CHAPTER 6 Court System
CHAPTER 6 Court System
CHAPTER 6 Court System
INTRODUCTION TO
LAW II
CHAPTER 6 :
LEGAL INSTITUTION
(COURT SYSTEM)
BY:
NORSYAZRAH BINTI
ZULKIFLI
CHAPTER 6 LEGAL
INSTITUTION
1.
2.
3.
4.
INTRODUCTION TO THE
COURT SYSTEM
COURT: Place to administer justice. As platform to
settle the dispute between individual or
individuals & other parties.
Jurisdiction : the power of the court or judge to
hear and decide a case or make a particular order
Superior court
HIGH COURT
Has original jurisdiction on civil and criminal matters and also
appellate jurisdiction
SESSION COURT
Has original jurisdiction on civil and criminal
matters
MAGISTRATE COURT
Has original jurisdiction on civil and criminal
matters
Subordinate Court
JUDICIAL INSTITUTION
(GENERAL)
ARTICLE 121 Of the Federal Constitution lays
down the power of superior courts in Malaysia;
Federal Court, Court of Appeal and High Court.
JURISDICTION OF FEDERAL
COURT (ARTICLE 121(2))
a) To determine appeals from
decisions of a High Court or a
judge thereof and
b) Such other jurisdiction as may be
conferred by or under federal law
JURISDICTION OF COURT OF
APPEAL (ARTICLE 121 (1B))
a) Jurisdiction to determine appeals
from decisions of Court of appeal,
of the High Court or a judge
thereof
b) Such original or consultative
jurisdiction as specified in
Articles 128 and 130
c) Such other jurisdiction as may be
conferred by or under federal law
TYPES OF JURISDICTION
ORIGINAL JURISDICTION :
The power of the court to hear the case in the first instance
APPELATE JURISDICTION:
The power of the court to hear and determine appeal case from
the lower court.
REFERRAL JURISDICTION :
The power of the court to interpret/confirm on the application of
law or effect of any provision of the Federal Constitution.
ADVISORY JURISDICTION
Article 130 : YDPA may refer to the Federal Court for its opinion
regarding the effect of any provision in the Federal
Constitution which has arisen or likely to arise.
SUPERVISORY JURISDICTION :
To control activity of lower court or tribunal.
QUESTION OF FACT
AND QUESTION OF LAW
1. FEDERAL COURT
CONSTITUTION
COMPOSITION
ARTICLE 122
APPELLATE JURISDICTION
ARTICLE 128(1)
-Determine whether the law passed
by Parliament/ State Legislature is
valid and
-Determine/decide disputes on any
question between States and
Federation or vice versa (give a
declaratory judgment)
a) Civil
- From any judgment/order from Court of Appeal
on any civil matters decided by High Court
b) Criminal
- From any judgment of Court of Appeal on
criminal matters.
c) Referral
- For any question arose in other courts about the
interpretation/effect of any provision in Federal
Constitution.
d) Advisory
YDPA may refer to Federal Court if there is any
question of provision in Federal Constitution. It
will be pronounce its opinion in the open court.
2. COURT OF APPEAL
CONSTITUTION
COMPOSITION
Article 122A:
1.Chairman (President of Court of
Appeal)
2.22 other judges
Cont.
(1) At the hearing of an appeal the Court of Appeal shall hear the
appellant or his advocate, if he appears, and, if it thinks fit, the
respondent or his advocate, if he appears, and may hear the appellant or
his advocate in reply, and the Court of Appeal may thereupon confirm,
reverse or vary the decision of the High court, or may order a
retrial or may remit the matter with the opinion of the Court of
Appeal thereon to the trial court, or may make such other order in the
matter as to it may seem just, and may by that
order exercise any power which the trial court might have exercised:
Provided that the Court of Appeal may, notwithstanding that it is of
opinion that the point raised in the appeal might be decided in favour of
the appellant, dismiss the appeal if it considers that no substantial
miscarriage of justice has occurred.
(2) At the hearing of an appeal the Court of Appeal may, if it thinks that a
different sentence should have been passed, quash the sentence
passed, confirmed or varied by the High Court and pass such
other sentence warranted in law (whether more or less severe) in
substitution therefor as it thinks ought to have been passed.
(3) The Court of Appeal shall in no case make any order under this
section as to payment of costs of any appeal to or by the appellant or
respondent.
3. HIGH COURT
CONSTITUTION
COMPOSITION
Article 122AA
1.Chief Judge
2.Not less than four other judges
but limited to
60 judges in High Court in Malaya
13 judges in High Court in Sabah and
Sarawak
1. ORIGINAL JURISDICTION
1. CIVIL
1.1 GENERAL CIVIL JURISDICTION(Section 23 CJA)
Subject to the limitation in Article 128, High Court may try all
civil matters regardless the value, where:
(a) the cause of action arose;
(b) the defendant or one of several defendants resides or has
his place of business;
(c) the facts on which the proceedings are based exist or are
alleged to have occurred; or
(d) any land the ownership of which is disputed is situated,
within the local jurisdiction of the Court and notwithstanding
anything contained in this section in any case where all parties
consent in writing within the local jurisdiction of the other High
Court.
Cont.
Cont.
EXTRATERRITORIAL CRIMINAL
JURISDICTION(Section 22 (1)(b) of CJA
offences under Chapter VI of the Penal Code [Act 574], and
under any of the written laws specified in the Schedule
to the Extra-Territorial Offences Act 1976 [Act 163], or
offences under any other written law the commission of
which is certified by the Attorney General to affect the
security of Malaysia committed as the case may be,
(i) on the high seas on board any ship or on any aircraft
registered in Malaysia;
(ii) by any citizen or any permanent resident on the high
seas on board any ship or on any aircraft; or
(iii) by any citizen or any permanent resident in any place
without and beyond the limits of Malaysia.
# may impose the maximum sentence allowed by law.
2. APPELATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL (SECTION 27 CJA)
CRIMINAL(SECTION 26 CJA)
3. REVISIONARY AND
SUPERVISORY JURISDICTION
It has a revisionary jurisdiction over criminal and
civil proceedings in subordinate courts (Section
31 & Section 32 CJA)
Criminal revise criminal proceedings
Civil- revise correctness, legality or propriety of
any decision recorded or passed/ regularity of any
proceedings
4. SESSION COURT
CONSTITUTION (Section 59 of
SCA)
- YDPA may constitute Sessions
Court
COMPOSITION
1. Presided by a Sessions Court judge
ORIGINAL
(a) unlimited jurisdiction to try all actions and suits of a civil nature in respect of
motor vehicle accidents, landlord and tenant and distress;
(b) jurisdiction to try all other actions and suits of a civil nature where the
amount in dispute or the value of the subject matter does not exceed one
million ringgit; and
(c) without prejudice to the generality of paragraph (b), jurisdiction to try all
actions and suits of a civil nature for the specific performance or
rescission of contracts or for cancellation or rectification of
instruments, within the jurisdiction of the Sessions Court.
(2) (Deleted by Act A434).
(3) When the parties to an action or suit which, if the amount in dispute or value
of the subject matter thereof did not exceed the limit of the jurisdiction,
would be cognizable by a Sessions Court, have entered into an agreement
in writing that the Sessions Court shall have jurisdiction to try the action or
suit, the Sessions Court shall have jurisdiction to try the same, although the
amount of the subject matter thereof may exceed the value limit of
jurisdiction.
Cont.
5. MAGISTRATE COURTS
CONSTITUTION
COMPOSITION
TYPES OF MAGISTRATE
FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE
SENTENCES BY MAGISTRATE
(CRIMINAL)
FIRST CLASS MAGISTRATE
(SECTION 87)
(a) five years imprisonment;
(b) a fine of ten thousand ringgit;
(c) whipping up to twelve strokes; or
(d) any sentence combining any of the
sentences
APPELATE SYSTEM
Section 28 CJA:
Appellate criminal
jurisdiction
The appellate criminal
jurisdiction of the High Court
shall consist of the hearing of
appeals from subordinate
courts according to any law
for the time being in force
within the territorial
jurisdiction of the High
Court.
Section 27 CJA:
Appellate civil jurisdiction
HOW TO APPEAL?
ORDER 55 COURT RULES 2012:
Where under any written law an appeal lies from
any decision of any person or body of persons to
the High Court such appeal shall be made to the
High Court in the State where the decision was
given by way of an originating summons setting out
the grounds of the appeal and supported by an
affidavit, and if the Court so directs at the hearing
of the appeal, by way of oral evidence.
TRIAL PROCESS
(CIVIL LITIGATION)
PRE TRIAL
TRIAL
POST TRIAL
1. PRE TRIAL
OBJECTIVE:
1. To fully prepare the case
2. To define the case clearly or precisely
3. To prevent surprise in the nature of the case
and documentary evidence
4. To eliminate the case that can dispose without
trial
Cont.
Cont.
6. Discovery ( Order 24)- exchanging documents
- It can be done by documents/persons
-Interrogatories allowed - give question to other
party to reply/answer the dispute (any matter in
question) within 14 days (Order 26)
Why?- to assess the strength/weakness of the case
or encourage compromise (settle outside the court)
7. Pre trial case management
1.Appear in court
Order 34 : at any time court may direct the parties
to attend the court, if fail- court ill dismiss/strike/
makes any order
TRIAL
Order 33 : trial can be done before any of the
following persons:
i)A judge or
ii)Registrar or
iii) With or without the assessor
POST TRIAL
1.
2.
3.
-
Cost
Appeal
Enforcement:
If the judgment debtor fails to obey the order,
court may give order / judgment for
1. Writ of seizure and sale (seize and sell property)
2. Writ of delivery (recovery from any movable
property / its assessed value)
3. The garnishee order ( required the third party
who owes money to judgment debtor to pay
directly to judgment creditor)
PRE TRIAL
Types of offence:
i) Seizable (arrestable) offences: police may
investigate without order from warrant from
magistrate
ii) Non seizable : police must get order/ warrant
STEPS
1. Begins with First Information Report (police report)
2. Arrest Rights of arrested person(Article 5)
3. Search body search or place/premises
(if needed, they will seize the if it is believed to be
stolen property/object/things that creates
suspicion to commit crime)
Cont.
4. The suspect makes statements
-It will be recorded and admissible in court.If it was recorded it
will be informed to the suspect
-Suspect should answer all questions except it has tendency to
expose him/her to criminal charge
-If that so, suspect has a right/ not bound to answer
if the police makes a caution statement :
it is my duty to warn you that you are not obliged to say
anything or any to answer question but anything you say
whether in answer to a question or not may be give evidence
5. Charge (should be clarify and certain)
6. Bail (set free)- police officer
- court (bond)
- surety (find another person)
# non bailable offences offences punishable with
death/imprisonment
TRIAL
A suspect may bring the court by three ways;
1. By summons
2. By a warrant of arrest (order by court)
3. By arrest without warrant for seizable offences
Cont.
5. If the accused refused to plead guilty, the full trial will
begin.
6. It will be started by opening speech made by Public
Prosecutor (describe the nature and evidence proposed to
prove the guilt).
7. It will undergo the three stages of examination.
8. At the close of the prosecution case, the accused may
submit there is no case to answer or prosecution has
failed to make out all the ingredients in the charge.
9. Where the accused makes such a submission,
arguments from both side will be presented.
10. The court will decide; if the prosecution failed to made
out the case, the court will acquit the accused. If they
succeed, the accused will enter to defence his/her case.
POST TRIAL
APPEALS
Criminal appeals can bring in three stages; against
decision of subordinate courts to High Court, then to
Court of Appeal and lastly to the Federal Court.
REVISION
Examine the :
1. correctness any decisions( normally will decline on
question of fact)
2. Legality any decisions that refers to assumption of
jurisdiction
3. Regularity exercise the jurisdiction
4. Propriety of any decision sentencing/orders within
the discretion of the subordinate courts
TUTORIAL QUESTION
PLEASE READ THE CASE :
Dato' Seri Anwar Ibrahim v PP (FC) [2004] 2 CLJ 737