Solar Water Pump Supreme Rev

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 22

DESIGN OF A SOLAR-POWERED DRIP

IRRIGATIOIN SYSTEM FOR GROWING


MANGOES IN BURA NANIGHI.

PRESENTER : TERER DUNCAN KIPKIRUI


F21/3964/2009

SUPERVISORS : DR. DUNCAN O MBUGE


Eng ORODI ODHIAMBO
INTRODUCTION

• Dry areas are often faced with critical soil moisture deficit
hence carrying out productive agriculture is increasingly
difficult.
• Percentage of land under irrigation in Kenya.
• Need for food security and increasing the amount of land
under agriculture in.
• The benefits associated with this project include improved
food productivity.
PROBLEM STATEMENT AND ANALYSIS

• Agricultural production in semiarid areas is largely constrained


by low rainfall, poor or low nutrient soils, high temperatures,
high solar radiation, and low precipitation.
• The ever-increasing population is also creating a strain on the
existing food sources and thus putting food security of the
area in jeopardy
• The area experience severe annual food deficits, due to the
use of traditional techniques of farming that produce crops
that hardly meet the subsistence requirements
OVERALL OBJECTIVE
To design a solar powered drip irrigation system for
growing mangoes

Specific
 To design a drip-irrigation system layout for a 30 hectare
piece of land
 To design and determine the system specifications which
comprises of the pump, the solar trackers and the amount of
flow required
SITE ANALYSIS
Site analysis contd
• Rainfall is highly variable and occurs in the March–May and
the November–December seasons.
• The area is mainly covered with open bush and rather dense
shrub vegetation.
Month Jan Feb Mar April May June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec Year

Mean 28.6 29.5 30.1 29.5 28.5 26.8 26.3 26.4 27.1 28.4 28.8 28.4 28.2

Temp (mm)

Mean 16.1 5.1 53.2 101. 21.7 12.1 6.8 4.1 7.7 22.6 101.6 64.6 417.3

7
Rainfall, r

(mm)

Mean,Eo 205 201 227 210 214 211 209 225 235 214 192 173 2543

(mm)

Et (mm) 137 134 151 140 143 141 139 150 157 161 128 115 1696

r-Et -121 -129 -98 -38 -121 -129 -132 -146 -149 -138 -26 -50 -1277
INVENTORY
G.I PIPES
Pump
PVC pipes
PV array
pump controller
wiring
discharge tubing or piping
valves
emitters
drip lines
solar panels
mounting racks
LITERATURE REVIEW

Design parameters
• Area to be irrigated should be known .soil type identified,
type of crop to be planted, crop spacing and number of crops
per unit area should be put into consideration.
• Peak water requirement of crop per day should be known.
• Selection of emitter type, number of emitters per plant and
amount of water discharge per hour through each emitter
should be calculated.
• Layout of the system considering -topography, field shape and
location of the water source.
• Design of main and lateral drip lines. This depends upon
friction head losses.
• Selection of filters and other equipment that will be used in
the system.
Literature review contd
Cultivation of mangoes
• Climatic requirements
– Temperature ( 5- 45)
– Humidity and rainfall (average 105 mm)
Solar Water Pumping Principles
• Solar pumping system, the capacity to pump water is a function of
three main variables: pressure, flow, and power to the pump.
A solar-powered pumping system has the following minimum
components:
a) PV array
b) array mounting bracket and rack
c) pump controller
d) electrical ground for controller
e) wiring
f) discharge tubing or piping
Literature review contd
Solar power comes from photovoltaic (PV) cells that convert the
sun’s energy into usable DC electricity. A module consists of PV
cells and an array consists of several modules.
Drip irrigation system components
1. Control station (head control unit
2. Main and submain pipelines
3. Offtake hydrants
4. Hydrants
5. Manifold (feeder) pipelines
6. Dripper laterals
7. Emitters
PRODUCT DESIGN
METHODOLOGY
• Desk Study
– included the study of area map and the general information
about the area.
• Field Method
– Land divided into four quadrants.

Water quality test


pH
Turbidity, N.T.U
Dissolved solids, mg/l
Suspended solids, , mg/l
RESULTS AND ANALYSIS

• Bulk density

QUADRANT Weight of Weight of Weight of Mass of Bulk

can & lid + can & lid can +lid oven Density
(CM)
wet + Dry (g) dried soil
(g/cm3)
weight (g) weight (g) (g)

A 0-25 271.44 255.17 107.11 148.06 1.508127

25-50 180.26 170.70 100.49 70.21 0.715153

B 0-25 213.12 202.54 110.89 91.65 0.933539

25-50 182.04 173.19 108.03 65.16 0.663714

C 0-25 233.42 222.55 106.58 115.97 1.181260

25-50 223.69 209.05 110.49 98.56 1.003923

D 0-25 209.63 195.32 108.41 86.91 0.88525

25-50 21.56 195.09 99.84 95.29 0.970616


Results and analysis contd
Moisture Content
QUADRANT Mass Weight Weight Moistur Mass of Moistur

of can of can of can + e e


(cm) Dry soil
+ wet Dry content
(g) (%)
( g)
weight weight
(g)
(g)
(g)

A 0-25 23.79 106.22 98.42 7.8 74 10.54

25-50 32.16 81.99 77.73 4.26 45.57 9.35

B 0-25 24.91 102.54 96.57 5.97 71.66 8.33

25-50 22.58 106.57 99.77 6.8 77.19 8.81

C 0-25 23.32 99.42 92.53 6.89 69.21 9.96

25-50 16.44 95.62 88.94 6.68 72.5 9.21

D 0-25 25.17 144.37 134.00 10.37 108.83 9.53

25-50 25.03 110.01 102.27 7.74 77.24 10.02


Results and analysis contd
• The net scheme irrigation obtained from CROPWATT 8.0 is
4.959mm/day
• And the gross scheme irrigation is 5.742mm/day
• Therefore Net Irrigation Requirement per crop
= (4.959/1000) x 5 x 2 x 0.3
= 0.014877m3 or 14.877 l/crop/day
• Area of wetted soil = Sp x Sr x Pw
Where Sp = distance between the plant within a row
Sr = distance between plant rows or row spacing
(m)
• Area of wetted soil = 5 x 2 x 0.6
= 6 m2
Results and analysis contd

• Available soil moisture per crop= 140mm/m


= (140/1000) x 0.6 =
= 0.084m3 or 84 l/crop
• Readily available moisture for drip system to be
replenished by irrigation
= 84 l/crop x 0.2
= 16.8 l/crop
Results and analysis contd
Results and analysis contd

• Supply line and main line


• Δ H = 15.27 (Q1.852) L
D4.871
• Sub mains and laterals
• Δ H = 5.35 (Q1.852) L
D4.871
Results and analysis contd

• Suction lift 4.5 m


• Supply line 1.14 m
• Main line 2.58 m
• Sub main 2.9814 m
• Laterals 4.776 m
• Sub Total 15.9774
• Fitting 10% 1.59774
• Difference in elevation 6.5 m
• Total 24.07514

Power requirement = Q × H
360 × e
= 19.36476 × 24.07514
360 × 0.40
= 3.237 Kw
DESIGN DRAWING
CONCLUSION AND RECOMENDATION

• The broad objectives of carrying out a survey of the area to


determine its topographical characteristics was achieved
which guided in the irrigation system layout.
• The irrigation system layout should be checked regularly to
avoid clogging of pipes and emitters and the necessary repairs
and maintenance should be carried out.
REFERENCE

• ASAE 1990 ASAE EP 405.1.Design and installation of micro-irrigation


systems.
• FAO 1985 Water quality for agriculture.Fao Irrigation and Drainage
Paper No 29,Rev.1.preparedby:Ayers,R.S&westcot DW Rome,Italy.
• Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (2008) The
State of Food Insecurity in the World 2008: High food prices and
food security—threats and opportunities.
• Griesbach J. 1981. What you should know about mango growing.
Kenya Farmer. Nairobi, Kenya: Agricultural Society of Kenya.
• Griesbach J. 1985. New mango types currently grown in
Kenya.Kenya Farmer. Nairobi, Kenya: Agricultural Society of Kenya.
• http://www.ehow.com/list_7505003_hydrology-soil-
types.html#ixzz2kqjmm44f
• http://www.thecommunityengineer.com/forum.html.
• THANK YOU

You might also like