INSTITUTE OF ENGINEERING AND

TECHNOLOGY ,LUCKNOW

DISSERTATION PROPOSAL OF
THESIS

PRESENTED BY- SAUHARDRA

OJHA

1505205011 (M.TECH,STR)
A BRIEF INTRODUCTION ABOUT TOPIC

According to IS1893-2000, dual system can

be defined as

Shear wall with moment resisting frame

Braced frame with moment resisting frame
The moment resisting frame should be designed to
independently resist at least 25% of design base
shear and their relative stiffness.
OMRF with shear wall 3.0
SMRF with shear wall 4.0
Ductile shear wall with OMRF 4.5
Ductile shear wall with SMRF 5.0
CONTINUED..
The dual system is the one that both frames and shear walls contribute in
resisting the lateral loads, where the frame is a group of beams and
columns connected with each other by rigid joints
and the frames bend in accordance with (Shear Mode), whereas the
deflection of the shear walls is by a (Bending Mode) like the cantilever walls.

The frames will try to pull the shear walls in the top of the building while in
the bottom they will try to push the walls, so the frames will resist the
lateral loads in the upper part of the building, which means an increase
shear walls will resist most of the vertical loads in the lower part of the
building.
 BEHAVIOUR OF ORDINARY
WALL AND SHEAR WALL

BENDING BEHAVIOUR
TRUSS ANALOGY
 BEHAVIOUR OF SHEAR WALL AND
FRAME

SHEAR WALL
FRAME
NEED OF AND SCOPE OF DUAL
SYSTEM

The lateral load-resisting structure comprises ofmoment frameand

shear walls acting together in the same direction, and it is mostly
applicable to reinforced concrete structures
The bare frame alone can not be able to resist the earthquake in
multi storey building.
The walls may have a positive effect on the performance of the
frames such as by preventing a soft storey collapse.
Due to increase in the value of response reduction factor R, the
critical stress fuction i.e. storey drift ,deflection ,stiffness, strength
and other stress function.
The lateral load resisted by shear wall and bare frame is in their
proportion of stiffness
which leads to a better load path and load distribution mechanism.
 AIM AND OBJECTIVE
Calculate the design load for bare frame

Calculate the stiffness of the dual system

To find the load distribution between the

two system

And find the min. value of design base

shear for bare frame
 LITERATURE REVIEW
S.N YEAR LITERATURE TOPIC ABSTRACT
1: BEHAVIOUR OF MOMENT In this paper two structural systems i.e.
RESISTING FRAME AND moment resisting frame and wall-frame
2016 SHEAR WALL FRAME structure is compared in teams of time
STRUCTURE period, deflection and drift. The
analysis of 30 story RC building is
carried out in ETABS

2: PERFORMANCE BASED Present study includes linear-static and

SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF RC non-linear static analysis with different
2015 BUILDING CONSIDERING shear wall arrangements on dual
THE EFFECT OF DUAL systems such as flat slabs and shear
SYSTEMS walls & moment resisting frames and
shear walls for different irregular plans.
3: SEISMIC PERFORMANCE This paper is intended to evaluate the
EVALUATION OF seismic performance of a twelve-story
MULTISTORY REINFORCED reinforced concrete moment-resisting
CONCRETE MOMENT frame structure with shear walls for
RESISTING FRAME different earthquake using time history
STRUCTURE WITH SHEAR analysis
WALLS
S.N YEAR LITERATURE TOPIC ABSTRACT
O
4: 2014 SEISMIC DEFORMATION In this study a detailed parametric
DEMANDS ON study was conducted to investigate the
SHEAR WALLS IN FRAME- seismic deformation demands in terms
WALL of drift ratio, plastic base rotation and
SYSTEMS compressive strain in frame-wall
systems.
5: 2014 PERFORMANCE In this paper seismic performance
EVALUATION OF SHEAR different locations of shear wall is
WALL-FRAME studied with respect to strength and
INTERACTION(DUAL stiffness. Finite element software E-
SYSTEM) BASED ON TABS
LOCATION OF SHEAR
WALL
6: 2013 A well designed system of shear walls
in a building frame
SEISMIC PERFORMANCE improves its seismic performance
EVALUATION OF significantly. The configurations of RC
MULTISTORIED RC moment resisting framed building
FRAMED BUILDINGS structure with different arrangements
WITH SHEAR WALL of shear walls are considered for
evaluation of seismic performance
7: 2013 OPTIMAL SEISMIC optimal seismic design of dual systems
DESIGN OF REINFORCED (shear wall-frame) are proposed. With
S.N YEAR LITERATURE TOPIC ABSTRACT
O
8: 2012 COMPARATIVE STUDY This paper deals with the comparison
BETWEEN DUAL between three dual lateral load resisting
SYSTEMS FOR LATERAL systems ,1. Moment resisting frame with
LOAD RESISTANCE IN shear wall (MRSW), 2. Moment resisting
BUILDINGS OF frame with bracing (MRBR) 3. Flat slab
VARIABLE HEIGHTS with shear wall (FSSW).
9: 2010 NONLINEAR ANALYSIS In this study, different approaches for
METHODS FOR linear and nonlinear modeling of the
REINFORCED CONCRETE shear walls in structural analyses of
BUILDINGS buildings are studied and applied to RC
WITH SHEAR WALLS building with shear walls. The analyses
results of different approaches are
compared in terms of overall behavior of
the structural systems
10: 2008 COMPARISON OF In this study, different approaches of
PRACTICAL modeling the shear walls in structural
APPROACHES FOR analyses of buildings are discussed and
MODELLINGSHEAR compared
WALLS IN STRUCTURAL
ANALYSES OF
BUILDINGS
11: 2008 BASE SHEAR The model buildings were 4, 7 and 10
REDISTRIBUTION stories high with two frames and one
BETWEEN THE R/C DUAL wall-frame in longitudinal and four frames
S.NO YEAR LITERATURE ABSTRACT
TOPIC
12: 2007 Evaluation of the This paper assesses the significance of the
ASCE 7-05 25% design requirement for the secondary
Standard for Dual moment frames (SMF) in dual systems
Systems: with consideration of current structural
Response History engineering practice. Three 20-story
Analysis of a Tall buckling-restrained braced frame
Buckling- (BRBF) dual system structures have been
Restrained Braced designed with varying relative strengths
Frame Dual between the braced and special moment
frame systems.
13: Lateral Load Various example on lateral load resisting
Resisting Systems system
IIT KANPUR short
term course
14: EQ tips by IIT Explanatory Examples on Indian Seismic
Kanpur and NICEE Code IS 1893 (Part I)
15: ASCE and FEMA
codes on different
aspect of
structure
 SUMMARY OF LITERATURE REVIEW

TARGET ACCOMPLISHED TARGET YET TO ACHIEVE

Performance based analysis of Two R.C dual system can be

different STR (with and without infill compare for different time history
and different location of shear wall ) analysis
and comparison of stress function

Two dual system, steel bracing and

Nonlinear static analysis of dual
shear wall comparative study system subjected to different soil
structure
Analytical study stress function of
bare frame and wall frame study To find out the necessity behind the
distribution of base shear between
Performance based study of Shear frame and shear wall
wall frame interaction of dual system
a/c to FEMA 356
Comparison of parameter ductility
Different dual system according to ratio ,strength ratio, capacity ratio in
ASCE code, MRSW, MRBR,FSSW with dual system
variable height.
 VARIOUS SEISMIC ANALYSIS

Linear analysis Non linear

analysis

Static dynamics static

dynamics

IS code R.S.A. Push

over time history
 METHODOLOGY OF WORK
I will take plan regular ,symmetrical multi storey building .

Modeling the building in SAP 2000 and apply the loading on that and apply
time history analysis any time history that is available. .

The building is first without shear wall i.e only special moment resisting
frame only and analyze it for the given time history load.

Calculate the base shear and its distribution along the height of building
And also calculate the intra storey drift and shear force and moment at
required location.

Again the plan is modeled and this time I will add shear wall in that model so
that to approach as to building with dual system i.e. SMRF with shear wall
Analyze the dual system behaviour for the time history that is apply in SMRF
frame only.
Calculate the load such that base shear and its distribution,intra-storey
drift, moment and shear and other stress function that are required at
desire location in the structure that is modeled

The stress function calculated in first part i.e. with SMRF are noted and
down the base shear and its distribution is noted at floor level.

The second analysis result is also noted down and their stress function the
base shear and its distribution at floor level is noted

According to IS 1893-2000 we have to ensure that building with dual system

can have-
The moment-resisting frame must be capable of resisting at least 25
percent of the base shear, and the two systems must be designed to resist
the total lateral load in proportion to their relative rigidities.
The two systems are designed to resist the total design force in proportion
to their lateral stiffness considering the interaction of the dual system at all
floor levels.
 SCOPE OF WORK

The usefulness of structural walls in the framing of buildings has long

been recognized. It is generally preferred to use shear wall in
combination with moment resisting frame.

The scope of various dual system building is such that the

combination is used for multistory building which is situated in very
prone EQ area such as in zone 4 and zone 5
The use of moment resisting frame alone can not be able to resist
the major EQ, so the dual system is the substitute of that structure
The load distribution between the shear wall and frame should be
according to their stiffness such that a good load path that leads to
proper dissipation of energy.
The critical stress function in the dual system is reduced due to
increase in ductility and increase in response reduction factor.
 REFERENCES

prutha vyas Behaviour of Moment Resisting Frame and Shear wall

Frame Structure , 2016, International Journal of Innovative and Emerging
Research in Engineering Volume 3, Issue 4, 2016

Md Zibran Pawaar, Khalid Nayaz Khan, Syed Ahamed Raza

PERFORMANCE BASED SEISMIC ANALYSIS OF RC BUILDING CONSIDERING
THE EFFECT OF DUAL SYSTEMS 2015, IJRET: International Journal of
Research in Engineering and Technology.

Shachindra Kumar Chadhar, Dr. Abhay Sharma Comparative Study of RC

Moment Resisting Frame of Variable Heights with Steel Bracing and Shear
Wall,2015 International Journal of Civil and Structural Engineering
Research.
Mohd Azheruddin, Prof. Lokesh.G EVALUATION OF PERFORMANCE LEVEL
OF SYMMETRIC AND ASYMMETRIC
BUILDING BY ADOPTING A DUAL SYSTEM OF FRAMING,2015,
INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF ENGINEERING SCIENCES & RESEARCH
TECHNOLOGY
 Dipali Patel a, J. A. Amin,2015 Evaluation of Shear Wall-RC Frame Interaction of
High-rise Buildings using 2-D Model Approach JOURNAL OF MATERIALS AND
ENGINEERING STRUCTURES 2 (2015) 111119
. Kazaz SEISMIC DEFORMATION DEMANDS ONSHEAR WALLS IN FRAME-
WALLSYSTEMS Tenth U.S. National Conference on Earthquake Engineering Frontiers
of Earthquake Engineering July 21-25, 2014 Anchorage, Alaska
Prasad Vaidya Performance Evaluation of Shear Wall-Frame Interaction System
Based on Location of Shear Wall,2014 IJETT ISSN: 2350 08 | September 2014 |
Volume 1 | Issue 1 | 115
Shaik Kamal Mohammed Azam, Vinod Hosur Seismic Performance Evaluation of
Multistoried RC framed buildings with Shear wall International Journal of Scientific &
Engineering Research Volume 4, Issue 1, January-2013
Ali Kaveh and Pooya Zakian , Optimal Seismic Design of Reinforced Concrete Shear
Wall-Frame Structures KSCE Journal of Civil Engineering (2014) 18(7):2181-2190
Govindan Nandini Devi Behaviour of Reinforced Concrete Dual Structural System:
Strength, Deformation Characteristics, and FailureMechanism IJACSIT International
Journal of Engineering and Technology, Vol. 5, No. 1, February 2013
MS. KIRAN PARMAR and PROF. MAZHAR DHANKOT COMPARATIVE STUDY BETWEEN
DUAL SYSTEMS FOR LATERAL LOAD RESISTANCE IN BUILDINGS OF VARIABLE
HEIGHTS ISSN: 0975 6760| NOV 12 TO OCT 13 | VOLUME 02, ISSUE 02
 Y.M. Fahjan J. Kubin & M.T. Tan Nonlinear Analysis Methods for
Reinforced Concrete Buildings with Shear walls14 ECEE 2010
J. KUBIN1, Y. M. FAHJAN2 and M. T. TAN The 14th World Conference on
Earthquake Engineering October 12-17, 2008, Beijing, China
COMPARISON OF PRACTICAL APPROACHES FOR MODELLING
SHEARWALLS IN STRUCTURAL ANALYSES OF BUILDINGS
V. Sigmund1 and I.Guljas2 and M.Hadzima-Nyarko The 14th World
Conference on Earthquake EngineeringOctober 12-17, 2008, Beijing,
China BASE SHEAR REDISTRIBUTION BETWEEN THE R/C DUAL
SYSTEM STRUCTURAL COMPONENTS