)=k·Tsample: Time at step k in seconds
63
Digital Simulation Results
Variation of Variation of
ambient temperature (Tx) solar irradiation (Sx)
65
For trapezoidal reference speed trajectory
70
Conclusions
71
Future Work
72
Future Work (Continue) Novel Dynamic Error Driven
Sliding Mode Controller (SMC)
73
Dynamic tri-loop error-driven Sliding Mode Control (SMC) system
74
A Low Cost Dynamic Voltage Stabilization
Scheme for Standalone Wind Induction
Generator System
Outline
1.Introduction
2.Standalone Wind Energy System
3.Dynamic Series Switched Capacitor Compensation
including two parts: Digital Simulation Models and
Dynamic Simulation Results
4.Conclusions
5.Future Work
References
76
1. Introduction
78
2. Standalone Wind Energy System
79
2. Standalone Wind Energy System
80
2. Standalone Wind Energy System
82
3. Dynamic Series Switched Capacitor
Compensation
Figure 5 shows Tri-loop Error Driven PID Controlled PWM Switching Scheme
84
3. Dynamic Series Switched Capacitor
Compensation
85
3. Dynamic Series Switched Capacitor
Compensation
Figure 6
86
3. Dynamic Series Switched Capacitor
Compensation
87
3. Dynamic Series Switched
Capacitor Compensation
Without DSSC With DSSC
Compensation Compensation
Figure 7
88
3. Dynamic Series Switched
Capacitor Compensation
Under wind excursion
Figure 8
90
4. Conclusions
The low cost DSSC compensation scheme is very
effective for the voltage stabilization under linear,
non-liner passive load excursions as well as wind
speed excursions.
But it can not compensate adequately for large
inrush dynamic excursions such as induction motor.
The proposed low cost DSSC voltage compensation
scheme is only suitable for isolated wind energy
conversion systems feeding linear and non-linear
passive type loads.
91
5. Future Study
92
Reference
[1]. K.Natarajan, A.M Sharaf, S.Sivakumarand and
S.Nagnarhan, “Modeling and Control Design for Wind
Energy Conversion Scheme using Self-Excited Induction
Generator”, IEEE Trans. On E.C., Vol.2, pp.506-512,
Sept.1987.
[2]. S.P.Singh, Bhim Singh and M.P.Jain, “Performance
Characteristic and Optimum Utilization of a Cage Machine as
a Capacitor excited Induction Generator”, IEEE Trans. On
E.C., Vol. 5, No.4, pp.679-685, Dec.1990
[3]. A.Gastli, M.akherraz, M. Gammal,
“Matlab/Simulink/ANN Based Modeling and Simulation of A
Stand-Alone Self-Excited Induction Generator”, Proc. of the
International Conference on Communication, Computer and
Power, ICCCP’98, Dec.7-10 1998, Muscat, Sultanate of
Oman, pp.93-98
93
94
ULTRA HIGH SPEED PROTECTION OF SERIES
COMPENSATED TRANSMISSION LINES USING
WAVELET TRANSFORMS
95
Presentation Outline
Introduction
Wavelets
Background Theory
Proposed Scheme
Study System: Single Line Diagram
Study System: Test Cases
Incremental Voltages and Currents
Relaying Signals
Wavelet Approximation
Fault Direction Determination
Travelling Waves
Wavelet Thresholding
Conclusion
96
Introduction
97
Wavelets
where
98
Proposed Scheme
99
Proposed Scheme
101
Study System: Test Cases
102
Incremental Voltage (Case 1)
116