0% found this document useful (0 votes)
184 views21 pages

FP1 Chapter 6 - Proof by Induction

Here are the steps to prove that n3 − 7n + 9 is divisible by 3 for all positive integers n using induction: 1. Basis Step: Let f(n) = n3 − 7n + 9. When n = 1, f(1) = 13 - 7(1) + 9 = 3. 3 is divisible by 3. 2. Assumption: Assume that for n = k, f(k) = k3 - 7k + 9 is divisible by 3. 3. Inductive Step: When n = k + 1, f(k + 1) = (k + 1)3 - 7(k + 1) + 9. Expanding this, we get

Uploaded by

Mohd.MehdiAzmet
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
184 views21 pages

FP1 Chapter 6 - Proof by Induction

Here are the steps to prove that n3 − 7n + 9 is divisible by 3 for all positive integers n using induction: 1. Basis Step: Let f(n) = n3 − 7n + 9. When n = 1, f(1) = 13 - 7(1) + 9 = 3. 3 is divisible by 3. 2. Assumption: Assume that for n = k, f(k) = k3 - 7k + 9 is divisible by 3. 3. Inductive Step: When n = k + 1, f(k + 1) = (k + 1)3 - 7(k + 1) + 9. Expanding this, we get

Uploaded by

Mohd.MehdiAzmet
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 21

FP1 Chapter 6 Proof By

Induction
Dr J Frost ([email protected])

Last modified: 31st March 2015


What is Proof by Induction?
We tend to use proof by induction whenever we want to show some property holds
for all integers (usually positive).

Example
1
Show that =1 = 2 + 1 for all .

Showing its true for a few values of is not a proof.


We need to show its true for ALL values of .
If its true for = 1, it must be true for = 2. If its true for = 3, it must be true for = 4.

= = = = =

If its true for = 2, it must be true for = 3.


Suppose we could prove the And so on. Hence the statement must be true for all .
above is true for the first
value of , i.e. = 1. Suppose that if we assumed its true
for = , then we could prove its
true for = + 1. Then:
Chapter Overview
We will use Proof of Induction for 4 different types of proof:

1
1 Summation Proofs Show that =1 = 2 + 1 for all .

2 Divisibility Proofs Prove that 3 7 + 9 is divisible by 3 for all + .

Recurrence Relation Given that +1 = 3 + 4, 1 = 1,


3 prove that = 3 2
Proofs

1 1 1 1 2
4 Matrix Proofs Prove that = for all + .
0 3 0 2

Bro Tip: Recall that is the set of all integers, and + is the set of all
positive integers. Thus = + .
The Four Steps of Induction
For all these types the process of proof is the same:

! Proof by induction:

Step 1: Basis: Prove the general statement is true for = 1.


Step 2: Assumption: Assume the general statement is true for = .
Step 3: Inductive: Show that the general statement is then true for = + 1.
Step 4: Conclusion: The general statement is then true for all positive integers .

(Step 1 is commonly known as the base case and Step 3 as the inductive case)
Type 1: Summation Proofs
Step 1: Basis: Prove the general statement is true for = 1.
Step 2: Assumption: Assume the general statement is true for = .
Step 3: Inductive: Show that the general statement is then true for = + 1.
Step 4: Conclusion: The general statement is then true for all positive integers .

Show that =1(2 1) = 2 for all .

1 Basis Step When = 1, = 1=1 2 1 = 2 1 1 = 1


= 12 = 1. = so?summation true for = 1.

2 Assumption Assume summation true for = .


So =1(2 1) = 2 ?
3 Inductive When = + 1:
+1

2 1 = 2 1 + 2 +1 1
=1 =1 ?
= 2 + 2 + 1
= +1 2
Hence true when = + 1.

4 Conclusion Since true for = 1 and if true for = , true for = + 1,


true for all . ?
More on the Conclusion Step
As result is true for = 1, this implies true for all positive integers and hence
true by induction.

I lifted this straight from a mark scheme, hence use this exact wording!
The mark scheme specifically says:

(For method mark)


Any 3 of these seen anywhere in the proof:
true for =
assume true for =
true for = +
true for all /positive integers
Test Your Understanding
Edexcel FP1 Jan 2010

?
Exercise 6A
All questions except Q2.
Type 2: Divisibility Proofs
Step 1: Basis: Prove the general statement is true for = 1.
Step 2: Assumption: Assume the general statement is true for = .
Step 3: Inductive: Show that the general statement is then true for = + 1.
Step 4: Conclusion: The general statement is then true for all positive integers .

Prove by induction that 32 + 11 is divisible by 4 for all positive integers .

1 Basis Step Let = 32 + 11, where + .


? by 4.
1 = 32 + 11 = 20 which is divisible

2 Assumption Assume that for = , = 32 + 11 is divisible by 4 for + .


?


Type 2: Divisibility Proofs
Step 1: Basis: Prove the general statement is true for = 1.
Step 2: Assumption: Assume the general statement is true for = .
Step 3: Inductive: Show that the general statement is then true for = + 1.
Step 4: Conclusion: The general statement is then true for all positive integers .

Prove by induction that 32 + 11 is divisible by 4 for all positive integers .

3 Inductive Method 1 (the textbooks method, which I dont like)


Find the difference between successive terms and show this is
divisible by the number of interest.
+ 1 = 32 +1 + 11 Bro Tip: Putting in terms of 32 allows us to
= 32 32 + 11 better compare with the assumption case
since the power is now the same.
= 9 32 + 11 ?
+ 1 = 9 32 + 11 32 + 11
= 8 32 = 4 2 32 Method: You need to explicitly factor out 4 to show divisibility by 4.
Method: Then write + 1 back in term of () and the
+1 = +4 2 32 difference. We know both the terms on the RHS are divisible by 4.

Therefore () is divisible by 4 when = + 1.

4 Conclusion Since true for = 1 and if true for = , true for = + 1,


true for all .
?
Type 2: Divisibility Proofs
Prove by induction that 32 + 11 is divisible by 4 for all positive integers .

3 Inductive Method 2 (presented as Alternative Method in mark schemes)


Directly write ( + 1) in form + ( ) by splitting off ()
or some multiple of it, where is the divisibility number.
+ 1 = 32 +1 + 11
= 32 32 + 11
= 9 32 + 11
= 32 + 11 + 8 32 ? Method: We have separated into
32 + 8 32 because it allowed us to then
= + 4 2 32 replace 32 + 11 with ()

Therefore () is divisible by 4 when = + 1.


This method is far superior for two reasons:
a) The idea of separating out () is much more conceptually similar to both summation
proofs and (when we encounter it) matrix proofs, whereas using + 1 () is
specific to divisibility proofs. Thus we neednt see divisibility proofs as a different
method from the other types.
b) Well encounter a question next where we need to get in the form + 1 =
+ ( ), i.e. we in fact separate out a multiple of (). Thus causes absolute
havoc for Method 1 as our difference + 1 () has to refer to (), which is
mathematically inelegant.
Type 2: Divisibility Proofs
Prove by induction that 8 3 is divisible by 5.

2 Assumption ? 3 is divisible by 5 for +.


Assume that for = , = 8

3 Inductive When = + 1:
+ 1 = 8+1 3+1
= 8 8 3 3
?
= 3 8 3 + 5 8
Method: We have 3 lots of 8 and
3 we can split off.
Using Method 2
= 3 + 5(8 )
therefore true for = + 1.
Test Your Understanding
Step 1: Basis: Prove the general statement is true for = 1.
Step 2: Assumption: Assume the general statement is true for = .
Step 3: Inductive: Show that the general statement is then true for = + 1.
Step 4: Conclusion: The general statement is then true for all positive integers .

Prove by induction that 3 7 + 9 is divisible by 3 for all positive integers .

1 Basis Step Let = 3 7 + 9, where + .


1 = 3 which is divisible by 3. ?

2 Assumption Assume that for = , = 3 7 + 9 is divisible by 3 for


+ . ?
3 Inductive Method 1: Method 2:
+1 = +1 37 +1 +9 +1 = +1 37 +1 +9
= =
= 3 + 3 2 4 + 3 = 3 + 3 2 4 + 3
+ 1 = = 3 2 + 2 ? = 3 7 + 9 + 3 2 + 3 6
+ 1 = + 3 2 + 2 = + 3 2 + 2
Therefore () is divisible by 3 when = + 1. Therefore () is divisible by 3 when = + 1.

4 Conclusion Since true for = 1 and if true for = , true for = + 1,


true for all . ?
Exercise 6B
Page 130.
All questions.
Type 3: Recurrence Relation Proofs
Step 1: Basis: Prove the general statement is true for = 1. Notice that were trying
Step 2: Assumption: Assume the general statement is true for = . to prove a position-to-
Step 3: Inductive: Show that the general statement is then true for = + 1. term formula from a
Step 4: Conclusion: The general statement is then true for all positive integers . term-to-term one.

Given that +1 = 3 + 4 and 1 = 1, prove by induction that = 3 2

1 Basis Step When = 1, 1 = 31 2 = 1 as given.


?
IMPORTANT NOTE: The textbook gets this wrong (bottom of Page 131),
saying that is required. I checked a mark scheme it isnt.
Bro Tip: You need to carefully reflect on what statement you are trying to prove, i.e. = 3 2, and what
statement is GIVEN (and thus already know to be true), i.e.+1 = 3 + 4

2 Assumption Assume that for = , = 3 2 is true for + .


?
3 Inductive Then +1 = 3 + 4 Method: Sub in your
=3 3
2 +4 assumption expression
?
= 3+1 6 + 4 into the recurrence.
= 3+1 2
Bro Tip: For harder questions, write out what youre trying to prove in advance, i.e.
that we want to get 3+1 2, , to help guide your manipulation.

4 Conclusion ?
Since true for = 1 and if true for = , true for = + 1, true for all .
Test Your Understanding
Edexcel FP1 Jan 2011

?
Recurrence Relations based on two previous terms
Step 1: Basis: Prove the general statement is true for = 1.
Step 2: Assumption: Assume the general statement is true for = .
Step 3: Inductive: Show that the general statement is then true for = + 1.
Step 4: Conclusion: The general statement is then true for all positive integers .

Given that +2 = 5+1 6 and 1 = 13, 2 = 35, prove by induction that


= 2+1 + 3+1
1 Basis Step When = 1, 1 = 22 + 32 = 13 as given.
? given.
When = 2, 2 = 23 + 33 = 35 as
We have two base cases so had to check 2 terms!
2 Assumption Assume that for = and = + 1, = 2+1 + 3+1 and
+1 = 2+2 + 3+2 is true for ?+ . We need two previous instances of
in our assumption case now.
3 Inductive Let = + 1
(Brominder: its worth noting in advance were aiming for +1 = 2 +1 +1 + 3 +1 +1 )
Then +2 = 5+1 6
= 5 2+1 + 3+1 ?
6 2+1 + 3+1
=
= 2+3 + 3+3 = 2+2+1 + 3+2+1

4 Conclusion Since true for = 1 and = 2 and if true for = and = + 1,


true for = + 2, ?
true for all . (Warning: slightly different to before)
Exercise 6C
Page 132.
Q1, 3, 5, 7
Type 4: Matrix Proofs
Step 1: Basis: Prove the general statement is true for = 1.
Step 2: Assumption: Assume the general statement is true for = .
Step 3: Inductive: Show that the general statement is then true for = + 1.
Step 4: Conclusion: The general statement is then true for all positive integers .


1 1 1 1 2
Prove by induction that = for all + .
0 2 0 2
1 Basis Step 1 1 1 1 1
When = 1, = =
0 2 0 2
1 1 1 ?
= 1 1 12 = . As = , true for = 1.
0 2 0 2

2 Assumption 1 1 1 1 2
0 3 ?
Assume true = , i.e. =
0 2
3 Inductive When = + 1,
1 1 +1 1 1 1 1 1 1 2 1 1
= =
0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2 0 2
= = 1 1 +1 2+1
? Method: As with summation and divisibility
0 2 proofs, its just a case of separating off the
Therefore true when = + 1. assumption expression.

4 Conclusion Since true for = 1 and if true for = , true for = + 1,


true for all . ?
Test Your Understanding
Step 1: Basis: Prove the general statement is true for = 1.
Step 2: Assumption: Assume the general statement is true for = .
Step 3: Inductive: Show that the general statement is then true for = + 1.
Step 4: Conclusion: The general statement is then true for all positive integers .


2 9 3 + 1 9
Prove by induction that = for all + .
1 4 3 + 1
1 Basis Step 2 9 1 2 9
When = 1, = =
1 4 1 4
3 + 1 9 2 ? 9
= = . As = , true for = 1.
1 3+1 1 4

2 9 3 + 1 9
1 4 ?
2 Assumption Assume true = , i.e. =
3 + 1
3 Inductive When = + 1,
2 9 +1 2 9 2 9 3 + 1 9 2 9
= =
1 4 1 4 1 4 3 + 1 1 4
==
3 2 9 + 9
=
? + 1 + 1 9( + 1)
3
1 3 + 4 ( + 1) 3 +1 +1
Therefore true when = + 1.

4 Conclusion Since true for = 1 and if true for = , true for = + 1,


true for all . ?
Exercise 6D
Page 134.
All questions.

You might also like