Isobaric Versus Hypobaric Spinal Bupivacaine For Total Hip

Journal Reading
Isobaric Versus Hypobaric Spinal

Bupivacaine for Total Hip
Arthroplasty in the Lateral
Position
ALEXANDRE FAUST, MD*, ROXANE FOURNIER, MD*, ELISABETH VAN GESSEL,
MD*, ANNE WEBER, MD*,
PIERRE HOFFMEYER, MD, AND ZDRAVKO GAMULIN, MD*
*DIVISION OF ANESTHESIOLOGY, CLINIC OF ORTHOPEDIC SURGERY,
UNIVERSITY HOSPITAL GENEVA, GENEVA, SWITZERLAND
(ANESTH ANALG 2003;97:589 94)
Introduction
In university hospital of Geneva, total hip arthroplasty (THA) in the
lateral decubitus position is frequently performed using single-shot
spinal anesthesia with 1517.5 mg of plain bupivacaine 0.5% which
provides a surgical anesthesia for 34 h.
In such patients, hypobaric bupivacaine could in theory provide a
more selective subarachnoid distribution of local anesthetic on the
nondependent (operative) side.
Introduction
This can result in a more profound sensory and motor block of
longer duration which could be advantageous in the case of
unexpectedly prolonged surgery.
The use of hypobaric local anesthetic has been reported for singleshot injection and continuous spinal anesthesia.
However, possible advantages of hypobaric over isobaric solutions
have not been tested in these specific surgical conditions. (plain
bupivacaine mixed with distilled water) solutions for THA performed
with patients in the lateral decubitus position.
Purpose
The aim of the present study was to compare the anesthetic and
hemodynamic effects of isobaric (plain bupivacaine mixed with
normal saline) and hypobaric bupivacaine (plain bupivacaine mixed
with distilled water) solutions for THA performed with patients in the
lateral decubitus position.
Patient and Methods
Inclusion criteria: 40 orthopedic patients, aged 4075

yr, ASA physical status I or II, scheduled to undergo
elective THA under single-shotspinal anesthesia.
Exclusion criteria: coagulation disorders, local

infection, and obvious spinal postural abnormalities
(kyphosis) as well as inability to comprehend basic
aspects of the study.
Patients and Method

Pre operative : morphine 0.1 mg/kg
subcutaneously
Randomizatio
n
Isobaric bupivacaine:
3.5 mL (17.5 mg) of plain
bupivacaine 0.5%
(5-mL vial Carbostesine
0.5%; Astra Zeneca, Grafenau,
Zug, Switzerland) diluted with
normal saline to a total of
5 mL; measured density at
37C was 0.999406 g/mL.
Hypobaric bupivacaine:
3.5 mL (17.5 mg) of plain

bupivacaine 0.5% diluted with
distilled water, to a
total of 5 mL; measured
density at 37C was
0.997302 g/mL.
Patients and Method

With the operating table horizontal, the patients were placed in the lateral
decubitus position with the operated hip up.
Lumbar puncture was performed at the L2-3 interspace with a 25-gauge
Whitacre needle.
After observing free cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) reflux, the needle aperture was
oriented upward and 5 mL of the study solution injected at a rate of
approximately 0.5 mL/s.
The patients remained in the lateral position until the end of surgery, at which
time they were turned supine.
Measurement
Evolution of upper sensory block level on nondependent (operative)

and dependent sides.
Evolution of degree of motor block using a modified Bromage scale

ranging from 0 to 4
Mean arterial blood pressure (MAP) and heart rate (HR) were
recorded every 2.5 min during the first 45 min after spinal injection,
every 5 min during surgery, and every 15 min in the recovery room
until the study termination.
Measurement
Duration of anesthesia was defined as time between spinal

injection and the end of the surgery.
Duration of surgical analgesia was defined as the time between

spinal injection and the first analgesic requirement for a pain
score at the operated site 3 on the visual analog scale ranging
from 0 to 10.
Patients and Method
Comparisons between groups or between both sides in the same

group were performed using the Students t-test for unpaired or
paired data, the Mann-Whitney U-test, and the 2 test as required.
A P value 0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Results
Results
Results
Discussion
The results of the present study demonstrate an advantage of

hypobaric over isobaric spinal anesthesia in patients undergoing
THA in the lateral decubitus position.
Although both solutions provide satisfactory analgesia, hypobaric

bupivacaine showed a significantly delayed sensory regression to
L2 on the nondependent side of 45 minutes, thus postponing the
need for first analgesic.
Discussion
The appearance of delayed asymmetrical block can be attributed

to the differences in densities between anesthetic solutions and
CSF, associated with prolonged lateral position of approximately
3 h in the present study.
It is presumed that part of a local anesthetic injected

intrathecally remains free in CSF for at least 60 minutes, because
one hour after administration, variations in upper sensory level
were found when changing patient position.
Discussion
The author speculate that in the present study, three hours of

lateral decubitus positioning allows more neural fixation on the
nondependent roots of hypobaric than isobaric bupivacaine.
These arguments could explain the more pronounced differential

spread of hypobaric over isobaric bupivacaine observed during
regression of the spinal anesthesia.
Summary
For patients undergoing THA in the lateral position under spinal
anesthesia, 17.5 mg of hypobaric bupivacaine, compared with the
identical dose of isobaric bupivacaine, prolonged sensory regression
to L2 and delayed the use of first analgesic, without further
compromising systemic hemodynamics.

Isobaric Versus Hypobaric Spinal Bupivacaine For Total Hip

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Isobaric Versus Hypobaric Spinal Bupivacaine For Total Hip

Uploaded by

Document Information

Original Title

Copyright

Available Formats

Share this document

Share or Embed Document

Sharing Options

Did you find this document useful?

Is this content inappropriate?

Copyright:

Available Formats

Isobaric Versus Hypobaric Spinal Bupivacaine For Total Hip

Uploaded by

Copyright:

Available Formats

Journal Reading

Isobaric Versus Hypobaric Spinal

Patient and Methods

Inclusion criteria: 40 orthopedic patients, aged 4075

Exclusion criteria: coagulation disorders, local

Patients and Method

3.5 mL (17.5 mg) of plain

Patients and Method

Evolution of upper sensory block level on nondependent (operative)

Evolution of degree of motor block using a modified Bromage scale

Duration of anesthesia was defined as time between spinal

Duration of surgical analgesia was defined as the time between

Patients and Method

Comparisons between groups or between both sides in the same

The results of the present study demonstrate an advantage of

Although both solutions provide satisfactory analgesia, hypobaric

The appearance of delayed asymmetrical block can be attributed

It is presumed that part of a local anesthetic injected

The author speculate that in the present study, three hours of

These arguments could explain the more pronounced differential

You might also like