Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 92 views

    Organizatii+publice+si+organizatii+private (2) Fspac

    Uploaded by

    popaaureliavalentina
    This document discusses the differences between public and private organizations. While clear distinctions are difficult to make, public organizations aim to serve the broader public interest and protect common values, rather than private interests. They exist to address market failures like natural monopolies or public goods. Key identifiers of public organizations include how widely benefits and costs are shared, who has control over resources, and a prioritization of equity and responsibility over efficiency. Still, many hybrid forms exist, and relationships between public and private sectors are complex.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Organizatii+publice+si+organizatii+private (2) Fspac

    Uploaded by

    popaaureliavalentina
    92 views15 pages
    This document discusses the differences between public and private organizations. While clear distinctions are difficult to make, public organizations aim to serve the broader public interest and protect common values, rather than private interests. They exist to address market failures like natural monopolies or public goods. Key identifiers of public organizations include how widely benefits and costs are shared, who has control over resources, and a prioritization of equity and responsibility over efficiency. Still, many hybrid forms exist, and relationships between public and private sectors are complex.

    Original Description:

    ppt organizatii publice vs organizatii private

    Original Title

    Organizatii+publice+si+organizatii+private (2) fspac

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This document discusses the differences between public and private organizations. While clear distinctions are difficult to make, public organizations aim to serve the broader public interest and protect common values, rather than private interests. They exist to address market failures like natural monopolies or public goods. Key identifiers of public organizations include how widely benefits and costs are shared, who has control over resources, and a prioritization of equity and responsibility over efficiency. Still, many hybrid forms exist, and relationships between public and private sectors are complex.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
    92 views15 pages

    Organizatii+publice+si+organizatii+private (2) Fspac

    Uploaded by

    popaaureliavalentina
    This document discusses the differences between public and private organizations. While clear distinctions are difficult to make, public organizations aim to serve the broader public interest and protect common values, rather than private interests. They exist to address market failures like natural monopolies or public goods. Key identifiers of public organizations include how widely benefits and costs are shared, who has control over resources, and a prioritization of equity and responsibility over efficiency. Still, many hybrid forms exist, and relationships between public and private sectors are complex.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
    of 15

    ORGANIZATII PUBLICE SI

    ORGANIZATII PRIVATE
    Seminar 1, 12.03.2010
    Sumar
     De ce ne intereseaza problema?
     Management public, administratie publica si
    management privat
     Organizatii publice si organizatii private
     De ce avem nevoie de organizatii publice?
     Cum identificam organizatiile publice?

     Sunt ele fundamental diferite?


    Motivatia discutiei: dezbatere
    academica sau problema practica?
     De ce ne intereseaza problema?
     Reforma
     Interactiuni si influente reciproce
    Management public, administratie
    publica si management privat
     Este un singur raspuns corect? Totul depinde de cum
    definim conceptele.
     Identitate: administratia publica este managementul
    aplicat afacerilor de stat (Waldo, 1989);
     Subordonare:
     Management fata de administratie (Ott, Hyde,
    Shafritz 1991) – administratia publica e profesia iar
    managerul public este cel care profeseaza
     Administratie fata de management (Fayol, Sheldon)
    Management public, administratie
    publica si management privat (cont.)
     Distinctie:
     AP – include institutii politico-administrative ca
    ansamblu
     MP - organizatiile care realizeaza sarcinile
    guvernamentale intr-o anumita configuratie
    institutionala
     Management – Administratie Publica – Valori
     Management: eficienta, economie, eficacitate,
    performanta
     Administratie: echitate, responsabilitate, responsivitate,
    predictibilitate
    Managementul privat?
     Ce raporturi exista intre management public si privat?
     Resursa umana
     Tehnici manageriale
     Cum influenteaza managementul privat administratia
    publica?
     Resursa umana
     Exemple de buna practica
     Cum influenteaza administratia managementul privat?
     Reguli (ex: MRU)
     Red tape (ex: timp alocat pentru depunerea situatiilor contabile)
    ORGANIZATII PUBLICE – DE
    CE AVEM NEVOIE DE ELE SI
    CE SUNT?
    De ce avem nevoie de ele?
    1. Esecuri ale pietei (J. Stiglitz, 2000):
     Concurenta imperfecta:
     Monopol: exista un singur furnizor pe piata
     Oligopol: exista un numar redus de furnizori pe piata
     Cartel

     Bunuri publice:
     Nondivizibile: nu poti sa limitezi accesul unei persoane la bunul in
    cauza
     Nonexclusive: un consumator suplimentar nu atrage costuri
    suplimentare
     Pb:
     Cum fixezi pretul?
     Free rider
    Esecuri ale pietei (cont.)
     Externalitati negative: faptuitorii nu suporta plenitudinea
    consecintelor ce deriva din actiunile lor  le vor practica in exces
    Ex.: Poluarea
     Piete incomplete: desi exista cerere si disponibilitate de a plati
    peste costul de productie, nu exista furnizori
    Ex: piata asigurarilor refuza sa faca asigurari in anumite zone extrem
    de expuse
    Cauze: informatii incomplete, riscuri prea ridicate etc.
     Informatie imperfecta (incompetenta individuala)
     Partile nu se plaseaza pe pozitii de egalitate in tranzactie (ex:
    producator de medicamente si un pacient; producator auto si
    sofer.
     Somajul si inflatia
    De ce avem nevoie de ele?
     Eficienta colectiva, echilibrarea interesului public cu
    cel privat  urmarirea binelui comun
     Protejarea unor valori fundamentale (libertate,
    echitate, egalitate, proprietate etc)
     Asigura respectarea legii (enforce rule of the
    game)
    Ex: aplicarea contractelor
    Ce sunt organizatiile publice (criterii
    de identificare)
     Ce e public si ce e privat? (Benn si Gaus, 1983) –
    dupa ce judecam?
     Interese afectate (daca beneficiile si costurile sunt comune
    tuturora sau limitate la indivizi)
     Acces (deschiderea) la facilitati, informatii, resurse
     Calitatea celui care exercita un act (in nume propriu sau in
    numele unei comunitati etc)
     Exercitiu: o baza militara, cum e in functie de cele
    3?
    Identificarea organizatiilor publice
     Dupa interesul afectat: public vs privat
     Ex: o companie de farmaceutice, Boeing?
     Dupa proprietate si finantare (Wamsley si Zald, 1973)  4 mari
    categorii
     Autoritate politica si autoritate economica (Bozeman, 1987) in
    functie de posibilitatea de control a resurselor organizationale
     Premisa: toate organizatiile se afla sub presiunea politicului si sunt sub
    controlul autoritatilor publice
     Autoritatea politica permite exercitarea fortei de constrangere asupra
    cetatenilor, cea economica trebuie sa convinga (una e imperativa,
    cealalta e voluntara)
     Daca proprietarii/managerii au un control ridicat asupra , organizatia e mai
    privata, daca e mai mic, e mai publica)
     Avem un continuum autoritate politica si autoritate economica
    Poate fi realizata o diferentiere clara
    intre public si privat?
     De ce nu? (Raynei)
     Forme mixte, intermediare si hibride
     Companii publice
     ONG care realizeaza sarcini similare cu ale institutiilor publice
     Companii private care sunt coordonate si platite de public (ex:
    aparare nationala)
     Analogii functionale
     Directori, secretari, operatori pc, toti fac aprox. acelasi lucru atat
    in organizatii publice cat si private
     Relatii complexe intre sectoare
     Achizitii de servicii si bunuri, subventii, granturi etc
    Poate fi realizata o diferentiere clara
    intre public si privat? (Cont.)
     De ce da? (Allison 1983)
     Interesul public (care difera de cel privat) urmarit de
    organizatiile publice
     Responsabilitatea oficialilor fata de valori publice si
    fata de interesul public care primeaza asupra oricarui
    interes privat
     Echitate (toti tratati la fel - in public) si posibilitate de
    selectie a beneficiarilor (in privat. ex: negociatul la
    piata)
    Concluzii
     Raporturile Manag. Public, Privat, AP sunt fluide,
    depind de definitie
     Ratiunea de a fi a organizatiilor publice (esecuri
    ale pietei, binele comun, protejarea unor valori)
     Organizatii publice si organizatii private: dificil de
    stabilit o granita clara, insa nu identice
     TEMA!

    You might also like