Comparision of NDT Methods: Technical & Costs

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 11

Comparision of NDT

Methods
Technical & Costs
Comparison of various NDT methods
Characteristics Example of
Method Advantages Limitations
detected Use
acoustic Can penetrate Requires coupling Adhesive
impedance by thick to matl by assemblies
Ultrasonics

cracks, materials; contact with for bond


nonbonds, excellent crack surface/ integrity;
inclusions, or detection; can immersion in a laminations;
interfaces be automated fluid (water). hydrogen
Surface needs to cracking
be smooth.
Comparison of various NDT methods
Characteristi Example of
Method Advantages Limitations
cs detected Use
density Inspects wide Radiation safety Pipeline
from voids, range of matls requires welds for
inclusions, & thk; precautions; penetratio
Radiography

matl versatile; film expensive; n,


variations; provides record detection of inclusions,
placement of of inspection cracks can be and voids;
internal difficult unless internal
parts perpendicular defects in
to x-ray film. castings
Comparison of various NDT methods
Characteristics
Method Advantages Limitations Example of Use
detected
Surface Often Can be Paper, wood, or
characteristics convenient; applied metal for surface
such as finish, can be only to finish and
Visual optical

scratches, automated surfaces, uniformity


cracks, colour; through
strain in surface
transparent openings,
materials; or to
corrosion transparent
material
Comparison of various NDT methods
Characteristics Example of
Method Advantages Limitations
detected Use
Changes in Readily Limited to Heat
electrical automated; electrically exchanger
Eddy current

conductivity moderate conducting tubes for wall


caused by cost materials; thinning and
material limited cracks
variations, penetration
cracks, voids, depth
or inclusions
Comparison of various NDT methods
Characteristics
Method Advantages Limitations Example of Use
detected
Surface Inexpensive, Flaw must Turbine blades
openings due easy to use, be open to for surface
Liquid penetrant

to cracks, readily surface. Not cracks or


porosity, portable, useful on porosity;
seams, or sensitive to porous grinding cracks
folds small materials or
surface rough
flaws surfaces
Comparison of various NDT methods
Characteristics Example
Method Advantages Limitations
detected of Use
Leakage Inexpensive Limited to Railroad
magnetic flux or moderate ferromagnetic wheels
Magnetic particles

caused by cost, material; for large


surface or sensitive surface castings
near-surface both to preparation
cracks, voids, surface and cracks; and
inclusions, or near- post-inspection
material or surface flaws demagnetizatio
geometry n may be
changes required
Relative cost & other features of various NDT methods
Test method
UT X-ray ECT MPT LPT

Capital cost Medium High Low to Medium Low


to high medium
Consum- Very low High Low Medium Medium
able cost
Time of Immediate Delayed Immediate Short delay Short delay
results
Effect of Important Important Important Not too Not too
geometry Important Important
Relative cost & other features of various NDT methods
Test method
UT X-ray ECT MPT LPT
Access Important Important Important Important Important
problems
Type of Surface
Internal Most External External
defect breaking
Relative High Medium High Low Low
sensitivity
Formal
Expensive Standard Expensive Unusual Unusual
record
Operator
High High Medium Low Low
skill
Relative cost & other features of various NDT methods
Test method
UT X-ray ECT MPT LPT
Operator Important Important Important Important Low
training
Training High High Medium Low High
needs

Portability
High to High to
of High Low Little
medium medium
equipment
Relative cost & other features of various NDT methods
Test method
UT X-ray ECT MPT LPT
function of
Magnetic
material Very Quite Very Little
only
comp.
Ability to
Good Fair Good Fair Fair
automate
Thk.
Gaging; Thk.
Capa- some Thk. Gaging; Defects
Defects only
bilities compo- Gaging grade only
sition sorting
testing

You might also like