KDIGO Guidelines

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 41

Guideline Statements

27 guideline statements
Major content areas:
Immunosuppression
Graft monitoring and infections
Cardiovascular disease risk
Malignancies
Other complications

Immunosuppression
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
6)
7)

Induction
Maintenance: initial
Maintenance: long-term
Strategies to reduce cost
Monitoring medications
Treatment of acute rejection
Chronic allograft nephropathy

Graft Monitoring and


Infections
8) Monitoring kidney function
9) Kidney biopsy
10) Recurrent disease
11) Non-adnherence
12) Vaccination
13) Viral diseases
14) Other infections

Cardiovascular Disease Risk

15) Diabetes mellitus


16) Hypertension, dyslipidemia, tobacco use and
obesity
17) Cardiovascular disease management

Malignancies
18) Cancer of the skin and lip
19) Non-skin malignancies
20) Immunosuppressive medication reduction

Other Complications
21) Bone disease
22) Hematologic complications
23) Hyperuricemia and gout
24) Growth and development
25) Sexual function and fertility
26) Life style
27) Mental health

Initial Maintenance
Immunosuppressive Medications
Recommendations:
A combination of immunosuppressive medications
as maintenance therapy including a CNI and an
antiproliferative agent, with or without
corticosteroids. (1B)
Tacrolimus be the first-line CNI used. (2A)
Tacrolimus or CsA be started before or at the time
of transplantation, rather than delayed until the
onset of graft function. (2D tacrolimus; 2B CsA)
Mycophenolate be the first-line antiproliferative
agent. (2B)
CNI, calcineurin inhibitor; CsA, cyclosporine A; mTORi,
mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitor(s).

Initial Maintenance
Immunosuppressive Medications
(Contd..)

Recommendations:
In patients who are at low immunological
risk and who receive induction therapy,
corticosteroids could be discontinued
during the first week after
transplantation. (2B)
If mTORi are used, they should not be
started until graft function is established
and surgical wounds are healed. (1B)

Rationale
Used in combination and at reduced doses, drugs that have
different mechanisms of action may achieve additive
efficacy with limited toxicity.
The earlier that therapeutic blood levels of a CNI can be
attained, the more effective the CNI will be in preventing
acute rejection.
There is no reason to delay the initiation of a CNI, and no
evidence that delaying the CNI prevents or ameliorates
DGF.
Compared to CsA, tacrolimus reduces the risk of acute
rejection and improves graft survival during the first year
of transplantation.

Rationale
Low-dose tacrolimus minimizes the risk of new-onset diabetes after
transplantation (NODAT) compared to higher doses of tacrolimus.
Compared with placebo and azathioprine, mycophenolate reduces
the risk of acute rejection; there is some evidence
thatmycophenolate improves long-term graft survival compared
with azathioprine.
Avoiding the use of maintenance corticosteroids beyond the first
week after kidney transplantation reduces adverse effects without
affecting graft survival.
Mammalian target of rapamycin inhibitors (mTORi) have not been
shown to improve patient outcomes when used either as
replacement for antiproliferative agents or CNIs, or as add-on
therapy, and they have important short- and long-term adverse
effects

Long-Term Maintenance
Immunosuppressive Medications
Recommendations:
Using lowest planned doses of maintenance
immunosuppressive medications by 2
4months after transplantation, if there has
been no acute rejection. (2C)
CNIs be continued rather than withdrawn. (2B)
If prednisone is being used beyond the first
week after transplantation, we suggest
prednisone be continued rather than
withdrawn. (2C)

Rationale
If low-dose CNI was not implemented at the time of
transplantation, CNI dose reduction >24months after
transplantation may reduce toxicity yet prevent acute
rejection.
RCTs show that CNI withdrawal leads to increased acute
rejection, without altering graft survival.
RCTs show that steroid withdrawal more than 3 months
after transplantation increases the risk of acute rejection.
Different immunosuppressive medications have different
toxicity profiles and patients vary in their susceptibility
to adverse effects.

Topic Selection and Prioritization Process

For Clinical Practice


Guidelines and
Conferences

Prioritization of CPG Development*

Consistency with the mission of the


organization.
Feasibility of implementation.
Efficiency and utility of the results.

* Recommendations of the Institute of Medicine

WHO Guidelines for Guidelines


Stage 1. Maximum potential benefit to individual
or group of patients if resources were unlimited.
Stage 2. Assess tradeoffs between cost of applying
intervention on a population basis and its health
impact (very limited vs. unlimited resources).
Stage 3. Provide evidentiary basis and assistance
necessary for local Guideline Development Groups
in adopting and grading the
recommendations for regional
implementation considering available
resources.

KDIGO Criteria for


CPG Topic Selection

Prevalence of clinical problem.


Burden of illness imposed by the problem.
Variability in practice
Potential of guidelines to improve health
outcomes.

International Evidence Review Team


Grading Evidence and
Recommendations for Clinical
Practice Guidelines.
A Position Statement from KDIGO

Kidney Int 70:2058-2065, 2006

KDIGO Clinical Practice Guidelines


Prevention, Diagnosis, Evaluation and
Treatment of Hepatitis C in Chronic
Kidney Disease

Workgroup co-chairs: Michel Jadoul (Belgium) and David


Roth (USA). Published April 2008, Kidney Int

Diagnosis, Evaluation, Prevention and


Treatment of Chronic Kidney Disease
Related Mineral and Bone Disorders
(CKD-MBD)

Workgroup co-chairs: Tilman Dreke (France) and


Sharon Moe (USA). Anticipated Publication Fall 2008,
Kidney Int

Care of the Kidney Transplant Recipient

Workgroup co-chairs: Bertram Kasiske (USA) and Martin


Zeier (Germany). Anticipated Publication Winter 2008,
Kidney Int

Acute Kidney Injury,

Workgroup co-chairs: Norbert Lameire (Belgium) and


John Kellum (USA). Anticipated Publication 2009

Guideline Coordination Initiative


Joint effort of leaders of five Englishlanguage guideline development groups
Exploring the feasibility of a collaborative
and integrated international approach to
the development of new guidelines and the
updating of existing guidelines in the field
of kidney disease

Guideline Coordination
Canadian Society of Nephrology (CSN)
Guidelines
Caring for Australians with Renal
Impairment (CARI) Guidelines - ANZSN
United Kingdom Renal Association
Guidelines
European Best Practice (EBPG) Guidelines
ERA/EDTA
Kidney Disease Outcomes Quality Initiative
(KDOQI) Guidelines - NKF
KDIGO

Guideline Coordination
Globalize (Share) the Evidence Localize
the Decision Making
New CPGs: Global KDIGO Guidelines
Local Implementation
Existing CPGs: Coordinated, cooperative
process of updating

Guideline Coordination
What we can do together
Uniformity in grading the evidence and strength of
recommendations (Grading the evidence and recommendations for
clinical practice guidelines-A position statement from KDIGO).

Reconciliation of currently recommended targets (KDIGO


Website-Compare Guidelines).

Hepatitis C guidelines as first global guidelines in


nephrology for subsequent adoption by participating
organizations, which could then devote their resources to
implementation. Extend to CKD-MBD and Transplant CPGs,
with opportunity to provide input and participate early in the
review process.

Coordination with WHO


Liaison member on Guideline
Development Groups (where
applicable).
Participation in Controversies
Conferences.
Incorporation of KDIGO CKD Staging
into ICD 10-11.
Adopt the WHO Guidelines for
Guidelines methodology.

Website Guideline Database


Comparison of guidelines as a tool
for the harmonization of
recommended interventions: The
KDIGO website

Kidney International, 2007

Website Resources
International Clinical Practice
Guidelines in Nephrology
Guideline Development Summaries
Target Ranges Comparisons
Position Statements
CKD-Mineral and Bone Disorder
Classification of CKD

www.KDIGO.org

Website Resources
Global Nephrology Guideline
Database:

Guideline Overviews
Guideline Summaries by Topic
Guideline Target Comparisons

WWW.KDIGO.ORG

KDIGO Controversies Conferences


WHAT DO WE KNOW
(Available Evidence)

WHAT CAN WE DO WITH WHAT WE


KNOW
(Recommendations vs. Guidelines)

WHAT DO WE NEED TO KNOW

(Gaps in knowledge, Research questions)

Third KDIGO
Controversies Conference

Care of the Kidney Transplant


Recipient
Co-chairs: F. Delmonico, USA
M. Zeier, Germany
Lisbon, Portugal
February 2-4, 2006

Fourth KDIGO
Controversies Conference
CKD as a Global Public Health
Problem: Approaches and Initiatives
Co-Chairs: Andrew Levey, Kai-Uwe Eckardt, Adeera
Levin, Allan Collins, Meguid El-Nahas
Amsterdam, Netherlands
October 12-14, 2006

NKF-KDOQI Definition of CKD


KDIGO Modifications (Amsterdam 2004)
Structural or functional abnormalities of the kidneys for >3
months, as manifested by either:
1. Kidney damage, with or without decreased GFR, as defined
by
pathologic abnormalities
markers of kidney damage
urinary abnormalities (proteinuria)
blood abnormalities (renal tubular syndromes)
imaging abnormalities
kidney transplantation

2. GFR <60 ml/min/1.73 m2, with or without kidney damage

Conceptual Model for CKD


Complications
Complications

Normal

Increased
Increased
risk

Screening
CKD risk
for CKD
reduction;
risk factors:
Screening for
diabetes
CKD
hypertension
age >60
family history
US ethnic
minorities

Damage

GFR
GFR

Kidney
Kidney
failure
failure

Diagnosis
Estimate
Replacement
& treatment; progression;
by dialysis
Treat
Treat
& transplant
comorbid complications;
conditions;
Prepare for
Slow
replacement
progression

CKD
CKD
death

Sixth KDIGO
Controversies Conference
Coordination of Global Practice
Guidelines for Anemia in CKD
Co-Chairs: Francesco Locatelli &
Allen Nissenson
New York
October 15-16, 2007

Fifth KDIGO
Controversies Conference
Clinical Practice Guidelines:
Methodology and Transparency
Co-Chairs: Robert Alpern, Charles
van Ypersele, Katrin Uhlig, &
Alison MacLeod
New York
October 12-13, 2007

KDIGO Position Statements


Definition and classification of chronic kidney
disease: a position statement from Kidney
Disease: Improving Global Outcomes (KDIGO)
Levey AS, at al: Kidney Int 2005;67:2089-2100.
Definition, evaluation, and classification of renal
osteodystrophy: a position statement from
Kidney Disease: Improving Global Outcomes
(KDIGO) Moe S, et al: Kidney Int 2006;69:1945-1953.
A report of the Lisbon Conference on the care of
the kidney transplant recipient. Abbud-Filho M, et
al: Transplantation 83:S1-22, 2007
Chronic kidney disease as a global public health
problem: approaches and initiatives - a position
statement from Kidney Disease Improving
Global Outcomes. (KDIGO) Levey AS, et al: Kidney
Int 72:247-259, 2007

Mineral and Bone Initiative


Educational Resources: Clinical Guide to
Bone and Mineral Metabolism in CKD
Position Statements: Chronic Kidney
Disease-Mineral and Bone Disorder
Bone Biopsy/Bone Biomarker Correlation
Study

Clinical Guide to Bone and Mineral


Metabolism in CKD

Second KDIGO
Controversies Conference

Definition, Evaluation, and


Classification of Renal
Osteodystrophy.
A Position Statement from
KDIGO
Kidney Int 69:1945-1953, 2006

SUMMARY

Our primary goal is to improve patient care. We hope to


accomplish this in the short term by helping clinicians know
and better understand the evidence (or lack of evidence) that
determines current practice.
By making this guideline broadly applicable, our purpose is to
also encourage and enable the establishment and development
of transplant programs worldwide.
Finally, by providing comprehensive evidence-based
recommendations, this guideline will also help define areas
where evidence is lacking and research is needed.
Helping to define a research agenda is an often neglected, but
very important function of clinical practice guideline
development.
Kai-Uwe Eckardt, MD
KDIGO Co-Chair

Bertram L. Kasiske, MD
KDIGO Co-Chair

THANK YOU

You might also like