Propeller in Open Water
Propeller in Open Water
Kinematic Similarity
Advance Coefficient
Kinetic (Dynamic) Similarity
Inertia F. to gravity F. Inertia F. to viscous F. Pressure F. to Inertia F.
Froude Number Reynolds Number Pressure Coefficient
Euler Number
Reynolds Number of Propeller
Dimensional Analysis result in Open Water Characteristics
Laws of Similarity in Practice
Can we do this ??
Reynolds Number Equality
Gawn Series
Gawn Series
B / Wageningen / Marin / Troost / NSMB-B Series
Propeller Series – Wageningen B
• Blades : 2-7
Pitch Ratio : 0.60~1.40 (Four bladed propeller has no constant pitch
distribution)
Area Ratio : 0.30~1.05 Frame 001 28 Sep 2007
Z
0.1
Z
0
-0.15
0
-0.1 0.05
-0.05
X
0
Y
0.05 0.1
0.1
0.15
Propeller Series – Au Series
• Blades : 4-7
Pitch Ratio : 0.50~1.20
Area Ratio : 0.70~0.758
Skew Angles : 0o>
Section Type : AU type
Remark : Complemantary series of Wageningen B Series
Propeller Series – Gawn Series
• Blades : 3 Frame 001 28 Sep 2007
Z
0.05
Z
• Section Type : Circular
0
-0.05
• Remark :
-0.1
0
-0.15
-0.1 0.05
-0.05
X
0
Y 0.1
0.05
0.1
0.15
Propeller Series – Ma Series (Lindgren Series)
• Blades : 3, 5
• Pitch Ratio : 1.00~1.454
• Area Ratio : 0.75~1.20
• Skew Angles : 0o>
• Section Type : Circular
Propeller Series – KCA Series
• Blades : 3,4,5
Pitch Ratio : 0.60~2.00
Area Ratio : 0.20~1.10
Skew Angles : 0o>
Section Type : Ogival
Remark : Most widely use propeller series.
Suitable for most application.
Propeller Series – Skew KCA Series
• Blades : 3,4,5
• Pitch Ratio : 0.60~2.00
• Area Ratio : 0.50~1.10
• Skew Angles : 25o , 30o , 35o
• Section Type : Ogival
• Remark : Modified from
standard KCA series for
smooth application.
• Suitable for most application.
Propeller Series – NR Series
• Blades : 3, 4, 5
Frame 001 28 Sep 2007
Z
Y
X
0.1
Z
0
-0.15 -0.1
-0.1
0
-0.05
0
Y 0.05
0.1 0.1
0.15
• Blades : 4,5,6,7
• Pitch Ratio : 0.80~1.60
• Area Ratio : 0.50~1.40
• Skew Angles : According to design
• Section Type : Airfoil
• Remark : Theoretical design propeller series.
Propeller Series – New Foil Series
• Blades : 3,4,5
• Pitch Ration : 0.80~1.60
• Area Ration : 0.50~1.40
• Skew Angles : According to design
• Section Type : New Foil
• Remark : Theoretical design propeller series.
Propeller Series – Ka Series
• Blades : 3, 4, 5
• Pitch Ratio : 0.60~1.60
• Area Ratio : 0.55~0.75
• Skew Angles : 00,Skew available
• Section Type : Airfoil
• Remark : Suitable for
accelerating nozzle
propellers and bow or stern
thrusters.
Propeller Selection
Contents
• Case 1: Optimum rotation rate for a given diameter
• Case 2: Optimum diameter for a given rotation rate
• Case 3: Optimum propeller for given power and rate
• Case 4: Maximum bollard pull
• Case 5: Existing propeller
• Viscous Effects – ITTC Analysis Procedure
Case 1: Optimum Rotation Rate for a Given Diameter
• A common problem for the propeller is the design of a propeller when the
required propeller thrust is known and the propeller diameter is known.
• The advance velocity of a propeller can be estimated from the ship speed and
the wake fraction.
• The unknowns are the required power and especially the rate of rotation.
• The latter is important for the choice of the engine or for the choice of the
gear ratio.
• Suppose that a four-bladed propeller is chosen. In that case the
following data are known:
• The propeller thrust T =1393 kN.
• The propeller diameter D = 7 m.
• The advance velocity Va = 8.65 m/s.
• The density of water ρ = 1025 kg/m3.
• The number of blades Z = 4.
• Estimate the required area ratio to be 0.55. The diagram to be used is
that of the B 4.55 series.
• The thrust and diameter are known but the rotation rate is not.
• This means that the parameters Kt and J cannot be calculated yet.
• However, the parameters KT/J2 can be calculated because it does not
contain the rotation rate:
KT T 1,393,000
0.3707
J 2
V D 1025 8.65 7
2 2 2 2
WAGENINGEN B SERISI
SECILEN PERVANE = 46. PERVANEDIR
P/D=0.950
J= 0.674 Kt= 0.168 10Kq= 0.278 eta= 0.650
Bp= 14.7781 delta= 150.2568
T= 1393.00 kN Va= 8.650 m/s RHO = 1025.0 kg/m3
Z = 4. EAR = 0.550 D = 7.000 m
RPS= 1.834 dev/san RPM= 110.01 TORK=1608.316 kNm Pd=18528.5 kW
• After running the program, the conclusion is that the optimum efficiency can be reached with a pitch
ratio of 0.95.
• The optimum efficiency is 0.650. The advance ratio J is 0.699 and from this the required rotation rate
can be derived:
Va 8.65
n 1.834 RPS 110 RPM
JD 0.674 7
• The required power to propel ship can be derived from the torque coefficient KQ=0.0278. The torque is
found to be
• When the optimum rate of case 1 is chosen the question can be posed if
the diameter of 7 meters was the optimum diameter.
• The optimum diameter can be calculated in a similar way as the
optimum rotation rate, but now the value of KT/J4 can be calculated
because the diameter is absent in the parameter
KT T n2 1,393,000 1.8342
0.816
J 4
V 4
1025 8.654
• The optimum pitch ratio can again be found by iteration:
---|-------|-------|--------|--------|--------|------------|----------|
i P/D J Kt 10Kq eta0 Bp delta
---|-------|-------|--------|--------|--------|------------|----------|
34 0.830 0.631 0.1294 0.2001 0.6497 14.7837 160.4543
35 0.840 0.635 0.1326 0.2060 0.6506 14.7737 159.4914
36 0.850 0.639 0.1358 0.2119 0.6513 14.7657 158.5511
41 0.900 0.657 0.1519 0.2434 0.6524 14.7529 154.1675
51 1.000 0.690 0.1851 0.3148 0.6459 14.8266 146.7318
71 1.200 0.747 0.2535 0.4886 0.6166 15.1745 135.6321
81 1.300 0.771 0.2880 0.5883 0.6007 15.3752 131.3755
91 1.400 0.793 0.3225 0.6936 0.5867 15.5564 127.7158
---|-------|-------|--------|--------|--------|-----------|-----------|
WAGENINGEN B SERISI
SECILEN PERVANE = 35. PERVANEDIR
P/D=0.840
J= 0.635 Kt= 0.133 10Kq= 0.206 eta= 0.651
Bp= 14.7737 delta= 159.4914
T= 1393.00 kN Va= 8.650 m/s RHO = 1025.0 kg/m3
Z = 4. EAR = 0.550 D = 7.431 m
RPS= 1.833 dev/san RPM= 110.00 TORK=1607.891 kNm Pd=18521.6 kW
• The optimum efficiency remains almost the same 0.65, but the pitch
ratio is different.
Va 8.65
D 7.431m
n J 1.833 0.635
• As a result of this optimization at a given rotation rate the diameter
will always increase.
Case 3: Optimum propeller for given power and rate
• It is quite common to start the design from the available engine power.
• In that case the engine will develop a certain power at a given rotation
rate.
WAGENINGEN B SERISI
SECILEN PERVANE = 91. PERVANEDIR
P/D=1.400
J= 1.193 Kt= 0.151 10Kq= 0.382 eta= 0.750
Bp= 4.1538 delta= 84.8499
T= 22.90 kN Va= 14.420 m/s RHO = 1025.0 kg/m3
Z = 5. EAR = 0.750 D = 1.007 m
RPS= 12.000 dev/san RPM= 720.00 TORK= 5.836 kNm Pd= 440.0 kW
• In this case the limit in pitch ratio is the optimum value.
• It is not advisable to extrapolate outside the bounds of the diagrams, so the pitch ratio of 1.4 should
be used.
• In this case the diameter can again be found from the J value J=1.193:
Va 14.42
D 1m
n J 12 1.193
• A diameter of 1 meter should be used.
• This efficiency is high because the propeller loading is extremely low.
• In this case the speed was prescribed.
• In practice, a resistance curve is known, from which the required thrust as a function of speed can
be derived.
• In the above example the delivered thrust can be found from the thrust coefficient KT=0.153.
T KT n 2 D 4 0.1509 1025 122 1 22.9 kN
• When the delivered thrust is not in accordance with the ship resistance the same calculation should
be carried out for a different speed.
• The actual speed will the be found from an interpolation between the resistance curve and the curve
of delivered thrust.
• It can be checked if the blade area ratio is not too small from this diameter.
• Assume the shaft immersion to be 1 meter. From Keller’s formula the minimum blade area ratio is
found to be
EAR
1.3 0.3 5 22,900 0.591
•
10 9.811025 1.0 1700
5
• The value of pitch ratio is found from the B4-100 diagrams by iterating
P/D at J=0 until the required torque coefficient is reached.
• Some typical guidelines are:
WAGENINGEN B SERISI
T= 38637.82 kN Va= 6.680 m/s RHO = 1025.0 kg/m3
Z = 4. EAR = 0.700 D = 3.500 m
P/D=1.000
J= 0.939 Kt= 0.061 10Kq= 0.145 eta= 0.625
Bp= 4.6636 delta= 107.8797
RPS= 2.033 dev/san RPM= 122.00 TORK= 32.311 kNm Pd= 412.8 kW
TAM OLCEGE EKTRAPOLASYONDA
ITTC78 VISKOZ DUZELTME YONTEMI KULLANILMISTIR
Viscous Effects – ITTC Analysis Procedure
2.5
t 0.044 5 t c
CDM 2 2 2 1 2 CDS 2 2 2 1.89 1.62log
c Rn 6
0.75 R Rn0.75 R c
3
k p
• Rn0.75R must not be lower
2105 during open water tests t :max.thickness
c :chord length
k p 30 106 m
• Calculation of propeller characteristics:
c P
KT 0.30Z CD
CD CDM CDS D 0.75 R D
c
K Q 0.25Z CD
0.75 R
D
• Full-scale propeller characteristics:
KTS KTM KT
KQS KQM KQ
• Since CDM in general is larger than CDS , the full-scale KQ at given advance
ratio is lower and KT is slightly higher than in the model case