FDI Vs Trade - Last

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 53

FDI & Trade Vs

Economic Growth

Presented to:
Dr. AHMED MABROUK

Prepared By;
Hossam Adel
Bassem Dyab
Ahmed Mohye
Dalia Mohamed
Heba Azzam
Outlines

Introduction
Research Question
Literature review
FDI and Economy

Trade and Economy

Trade and FDI

Turkey

Data interpretation of Turkey


Relation between FDI, GDP, Trade

Conclusion
Introduction

FDI and Trade are viewed through many economical


studies and theories as the important key players
affecting the economic growth of developing nations.
Some theories tend to prove that FDI is more suitable
for growing economies as it sees these economies eager
for capital, yet FDI is seen as the water that quenches
this thirst.
On the other hand some other theories look to FDI as
temporary effectors on economic growth as it may
destroy domestic capital investments as FDI has the
power of capital, developed technology, knowledge
and market access which may negatively reflected on
the long run of economic growth.

Most developing countries take trade as an engine for


economic growth. They depend on export as a
development strategy that put industrial companies
into competition and hence creates industrial
development and push the economic growth.
While the import substitution schools believes that
trade protection and industrial policies are constrains
on ability to conduct microeconomic policy.
Debates about trade and FDI and the linkage to
economic growth are still a subject of many studies
and theories specially after the big change happened
by the BRICS (Brazil, Russia, India, China and South
Africa) which prove a growth lead by developing
countries against the G7 economies
(the United States, Canada, France, Germany, Italy,
Japan, and the United Kingdom).
Our study in taking Turkey as a model for
economic growth changes as FDI & Trade had
the great effect on this development in the
recent 2 decades that was subject to many
studies in this regard.
Research Questions:

The Effect of FDI on Economic Growth

The Effect of Trade


( export and import and net trade )

The relation between FDI and Trade elements


Individually and collectively and their effect on
economic growth
Literature review
FDI ECONEMY

The neoclassical and endogenous growth models can


be considered as a theoretical foundation for FDI led
economic growth hypothesis of a country.

The neoclassical growth theories assume that FDI can


channel required funds to the productive sectors of a
capital shortage economy which, in turn, help increase
the economic growth rate by increasing the marginal
productivity of capital
On the other hand, the endogenous growth theories
state that the long-run growth of a country is not only
influenced by the volume of physical investment but
also depends on the efficiency of utilizing investment.

Therefore, endogenous growth model focuses on


incorporating organizational, managerial, technical
and human skills, innovation and technological
progress, and accumulation of knowledge
endogenously in the growth theories that are often
brought by FDI
Despite this positive link between FDI and economic
growth, empirical evidence also reveals negative
association between them.

The dependency theories also argue that foreign


gigantic players may create negative effect on the
growth and development of domestic firms of a host
country in the long-run as they have large volume of
capital, superior technologies, higher market access,
advanced marketing networks and better managerial
and human relation skills
TRADE ECONEMY

Export-led economic growth hypothesis.

the argument is exports increase factor productivity


because of better utilization of capacity and
economies of scale.

Exports are likely to alleviate foreign-exchange


constraints and thereby facilitate importation of
better technologies and production methods.
Open trade regimes go hand-in-hand with good
investment climates, technology externalities, and
learning effects.

In the long run, trade openness may encourage to


economic growth by diffusing technical

knowledge by importing high-tech items and from


the spillover effects of foreign direct investment
(FDI) for instance
Other studies, however, that question the wisdom of
trade openness.

j-curve relationship between trade liberalization and


economic growth; they also illustrated that trade
increases economic growth at certain levels of trade
liberalization and then declines it.
FDI TRADE

Multinational corporations (MNCs) the link between


the FDI and trade is underscored in the following
principle.

Operations of MNCs can be vertically linked with


the host nations, an increase in MNCs activities will
generate demand for intermediate goods and
capital goods from the home nation
FDI could be complementary or substitute and it
depends on the nature of FDI.

If it is a substitute for imports it improves the host


country's balance of payment position indicating
that FDI is used for exports. However, if it is
complementary the balance of payment is
adversely affected.

Horizontal investments in which a firm sets up


abroad to produce the same products that it
produces at home
Vertical investments in which the production
process is decomposed by stages according to
factor intensities in different countries

Theories of horizontal MNCs suggest they are


substitutes

Vertical MNCs suggest that FDI and trade are


complements. Here, firms geographically separate
different production stages across countries to take
advantage of lower factor prices
FDI and trade in economic growth of developing
countries, FDI and trade contribute toward
advancing economic growth in developing
countries. There is a strong, positive interaction
between FDI and trade.
TURKEY

FDI inflows and domestic investments on the economic


growth in Turkey during the period 19802012

There was a long run relationship among the economic


growth, FDI inflows and DI.

FDI inflows had negative effect on economic growth,


while gross domestic investments had positive impact
on economic growth.
Foreign direct investments (FDI) and import growth in
Turkey over the period 1950 to 2004.

FDI, GDP, and domestic price affect import demand


Causal relationship running from exports to economic
growth in Turkey from 1987-I to 2002-IV.

The study did not find significant positive spillovers from


FDI to GDP. Furthermore, the findings do not suggest a
kind of FDI-led export growth linkage
(FDI), import service sector, and export service sector

over 1980 to 2012.


An increase in the export service sector level shows that it

promotes imports.

Also the results of the study show that an increase in the export

service sector level stimulates inward FDI.


Trade openness on economic growth in the case of
Turkey
Sample period 1960 2014
In the short run, trade openness promotes economic
growth
In the long run this relationship is positive and
statistically insignificant
Data interpretation
FDI Vs Economic Growth
2001 to 2007
Seems to be a correlation in pattern though momentum
seems to vary that suggests presence of other factors
involving in GDP performance .

2009 2010
Sharp decline in both GDP and FDI might suggest a direct
causal effect

2011 to 2016
Almost complete mismatch between the two factors in terms
of performance pattern and magnitude . the reason could
be attributed to other more powerful factors intervenes the
GDP performance .
Trade VS GDP
Exports vs GDP
There seems to be a significantly strong resemblance between the two
factors performance curves . That emphasises the role of exports as a
determinant of GDP performance .
Imports Vs GDP
Surprisingly there is a semi complete matching between both imports and
GDP magnitudes .

There are many reasons for that requires investigation but may be attributed
to importing production goods or just imports due to improvement in economic
conditions .
Trade balance Vs GDP
2001 t0 2007
Increase in the negative gap between exports and imports
accompanied by increase in the GDP.

2008-2009
Sharp improvement in trade balance accompanied by
sharp decline in GDP

2010 to 2014 deficit in trade balance increases and then


decreases from 2014 to 2016 . on the GDP side we find the
same pattern inversely applied.

We can conclude a negative correlation between trade balance


and GDP . A finding that is contrary to the classical equation of
GDP = C+I+G+(X-M)
IMPORTS , EXPORTS VS FDI

IMPORTS , EXPORTS VS FDI


There is a perfect match between exports and FDI .
That suggests a strong positive correlation between the two measures and
implies a positive impact of FDI on exports .

Matching between imports and FDI is almost perfect in pattern, that might
be attributed to the need for production goods that are not available
domestically .
Major GDP sectors VS Imports

MAJOR GDP SECTORS VS IMPORTS


We can find a direct matching between imports and both GDP from construction
and manufacturing . this matching is lost completely when comparing these
variables to the GDP from agriculture .

FDI , EXPORTS ,IMPORTS


Conclusion

Thisstudy was conducted on the Turkish module . it


studied the past 16 years

We found a direct correlation between FDI and GDP


performance in terms of pattern and magnitude .

We could find direct correlation between exports and


GDP which implies a strong role of exports in GDP
performance improvement.

Surprisingly we could find an identical positive


correlation between imports and GDP
Conclusion
We could find an identical positive correlation that links
increase in trade deficit and increase in GDP . this is
totally contrary to the mathematical equation .

A very meaningful reason for the previous finding would


be the nature of imported goods . these would be
production goods that tremendously enhanced both
construction and manufacturing sectors .

The governmental expenditure would have been


increased especially in construction and infra structure
and that has led to both increase in FDI and GDP
according to the equation
THANKS

You might also like