Hoshin Planning Process: Workshop Month XX, 20xx
Hoshin Planning Process: Workshop Month XX, 20xx
Hoshin Planning Process: Workshop Month XX, 20xx
Process
Workshop
Month xx, 20xx
Agenda
- Wrap Up 5 min.
Why?:
- Proper alignment requires more than independent
establishment of strategies
- Hoshin Planning will align those strategies and drive the
execution
- To Achieve Breakthrough RESULTS!
Strategic
Objective
is
Hoshin
Planning Achieved!
Improvement
KAIZEN
Hoshin
Planning
KAIZEN
Hoshin
Base
Planning
KAIZEN Base
Base
Base
Base
VS.
QMS
Daily Mgt. Hoshin Management
People
All activities necessary to AOP STRAP
carry out the routine work
for the SBU STRATEGIES
Defined to follow and be governed by
Rapid Problem Solving methods
PDCA
Demonstrated through standardized work
On the shop floor
Controlled and driven through Leadership
Standardized Work in daily gemba walks
11 freeleansite.com File Number
How to Use Hoshin?
What Does Hoshin Planning Mean To You?
Top Mgt
Breakthrough
Middle
Mgt
Kaizen
Supervisor Daily
Management
Front Line
Associate
Adapted From Beyond Strategic Vision, Effective Corporate Action
With Hoshin Planning; Cowley, Domb, 1997 pg. 57
STRATEGIC PLANNING
HP LEV 1 COMPLETE
ACTION PLAN
DEV COMPLETE
HP LEV 2 & 3
COMPLETE NEW
YEAR
HP
CONCURRENT BUDGETING PROCESS BEGINS
Establish
Organizational Vision
PLANNING P Strategic Planning/ Develop 3-5
Year Breakthrough Objectives
Step 1 : WHAT
Breakthrough Thinking
Step 3 : HOW
Identify Key Driver Process
Step 5 : WHO
Identify Key Resources &
Deploy
World-Class
Breakthrough
Objective
Best-In-Class
Current
Current Situation
Situation
Breakthrough
Objective
Annual BT Objectives Yr 3 Yr 3
Annual BT Objectives Yr 2 Yr 2
Yr 1
Annual BT Objectives Yr 1
Current Situation
100
100% 100%
Resource A
3%
Current Team B 20% Relative
Distribution Impact On
20% Improvement
Of Resources
Resource C Priorities
Resource D 40%
Team E
0% 0%
Objective is
Hoshin Achieved!
Planning
KAIZEN
Hoshin
Planning
KAIZEN
Hoshin Daily
Planning Mgmt
Daily
KAIZEN
Mgmt
Daily
Foundation Mgmt
for Daily Daily
Mgmt Mgmt
HP
HOW
Top Level
All items
Improvement
Priorities
are listed HOW
HOW Annual WHO
in priority order
Breakthrough
Targets
to Improve MUCH
FAR Objectives
starting from
3-5 Year
Breakthrough
Annual Metrics the center
Objectives
RESOURCES
= Secondary Responsibility
OWNER
Top Level
Improvement
Priorities NOTE: Only Solid dots on
a resource deploy to the
Annual Targets next level
Breakthrough to Improve
2- HOW Objectives
4- HOW RESOURCES
OWNER
Top Level
Improvement
Priorities
Dots show Annual Targets
linkage from Breakthrough To
Target back to Objective Improve
Breakthrough
for that level 3-5 Year
Breakthroughs
to be used as
a sanity check Top Level
The Improvement
Improvement
Priorities
Annual Targets
Breakthrough to
Objectives Improve
3-4 year
Priority is deployed
Breakthrough
Objectives
Resources
l Primary Responsibility
m Secondary Responsibility
matrix or an action
plan Second Level
Improvement
Priorities
Top Level
Targets to
Improvement
Improve
Priorities
Annual
Breakthrough
Objectives
RESOURCES
l Primary Responsibility
m Secondary Responsibility
copied directly
Improvement
Priorities
Matrices. l
m
Resources
Primary Responsibility
Secondary Responsibility
SECOND LEVEL
Second Level Policy Deployment
Typically, a 2nd
Level Matrix is
created for a Second Level
Improvement
Top Level
Improvement Annual
Breakthrough
Objectives
Priority. l
m
RESOURCES
Primary Responsibility
Secondary Responsibility
are copied
Improvement
Priorities
Top Level
HP Matrices. l
m
Resources
Primary Responsibility
Secondary Responsibility
THIRD LEVEL
THIRD Level Policy Deployment
If necessary, a 3rd
Level Matrix is
created for a Third Level
Improvement
Second Level
Priority. l
m
RESOURCES
Primary Responsibility
Secondary Responsibility
2nd Level
Improvement
2- HOW Priorities Use dots as a check to make sure
Top Level
Improvement
Targets
to
the Improvement Priorities & Targets
Priorities Improve
meet the goal and support the
Annual
Breakthrough Annual Breakthrough Objectives
Objectives
RESOURCES
4- HOW
1- HOW FAR MUCH/WHEN
= Primary Responsibility
= Secondary Responsibility
OWNER
Top
Point of Impact - Action Plan
The level where root causes are
Level
Improvement
Priorities
Annual
Breakthrough
Objectives
Target to
Improve
SECOND
LEVEL addressed! Action Plans can be
3-5 Year
Breakthrough
Objectives
Resources
Plant/Business
l Primary Responsibility
m Secondary Responsibility
Second
Level
Improvement
Priorities
Top
Level Target to
Improvement Improve
Priorities
Annual
Breakthrough
ROOT CAUSE
Objectives
POINT OF IMPACT -
RESOURCES
l Primary Responsibility
m Secondary Responsibility
Review Team : *
Policy Deployment Action Plan
Departm ent/Location: Managem ent Ow ner:
* *
Date: *
Next Review : *
Tim eline
Target Im provem ent
Core Objective: *
POINT
Third
= Original Plan x = Progress at Review
Level Planned 2003 Status
Im pact
Improvement Action Step/ Kaizen Events Ow ner (Lead is bold) Milestone Dates Jan Feb M ar Apr M ay June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec ( P a st D u e i n R e d )
Priorities
Second
Level
Improvement
Priorities
Target to
Improve OF
Top
Level
Improvement
Priorities
IMPACT
RESOURCES
l Primary Responsibility
m Secondary Responsibility
Planned
= Original Plan x = Progress at Review
2004
Target Im provem ent
Status
For every Improvement
Im pact
Action Step/ Kaizen Events Ow ner (Lead is bold) Milestone Dates Jan Feb M ar Apr M ay June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec ( P a st D u e i n R e d )
Breakthrough Objective:
Attain competitive advantage in Delivery Performance
Effect = Results!
Annual BT Objective #1:
Streamline Engineer-to-Order Processes
POINT
Action Step 2: OF
IMPACT
SW Kaizen to improve productivity
by 35% Actions = Cause
POINT
OF
Action Step 3: IMPACT
VRK to reduce Quote processing time
by 50%
Breakthrough Objectives
Annual BT Objectives
Action Plans
Tim eline
Target Im provem ent
Core Objective: *
= Original Plan x = Progress at Review
Planned 2004 Status
Im pact
Action Step/ Kaizen Events Ow ner (Lead is bold) Milestone Dates Jan Feb M ar Apr M ay June July Aug Sept Oct Nov Dec ( P a st D u e i n R e d )
DASHBOARD/SCORECARD
Targets To
Improve JOP Jumping Off Point from
are entered in which you started tracking the target
priority order
YTD ACT Each month this field gets
updated (is YTD from the monthly
fields located to the right)
TOP LEVEL
IMPROVEMENT Dev. Cycle to 120 Days by 12/95
Increase Market Share to 60%
PRIORITIES
Marketing Department
Materials Department
Finance Department
TARGET
Sales Department
ANNUAL
BT TO
OBJECTIVES
IMPROVE
3-5 YEAR
BREAKTHROUGH
OBJECTIVE
RESOURCES
= Primary Responsibility
= Secondary Responsibility
TOP LEVEL
Danaher Business System Office - Policy Deployment 1998
Title
SCORECARD
Top Level
Improvement
Priorities
Annual Target s to
Breakthrough Improve
Objectives
3-5 year
Breakthrough
Objective
Resources
l Primary Responsibility
m Secondary Responsibility
SECOND LEVEL
Second Level Policy Deployment
SCORECARD
2nd Level
Improvement
Priorities
Targets to
Top Level Improve
Improvement
Priorities
Annual Breakthrough
Objectives
RESOURCES
l Primary Responsibility
m Secondary Responsibility
A D
C
Execute to the plan and perform daily, weekly and monthly reviews of
each action plan (Daily Mgt.)
Problem Statement:
$136k monthly miss is due to Delayed Evaluation Kit Development, Insufficient Sales Prospects and Delayed Print Engine
Delivery.
Countermeasures
What Who When How Much (Impact)
Addressed Root Cause: Delayed Evaluation Kit Development
Short-Term:
Short-Term: Assign additional Engineer to complete evaluation
Short-Term: MJF 10/28/03
kit development (delayed one month) in time for ITMA show. $61
Long-Term: JBR Long-Term:
Long-Term: Update Tollgate process to include Engineering
12/15/03
development for necessary targeted-vertical launch kits.
Addressed Root Cause: Insufficient Sales Prospects
Execute Sales Funnel Targets for UK 'T' Shirt outlettwice per DW/HW 10/15/03 $48
week follow-up on Sales Funnel Targets with Sales Engineer.
Addressed Root Cause: Delayed Print Engine Delivery
Execute kanban re-sizing process for Printos at once per quarter
RZ/ MJF 10/22/03 $27
frequency (currently twice-per-yearwhich is not frequent
enough for ramping production).
5 Why Analysis
Countermeasures are
reactive they address how
60 to get back to plan when a
goal is missed for a period
50
40
HP miss Jump Off Point (JOP)
to stretch target
30
Todays HP Review 5%
Financial Review 15%
Hoshin Planning 60%
- Road Blocks to Growth, Major
Predetermined Topics Follow a typical
- Established HP Growth Initiatives MOR session
- New Product Development
- Remaining HP Elements (Q, D,C)
KPIs
People/Org. Issues 20%
Other Business