Gurgaon Master Plan
Gurgaon Master Plan
Gurgaon Master Plan
Unclear vision of a
future megapolis
Dr Bhawani Shankar Tripathy
Empowering local bodies for better governance, September 1, 2013
Residential
Notified in 2007
Population increase from 22 lakh to 37 lakh
(15 lakh plus)
Area increase from 8000 ha to 37,000 ha
Population density 200 per ha
Additional sectors 58-115
Commercial
Land reserved for big
commercial malls
and corporates
Max 50%
commercial areas to
be developed by
privaterest by
public
Industrial
In addition Manesar,
new industrial areas
have been proposed
along express
highway adjacent to
IMT Manesar.
Transport and communication1
Construction of 3 link roads between Delhi-Gurgaon
90 m wide road link between Vasant Kunj to MG Road (along
Biodiveristy Park periphery)
90 m wide road link from Andheria Mor to Gurgaon-Faridabad
road through Mandi and Gual Pahari.
150 m wide road link between Dwarka and Palam Vihar.
Increase in width of Master roads from 30m to 60m and
75m
Northern (150 m), Southern (90 m) wide Peripheral
roads
MRTS corridor along the NPR proposed. Another MRTS
proposed along Mehrauli road to extending up to the
proposed 90-m link road with Delhi via Gwalpahari.
Transport and communication2
Construction of EWS
house/flats which shall
remain the property of
the state/housing
apartment associations
but shall be rented out
on nominal rent to EWS
category applicants
under government
supervision.
Housing for the poor and middle
In sector-68, a pocket of approx 50 ha with density of
1,125 persons/ha reserved for providing housing to low
and medium income group.
Density is against average of 270 persons/ha for the city
as a whole and is too high.
Planned housing will cater to only about 56,000 of the
low income (2.8% of total population).
It needs to be drastically raised and spread over a
number of sectors
National average of poor in urban areas is about 20%.
Housing suggestion
Government must retain lien on all EWS constructions
and supervise the renting out of these properties only to
pre-defined EWS categories as given in state policy
document.
Planning for educational hubs is unclear
DDP had 9 points. FDP has 14. The new headings are:
10. Natural Conservation Zone
11. Environmental Concerns
12. Conservation of Heritage sites
13. Development of infrastructure
14. Land use distribution of Hubs