Leafspring Report
Leafspring Report
Leafspring Report
ABSTRACT
The fuel efficiency and emission of gas regulation of automobiles are two
important issues. To fulfill this problem the automobile industries are
trying to make new vehicle which can provide high efficiency with low
cost.
The best way to increase the fuel efficiency is to reduce the weight of the
automobile. The weight reduction can be achieved primarily by the
introduction of better material, design optimization and better
manufacturing processes.
INTRODUCTION
What is a Spring?
A spring is defined as an elastic body, whose function is to distort when
loaded and to recover its original shape when the load is removed. Springs
are elastic bodies that can be twisted, pulled or
stretched by some force.
They can return to their original shape when the force is released.
Leaf Spring
Leaf spring (also known as flat springs) is made out of flat plate. The
advantage in leaf spring over helical spring is that the ends of the spring
may be guided along a definite path as it deflects to act as a
structural member in addition the energy absorbing device. Thus the
leaf springs may carry lateral loads, brake torque, driving torque etc.,
in addition to shocks.
The leaf spring acts as a linkage for holding the axle in position and thus
separate linkage are not necessary.
The material used for leaf springs is usually a plain carbon steel having
0.90 to 1.0% carbon. The leaves are heat treated after the forming process.
The heat treatment of spring steel produces greater strength and therefore
greater load capacity, greater range of deflection and better fatigue
properties.
The material of the spring should have high fatigue strength, high ductility,
high resilience and it should be creep resistant. It largely depends upon the
service for which they are used i.e. severe service, average service or light
service
Surface preparation
1. Shot peening / stress peening
2. Painting
Eye bush preparation process
1. Eye reaming / eye boring
2. Bush insertion
3. Bush reaming
Assemble
1. Presetting and load testing
2. Paint touch-up
3. Marking and packing
LITERATURE REVIEW
From the static analysis results it was found that there is a maximum
displacement of 10.16mm in the steel leaf spring and the corresponding
displacements in E-glass/epoxy, Graphite epoxy, and Carbon epoxy are 15
mm, 15.75 mm and 16.21 mm.
From the static analysis results, the von-mises stress in the steel is 453.92
MPa and the von-mises stress in Eglass epoxy, Graphite epoxy and Carbon
epoxy is 163.22 MPa, 653.68 MPa and 300.30 MPa was exiting
respectively.
A comparative study has been made between steel and composite leaf
spring with respect to strength and weight. Composite mono leaf spring
reduces the weight by 81.22% for E-Glass/epoxy, 91.95% for Graphite
epoxy, and 90.51 % for Carbon epoxy over conventional leaf spring
~ Design and analysis of composite leaf spring for light vehicles By
Pankaj Saini, Ashish Goel and Dushyant Kumar
Also from the analysis result they optimized spring geometry and found
that spring width is decreased with hyperbolically and thickness is increase
linearly from spring eyes towards the axle seat.
Also they concluded that the optimize composite leaf spring has much
lower stress as compared to steel spring and the spring weight without eye
units which having in steel is 9.2 kg is decrease by 80 % of its value.
The natural frequency of composite leaf spring is higher than that of the
steel leaf spring
Analysis and optimization of a composite leaf spring by Mahmood M.
Shokrieh and Davood Rezaei
The composite leaf spring having 67.35% less stress, 64.95% higher
stiffness and 126.98% higher natural frequency than that of existing steel
leaf spring.
Mono composite leaf spring for light weight vehicle Design, end joint
analysis and testing by Gulur Siddaramanna Shiva Shankar and
Sambagam Vijayarangan
The load carrying capacity, stiffness and weight of composite leaf spring are
compared with that of steel leaf spring analytically and experimentally.
It was analyzed that, the composite leaf spring has 67.35 % lesser stress,
64.95 % higher stiffness and 126.98 % higher natural frequency compare to
existing steel leaf spring. A weight reduction of 68.15 % is also achieved by
using composite leaf spring.
The composite leaf spring fatigue life is more than that of the conventional
steel leaf spring.
Analytical and experimental studies on fatigue life prediction of steel and
composite multi-leaf spring for light passenger vehicles using life data
analysis by Mouleeswaran Senthil Kumar and Sabapathy Vijayarangan.
The bending stress in GRP leaf spring is decreased by 83.64% that of steel
leaf spring.
DESIGN CALCULATIONS
STEP 1 - MATERIAL OF LEAF SPRING
Material selected steel : 50 Cr 1 V 23
Composition of material : 0.45% C,
0.1-0.3% Si,
0.6-0.9 % Mn,
0.9-1.2 Cr
STEP 2 - BASIC DATA OF FORCE MOTORS TRAX CRUISER LEAF
SPRING
Total length of the spring (Eye to Eye) = 1250 mm
No. of full length leaves (nf) = 02
1. Consider the leaf spring is cantilever beam. S the load acting on the
each assembly of the leaf spring is acted on the two ends of the
leaf
spring. Load acted on the leaf spring is divided by the two because of
consideration of the cantilever beam.
2W = 7125 N
W = 7125/2
W = 3562.5N
2. For support and clamping of the leaf spring the U bolt is use and the distance
between the U bolts is 110 mm. This is considered as an unbent portion of the
leaf spring. Ineffective length of the leaf spring is as under:
l = 100.00 mm
Effective length of the spring:
2*L = 2*L1 l
2*L = 1250 2/3 (110)
2*L = 1176.67
L = 1176.67/2
L = 588.34 mm
COMPOSITE MATERIALS
CHARACTERISTICS
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
WHY A COMPOSITE?
BENEFITS
Weight Reduction.
High Strength.
Corrosiveness and
CARBON FIBRE
The binding polymer is often a thermoset resin such as epoxy, but other
thermoset or thermoplastic polymers, such as polyester, vinyl ester or
nylon, are sometimes used.
The reinforcement will give the CFRP its strength and rigidity; measured
by stress and elastic modulus respectively.
Unlike isotropic materials like steel and aluminum, CFRP has directional
strength properties
MANUFACTURING
MOLDING
VACUUM BAGGING
COMPRESSION MOLDING
FILAMENT WINDING
DISPOSAL AND RECYCLING
APPLICATIONS
Aerospace engineering
Automotive engineering
Civil engineering
Carbon fiber microelectrodes
Sports goods
Solid works is modeling software for modeling various mechanical designs for
performing related design and manufacturing operations. The system uses a 3D solid
modeling system as the core, and applies the feature base parametric modeling method.
Some of the features of solid works are as below:
Ease of use
Parametric & feature based modeling
Robustness
User Friendly Environment
Create sketch with the help of leaf spring length and camber. Divide leaf
spring length and camber into equal division and draw a spline which
passes through intersection of camber and length division.
2.
3.
INTRODUCTION TO ANSYS
The process of performing ANSYS can be broken down into three main
steps.
1) Pre-processing
2) Solver
3) Post-processing
ASSUMPTIONS
MESHED MODEL
BOUNDARY CONDITION
COMPARISON OF RESULTS
PROPERTIES OF STEEL LEAF SPRING
Parameter
Values
Material selected
50Cr1V23
Youngs modulus
2*105 MPa
Passions ratio
0.3
BHN
534-601
2000 MPa
1800 MPa
Density
7850 Kg/m3
MATERIAL PROPERTIES OF
CARBON/EPOXY
Tensile modulus along x-direction(Mpa
68457
66527
10000
4570
3570
3570
0.39
0.0044
0.045
Mass density(kg/mm3)
1500e-9
CONCLUSION
All the three composite leaf springs have lower displacements and
stresses than that of existing steel leaf spring
Composite leaf spring reduces the weight by 79.66% for Carbon
epoxy over steel leaf spring
FUTURE SCOPE
REFERENCES
Pankaj Saini, Ashish Goel, Dushyant Kumar, Design and analysis of composite leaf
spring for light vehicles, International Journal of Innovative Research in Science,
Engineering and Technology, Vol. 2, Issue 5, May 2013.
Mahmood M. Shokrieh, Davood Rezaei, Analysis and optimization of a composite leaf
spring, Composite Structures 60 (2003) 317325.
M.Venkatesan, D.Helmen, Design and analysis of composite leaf spring in light vehicle,
International Journal of Modern Engineering Research, Vol.2, Issue.1, 2012, pp 213-218.
Gulur Siddaramanna Shiva Shankar, Sambagam Vijayarang n, Mono Composite Leaf
Spring for Light Weight Vehicle Design, d Joint Analysis and Testing, Materials science
(mediagotyra), Vol. 12, No. 3, 2006.
Mouleeswaran Senthil Kumar, Sabapath Vijayarangan, Analytical and Experimental
Studies on Fatigue Life Prediction of Steel and Composite Multi-leaf Spring for Light
Passenger Vehicles Using Life Data Analysis, Materials science (mediagotyra), Vol. 13,
No. 2, 2007.
THANK YOU