Prepared By: Burato, Antoinette Manuel, Lei Rheza
Prepared By: Burato, Antoinette Manuel, Lei Rheza
Burato, Antoinette
Manuel, Lei Rheza
WHAT IS PERFORMANCE
MANAGEMENT?
Performance Management is
a continuous process of
Identifying
The
Measuring Performance of
Developing individuals and
an teams Strategic
With goals of the
Aligning d
the Organizatio
performance
n
Other Definitions are:
Performance management is:
“The development of individuals
with competence and
commitment, working towards the
achievement of shared
meaningful objectives within an
organisation which supports and
encourages their achievement”
(Lockett, J. ).
Other Definitions are:
Performance management is: the
process of “Directing and supporting
employees to work as effectively and
efficiently as possible in line with the
needs of the organisation” (Walters)
“Performance management is a
strategic and integrated approach to
delivering sustained success to
organisations by improving the
performance of the people who work in
them and by developing the
Evolution of Performance
Management
MANAGEMENT
BY
OBJECTIVIED
MERIT PM
RATING
PERFORMANC
E
MANAGEMENT
1960’ NOW
1920’ 1960’ 1970’ 1980’
s–
s s s s
1970’
s
PERFORMANCE
APPRAISAL
RESULTS
BASED
PERFORMANC
E APPRAISAL
The term performance
management gained its
popularity in early 1980’s when
total quality management
programs received utmost
importance for achievement of
superior standards and quality
performance.
WHAT IS THE
PURPOSE OF
PERFORMANCE
MANAGEMENT
Identify high performers and drive
quality performance
Manage and improveSYSTEM?
the workplace
Reward employees financially (Merit)
Protect the Organization through the
Performance Management documentation
process
Succession planning
Locate and “weed out” sub-par and
underperforming employees
MAJOR PURPOSES OF
PERFORMANCE
MANAGEMENT
Strategic
Strategic Administrative
Administrative Developmental
Developmental
Purpose
Purpose Purpose
Purpose Purpose
Purpose
FIVE CRITERIA FOR
EFFECTIVE
PERFORMANCE
MANAGEMENT
STRATEGI
C RELIABILI ACCEPTA SPECIFICI
VALIDITY TY BILITY TY
CONGRUE
NCE
MAJOR DETERMINANTS OF INDIVIDUAL
PERFORMANCE
ORGANIZATIONAL
STRATEGY
(Long and Short term
goals and values)
INDIVIDUAL OBJECTIVE
ATTRIBUTES INDIVIDUAL RESULTS
(Skills, abilities) BEHAVIORS
SITUATIOANL
CONSTRAINTS
(Culture and economic
conditions)
PARTS OF PERFORMANCE
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
JOB
ANALYSIS
PERFORM
ANCE
APPRAISA
PERFORM
L ANCE
FEEDBACK
What is Job Analysis?
Collection of background
information
Selection of representative position
to be analyzed
Collection of job analysis data
Developing a job description
Developing a job specification
Developing employee specification
Benefits of Job Analysis
Organization & human resource
planning
Selection, induction, & training
Performance appraisal
Job evaluation
Wages & salary administration
Internal mobility
Preventing dissatisfaction
Discipline
Health safety
Industrial relations
PARTS OF PERFORMANCE
MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
JOB
ANALYSIS
PERFORM
ANCE
APPRAISA
L
What is Performance Appraisal?
A performance appraisal is a balancing
act. It should balance the need to look
backwards (the review), with the need to
look forwards (the plan). It should also
balance the need to address weaknesses,
whilst at the same time building on
strengths.
Why use performance appraisals?
feedback
system
bjectives of Performance Apprais
To maintain records in order to determine
compensation packages, wage structure,
salaries raises, etc.
To identify the strengths and weaknesses
of employees to place right men on right
job.
To maintain and assess the potential
present in a person for further growth and
development.
To provide a feedback to employees
regarding their performance and related
status.
It serves as a basis for influencing working
habits of the employees.
Essential of Good Performance
Appraisal System
Clear objectives
Mutual Trust Standardization
Job
Relatedness
Training Documentation
Individual
differences
Feedback and Post appraisal
participation Interview
Review and
appeal
ADVANTAGES OF PERFORMANCE
APPRAISAL
Promotion
Compensation
Employees development
Selection validation
Communication
Motivation
O F P E R F O R MA N CE
DISADVANTAGES
APPRAISAL l) p praisa
n o f P erf o rm anc e A
itatio
(Problems and/or Lim
1. Errors in Rating
2. Halo effect
3. Stereotyping
4. Central Tendency
5. Constant error
6. Personal Bias
7. Spill over effect
8. Lack of Reliability
9. Incompetence
METHODS OF PERFORMANCE
APPRAISAL
JOB
ANALYSIS
PERFORM
ANCE
APPRAISA
PERFORM
L ANCE
FEEDBACK
What Is Performance Feedback?
The performance
feedback process is
ongoing between
managers and
employees. The
exchange of information
involves both
performance expected
and performance
exhibited.
Types of Performance
Feedback
1. Positive/ Affirming
2. Constructive/ Developmental
3. Negative/ Critical
Positive/ Affirming Feedback
Make someone aware of a
specific behaviour or action
that they have taken
Is a tool to: Understand specifically the
positive nature of the impacts
of that behaviour or action
Increase the chances of
further examples of that
behaviour or action in the
future
Constructive/Developmental Feedback
Is information-specific, issue-focused, and based
on observation
Praise Criticism
(Favorable (Unfavorable
Judgement) Judgement)
Situations which require giving
Constructive feedback
• Ongoing performance discussions
• Providing specific performance pointers
• Following up on coaching discussions
• Giving corrective guidance
• Letting someone know the consequences
of their behavior
Some clues that constructive feedback is
needed are when:
• Someone asks for your opinion about
how they are doing
• Unresolved problems persist
• Errors occur again and again
• An employee's performance doesn't
meet expectations
• A peer's work habits disturb you
SIX WAYS TO MAKE FEEDBACK
CONSTRUCTIVE
1. If you can't think of a constructive purpose
for giving feedback, don't give it at all
2. Focus on description rather than judgement
3. Focus on observation rather than inference
4. Focus on behavior rather than the person
5. Provide a balance of positive and negative
feedback
6. Be aware of feedback overload.
THE SIX STEP METHOD FOR
GIVING CONSTRUCTIVE FEEDBACK
1. State the constructive purpose of your
feedback.
2. Describe specifically what you have
observed.
3. Describe specifically what you have
observed.
4. Describe your reactions.
5. Give the other person an opportunity to
respond.
6. Offer specific suggestions.
Giving negative feedback: correcting poor performance
Note poor performance immediately upon observing it.
Specify what does not meet expectations.
Refer to performance standards.
Note the effect of observed performance on work
group/organization.
Model or restate appropriate performance.
Describe negative consequences.
Obtain agreement on the problem.
Mutually seek solutions.
Agree on action plan.
Encourage improvement.
Set date for check (if appropriate).
Don't belabor a point.
Move forward after the discussion.
Avoid giving correction in public.
Giving positive feedback:
praising good performance
Alignin
Model
g
&
Objecti
Mentor
Setting ves Giving
Objecti Feedba
ves ck
Positive
Reinforcement