SCOR Modeling in Supply Chain Performance Analysis
SCOR Modeling in Supply Chain Performance Analysis
performance analysis
Supply Chain Performance indicators –some basic
issues
• Objective – customer satisfaction at low costs ensuring long-
term competitive capability
• Level 3
– Level for further decomposition.
– Source Stocked Product (S1) is broken to sub-processes like Schedule
Product deliveries (S1.1), Receive Product (S1.2), Verify product (S1.3),
Transfer Product (S1.4) and Authorize Supplier Payment (S1.5).
– These five sub-processes are similar to the generic activities Plan,
Source, Make, Deliver and Return under the Sourcing of Stocked
Product, a process of Level 2.
As – Is Geography Map
• A spatial representation with prime focus on geographic location of
supply chain partners and their linkages. (Figure 1)
• Initial requirements
– To rethink on the scope issues of the supply chain under consideration.
• How much of your supplier’s supply chain do you want to include in your
analysis?
• Do you distribute through wholesalers and do you want to include them in
analysis?
• Is this analysis meant for one specific product line or for all the products
produced by your company covering all the customers?
• For the purpose of overall improvement and to avoid complexity in
analysis, the level 3 sub processes are rarely used in As – Is Geography
Map .
• For more detailed analysis or detailed description of elemental
processes the Level 3 sub-processes may be included in later stage.
Thread Diagram
• Geography Map more location-focused diagram.
• The gap analysis also throws some light on the possible benefit
and cost associated with eliminating the gap between As – Is and
To – Be supply chain.
Redesign the supply chain
• To redesign the To- Be supply chain on the basis of targets for each
performance attributes and prioritized gaps to be eliminated.
• A To- Be Geographical map and Thread Diagram is created introducing the
changes in process and activities for better performance.
• The designers start with a tentative redesign and create the corresponding map
and thread diagram.
• The team looks for opportunities, explores possibilities and studies the problem
in depth.
• The To- Be thread diagram may be changed several times for getting the
ultimate redesign of the supply chain.
• Once the first draft of the Level II Thread Diagram is complete team moves to
Level III.
• Sometimes swimlane type diagram is used to incorporate functional
responsibilities in analyzing the activities at Level III as shown in figure 5.
• The SCOR project team essentially refers to the list of best practices
(available for external service providers like PMG) corresponding to a
process element (i.e. a sub process created in level III).
• The team is to decide what changes they might make, if they were to adopt
one or more of the best practices.
• Best practice suggestions may be categorized under three types
– new management practices
– new employee practices and
– use of software applications or automation for supporting activities or
employees.
• By management process we mean the generic “plan” process.
• Plan processes are activities that are assigned to managers who must
oversee operational processes.
• These processes can be improved by best management practices
• P2 i.e. Plan Source process may be improved utilizing the
following information collected from SCOR card.
– Reliability: Supplier delivery as on- time delivery performance.
– Responsiveness: Cumulative source cycle time.
– Flexibility: Source flexibility.
– Cost & Assets: None identified.
• Best practices: