GC Instruments: Carrier Gas
GC Instruments: Carrier Gas
GC Instruments: Carrier Gas
• Splitless Injection:
– Sample is vaporized in the injector itself and ALL of the sample is
swept onto the column by the carrier gas
– Again, relatively small samples are injected (10 L or less in
capillary GC)
– Sample spends a large amount of time in the injector
– Best for trace (1 -100 ppm range) concentrations of high boiling
point analytes in low boiling point solvents
• extra time in the injector helps volatilize the analytes.
• Split Injection:
– the injection is split, with only a portion of the sample
(usually 1% - 20%) actually making it to the column
– the most common method of injecting samples onto small
diameter, open-tubular columns.
• Even if you inject 20 L, only a fraction (adjustable) makes it on to
the column
– Not good for analytes with a wide range of boiling points
• some may be swept out the split vent before they are volatilized
• Modern capillary GCs come with a Split/Splitless
injectors standard
– you switch between modes by changing the split vent gas
flow and using a different injection liner.
Choosing a GC Column…
• Is the column compatible with your analytes
– polar analytes require polar stationary phases so they will spend
some of their “time” in the stationary phase
– non-polar analytes require non-polar stationary phases
– You usually have to compromise on the stationary phase to get a
good column for your analytes (which are probably a mix of polar
and non-polar)
– DB-5, HP-5, EC-5, RTX-5 (5% dimethyl, 95% diphenyl polysiloxane)
most common general use column.
• Temperature range, solvent and carrier gas compatibility
• Sample capacity versus resolution
– usually determines packed vs.. capillary
– GC’s usually setup for either packed or capillary
Capillary vs. Packed Columns
• Capillary Columns: • Packed Columns
– Higher resolution (R) – Greater sample capacity
– Greater HETP and N – Lower cost (can make your own)
– Shorter analysis time – More rugged
– Greater sensitivity – Most common in process labs or
– Most common in analytical separating/determining major
laboratory GC instruments components in a sample (prep GC)
– Smaller sample capacity – Limited lengths reduces R and N
– Higher cost/column – Not compatible with some GC
detectors
– Columns more susceptible to
damage
For capillary GC columns….
• Increased length = greater N, therefore a greater R
– expense is possible band broadening if analytes are on the column
too long!
– Increased length leads to longer separations. Do you have the
time?
• Increased stationary phase thickness and column diameter
provides increased sample capacity and can provide
increased resolution
– tradeoffs are a longer analysis time and more column bleed with
thicker stationary phases
• Is the column compatible with the detector?
– Thick stationary phases bleed more and will contaminate a mass
spectrometer.
• For most analytical work, a best “compromise” column is
chosen and other variables (temp, etc.) are altered to
optimize the separation.
Temperature Programming in GC
• The “simplest” way to alter the separation in GC is to alter
the temperature program in the oven. You can also alter
the pressure of the carrier gas, but this is less common
(much).
• Isothermal = constant temperature
• Gradient = varied temperature
The choice of detector will depend on the analyte and how the GC method is
being used (i.e., analytical or preparative scale)
1.) Thermal Conductivity Detector
(TCD)
- katherometer or hot-wire detector
- first universal detector developed for GC
Process
- measures a bulk property of the mobile phase leaving the column.
- measures ability to conduct heat away from a hot-wire (i.e., thermal conductivity)
- thermal conductivity changes with presence of other components in the mobile
phase
Considerations
- mobile phase must have very different thermal conductivity then solutes being
separated.
- most compounds separated in GC have thermal conductivity of about 1-4X10-5.
- H2 and He are carrier gases with significantly different thermal conductivity values.
- H2 reacts with metal oxides present on the resistors, so not used
Design
- based on electronic circuit known as a
Wheatstone bridge.
- circuit consists of an arrangement of four
resistors with a fixed current applied to them.
- thermal conductivity changes with presence of
other components in the mobile phase.
- the voltage between points (+) and (-) will be
zero as long as the resistances in the different
arms of the circuit are properly balanced
advantages:
- truly universal detector
‚ applicable to the detection of any compound in GC
- non-destructive
‚ useful for detecting compounds from preparative-scale columns
‚ useful in combination with other types of GC detectors
disadvantage:
- detect mobile phase impurities
- sensitive to changes in flow-rates
- limit of detection
‚ ~ 10-7 M
‚ much higher then other GC detectors
2.) Flame Ionization Detector (FID)
- most common type of GC detector
- “universal” detector capable of measuring the presence of almost any organic and many
inorganic compound
Process
- measures the production of ions when
a solute is burned in a flame.
- ions are collected at an electrode to
create a current
advantages:
- universal detector for organics
‚ doesn’t respond to common inorganic compounds
- mobile phase impurities not detected
- carrier gases not detected
- limit of detection: FID is 1000x better than TCD
- linear and dynamic range better than TCD
disadvantage:
- destructive detector
3.) Nitrogen-Phosphorus Detector (NPD)
- used for detecting nitrogen- or phosphorus containing compounds
- also known as alkali flame ionization detector or thermionic detector
disadvantage:
- destructive detector
- NPD is less sensitive to organic compounds compared to FID
4.) Electron Capture Detector (ECD)
- radiation-based detector
- selective for compounds containing electronegative atoms, such as halogens
Process
- based on the capture of electrons by
electronegative atoms in a molecule
- electrons are produced by ionization of the
carrier gas with a radioactive source
‚ 3H or 63Ni
- in absence of solute, steady stream of
these electrons is produced
- electrons go to collector electrode where
they produce a current
- compounds with electronegative atoms
capture electrons, reducing current
advantages:
- useful for environmental testing
‚ detection of chlorinated pesticides or herbicides
‚ detection of polynuclear aromatic carcinogens
‚ detection of organometallic compounds
- selective for halogen- (I, Br, Cl, F), nitro-, and sulfur-containing compounds
- detects polynuclear aromatic compounds, anhydrides and conjugated
carbonyl compounds
• Particularly sensitive to halogens nitriles,
carbonyls, nitro compounds ECD
• Analytes pass through a cell, in which
electrons are traveling between a 63Ni
electrode and a collector electrode
• As analytes with “electron capturing ability”
pass through the cell, the flow of electrons is
interrupted.
• The change in current, due to reduced flow of
electrons, is recorded.
• EXTREMELY SENSITIVE TO HALOGENS
– could ruin detector with 1 ppm
hexachlorocyclohexane by contaminating it
with excess analyte
• Widely used for the determination of
pesticides, herbicides and PCBs in
environmental samples.
• Non-destructive
QUALITATIVE ANALYSIS OF GC
QUANTITATIVE ANALYSIS IN GC
1. AREA NORMALIZATION
2. NORMALIZATION WITH RESPONSE FACTOR
3. EXTERNAL STANDARD
4. INTERNAL STANDARD
5. STANDARD ADDITION
AREA NORMALIZATION
31
NORMALIZATION WITH RESPONSE
FACTOR
32
NORMALIZATION WITH RESPONSE FACTOR
34
EXERCISE
2. Seorang analis diberi tugas untuk menganalisis komposisi sampel asam lemak.
Diperkirakan sampel tersebut terdiri atas asam miristat, asam palmitat, asam stearat, dan asam
oleat. Analis tersebut menganalisis dengan menggunakan kromatografi gas dengan cara normalisasi
respon faktor. Ditimbang standard asam miristat, asam palmitat, asam stearat dan asam oleat
masing-masing sebanyak; 0,1237 g; 0,2344 g; 0,4452 g; dan 0,2271 g lalu dicampur homogen.
Kemudian standard dan sampel diinjeksikan ke alat kromatografi gas dan diperoleh area sbb:
Komponen Area
STANDARDAsam miristat 1236612
Asam palmitat 2077365
Asam stearat 4410998
Asam oleat 2378661
SAMPEL Asam miristat 1203562
Asam palmitat 2213835
Asam stearat 3378927
Asam oleat 2237829
Tentukan:
a. Persen berat (%w/w) masing-masing komponen pada standard
b. Nilai respon faktor masing-masing komponen (RF asam miristat = 1,0000)
c. Komposisi (%w/w) masing-masing komponen dalam sampel
ANSWER
STANDARD (a) (b)
Berat %W Area %W~area RF
0,1237 12,01 1236612 9,70801E-06 1,0000
0,2344 22,75 2077365 1,09506E-05 1,1280
0,4452 43,21 4410998 9,79518E-06 1,0090
0,2271 22,04 2378661 9,26571E-06 0,9544
1,0304
SAMPEL
©
Area RF A X RF %
Asam miristat 1203562 1,0000 1203562 13,0
Asam palmitat 2213835 1,1280 2497206 27,0
Asam stearat 3378927 1,0090 3409337 36,9
Asam oleat 2237829 0,9544 2135784 23,1
9245889
EXTERNAL STANDARD
37
INTERNAL STANDARD
38
39
INTERNAL STANDARD
43
STANDARD ADDITION
44
STANDARD ADDITION
45