Research
Research
Research
DRIED PAPAYA
(Carica) LEAVES
AS ORGANIC
MULCH TO By:
Farmers around the world and people who love to plant are experiencing dicfficulty due to
insects being an annoying thing to their crops leading the crop to slow down its growth
Philippines had been trough a tough obstacle when typhoon Haiyan strutted in the Northern
Philippines and destroyed hectares of land for crop production and irrigated agriculture which is
one of the main source of food food production for tha past decades. Due to this kind of
problem, people around the world are looking for their own way of organic ground covering that
could help problems about land damge that affects crop production.
Mulching in agriculture provides a safe yet eqally profitable in the process of enriching and
fertilizing the soil planted with crops. Most often-used mulches are of organic composition, such
as barks. Unlike synthetic fertilizers and herbicides, these organic mulches pose no little
damage tothe soil and crops.
And now generally speaking, the researchers will join the race of finding organic ground
covering.
Theoretical
Background
This study assumes that Dried Carica Papaya Leaves is feasible
organic mulch to plants.
Mulching Principle also stated that what type of site to select, type of
mulch to use a specific plant, erosoin control mats, and porous
synthetic weed barriers.
Reseach Design
Process
Research Method
The proponent will use the two group design to this precise
study. The design is most appropriate because there are two
comparable groups that are employed and are both
experimental groups.
The MannWhitney U test remains the logical choice when the data are ordinal but not interval scaled, so that
the spacing between adjacent values cannot be assumed to be constant.
When normality holds, the MannWhitney U test has an (asymptotic) efficiency of 3/ or about 0.95 when
compared to the t-test. For distributions sufficiently far from normal and for sufficiently large sample sizes, the
MannWhitney U test is considerably more efficient than the t-test
Overall, the robustness makes the MannWhitney U test more widely applicable than the t-test, and for large
samples from the normal distribution, the efficiency loss compared to the t-test is only 5%, so one can
recommend the MannWhitney U test as the default test for comparing interval or ordinal measurements with
similar distributions.