Kuliah Spine Trauma
Kuliah Spine Trauma
Kuliah Spine Trauma
SPINALIS
Dr. Rendra leonas SpOT
ORTHOPAEDIC SPINE SURGEON
DEPARTMENT OF SURGERY
MOH. HOESIN PALEMBANG
Introduction
Most common
age and high speed level
traffic accident >>
80% spinal inj not assoc SI
more important preliminary
care
At least 5% of patients
With spinal cord injuries
Worsen neurologically at
hospital.
Function
Skeletal support structure
Major portion of axial skeleton
Protective container for
spinal cord
Vertebral Body
Major weight-bearing
component
Anterior to other
vertebrae components
8 cervical
12 thoracic
5 lumbar
5 saccral
1 coccygeal
Pedicles
Thick, bony structures
that connect the
vertebral body to the
spinous and transverse
processes
Anatomy
Spinal cord ends below lower border of L1
Cauda equina is below L1
Mid dorsal spinal cord & neural canal space are of
same diameter hence prone for complete lesion
Mechanical injury - early ischaemia, cord edema cord necrosis
Neurological recovery unpredictable in cauda equina
ie. peripheral nerves
OVERVIEW
LOOK
inspection
FEEL
palpation
MOVE
active & passive
movements
EXAMINATION :STANDING
Feel :
Tenderness: may be bony,
intervertebral or paravertebral
Bony prominence or steps
spinous processes
using C7 &/or L4-5
as landmarks
facet joints
approx. 2cm lateral to spinous processes
EXAMINATION : STANDING
Feel :
assess alignment, mobility &
tenderness of:
transverse processes of
vertebrae
lateral to spinous processes
Neurological Examination
Objectives :
Determine if defect is present
Localize the level of the deficit
Include :
Sensory
Motor
Reflex
Neurological Examination
Sensory examination
Explain, eyes closed
Examine : touch, 2 point
discrimination, proprioceptive.
Sensory dermatomes, compare each
opposite
Sensory Dermatome
Neurological Examination
Motor
examination
Muscle grading
Compare each side
Cervical
:
Scapular
C4
C5
C6
C7
Neurological Examination
Motor
examination
Lumbo-sacral
Hip flexor
Hip extensor
L 1,2,3
S1
Knee flexor
Knee extensor
L 4,5, S1,2
L 2,3,4
Ankle flexor
Ankle extensor
S1
L5
Denis
Classification
Flexion-rotation
Flexion-distraction
Classification spine
fracture
Stable injury
fracture
compression
burst fracture
Compression fracture
Criteria unstable
Loss of 50% of vert body height
Angulation of thoracolumbar junct >
20 deg
Mutiple adjacent column of spine
Failure of 2/3 of column of spine
Chance fracture
Anterior column falls in tension
(along w/ the middle and posterior
columns)
Three columns rupture in distraction
(tension)
Seldom assc w/ neurologic
comprimise unless
Unstable
Burst fracture
Compressive failure of vert body both
anteriorly & posteriorly , w/ failure of
both anterior & middle columns
Axial loading applied to
intravertebral disc results in
increased nuclear pressure and hoop
stresses in the annulus
Classification :
Stable frx
- neurologically intact
- poterior arch remains intact : pedicl
widening implies post arch
disruption
- less than 50% anterior body height
- compression fracture
Unstable frx
- neurologic defisit
- loss of 50% vertebral body height
- fracture dislocation
- thoracolumbar burst frx
Jefferson Fracture
Pediatric frx
- frx proceeds thru open
synchondroses,
and may occur w/ minimal trauma/
- posterior synchondroses fuses at
age 4
- anterior synchondroses fuses at age
7
Mechanism
- original description in 1920 noted
role of
axial compression
- may also be caused by
hyperextension,
causing a posterior arch fracture
Associated injuries
- approx 1/3 of these fractures are
associated with a axis fracture
- approx 50% chance that some
other
C-spine injury is present
- low rate of neurologic deficits is due
to
large breadth of C1 canal
Radiographs
Odontoid view
Lateral view
Flexion and extension views
CT scan
Dens Fracture
Odontoid fractures are the most
common upper cervical spine
fratures
Remember rule of thirds cervical
cord occupies a 1/3 of canal, dens
occupies a 1/3 and the remaining 1/3
is empty
Mechanism
Flexion loading
Extension loading
Classification
Type I
Type 2 Dens frx
Type 3
Associated Injury
Atlas frx
Transverse ligament rupture
Pharangeal injury
Hangmans frx/Traumatic
Spondylolisthesis of the Axis
Fix of pars interarticularis of C2 & disruption of
C2-C3 junction
Type of traumatic spondylolisthesis Hangmans
frx
Term Hangmans fracture is not accurate for the
majority of cases, because mechanism of injury
for clinically encountered frx often lacks large
traction force present in judicial hangings
SCIWORA Syndrome
Occurs may often in pediatric
population
Accounts for up to 2/3 of severe
cervical injuries in children < 8 years
of age
Inherent elasticity in pediatric
cervical spine can allow severe spinal
cord injury to occur in absence of xray findings
Complete
Incomplete
Anterior cord syndrome
Central cord syndrome
Brown sequad
Cauda equina
Anatomy
crossection spinal cord
Ascending
Tract
Tracts of Goll and
Burdach (fasc gracilis
and cuneatus
Proprioception,vibration
,discrimination
uncrosssed
Proprioception, light
touch
uncrossed
Lateral spinothalamic
tract
Pain, temperature
crossed
crossed
Ventral spinothalamic
tract
crossed
Motor control
uncrossed
Rubrospinal tract
Cerebellar reflexes
crossed
Lateral reticulospinal
Vestibulospinal
tracttract
Inhibits
locomotor
Postural
control conytrol
crossed
Uncrossed
Reticulospinal tract
Tectospinal tract
uncrossed
crossed
Descending
Tract
Prognosis
anterior cord syndrome has the worst
prognosis of all cord syndromes
prognosis is good if recovery is evident &
progressive during first 24 hours
after 24 hrs, if no signs of sacral sensibility
to pinprick or temp are present,
prognosis for further functional recovery
are poor; only 10 to 15% of patients
demonstrate functional recovery;
Anatomy:
fibers responsible for lower extremity
motor and sensory functions are
located in the most peripheral part of
the cord
whereas fibers controlling the upper
extremity and voluntary bowel and
bladder function are more centrally
located
sacral tracts are positioned on the
periphery of the cord & are usually
Mechanism of Injury:
hyperextension injury
central cord injury and hemorrhage
occur with compression of adjacent
white-matter tracts
more peripheral positioning of lower
extremity axons within the spinal
cord tracts accounts for the injury
pattern
Examination
central cord syndrome is remarkable for
more cord involvement in the upper
extremities than in the lower extremities
manifests w/ loss of distal upper extremity
pain & temperature sensation and
strength, w/ relative preservation of lower
extremity strength & sensation
upper extremities:
mixed upper and lower-motor-neuron lesion,
w/ partial
flaccid paralysis of upper
extremities (indicativeof involvement of
lower motor neurons)
prognosis is variable w/ poor hand function
lower extremities:
spastic paralysis of lower extremities
(indicative of involvement of upper motor
neurons)
bladder and bowel function may also be
Prognosis:
this syndrome has a good prognosis
for recovery
more than 90% of pts regain bladder
& bowel control & ability to walk
most patients will regain some
strength in lower extremities and
most will regain functional walking
ability;;
Significance
Unstable if middle column + either Anterior or
Posterior column is damaged
Rupture of interspinous ligament is :
- associated with avulsion of spinous process
- Unstable spine
- Further flexion increases neurological injury
THANK YOU!