Decision Making Relevant Costing
Decision Making Relevant Costing
Relevant Information
Chapter 11
11 - 1
Introduction
11 - 2
Learning Objectives
11 - 3
Learning Objectives
11 - 4
Learning Objectives
11 - 5
Learning Objective 1
11 - 6
Information and the
Decision Process
A decision model is a formal method for
making a choice, often involving quantitative
and qualitative analysis.
11 - 7
Five-Step Decision Process
1 Gathering information
2 Making predictions
3 Choosing an alternative
4 Implementing the decision
5 Evaluating performance
11 - 8
Learning Objective 2
11 - 9
The Meaning of Relevance
11 - 10
The Meaning of Relevance
11 - 11
The Meaning of Relevance
11 - 12
Learning Objective 3
Distinguish between
quantitative factors and
qualitative factors in decisions
11 - 13
Quantitative and Qualitative
Relevant Information
Quantitative factors are outcomes that are
measured in numerical terms:
– Financial
– Nonfinancial
Qualitative factors are outcomes that cannot
be measured in numerical terms.
11 - 14
One-Time-Only Special Order
11 - 15
One-Time-Only Special Order
Variable Fixed
Costs Costs
Per Unit Per Unit
Direct materials $6.50 $ -0-
Direct labor .50
1.50 Manufacturing costs 1.50
3.50 Total $8.50
$5.00
11 - 16
One-Time-Only Special Order
11 - 17
One-Time-Only Special Order
11 - 18
One-Time-Only Special Order
11 - 19
One-Time-Only Special Order
11 - 20
One-Time-Only Special Order
Decision criteria:
Accept the order if the revenue differential
is greater than the cost differential.
11 - 21
Learning Objective 4
11 - 22
Potential Problems in
Relevant-Cost Analysis
General assumptions:
– Do not assume that all variable costs are
relevant.
– Do not assume that all fixed costs are
irrelevant.
11 - 23
Potential Problems in
Relevant-Cost Analysis
Unit-cost data can potentially mislead
decision makers:
– Irrelevant costs are included.
– The same unit costs are used at different
output levels.
11 - 24
Insourcing versus Outsourcing
11 - 25
Make-or-Buy Decisions
11 - 26
Make-or-Buy Decisions
11 - 27
Make-or-Buy Decisions
11 - 29
Make-or-Buy Decisions
11 - 30
Make-or-Buy Decisions
11 - 31
Make-or-Buy Decisions
11 - 32
Make-or-Buy Decisions
11 - 33
Make-or-Buy Decisions
11 - 34
Make-or-Buy Decisions
11 - 35
Make-or-Buy Decisions
11 - 36
Learning Objective 5
11 - 37
Opportunity Costs, Outsourcing,
and Constraints
Assume that if Gabriela buys the part from
Alec Enterprises, it can use the facilities
previously used to manufacture Part #2 to
produce Part #3 for Krysta’s Company.
The expected additional future operating
income is $18,000.
What should Gabriela & Co. do?
11 - 38
Opportunity Costs, Outsourcing,
and Constraints
Gabriela & Co. has three options:
1 Make Part #2 and do not make Part #3 for
Krysta.
2 Buy Part #2 and do not make Part #3 for
Krysta.
3 Buy the part and use the facilities to produce
Part #3 for Krysta.
11 - 39
Opportunity Costs, Outsourcing,
and Constraints
Expected cost of obtaining 150,000 parts:
Buy Part #2 Buy Part #2
and do not and make Make
make Part #3 Part #3 Part #2
$82,500 $64,500* $76,500
*$82,500 – $18,000 = $64,500
11 - 40
Opportunity Costs, Outsourcing,
and Constraints
Opportunity cost is the contribution to income
that is foregone (rejected) by not using a
limited resource in its next-best alternative
use.
11 - 41
Opportunity Costs, Outsourcing,
and Constraints
Opportunity costs are not recorded in formal
accounting records since they do not generate
cash outlays.
These costs also are not ordinarily
incorporated into formal reports.
11 - 42
Opportunity Costs, Outsourcing,
and Constraints
The opportunity cost of holding inventory is
the income forgone from tying up money in
inventory and not investing it elsewhere.
11 - 43
Opportunity Costs, Outsourcing,
and Constraints
Carrying costs of inventory can be a
significant opportunity cost and should be
incorporated into decisions regarding lot
purchase sizes for materials.
11 - 44
Opportunity Costs, Outsourcing,
and Constraints
Assume that annual estimated Part #2
requirements for next year is 150,000.
Cost per purchase order is $40.
Cost per unit when each purchase is of 1,500
units = $0.55.
Cost per unit when each purchase is equal to
or greater than 150,000 = $0.54.
11 - 45
Opportunity Costs, Outsourcing,
and Constraints
Average investment in inventory is either:
(1,500 x .55) ÷ 2 = $412.50 or
(150,000 x $0.54) = $40,500
Annual interest rate for investment in
government bonds is 6%.
$412.50 × .06 = $24.75
$40,500 × .06 = $2,430
11 - 46
Opportunity Costs, Outsourcing,
and Constraints
Option A: Make 100 purchases of 1,500 units:
Purchase order costs: (100 × $40) $ 4,000.00
Purchase costs: (150,000 × $0.55) 82,500.00
Annual interest income
that could be earned: 24.75
Relevant costs $86,524.75
11 - 47
Opportunity Costs, Outsourcing,
and Constraints
Option B: Make 1 purchase of 150,000 units:
Purchase order costs: (1 × $40) $ 40
Purchase costs: (150,000 × $0.54) 81,000
Annual interest income
that could be earned: 2,430
Relevant costs: $83,470
11 - 48
Opportunity Costs, Outsourcing,
and Constraints
In this case purchasing all 150,000 units
at the beginning of the year is preferred.
Why?
The higher purchase and ordering costs
exceeds the lower opportunity cost of
holding smaller inventory.
11 - 49
Learning Objective 6
11 - 50
Product-Mix Decisions Under
Capacity Constraints
What product should be emphasized to
maximize operating income in the face of
capacity constraints?
Gabriela & Co. produces Product #2 and
Product #3.
The company has 3,000 machine hours
available to produce these products.
11 - 51
Product-Mix Decisions Under
Capacity Constraints
Decision criteria:
Aim for the highest contribution margin per
unit of the constraining factor.
When multiple constraints exist, optimization
techniques such as linear programming can be
used in making decisions.
11 - 52
Product-Mix Decisions Under
Capacity Constraints
Per unit Product #2 Product #3
Sales price $2.11 $14.50
Variable expenses 0.41 13.90
Contribution margin $1.70 $ 0.60
Contribution margin ratio 81% 4%
11 - 53
Product-Mix Decisions Under
Capacity Constraints
One unit of Prod. #2 requires 7 machine hours.
One unit of Prod. #3 requires 2 machine hours.
What is the contribution of each product per
machine hour?
Product #2: $1.70 ÷ 7 = $0.24
Product #3: $0.60 ÷ 2 = $0.30
11 - 54
Product-Mix Decisions Under
Capacity Constraints
Which product should be emphasized?
The product with the highest contribution
margin per unit of the constraining resource.
11 - 55
Learning Objective 7
11 - 56
Profitability, Activity-Based
Costing, and Relevant Costs
Companies must often make decisions about
adding or discontinuing a product line, branch,
or business segment.
Companies must also make decisions about
adding or dropping customers.
11 - 57
Profitability, Activity-Based
Costing, and Relevant Costs
Blowing Rock Furniture supplies specialized
furniture to two local retailers – Stevens and
Cohen.
Blowing Rock Furniture has a monthly
capacity of 3,000 machine hours.
Fixed costs are allocated on the basis of
revenues.
11 - 58
Profitability, Activity-Based
Costing, and Relevant Costs
Stevens Cohen
Revenues $200,000
$100,000 Variable costs 70,000
60,000 Fixed costs 100,000
50,000 Total operating costs
$170,000 $110,000
Operating income $ 30,000 $
(10,000) Machine-hours required
2,000 1,000
11 - 59
Profitability, Activity-Based
Costing, and Relevant Costs
Total
Revenues $300,000
Variable costs 130,000
Fixed costs 150,000
Total operating costs $280,000
Operating income $ 20,000
Machine-hours required 3,000
11 - 60
Profitability, Activity-Based
Costing, and Relevant Costs
Should Blowing Rock Furniture drop the
Cohen business, assuming that dropping
Cohen would decrease its total fixed costs
by 10%?
New fixed costs would be:
$150,000 – $15,000 = $135,000
11 - 61
Profitability, Activity-Based
Costing, and Relevant Costs
Stevens Alone
Revenues $200,000
Variable costs 70,000
Fixed costs 135,000
Total operating costs $205,000
Operating income $ (5,000)
Machine-hours required 3,000
11 - 62
Profitability, Activity-Based
Costing, and Relevant Costs
Cohen’s business is providing a contribution
margin of $40,000.
$40,000 decrease in contribution margin –
$15,000 decrease in fixed costs = $25,000
decrease in operating income.
11 - 63
Profitability, Activity-Based
Costing, and Relevant Costs
Assume that if Blowing Rock Furniture drops
Cohen’s business it can lease the excess
capacity to the Perez Corporation for $50,000.
Fixed costs would not decrease.
Should Blowing Rock Furniture lease to
Perez?
11 - 64
Profitability, Activity-Based
Costing, and Relevant Costs
$50,000 would be Blowing Rock Furniture’s
opportunity cost of continuing serving Cohen.
The $50,000 offsets the $40,000 contribution
of Cohen’s business.
11 - 65
Learning Objective 8
11 - 66
Equipment-Replacement
Decisions
Assume that Gabriela & Co. is considering
replacing a cutting machine with a newer
model.
The new machine is more efficient than the
old machine.
Revenues will be unaffected.
11 - 67
Equipment-Replacement
Decisions
Existing Replacement
Machine Machine
Original cost $80,000 $105,000
Useful life 4 years 4 years
Accumulated depreciation $50,000
Book value $30,000
Disposal price $14,000
Annual costs $46,000
$ 10,000
11 - 68
Equipment-Replacement
Decisions
Ignoring the time value of money and income
taxes, should Gabriela replace the existing
machine?
Yes!
The cost savings per year are $36,000.
The cost savings over a 4-year period will be
$36,000 × 4 = $144,000.
11 - 69
Equipment-Replacement
Decisions
Investment = $105,000 – $14,000 = $91,000
$144,000 – $91,000 = $53,000 advantage of
the replacement machine.
11 - 70
Irrelevance of Past Costs
11 - 71
Irrelevance of Past Costs
11 - 72
Learning Objective 9
11 - 73
Decisions and Performance
Evaluation
What is the journal entry to sell the existing
machine?
Cash 14,000
Accumulated
Depreciation 50,000
Loss on disposal 16,000
Machine 80,000
11 - 74
Decisions and Performance
Evaluation
In the real world would the manager replace
the machine?
An important factor in replacement decisions
is the manager’s perceptions of whether the
decision model is consistent with how the
manager’s performance is judged.
11 - 75
Decisions and Performance
Evaluation
Managers often behave consistent with their
short-run interests and favor the alternative
that yields best performance measures in the
short run.
When conflicting decisions are generated,
managers tend to favor the performance
evaluation model.
11 - 76
Decisions and Performance
Evaluation
Top management faces a challenge – that is,
making sure that the performance-evaluation
model of subordinate managers is consistent
with the decision model.
11 - 77
End of Chapter 11
11 - 78