KDIGO Guidelines
KDIGO Guidelines
KDIGO Guidelines
27 guideline statements
Major content areas:
Immunosuppression
Graft monitoring and infections
Cardiovascular disease risk
Malignancies
Other complications
Immunosuppression
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)
Induction
Maintenance: initial
Maintenance: long-term
Strategies to reduce cost
Monitoring medications
Treatment of acute rejection
Chronic allograft nephropathy
Malignancies
18) Cancer of the skin and lip
19) Non-skin malignancies
20) Immunosuppressive medication reduction
Other Complications
21) Bone disease
22) Hematologic complications
23) Hyperuricemia and gout
24) Growth and development
25) Sexual function and fertility
26) Life style
27) Mental health
Initial Maintenance
Immunosuppressive Medications
Recommendations:
A combination of immunosuppressive medications
as maintenance therapy including a CNI and an
antiproliferative agent, with or without
corticosteroids. (1B)
Tacrolimus be the first-line CNI used. (2A)
Tacrolimus or CsA be started before or at the time
of transplantation, rather than delayed until the
onset of graft function. (2D tacrolimus; 2B CsA)
Mycophenolate be the first-line antiproliferative
agent. (2B)
CNI, calcineurin inhibitor; CsA, cyclosporine A; mTORi,
mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor(s).
Initial Maintenance
Immunosuppressive Medications
(Contd..)
Recommendations:
In patients who are at low immunological
risk and who receive induction therapy,
corticosteroids could be discontinued
during the first week after
transplantation. (2B)
If mTORi are used, they should not be
started until graft function is established
and surgical wounds are healed. (1B)
Rationale
Used in combination and at reduced doses, drugs that have
different mechanisms of action may achieve additive
efficacy with limited toxicity.
The earlier that therapeutic blood levels of a CNI can be
attained, the more effective the CNI will be in preventing
acute rejection.
There is no reason to delay the initiation of a CNI, and no
evidence that delaying the CNI prevents or ameliorates
DGF.
Compared to CsA, tacrolimus reduces the risk of acute
rejection and improves graft survival during the first year
of transplantation.
Rationale
Low-dose tacrolimus minimizes the risk of new-onset diabetes after
transplantation (NODAT) compared to higher doses of tacrolimus.
Compared with placebo and azathioprine, mycophenolate reduces
the risk of acute rejection; there is some evidence
thatmycophenolate improves long-term graft survival compared
with azathioprine.
Avoiding the use of maintenance corticosteroids beyond the first
week after kidney transplantation reduces adverse effects without
affecting graft survival.
Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) have not been
shown to improve patient outcomes when used either as
replacement for antiproliferative agents or CNIs, or as add-on
therapy, and they have important short- and long-term adverse
effects
Long-Term Maintenance
Immunosuppressive Medications
Recommendations:
Using lowest planned doses of maintenance
immunosuppressive medications by 2
4months after transplantation, if there has
been no acute rejection. (2C)
CNIs be continued rather than withdrawn. (2B)
If prednisone is being used beyond the first
week after transplantation, we suggest
prednisone be continued rather than
withdrawn. (2C)
Rationale
If low-dose CNI was not implemented at the time of
transplantation, CNI dose reduction >24months after
transplantation may reduce toxicity yet prevent acute
rejection.
RCTs show that CNI withdrawal leads to increased acute
rejection, without altering graft survival.
RCTs show that steroid withdrawal more than 3 months
after transplantation increases the risk of acute rejection.
Different immunosuppressive medications have different
toxicity profiles and patients vary in their susceptibility
to adverse effects.
Guideline Coordination
Canadian Society of Nephrology (CSN)
Guidelines
Caring for Australians with Renal
Impairment (CARI) Guidelines - ANZSN
United Kingdom Renal Association
Guidelines
European Best Practice (EBPG) Guidelines
ERA/EDTA
Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative
(KDOQI) Guidelines - NKF
KDIGO
Guideline Coordination
Globalize (Share) the Evidence Localize
the Decision Making
New CPGs: Global KDIGO Guidelines
Local Implementation
Existing CPGs: Coordinated, cooperative
process of updating
Guideline Coordination
What we can do together
Uniformity in grading the evidence and strength of
recommendations (Grading the evidence and recommendations for
clinical practice guidelines-A position statement from KDIGO).
Website Resources
International Clinical Practice
Guidelines in Nephrology
Guideline Development Summaries
Target Ranges Comparisons
Position Statements
CKD-Mineral and Bone Disorder
Classification of CKD
www.KDIGO.org
Website Resources
Global Nephrology Guideline
Database:
Guideline Overviews
Guideline Summaries by Topic
Guideline Target Comparisons
WWW.KDIGO.ORG
Third KDIGO
Controversies Conference
Fourth KDIGO
Controversies Conference
CKD as a Global Public Health
Problem: Approaches and Initiatives
Co-Chairs: Andrew Levey, Kai-Uwe Eckardt, Adeera
Levin, Allan Collins, Meguid El-Nahas
Amsterdam, Netherlands
October 12-14, 2006
Normal
Increased
Increased
risk
Screening
CKD risk
for CKD
reduction;
risk factors:
Screening for
diabetes
CKD
hypertension
age >60
family history
US ethnic
minorities
Damage
GFR
GFR
Kidney
Kidney
failure
failure
Diagnosis
Estimate
Replacement
& treatment; progression;
by dialysis
Treat
Treat
& transplant
comorbid complications;
conditions;
Prepare for
Slow
replacement
progression
CKD
CKD
death
Sixth KDIGO
Controversies Conference
Coordination of Global Practice
Guidelines for Anemia in CKD
Co-Chairs: Francesco Locatelli &
Allen Nissenson
New York
October 15-16, 2007
Fifth KDIGO
Controversies Conference
Clinical Practice Guidelines:
Methodology and Transparency
Co-Chairs: Robert Alpern, Charles
van Ypersele, Katrin Uhlig, &
Alison MacLeod
New York
October 12-13, 2007
Second KDIGO
Controversies Conference
SUMMARY
Bertram L. Kasiske, MD
KDIGO Co-Chair
THANK YOU