100% found this document useful (1 vote)
572 views78 pages

Decision Making Relevant Costing

This chapter discusses decision making and relevant information. It explores the five-step decision making process of gathering information, making predictions, choosing an alternative, implementing the decision, and evaluating performance. The chapter differentiates between relevant and irrelevant costs and revenues in decisions. It also distinguishes between quantitative and qualitative factors. Examples are provided on decisions around accepting a one-time special order and insourcing versus outsourcing. Potential problems with relevant cost analysis are identified.

Uploaded by

mmattiullah584
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
100% found this document useful (1 vote)
572 views78 pages

Decision Making Relevant Costing

This chapter discusses decision making and relevant information. It explores the five-step decision making process of gathering information, making predictions, choosing an alternative, implementing the decision, and evaluating performance. The chapter differentiates between relevant and irrelevant costs and revenues in decisions. It also distinguishes between quantitative and qualitative factors. Examples are provided on decisions around accepting a one-time special order and insourcing versus outsourcing. Potential problems with relevant cost analysis are identified.

Uploaded by

mmattiullah584
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 78

Decision Making and

Relevant Information
Chapter 11

11 - 1
Introduction

 This chapter explores the decision-making


process.
 It focuses on specific decisions such as
accepting or rejecting a one-time-only special
order, insourcing or outsourcing products or
services, and replacing or keeping equipment.

11 - 2
Learning Objectives

1 Use the five-step decision process to make


decisions
2 Differentiate relevant costs and revenues from
irrelevant costs and revenues in any decision
situation
3 Distinguish between quantitative factors and
qualitative factors in decisions

11 - 3
Learning Objectives

4 Identify two potential problems that should


be avoided in relevant-cost analysis
5 Describe the opportunity cost concept and
explain why it is used in decision making
6 Describe the key concept in choosing which
among multiple products to produce when
there are capacity constraints

11 - 4
Learning Objectives

7 Discuss the key factor managers must consider


when adding or dropping customers and segments
8 Explain why the book value of equipment is
irrelevant in equipment-replacement decisions
9 Explain how conflicts can arise between the
decision model used by a manager and the
performance model used to evaluate the manager

11 - 5
Learning Objective 1

Use the five-step decision


process to make decisions

11 - 6
Information and the
Decision Process
 A decision model is a formal method for
making a choice, often involving quantitative
and qualitative analysis.

11 - 7
Five-Step Decision Process

1 Gathering information
2 Making predictions
3 Choosing an alternative
4 Implementing the decision
5 Evaluating performance

11 - 8
Learning Objective 2

Differentiate relevant costs


and revenues from irrelevant
costs and revenues in any
decision situation

11 - 9
The Meaning of Relevance

 Relevant costs and relevant revenues are


expected future costs and revenues that differ
among alternative courses of action.

11 - 10
The Meaning of Relevance

 Historical costs are irrelevant to a decision but


are used as a basis for predicting future costs.
 Sunk costs are past costs which are
unavoidable.

11 - 11
The Meaning of Relevance

 Differential income (net relevant income) is


the difference in total operating income when
choosing between two alternatives.
 Differential costs (net relevant costs) are the
difference in total costs between two
alternatives.

11 - 12
Learning Objective 3

Distinguish between
quantitative factors and
qualitative factors in decisions

11 - 13
Quantitative and Qualitative
Relevant Information
 Quantitative factors are outcomes that are
measured in numerical terms:
– Financial
– Nonfinancial
 Qualitative factors are outcomes that cannot
be measured in numerical terms.

11 - 14
One-Time-Only Special Order

 Gabriela & Co. manufactures fancy bath towels


in Boone, North Carolina.
 The plant has a production capacity of 44,000
towels each month.
 Current monthly production is 30,000 towels.
 The assumption is made that costs can be
classified as either variable with respect to units
of output or fixed.

11 - 15
One-Time-Only Special Order

Variable Fixed
Costs Costs
Per Unit Per Unit
Direct materials $6.50 $ -0-
Direct labor .50
1.50 Manufacturing costs 1.50
3.50 Total $8.50
$5.00

11 - 16
One-Time-Only Special Order

 Total fixed direct manufacturing labor


amounts to $45,000.
 Total fixed overhead is $105,000.
 Marketing costs per unit are $7 ($5 of which
is variable).
 What is the full cost per towel?

11 - 17
One-Time-Only Special Order

 Variable ($8.50 + $5.00): $13.50


 Fixed: 7.00
 Total $20.50
 A hotel in Puerto Rico has offered to buy
5,000 towels from Gabriela & Co. at $11.50
per towel for a total of $57,500.

11 - 18
One-Time-Only Special Order

 No marketing costs will be incurred for this


one-time-only special order.
 Should Gabriela & Co. accept this order?
 Yes!
 Why?

11 - 19
One-Time-Only Special Order

 The relevant costs of making the towels are


$42,500.
 $8.50 × 5,000 = $42,500 incremental costs
 $57,500 – $42,500 = $15,000 incremental
revenues
 $11.50 – $8.50 = $3.00 contribution margin
per towel

11 - 20
One-Time-Only Special Order

 Decision criteria:
 Accept the order if the revenue differential
is greater than the cost differential.

11 - 21
Learning Objective 4

Identify two potential problems


that should be avoided in
relevant-cost analysis

11 - 22
Potential Problems in
Relevant-Cost Analysis
 General assumptions:
– Do not assume that all variable costs are
relevant.
– Do not assume that all fixed costs are
irrelevant.

11 - 23
Potential Problems in
Relevant-Cost Analysis
 Unit-cost data can potentially mislead
decision makers:
– Irrelevant costs are included.
– The same unit costs are used at different
output levels.

11 - 24
Insourcing versus Outsourcing

 Outsourcing is the process of purchasing


goods and services from outside vendors
rather than producing goods or providing
services within the organization, which is
called insourcing.

11 - 25
Make-or-Buy Decisions

 Decisions about whether to outsource or


produce within the organization are often
called make-or-buy decisions.
 The most important factors in the make-or-buy
decision are quality, dependability of supplies,
and costs.

11 - 26
Make-or-Buy Decisions

 Gabriela & Co. also manufactures bath


accessories.
 Management is considering producing a
part it needs (#2) or using a part produced
by Alec Enterprises.

11 - 27
Make-or-Buy Decisions

 Gabriela & Co. has the following costs for


150,000 units of Part #2:
 Direct materials $ 28,000
Direct labor 18,500
Mixed overhead 29,000
Variable overhead 15,000
Fixed overhead 30,000
Total $120,500
11 - 28
Make-or-Buy Decisions

 Mixed overhead consists of material handling


and setup costs.
 Gabriela & Co. produces the 150,000 units in
100 batches of 1,500 units each.
 Total material handling and setup costs equal
fixed costs of $9,000 plus variable costs of
$200 per batch.

11 - 29
Make-or-Buy Decisions

 What is the cost per unit for Part #2?


 $120,500 ÷ 150,000 units = $0.8033/unit
 Alec Enterprises offers to sell the same part
for $0.55.
 Should Gabriela & Co. manufacture the part
or buy it from Alec Enterprises?

11 - 30
Make-or-Buy Decisions

 The answer depends on the difference in


expected future costs between the alternatives.
 Gabriela & Co. anticipates that next year the
150,000 units of Part #2 expected to be sold
will be manufactured in 150 batches of 1,000
units each.

11 - 31
Make-or-Buy Decisions

 Variable costs per batch are expected to


decrease to $100.
 Gabriela & Co. plans to continue to produce
150,000 next year at the same variable
manufacturing costs per unit as this year.
 Fixed costs are expected to remain the same
as this year.

11 - 32
Make-or-Buy Decisions

 What is the variable manufacturing cost


per unit?
 Direct material $28,000
Direct labor 18,500
Variable overhead 15,000
Total $61,500
 $61,500 ÷ 150,000 = $0.41 per unit

11 - 33
Make-or-Buy Decisions

 Expected relevant cost to make Part #2:


 Manufacturing $61,500 Material handling
and setups 15,000* Total relevant cost to
make $76,500 *150 × $100 = $15,000
 Cost to buy: (150,000 × $0.55) $82,500
 Gabriela & Co. will save $6,000 by making the
part.

11 - 34
Make-or-Buy Decisions

 Now assume that the $9,000 in fixed clerical


salaries to support material handling and setup
will not be incurred if Part #2 is purchased
from Alec Enterprises.
 Should Gabriela & Co. buy the part or make
the part?

11 - 35
Make-or-Buy Decisions

 Relevant cost to make:


 Variable $76,500
Fixed 9,000
Total $85,500
 Cost to buy: $82,500
 Gabriela would save $3,000 by buying
the part.

11 - 36
Learning Objective 5

Describe the opportunity cost


concept and explain why it is
used in decision making

11 - 37
Opportunity Costs, Outsourcing,
and Constraints
 Assume that if Gabriela buys the part from
Alec Enterprises, it can use the facilities
previously used to manufacture Part #2 to
produce Part #3 for Krysta’s Company.
 The expected additional future operating
income is $18,000.
 What should Gabriela & Co. do?

11 - 38
Opportunity Costs, Outsourcing,
and Constraints
 Gabriela & Co. has three options:
1 Make Part #2 and do not make Part #3 for
Krysta.
2 Buy Part #2 and do not make Part #3 for
Krysta.
3 Buy the part and use the facilities to produce
Part #3 for Krysta.

11 - 39
Opportunity Costs, Outsourcing,
and Constraints
 Expected cost of obtaining 150,000 parts:
 Buy Part #2 Buy Part #2
and do not and make Make
make Part #3 Part #3 Part #2
$82,500 $64,500* $76,500
 *$82,500 – $18,000 = $64,500

11 - 40
Opportunity Costs, Outsourcing,
and Constraints
 Opportunity cost is the contribution to income
that is foregone (rejected) by not using a
limited resource in its next-best alternative
use.

11 - 41
Opportunity Costs, Outsourcing,
and Constraints
 Opportunity costs are not recorded in formal
accounting records since they do not generate
cash outlays.
 These costs also are not ordinarily
incorporated into formal reports.

11 - 42
Opportunity Costs, Outsourcing,
and Constraints
 The opportunity cost of holding inventory is
the income forgone from tying up money in
inventory and not investing it elsewhere.

11 - 43
Opportunity Costs, Outsourcing,
and Constraints
 Carrying costs of inventory can be a
significant opportunity cost and should be
incorporated into decisions regarding lot
purchase sizes for materials.

11 - 44
Opportunity Costs, Outsourcing,
and Constraints
 Assume that annual estimated Part #2
requirements for next year is 150,000.
 Cost per purchase order is $40.
 Cost per unit when each purchase is of 1,500
units = $0.55.
 Cost per unit when each purchase is equal to
or greater than 150,000 = $0.54.

11 - 45
Opportunity Costs, Outsourcing,
and Constraints
 Average investment in inventory is either:
 (1,500 x .55) ÷ 2 = $412.50 or
 (150,000 x $0.54) = $40,500
 Annual interest rate for investment in
government bonds is 6%.
 $412.50 × .06 = $24.75
 $40,500 × .06 = $2,430

11 - 46
Opportunity Costs, Outsourcing,
and Constraints
 Option A: Make 100 purchases of 1,500 units:
 Purchase order costs: (100 × $40) $ 4,000.00
 Purchase costs: (150,000 × $0.55) 82,500.00
 Annual interest income
that could be earned: 24.75
 Relevant costs $86,524.75

11 - 47
Opportunity Costs, Outsourcing,
and Constraints
 Option B: Make 1 purchase of 150,000 units:
 Purchase order costs: (1 × $40) $ 40
 Purchase costs: (150,000 × $0.54) 81,000
 Annual interest income
that could be earned: 2,430
 Relevant costs: $83,470

11 - 48
Opportunity Costs, Outsourcing,
and Constraints
 In this case purchasing all 150,000 units
at the beginning of the year is preferred.
 Why?
 The higher purchase and ordering costs
exceeds the lower opportunity cost of
holding smaller inventory.

11 - 49
Learning Objective 6

Describe the key concept in


choosing which among multiple
products to produce when there
are capacity constraints

11 - 50
Product-Mix Decisions Under
Capacity Constraints
 What product should be emphasized to
maximize operating income in the face of
capacity constraints?
 Gabriela & Co. produces Product #2 and
Product #3.
 The company has 3,000 machine hours
available to produce these products.

11 - 51
Product-Mix Decisions Under
Capacity Constraints
 Decision criteria:
Aim for the highest contribution margin per
unit of the constraining factor.
 When multiple constraints exist, optimization
techniques such as linear programming can be
used in making decisions.

11 - 52
Product-Mix Decisions Under
Capacity Constraints
 Per unit Product #2 Product #3
Sales price $2.11 $14.50
Variable expenses 0.41 13.90
Contribution margin $1.70 $ 0.60
 Contribution margin ratio 81% 4%

11 - 53
Product-Mix Decisions Under
Capacity Constraints
 One unit of Prod. #2 requires 7 machine hours.
 One unit of Prod. #3 requires 2 machine hours.
 What is the contribution of each product per
machine hour?
 Product #2: $1.70 ÷ 7 = $0.24
 Product #3: $0.60 ÷ 2 = $0.30

11 - 54
Product-Mix Decisions Under
Capacity Constraints
 Which product should be emphasized?
 The product with the highest contribution
margin per unit of the constraining resource.

11 - 55
Learning Objective 7

Discuss the key factor managers


must consider when adding or
dropping customers and
segments

11 - 56
Profitability, Activity-Based
Costing, and Relevant Costs
 Companies must often make decisions about
adding or discontinuing a product line, branch,
or business segment.
 Companies must also make decisions about
adding or dropping customers.

11 - 57
Profitability, Activity-Based
Costing, and Relevant Costs
 Blowing Rock Furniture supplies specialized
furniture to two local retailers – Stevens and
Cohen.
 Blowing Rock Furniture has a monthly
capacity of 3,000 machine hours.
 Fixed costs are allocated on the basis of
revenues.

11 - 58
Profitability, Activity-Based
Costing, and Relevant Costs
Stevens Cohen
Revenues $200,000
$100,000 Variable costs 70,000
60,000 Fixed costs 100,000
50,000 Total operating costs
$170,000 $110,000
Operating income $ 30,000 $
(10,000) Machine-hours required
2,000 1,000

11 - 59
Profitability, Activity-Based
Costing, and Relevant Costs

Total
Revenues $300,000
Variable costs 130,000
Fixed costs 150,000
Total operating costs $280,000
Operating income $ 20,000
Machine-hours required 3,000

11 - 60
Profitability, Activity-Based
Costing, and Relevant Costs
 Should Blowing Rock Furniture drop the
Cohen business, assuming that dropping
Cohen would decrease its total fixed costs
by 10%?
 New fixed costs would be:
$150,000 – $15,000 = $135,000

11 - 61
Profitability, Activity-Based
Costing, and Relevant Costs

Stevens Alone
Revenues $200,000
Variable costs 70,000
Fixed costs 135,000
Total operating costs $205,000
Operating income $ (5,000)
Machine-hours required 3,000

11 - 62
Profitability, Activity-Based
Costing, and Relevant Costs
 Cohen’s business is providing a contribution
margin of $40,000.
 $40,000 decrease in contribution margin –
$15,000 decrease in fixed costs = $25,000
decrease in operating income.

11 - 63
Profitability, Activity-Based
Costing, and Relevant Costs
 Assume that if Blowing Rock Furniture drops
Cohen’s business it can lease the excess
capacity to the Perez Corporation for $50,000.
 Fixed costs would not decrease.
 Should Blowing Rock Furniture lease to
Perez?

11 - 64
Profitability, Activity-Based
Costing, and Relevant Costs
 $50,000 would be Blowing Rock Furniture’s
opportunity cost of continuing serving Cohen.
 The $50,000 offsets the $40,000 contribution
of Cohen’s business.

11 - 65
Learning Objective 8

Explain why the book value


of equipment is irrelevant in
equipment-replacement
decisions

11 - 66
Equipment-Replacement
Decisions
 Assume that Gabriela & Co. is considering
replacing a cutting machine with a newer
model.
 The new machine is more efficient than the
old machine.
 Revenues will be unaffected.

11 - 67
Equipment-Replacement
Decisions
Existing Replacement
Machine Machine
Original cost $80,000 $105,000
Useful life 4 years 4 years
Accumulated depreciation $50,000
Book value $30,000
Disposal price $14,000
Annual costs $46,000
$ 10,000
11 - 68
Equipment-Replacement
Decisions
 Ignoring the time value of money and income
taxes, should Gabriela replace the existing
machine?
 Yes!
 The cost savings per year are $36,000.
 The cost savings over a 4-year period will be
$36,000 × 4 = $144,000.

11 - 69
Equipment-Replacement
Decisions
 Investment = $105,000 – $14,000 = $91,000
 $144,000 – $91,000 = $53,000 advantage of
the replacement machine.

11 - 70
Irrelevance of Past Costs

 The book value of existing equipment is


irrelevant since it is neither a future cost nor
does it differ among any alternatives (sunk
costs never differ).

11 - 71
Irrelevance of Past Costs

 The disposal price of old equipment and the


purchase cost of new equipment are relevant
costs and revenues because...
– they are future costs or revenues that differ
between alternatives to be decided upon.

11 - 72
Learning Objective 9

Explain how conflicts can arise


between the decision model
used by a manager and the
performance model used to
evaluate the manager

11 - 73
Decisions and Performance
Evaluation
 What is the journal entry to sell the existing
machine?
 Cash 14,000
Accumulated
Depreciation 50,000
Loss on disposal 16,000
Machine 80,000

11 - 74
Decisions and Performance
Evaluation
 In the real world would the manager replace
the machine?
 An important factor in replacement decisions
is the manager’s perceptions of whether the
decision model is consistent with how the
manager’s performance is judged.

11 - 75
Decisions and Performance
Evaluation
 Managers often behave consistent with their
short-run interests and favor the alternative
that yields best performance measures in the
short run.
 When conflicting decisions are generated,
managers tend to favor the performance
evaluation model.

11 - 76
Decisions and Performance
Evaluation
 Top management faces a challenge – that is,
making sure that the performance-evaluation
model of subordinate managers is consistent
with the decision model.

11 - 77
End of Chapter 11

11 - 78

You might also like