Evaluation Journal Final Ian
Evaluation Journal Final Ian
Evaluation Journal Final Ian
Presenter:
Dr. Aprian Ilhami
Moderator:
Dr. H. Azhari, Sp.OG(K)
• Between January 2016 and September • Before being discharged they were
2016. informed by the doctor and
• Mothers, and their infants born at breastfeeding nurse about nutrition,
Bağcılar Training and Research Hospital, infant care, and the most common
Obstetric Unit mistakes.
• These forms were reapplied on the 15th
and 30th days in neonatal polyclinic
controls and the changes were
evaluated.
• The correct information was repeated
to the mothers who were detected to
have misinformation and wrong
attitudes in the evaluations in each
form application period.
Study Outcomes
Statistical Analysis
• Number Cruncher Statistical System (NCSS) 2007 (Kaysville, Utah, USA)
program was used for statistical analyses.
• Descriptive statistical variables were used for quantitative variables in the
study data.
• The Friedman test was used for the evaluations and comparisons between the
variables and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the Spearman correlation test
were used in paired evaluations.
• The level of p<0.05 was accepted to be significant.
Results
Table 1. Distribution of descriptive characteristics
n %
Method of delivery
Vaginal 53 53.0
Cesarean Section 47 47.0
Gender Female 48 48
Male 52 52
Maternal educational level
Illiterate 17 17.0
Primary school 27 27.0
Secondary school 36 36.0
High school 13 13.0
University 7 7.0
Time of the first breastfeeding of the infant
Did not breastfeed 5 5.0
30 minutes 30 30.0
1 hour 40 40.0
Table II. Evaluations for breastfeeding, bathing and umbilical care
Strength Limitation
• The sample was similar in demographic but • The sample size calculation was not
different in educational level explained properly
• Need more participant
Conclusion
Bağcılar Training and “... and their infants born at Bağcılar Training and
Research Hospital, Research Hospital, Obstetric Unit between January
Obstetric Unit between 2016 and September 2016. ”
January 2016
and September 2016.
Inductive or deductive Inductive reasoning Questionnaire form collecting data analyze
reasoning? conclusion
CRITICAL APPRAISAL
Questions Answers Explanation
Were the criteria used to No • There is no explanation about included and excluded
select articles for inclusion criteria
predetermined, clearly
stated, and appropriate?
20
CRITICAL APPRAISAL
Questions Answers Explanation
Group or ungroup data? Group Data “.. highest correlation between the maternal education
level and the post-education knowledge and attitude
change was determined in uneducated and primary school
graduate mothers ..”
Ad hoc or routine data? Ad Hoc Data was collected for some period of time during study.
Measures of Central Tendency, None We had planned to carry out, data permitting, cross-
Position and Dispersion sectional study.
21
CRITICAL APPRAISAL
Tables that was used to Descriptive tables Data were presented using tables
present results of this study
24
CRITICAL APPRAISAL
Questions Answers Explanation
Statistical analysis • Number Cruncher Statistical System (NCSS) 2007 (Kaysville, Utah,
USA) program was used for statistical analyses.
• Descriptive statistical variables were used for quantitative
variables in the study data.
• The Friedman test was used for the evaluations and comparisons
between the variables and the Wilcoxon signed-rank test and the
Spearman correlation test were used in paired evaluations.
• The level of p<0.05 was accepted to be significant.
Error to conclude statistical None
analysis results
How was the presentation of Good Writers clearly explained background, methods and results in this
results in this paper? study.
25
THANK YOU