Scribd Logo
Upload

Welcome to Scribd!

  • 66 views

    Ph3452 Lab 3 Present

    Uploaded by

    Fahmi Chandra
    This lab report summarizes an experiment to study evanescent and propagating modes in a water-filled waveguide. Key findings include: 1) Cut-off frequencies of the first two transverse modes were calculated based on the waveguide dimensions and observed visually. 2) Transverse mode shapes, attenuation lengths, phase and group speeds were measured and compared to theoretical predictions, with good agreement within 0.9-3.2% error. 3) Possible sources of the small discrepancies identified were non-ideal pressure-release boundaries and variations in waveguide dimensions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Ph3452 Lab 3 Present

    Uploaded by

    Fahmi Chandra
    66 views10 pages
    This lab report summarizes an experiment to study evanescent and propagating modes in a water-filled waveguide. Key findings include: 1) Cut-off frequencies of the first two transverse modes were calculated based on the waveguide dimensions and observed visually. 2) Transverse mode shapes, attenuation lengths, phase and group speeds were measured and compared to theoretical predictions, with good agreement within 0.9-3.2% error. 3) Possible sources of the small discrepancies identified were non-ideal pressure-release boundaries and variations in waveguide dimensions.

    Original Description:

    PRESENTATION REGARDING WAVEGUIDE EXPERIMENT FOR UNDERWATER ACOUSTICS

    Copyright

    © © All Rights Reserved

    Available Formats

    PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd

    Did you find this document useful?

    Is this content inappropriate?

    This lab report summarizes an experiment to study evanescent and propagating modes in a water-filled waveguide. Key findings include: 1) Cut-off frequencies of the first two transverse modes were calculated based on the waveguide dimensions and observed visually. 2) Transverse mode shapes, attenuation lengths, phase and group speeds were measured and compared to theoretical predictions, with good agreement within 0.9-3.2% error. 3) Possible sources of the small discrepancies identified were non-ideal pressure-release boundaries and variations in waveguide dimensions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    66 views10 pages

    Ph3452 Lab 3 Present

    Uploaded by

    Fahmi Chandra
    This lab report summarizes an experiment to study evanescent and propagating modes in a water-filled waveguide. Key findings include: 1) Cut-off frequencies of the first two transverse modes were calculated based on the waveguide dimensions and observed visually. 2) Transverse mode shapes, attenuation lengths, phase and group speeds were measured and compared to theoretical predictions, with good agreement within 0.9-3.2% error. 3) Possible sources of the small discrepancies identified were non-ideal pressure-release boundaries and variations in waveguide dimensions.

    Copyright:

    © All Rights Reserved
    Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
    Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
    of 10

    LAB REPORT-3

    WAVEGUIDE
    OBJECTIVE
    To study evanescent and propagating modes in a water filled
    waveguide by determining mode shapes, attenuation lengths, cut-off
    frequency, phase speed and group speed
    PRE LAB PREPARATION
    • Calculating cut-off frequency
    1481 𝜋 2 𝜋 2
    • 𝑓11 = + = 𝟗. 𝟕𝟒𝟗𝟓 𝒌𝑯𝒛
    2𝜋 0.110 0.105
    1481 2𝜋 2 𝑚𝜋 2
    • 𝑓21 = + = 𝟏𝟓. 𝟔𝟐𝟗 𝒌𝑯𝒛
    2𝜋 0.110 0.105
    • Observing cut-off frequency visually = 9.660 kHz
    CALIBRATION OF POSITION

    Note: Radiushydrophone=0.5 cm
    REPORT 2.1
    TRANVERSE MODE
    REPORT 2.2
    EVANESCENT MODE

    Normalized pressure amplitude of the Semi logarithmic plot of the


    evanescent mode evanescent mode
    REPORT 2.2
    EVANESCENT MODE (Cont’d)
    𝑧 2 −𝜔2
    −𝑐 𝜔11
    𝑃= 𝑒 , 𝑤ℎ𝑒𝑟𝑒 𝜔 = 0.9𝜔11 𝑎𝑛𝑑 𝜔 = 2𝜋𝑓

    Next we take the natural logarithm on both side:

    𝑧 2
    𝑧 𝑧
    ln 𝑃 = − 𝜔11 − 𝜔2 = − 2𝜋𝑓11 2 − 2𝜋0.9𝑓11 2 = − 2𝜋𝑓11 1 − 0.92
    𝑐 𝑐 𝑐

    ln 𝑃 𝑐 𝑐 1481
    𝑓11 = − = −𝑠𝑙𝑜𝑝𝑒 ⋅ = 0.18613 ⋅ = 𝟏𝟎. 𝟎𝟔𝟓 𝒌𝑯𝒛
    𝑧 1− 0.92 2𝜋 1 − 0.92 2𝜋 1 − 0.92
    REPORT 2.3
    SOUND, PHASE AND GROUP SPEED
    𝑐 𝑐2
    𝑐𝑝 = → 𝑓𝑐 = 1 − 2 ⋅ 𝑓2
    𝜔 2 𝑐𝑝
    1 − 𝑐2
    𝜔
    𝑚
    1481 𝑠 2
    = 11𝑘𝐻𝑧 1− = 𝟗𝟕𝟗𝟏 𝑯𝒛
    𝑚2
    3249 𝑠

    𝜔𝑐 2 𝑐𝑔2
    𝑐𝑔 = 𝑐 1 − 2 → 𝑓𝑐 = 1 − 2 ⋅ 𝑓2
    𝜔 𝑐
    𝑚2
    701.329
    = 11𝑘𝐻𝑧 1− 𝑠 = 𝟗𝟔𝟖𝟖. 𝟒 𝑯𝒛
    𝑚2
    1481 𝑠
    REPORT 2.4
    METHOD COMPARISON

    Method Cut-off frequency (kHz) % difference from


    prediction
    Prediction based on dimensions 9.750
    Visual inspection 9.660 0.9%
    Using the evanescent slope 10.07 3.2%
    Using the asymptote 9.802 0.5%
    Using a cp data point 9.791 0.4%
    Using a cg data point 9.688 0.6%
    REPORT 2.5
    FINAL QUESTION
    • In this experiment we used mylar source that cause mode 1,2 will be
    excited if we place the source in the centre of the waveguide
    • The two possible discrepancies :
    • Waveguide boundaries are not the perfect pressure release
    • Dimensions of waveguide vary along the length of the waveguide
    • The possible reasons why the pressure do not go to zero at the sides :
    • Waveguide boundaries are not the perfect pressure release
    • Note that in the measurement, the recorded data never really goes to zero since the receiver
    can not measure the pressure at the wall

    You might also like