Scribd
Upload
37 views44 pages

Optimization Via Search: CPSC 315 - Programming Studio Spring 2008 Project 2, Lecture 4

This document discusses different optimization techniques for finding the maximum or minimum value of a function. It begins by introducing the concept of searching a state space to iteratively improve a solution. Hill-climbing is described as starting with a random state and taking random steps to improve the function value. Gradient descent is presented as a modification that takes steps in the direction of greatest increase or decrease. The document also covers simulated annealing, which can accept worse states probabilistically, and genetic algorithms, which evolve solutions over multiple generations.

Uploaded by

rajeswarikannan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
37 views44 pages

Optimization Via Search: CPSC 315 - Programming Studio Spring 2008 Project 2, Lecture 4

This document discusses different optimization techniques for finding the maximum or minimum value of a function. It begins by introducing the concept of searching a state space to iteratively improve a solution. Hill-climbing is described as starting with a random state and taking random steps to improve the function value. Gradient descent is presented as a modification that takes steps in the direction of greatest increase or decrease. The document also covers simulated annealing, which can accept worse states probabilistically, and genetic algorithms, which evolve solutions over multiple generations.

Uploaded by

rajeswarikannan
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 44

Optimization via

Search
CPSC 315 Programming Studio
Spring 2008
Project 2, Lecture 4

Adapted from slides of


Yoonsuck Choe
Improving Results and
Optimization
Assume a state with many variables
Assume some function that you want to
maximize/minimize the value of
Searching entire space is too complicated
Cant evaluate every possible combination of
variables
Function might be difficult to evaluate analytically
Iterative improvement
Start with a complete valid state
Gradually work to improve to better and
better states
Sometimes, try to achieve an optimum, though
not always possible
Sometimes states are discrete, sometimes
continuous
Simple Example
One dimension (typically use more):

function
value

x
Simple Example
Start at a valid state, try to maximize

function
value

x
Simple Example
Move to better state

function
value

x
Simple Example
Try to find maximum

function
value

x
Hill-Climbing
Choose Random Starting State
Repeat
From current state, generate n random
steps in random directions
Choose the one that gives the best new
value
While some new better state found
(i.e. exit if none of the n steps were better)
Simple Example
Random Starting Point

function
value

x
Simple Example
Three random steps

function
value

x
Simple Example
Choose Best One for new position

function
value

x
Simple Example
Repeat

function
value

x
Simple Example
Repeat

function
value

x
Simple Example
Repeat

function
value

x
Simple Example
Repeat

function
value

x
Simple Example
No Improvement, so stop.

function
value

x
Problems With Hill Climbing
Random Steps are Wasteful
Addressed by other methods
Local maxima, plateaus, ridges
Can try random restart locations
Can keep the n best choices (this is also called beam
search)
Comparing to game trees:
Basically looks at some number of available next moves
and chooses the one that looks the best at the moment
Beam search: follow only the best-looking n moves
Gradient Descent (or Ascent)
Simple modification to Hill Climbing
Generallly assumes a continuous state space
Idea is to take more intelligent steps
Look at local gradient: the direction of largest
change
Take step in that direction
Step size should be proportional to gradient
Tends to yield much faster convergence to
maximum
Gradient Ascent
Random Starting Point

function
value

x
Gradient Ascent
Take step in direction of largest increase
(obvious in 1D, must be computed
in higher dimensions)
function
value

x
Gradient Ascent
Repeat

function
value

x
Gradient Ascent
Next step is actually lower, so stop

function
value

x
Gradient Ascent
Could reduce step size to hone in

function
value

x
Gradient Ascent
Converge to (local) maximum

function
value

x
Dealing with Local Minima
Can use various modifications of hill climbing
and gradient descent
Random starting positions choose one
Random steps when maximum reached
Conjugate Gradient Descent/Ascent
Choose gradient direction look for max in that
direction
Then from that point go in a different direction
Simulated Annealing
Simulated Annealing
Annealing: heat up metal and let cool to
make harder
By heating, you give atoms freedom to move
around
Cooling hardens the metal in a stronger state
Idea is like hill-climbing, but you can take
steps down as well as up.
The probability of allowing down steps goes
down with time
Simulated Annealing
Heuristic/goal/fitness function E (energy)
Generate a move (randomly) and compute
DE = Enew-Eold
If DE <= 0, then accept the move
If DE > 0, accept the move with probability:
Set DE

P(DE ) e kT

T is Temperature
Simulated Annealing
Compare P(DE) with a random number from
0 to 1.
If its below, then accept
Temperature decreased over time
When T is higher, downward moves are more
likely accepted
T=0 means equivalent to hill climbing
When DE is smaller, downward moves are
more likely accepted
Cooling Schedule
Speed at which temperature is reduced has
an effect
Too fast and the optima are not found
Too slow and time is wasted
Simulated Annealing T = Very
High

Random Starting Point

function
value

x
Simulated Annealing T = Very
High

Random Step

function
value

x
Simulated Annealing T = Very
High

Even though E is lower, accept

function
value

x
Simulated Annealing T = Very
High

Next Step; accept since higher E

function
value

x
Simulated Annealing T = Very
High

Next Step; accept since higher E

function
value

x
Simulated Annealing T = High

Next Step; accept even though lower

function
value

x
Simulated Annealing T = High

Next Step; accept even though lower

function
value

x
Simulated Annealing T = Medium

Next Step; accept since higher

function
value

x
Simulated Annealing T = Medium

Next Step; lower, but reject (T is falling)

function
value

x
Simulated Annealing T = Medium

Next Step; Accept since E is higher

function
value

x
Simulated Annealing T = Low

Next Step; Accept since E change small

function
value

x
Simulated Annealing T = Low

Next Step; Accept since E larget

function
value

x
Simulated Annealing T = Low

Next Step; Reject since E lower and T low

function
value

x
Simulated Annealing T = Low

Eventually converge to Maximum

function
value

x
Other Optimization Approach:
Genetic Algorithms
State = Chromosome
Genes are the variables
Optimization Function = Fitness
Create Generations of solutions
A set of several valid solution
Most fit solutions carry on
Generate next generation by:
Mutating genes of previous generation
Breeding Pick two (or more) parents and create
children by combining their genes

You might also like