Agri
Agri
Agri
Listed below are the areas that you can troubleshoot the relief
valves: If low or erratic pressure occurs for the sake of
troubleshooting, the following items must be considered.
Valve adjustment is incorrect.
Dirt, chip, or burrs may cause the valve partially open.
Poppets or seats may be worned or damaged.
Valve piston in the main body may be sticked.
Selection of spring is wrong Spring ends may be damaged.
Valve in the body may be cocked.
If relief valve has no pressure, the following items
must be considered.
Orifice or balance hole may be plugged.
Poppet does not seat.
Valve may have a loose fit.
Spring may be broken.
Dirt, chip, or burrs may cause the valve partially open.
Poppet or seat may be worned or damaged.
Valve in the body may be cocked.
If excessive noise occurs consider the following items;
Oil viscosity may be too high.
Poppet or seat may be faulty or worned.
Line pressure may have an excessive return.
Pressure setting is too close to that of another valve in the circuit.
Spring may be broken.
If adjustment of the relief valve can not be achieved
properly, consider the following items;
Spring may be broken.
Fatigue for spring material may come across.
Improper spring may have been used.
Drain line in system may be restricted
Relief Valve Test Observations
PRESSURE RELIEF VALVE CYCLIC TEST RIG
Cyclic test on New Pressure Relief Valve Performed cyclic tests on a
given specimen valve, the intent of data gathered by this testing
procedure to provide justification for the replacement of valve elements
mainly poppet , valve seat and spring . For the system set pressure
observed the valve leakage and valve elements erosion wear for
every1200 cycles. Both the poppet and valve seat revealed the no
presence of erosion pits and groove. It was also observed no wear
damage was observed for a long extended test period, i.e. up to 52000
cycles.
Analysis of rejected valves Parameters considered are hardness,
geometry, operating characteristics like setting pressure, full flow
pressure and cracking pressure and leakage flow. At higher temperatures
ie, 70º C to 80º , it is possible that the hardness of the poppet and valve
seat valve may be reduced due to tempering, which could lead to
increased valve recession or even fatigue failure of valves.
In this study, we focus on the details of the flow fluctuations
around the poppet for various pressure drop. Erosion pits and
their effects on erosion progression were investigated in detail for
direct acting Pressure Relief Valve
RESULTS
The outcome of this effort was focused on determining whether the test rig
was adequate in size and function, and that the test procedure is capable of
providing data that can support downstream statistical analysis of relief
valve mechanical integrity (service life).
The valve seat, poppet wear problem involves two distinct mechanisms:
impact of the poppet on the valve seat on valve closure and sliding of the
poppet on the valve seat under the action of the system pressure.
Depending , however, on the accuracy of the poppet and the valve seat
machining, it is conceivable that such misalignment may occur in valve
and therefore, be a source of valve recession.
When a component reliability having analyzed the root causes of the valve
failure and considered the implications for valve design and seat and
poppet materials, it is decided to investigate the potential for reducing
valve recession by improving the existing design
CONCLUSION
The investigation, however, has clearly shown that: A successful design
of poppet valves requires a thorough analysis of both velocity and
pressure fields, with the aim of improving the poppet/seat geometry.
1. Systematic observations of the feature of erosion pits and the groove
showed that the predominant failure was a fatigue process. In order to
detect erosion damage of the closure member or possible blockage in the
valve body, it is necessary in addition to measure the pressure over the
valve and to obtain data of the volume flow through the valve.
2. Material choice is clearly critical in addressing valve wear problems.
In deciding which material combination to use, consideration should be
given to deciding which is more preferable: greater valve seat wear or
greater poppet wear.
3. The bench test apparatus provides a valid physical simulation of the wear of
both poppet and valve seat in the pressure relief valve. An obvious possible
upgrade to the test rig would be to integrate a pressure transducer and computer
data acquisition program.
4. Wear may increases with valve closing velocity, system pressure, and
misalignment of the poppet, valve seat and spring retainer.
REFERENCES
[1] Prof. Dr. M. Sc. Pancar Yasa,, Assoc. Prof. Dr. M. Sc. Ergur H. Sevil,
Troubleshooting for relief valves used in hydraulic systems.
[2] Jekel, T. B., Claas, M., and Reindl, D. T. Development and Validation of
a Bench Test Procedure for Post Mortem Testing of Relief Valves, IIAR
2011 Ammonia Refrigeration Convention & Exhibition Orlando, FL March
26-30, 2011.
[3] Binoy B. Nair, Vamsi Preetam M. T. A Novel Feature Selection method
for Fault Detection and Diagnosis of Control Valves, IJCSI International
Journal of Computer Science Issues, Vol. 8, Issue 3, No. 1, May 2011,
[4] Lasse Skov, Peter Fogh Odgaard, Critical fault detection, by measure
current on electromechanical hydraulic valves, VCC Aalborg University
2010.
THANK YOU