The document discusses the key differences between fixed and discretionary trusts with regards to certainty of object.
A fixed trust specifies how the trust property is to be distributed, leaving the trustees no discretion. A discretionary trust gives trustees discretion over distribution. Certainty of object is more difficult with discretionary trusts as beneficiaries are not predetermined.
The cases of McPhail v Doultons and Re Baden Deed Trust illustrate three types of uncertainty - conceptual uncertainties due to vague language, evidential difficulties requiring evidence to identify beneficiaries, and administrative uncertainties where identification is conceptually clear but administratively impossible.
The document discusses the key differences between fixed and discretionary trusts with regards to certainty of object.
A fixed trust specifies how the trust property is to be distributed, leaving the trustees no discretion. A discretionary trust gives trustees discretion over distribution. Certainty of object is more difficult with discretionary trusts as beneficiaries are not predetermined.
The cases of McPhail v Doultons and Re Baden Deed Trust illustrate three types of uncertainty - conceptual uncertainties due to vague language, evidential difficulties requiring evidence to identify beneficiaries, and administrative uncertainties where identification is conceptually clear but administratively impossible.
The document discusses the key differences between fixed and discretionary trusts with regards to certainty of object.
A fixed trust specifies how the trust property is to be distributed, leaving the trustees no discretion. A discretionary trust gives trustees discretion over distribution. Certainty of object is more difficult with discretionary trusts as beneficiaries are not predetermined.
The cases of McPhail v Doultons and Re Baden Deed Trust illustrate three types of uncertainty - conceptual uncertainties due to vague language, evidential difficulties requiring evidence to identify beneficiaries, and administrative uncertainties where identification is conceptually clear but administratively impossible.
The document discusses the key differences between fixed and discretionary trusts with regards to certainty of object.
A fixed trust specifies how the trust property is to be distributed, leaving the trustees no discretion. A discretionary trust gives trustees discretion over distribution. Certainty of object is more difficult with discretionary trusts as beneficiaries are not predetermined.
The cases of McPhail v Doultons and Re Baden Deed Trust illustrate three types of uncertainty - conceptual uncertainties due to vague language, evidential difficulties requiring evidence to identify beneficiaries, and administrative uncertainties where identification is conceptually clear but administratively impossible.
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online from Scribd
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 18
• QUESTION 1
# Why there is a need to distinguish between
fixed trust and a discretionary trust in discussing certainty of object and explain the nature of these two trusts Certainty of Object Nature of Fixed Trust and Discretionary Trust • Fixed Trust
• The trustees are given very specific instructions
as to how and to whom the subject matter of the trust is to be distributed • The trustees do not have any power:- - to vary the amounts give - to the different beneficiaries named, - -or to decide whether or not to benefit one particular beneficiary over the others. Inland Revenue Commissioners v Broadways Cottage Trust • Jenkin LJ said:”there can be no division in equal shares amongst a class of person unless all the members of the class are known”. • This normally been taken as an authority for general proposition that in order for a fixed trust to be valid. • A list of all possible objects must be possible of compilation, the so called “list certainty”. - A fixed trust might look as follows: • I give £10,000 to my trustees to divide equally between my children, Jacob and Frances • You will see here that the trustees have no discretion as to how to divide the £10,000 . • The money must be divided equally. Neither are the trustees given any discretion as to whom the money is to be given. • The settlor is clearly stated that the money is to be divided equally • Between Jacob and Frances. • They are each to be given a half-share of the money and so • will each receive the sum of £5,000. • Further example of a fixed trust • I give £10,000 to my trustees to hold for my children, Jacob and Frances. • Despite the fact that there is no express stipulation as to how the money is to be divided, • the trust will still be fixed. In the absence of a direction as to how the trustees are to divide • the money, the equitable maxim ‘equity is equality’ will apply, and the money will be • divided equally between the two children, as with the first example. DISCRETIONARY TRUST • With a discretionary trust • A trust where the share for each beneficiary or to whom the share is given is not being specified. • Beneficiary is not the equitable owner of the interest.(suspense until - exercise the discretion) • the trustees are given discretion, either to • decide the shares into which the trust fund will be divided • or to decide who will benefit • A discretionary trust might look like :- • I give £10,000 to my trustees to divide between those of my children they consider most deserving in their absolute discretion. • In this scenario, the trustees have discretion as to how the money is divided. • discretion as to whom the money is given. • The Settlor has allowed them to choose which of • the children they consider most deserving and divide the money • between them. • No shares are specified and so the trustees are free to decide in what proportions the money is to be divided. • Thus, the trustees could decide to split the money between Jacob and Frances, £7,000 to Jacob and the remaining £3,000 to Frances. • Alternatively, if they considered Jacob undeserving of a share of the trust fund, they could decide to benefit Frances with the whole £10,000. Such is the nature of their discretion. Why there is a need to distinguish between fixed trust and discretionary trust? 1)The trustee know to whom the property should be distributed. Fixed trusts: the property is held for a fixed number of beneficiaries, and the trustee is obliged to distribute property without any discretion over who gets what. Discretionary trust, the trustee has discretion over his actions. 2.Lack of certainty of object will cause the trust to be void • Fixed Trust: risk of uncertainty is lesser • Discretionary Trust: Trustee need to exercise his discretion and try as much as possible to ensure certainty of beneficiary. 3.Beneficiaries’ right over trust property • Fixed trusts, the potential beneficiaries have the equitable ownership of their property. Beneficiaries has equitable right against trust property. • The beneficiaries can compel the trustee to act according to trust deed. • Discretionary trusts-Is not the equitable owner of the interest - The beneficial interest is in suspense until trustees exercise the discretion .Trustees decide both who shall benefit and what the benefit shall be. - Beneficiary cannot claim any right over the interest unlike. 4.Fail to distribute property, trustee liable for breach of trust • Lack of certainty of object will cause trust to be void. • The beneficiaries must be identifiable. • Failure on part if trustee, will cause him/her liable of breach of trust. • Fixed trust: Must execute trust according to fixed portion. • Discretionary trust , according to trustee’s discretionary power . Given power to carry put the trust. • Question 2 # Explain the case of Mc Phail v Doultons and Re Baden Deed Trust and illustrate and explain the following terms based on these cases : a.) conceptual uncertainties b.) evidential difficulties c.) administrative uncertainty Mc Phail v Doultons • In McPhail, Bertram Baden established a fund for the benefit of the staff of Matthew Hall & Co Ltd. He died in 1960 and the executors of his trust claimed that the trust was invalid for uncertainty of objects. It was, therefore a power not a trust. • The issue contested was contained in clause 9(a) of the trust deed. • “The trustee shall apply the net income of the fund in making at their absolute discretion grants to or the benefit of any of the officers and employees of the company or to any relatives or dependents of any persons in such amounts as they think fits. JUDGEMENT 1st instance It was power and not a trust COA It was power and not a trust HOUSE OF LORD The deed created the trust and not power In re BADEN'S DEED TRUSTS (No. 2) • Whether inclusion of relatives and dependants made trust void for uncertainty • The decision of this case provides the good example of the application of the criterion certainty test. • The test : can it be said with certainty that any given individual is or is not a member of the class “ Sachs LJ stated that in applying the test its essential to bear in mind to difference between conceptual uncertainty and evidential difficulties.”
• It was held that relatives are all those person from
whom its possible to trace legal descent from a common ancestor. The widest meaning for relatives did not produce uncertainty and it was satisfactory as a criterion for a discretionary trust. Dependant was held to mean ‘dependant’ for the ordinary necessities of life for a person of the applicant class and position. Dependant was also held to satisfy criterion certainty.” THREE KINDS OF UNCERTAINTY Conceptual uncertainties Vagueness of language used by the testator to express his intention Conceptual uncertainty arises :- -to benefit "handsome barristers“ -My shorter employee -For my old friends and business associates Effect: Express trust fail Evidential difficulties • Language used is precise • Evidence is need for the trustee to carry out the settlor’s instruction Administrative uncertainties • Definition is clear but in terms of administrative is impossible. -