Scribd
Upload
59 views25 pages

Lecture2 3

This document discusses PID controllers and their tuning. PID controllers are widely used to control over 95% of industrial processes. They contain proportional, integral, and derivative terms. Common tuning methods include Ziegler-Nichols reaction curve and oscillation methods. The proportional term reduces error, integral ensures error goes to zero, and derivative provides prediction. Lead-lag compensators are also discussed as they relate to PID control.

Uploaded by

vrushalibhatt
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
59 views25 pages

Lecture2 3

This document discusses PID controllers and their tuning. PID controllers are widely used to control over 95% of industrial processes. They contain proportional, integral, and derivative terms. Common tuning methods include Ziegler-Nichols reaction curve and oscillation methods. The proportional term reduces error, integral ensures error goes to zero, and derivative provides prediction. Lead-lag compensators are also discussed as they relate to PID control.

Uploaded by

vrushalibhatt
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 25

Control Systems

Part 6: Classical PID Control


Learning objectives

To state the definition of PID controllers

To learn different forms of controller structures

To learn different tuning techniques for PID


controllers

To understand the effect of each controller


parameter on the system responses.
PID controllers

PID stands for: P (Proportional)


I (Integral)
D (Derivative)
Historical note

The first application of PID controller was in 1922 by


Minorsky on ship steering.

Minorsky (1922) “Directional stability of automatically


steered bodies”, J. Am. Soc. Naval Eng., 34, p.284.

This was the first mathematical treatment of the type of


controller that is now used to control almost all
industrial processes.
The current situation

Despite the abundance of sophisticated tools, including advanced


controller design techniques, PID controllers are still the most
widely used controller structure in modern industry, controlling
more that 95% of closed-loop industrial processes.

Different PID controllers differ in the way how their parameters be


tuned, manually, or automatically.

Most of the DCS systems have built-in routines to perform auto-


tuning of PID controllers based on the loop characteristics. They
are often called: auto-tuners.
PID structure

Consider the simple SISO control loop shown below

C(s) is the
controller
PID structures

Standard PID controllers have the following structures:

Proportional only:

Proportional plus Integral:

Proportional plus derivative:

Proportional, integral and


derivative:
PID structures

An alternative series form is:

Yet another alternative form is the, so called,


parallel form:
Tuning techniques for PID controllers

Because of their widespread use in practice, we


present below several methods for tuning PID
controllers. Actually these methods are quite old
and date back to the 1950’s. Nonetheless, they
remain in widespread use today.

 Ziegler-Nichols Oscillation Method


 Ziegler-Nichols Reaction Curve Method
 Cohen-Coon Reaction Curve Method
Ziegler-Nichols (Z-N) Oscillation Method

This procedure is only valid for open loop stable


plants and it is carried out through the following
steps
 Set the true plant under proportional control,
with a very small gain.
 Increase the gain until the loop starts
oscillating. Note that linear oscillation is
required and that it should be detected at the
controller output.
Ziegler-Nichols (Z-N) Oscillation Method

 Record the controller critical gain Kp = Kc and


the oscillation period of the controller output, Pc.
 Adjust the controller parameters according to the
following table.
PID Tuning Example

Consider a plant with a model given by

Find the parameters of a PID controller using the


Z-N oscillation method. Obtain a graph of the
response to a unit step input reference and to a
unit step input disturbance.
Solution

Applying the procedure outlined before, we have


Kc = 8 and ωc = 3.

Hence, from the Table, it follows that

The closed loop response to a unit step in the reference


at t = 0 and a unit step disturbance at t = 10 are
shown next.
Step response of PID controlled system
Reaction Curve Based Methods

The PID Controller parameters can also be determined


by performing a open-loop step test detailed as follows:

1. With the plant in open loop, take the plant manually


to a normal operating point. Say that the plant
output settles at y(t) = y0 for a constant plant input
u(t) = u0.
2. At an initial time, t0, apply a step change to the
plant input, from u0 to u (this should be in the range
of 10 to 20% of full scale).
Reaction Curve Based Methods (Cont)

3.Record the plant output until it settles to the


new operating point. This curve is known as
the process reaction curve.
4.Compute the following parameters
Reaction Curve Based Methods (Cont)

Based on the parameters recorded in the reaction


curve, the parameters of the OID controller can be
calculated as shown in the table on next page.

where m.s.t. stands for maximum slope tangent.


Reaction Curve Based Methods (Cont)
Lead-lag Compensators

Closely related to PID control is the idea of lead-lag


compensation. The transfer function of these
compensators is of the form:

If 1 > 2, then this is a lead network and when 1 < 2,
this is a lag network.
Frequency response of a lead-lag compensator

We see from the previous slide that the lead-lag


compensator gives phase advance at  = 1/1
without an increase in gain. Thus it plays a role
similar to derivative action in PID.
Frequency response of a lag-lead compensator

We see from the previous slide that the lag-lead


compensator gives low frequency gain increase.
Thus it plays a role similar to integral action in PID.
Summary

 PI and PID controllers are widely used in


industrial control.
 From a modern perspective, a PID controller is
simply a controller of (up to second order)
containing an integrator. Historically, however,
PID controllers were tuned in terms of their P, I
and D terms.
 It has been empirically found that the PID
structure often has sufficient flexibility to yield
excellent results in many applications.
Summary

 The basic term is the proportional term, P,


which causes a corrective control actuation
proportional to the error.
 The integral term, I gives a correction
proportional to the integral of the error. This has
the positive feature of ultimately ensuring that
sufficient control effort is applied to reduce the
tracking error to zero. However, integral action
tends to have a destabilizing effect due to the
increased phase delay.
Summary

 The derivative term, D, provides a predictive


capability yielding a control action proportional to
the rate of change of the error. This tends to
have a stabilizing effect but often leads to large
control movements.
 Various empirical tuning methods can be used to
determine the PID parameters for a given
application. They should be considered as a first
guess in a search procedure.
Summary

 Attention should also be paid to the PID structure.


 Systematic model-based procedures for PID
controllers will be covered in later chapters.
 A controller structure that is closely related to PID
is a lead-lag network. The lead component acts
like D and the lag acts like I.

You might also like