Study and Improvement in Operations of Chemical Plant

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 38

STUDY AND IMPROVEMENT IN

OPERATIONS OF CHEMICAL PLANT

GROUP MEMBERS

SIDDESH NAIK
PRATIK PARSEKAR
MOHIT KESARKAR
ANJOOM NAIK

(111102044)
(111102050)
(111102061)
(111102040)

GUIDE:- SHRI. MAHESH DHAWALIKAR

OBJECTIVES ACCOMPLISHED

Boiler study and boiler efficiency calculations.

Ways to improve boiler efficiency.

Preventive maintenance program for boiler.

Layout and cost of reactor automation.

Suggestions in 5S.

IMPLEMENTATION COST AND SAVINGS


Sr.no

Methods used

Cost of

Savings per year in

implementation in

Rupees

Rupees
1

Installing an economizer

90,000

1,08,405

Use of solar energy to heat boiler


feed water

6,68,826

90,301

Automatic TDS blowdown system

1,50,000

3,06,600

Economic Thickness of Insulation

13,250

2,18,767

Reactor automation

85,56,000

13,04,395

BOILER EFFICIENCY CALCULATIONS

Boiler efficiency=

= %
Efficiency =
=62.22%
Calculated efficiency of boiler at esteem industry=62.22%

WAYS SUGGESTED TO IMPROVE EFFICIENCY


1.

Reduce excess air

2.

Install an economizer

3.

Economic thickness of insulation

4.

Solar power to heat boiler feed water

5.

Automatic blowdown system

1.SOLAR ENERGY TO HEAT BOILER FEED WATER

Solar power can be used to heat the feed water from 45C to 60 C
which will lead to fuel saving.

Total water required per day = 21KL

Q = m*cp*dT
Q = 21000*4.19*(60-45)
= 1319850/(24*3600)
= 15.27 Kg/sec
= 15.27 KW

Cost for the installation of solar plant = 0.73$per Watt


Cost for the installation of solar plant = 15.27*1000*0.73*60
= Rs 668826
For 10 hour cost of fuel = Rs 12370

Considering 2% of fuel cost saved.

Total amount saved per day= Rs 247.4

Period required to overcome the cost of solar plant= 7.4 years

The life of the solar plant will be 20 years . Therefore for 12.6 years less
amount of fuel will be required

AUTOMATIC TDS BLOWDOWN SYSTEM

AUTOMATED BLOWDOWN COST JUSTIFICATION

Boiler produces-3000Kg/hr

TDS level to be maintained-18-22 ppm

Records at esteem show that ppm has been maintained at an average


-19ppm.
With automatic TDS this value can be increased to 21ppm without
exceeding 22 ppm.
This would decrease blowdown by - (21-19)/19=10.52%

Typically 19 ppm results from 10 cycles. Blowdown required to maintain


10 cycles = 3000/10 = 300Kg/hr
If 300kg/hr is reduced by 10.52% thats a saving- 0.1052*300
= 31.56Kg/hr

To heat 31.56Kg/hr fuel cost required = (31.56*5)/4.44


= 35 Rs/hr
Cost of implementation = Rs1,50,000/

Payback period=1,50,000/35 = 4285.71hrs


= 6 months

5.ECONOMIC THICKNESS OF INSULATION


DESCRIPTION
Length of pipe, L
Bar pipe outer dia. ,D1
Bare pipe surface area , A

UNIT

1 INCH

2 INCH

3 INCH

50

50

50

mm

76.2

76.2

76.2

23.9268

23.9268

23.9268

30

30

30

120

120

120

50

50

50

glass wool

glass wool

glass wool

85

85

85

0.036

0.034

0.032

0.95

0.95

0.95

0.13

0.13

0.13

Sq. m

Ambient temperature ,Ta

Degree Celsius

Bare pipe wall temperature,Th

Degree Celsius

Desired wall temp. with insulation ,Tc

Degree Celsius

Material of insulation
Mean temp. of insulation ,Tm
Specific conductivity of insulation
Surface emissivity of bare pipe
Surface emissivity of Al cladding

Degree Celsius

DESCRIPTION

UNITS

Surf. Heat transfer coeff. of hot bare


surf., h=(0.85+0.005(Th-Ta))*10

Watt/sq.m celsius

Surf. Heat transfer coeff. After


insulation, h=(0.31+0.005(Tc-Ta))*10

Watt/sq.m celsius

Thermal resistance, Rth=(Th Tc )/


(h*(Tc-Ta))
Thickness of insulation , t=Rth*k
R1=outer dia./2
Teq=R2*ln(R2/R1)
Outer rafius ,R2

1 INCH

2 INCH

3 INCH

13

13

13

4.1

4.1

4.1

Celsius sq.m/watt

0.853

0.853

0.853

mm

30.7

mm

38.1

mm

30.7

mm

62.35

29.024
38.1
29.024
61.21

27.2
38.1
27.2
60

DESCRIPTION
Thickness of insulation

UNITS

1 INCH

2 INCH

3 INCH

mm

24.25

23.11

21.9

19.58

19.2296

18.8495

27.994

27.994

27.994

4.415

4.336

4.25

23.579

23.658

23.744

8000

8000

8000

188632

183264

189952

Insulated pipe area , A


Total losses from bare surf. ,
Q=h*A*(Th-Ta)

KJ/sec

Total loss from insulated surface,


Q=h*A*(Tm-Ta)

KJ/sec

Power saved by insulation


P=(Q-Q)

KJ/sec

Annual working hours , n

hrs./year

Energy saving after insulation


E=P*n

KWh/year

COST SAVINGS

Heat energy cost = calorific value of fuel*mass of fuel per second*hours of operation
annually
=14644*225/3600*8000

=73,22,000 KWh/year

Fuel cost annually = fuel cost /Kg*fuel fed/hour * annual hours operation
= 5*225*8000

= 90,00,000 Rs/year

Heat energy cost = 9000000/7322000


= 1.23 Rs/KWh

1. Savings with 1 inch thickness = 1.23*205224


= 2,32,425.52 Rs/year
Implementation cost = 50*265
= 13,250/ Total savings = 232425052-13250
= 2,19,175.52 Rs/year

2. Savings with 2 inch thickness = 1.23*205488


= 2,52,750.24/year
Implementation cost = 50*370
= 18,500/ Total savings = 252750.24-18500 = 2,34,250.24 Rs/year

3. Savings with 3 inch thickness =1.23*205784


= 253114.32Rs/year
Implementation cost = 50*500
= 25,000/ Total savings = 253114.32 - 25000
= 228114.32 Rs/year

The data above shows that 2 inch thickness gives maximum cost savings
and hence is the economic thickness of insulation.
Thus we can conclude that implementation of 2 inch thickness will reduce
heat loss.

PREVENTIVE MAINTENANCE OPERATION FOR BOILER


1.Installing meters on makeup water lines to monitor flow.
2. Blowing down routinely without overdoing it. Excessive blow-down wastes
water, chemicals and energy.
3. Checking insulation on piping and storage tanks.
4. Cleaning and inspecting water and fire tubes regularly to reduce scaling.

5. Checking safeties, including primary and auxiliary low-water cutoffs, gauge


glass, pressure controls, scanners, and pressure switches.
6. Tuning boilers regularly to optimize performance.
7. Inspecting steam traps and steam lines routinely for leaks.

COMPONENTS FOR AUTOMATION


1.Sensors
2.Remote terminal unit/PLC
3. Telemetry
4.Supervisory system
5.HMI (Monitor)

1.SENSORS

Temperature sensors
RTD(resistance temperature detectors)

INFRARED THERMOMETER

PRESSURE SENSORS

Elastic Sensors

Electric Sensors

2. RTU(A REMOTE TERMINAL UNIT)

A remote terminal unit (RTU) is a microprocessor-controlled electronic device


that interfaces objects in the physical world to a SCADA .
It convert sensor signals to digital data.
They have telemetry hardware capable of sending digital data to the
supervisory system, as well as receiving digital commands from the
supervisory system

3. HMI

HMI interface present data collected from Remote Telemetry Units (RTUs) and
Intelligent Electronic Devices (IEDs).
Without an HMI installed within the SCADA network, operators would be
unable to see or act upon the data gathered by RTUs and individual sensors.

4. SUPERVISORY SYSTEM

SCADA (supervisory control and data acquisition) is a system operating with


coded signals over communication channels so as to provide control of remote
equipment.
It is a main supervisory system where action are taken and operator can
change process parameters as per the process requirements.

SPECIFICATION AND EXAMPLES OF REACTOR


COMPONENTS
SR.NO

COMPONENTS

TEMPERATURE SENSOR

SPECIFICATIONS
Temperature range :
373k-573k

EXAMPLE
RTD ,Thermocouples.

PRESSURE SENSOR
2

RTU/S

Pressure range:2kpa5kpa

Elastic sensor ,Electric


sensor

Ethernet IO (ADAM-6000
series)

High reliability, powerful


communication
capabilities

PLC
3

HMI

CONTROL SYSTEM

Ethernet IO (ADAM-6000
series)

Colour display,high
resolution.
Softwares: GENESIS64
AUTOCAD,SOLIDWORKS,C,C+
+,
IGGRAPHIX,LABVIEW, SCADA .

HMi04BU

IBM PC, Apple IIe,


Apple IIc and Amiga
500.

OVERVIEW OF REACTOR

AUTOMATED REACTOR

HOW SCADA(CONTROL SYSTEM)WORKS

A SCADA system, at the machine level, consists of a central station for


gathering data and managing the overall operation.
The RTU or the PLC collects the information locally and then passes it on to
the central station.
SCADA systems also allow staff or supervisors to change the settings as
appropriate at the level of the RTU or the central station.
Alarming conditions like high temperature can then be stored and displayed.

SUGGESTED COMPONENTS

Temperature sensor- Platanium RTD, cost of which is 5000/-

Pressure sensor: Electric sensor ,cost of which is 4000/-

RTU, cost of which is 27000/-

HMI- HMi04BU ,cost of which is 10,000/-

Control system-Apple Iieas ,cost of which is 3,00,000/-

Valve-solenoid valve, cost of each solenoid operated valve is 2000/-

OVERALL REACTOR AUTOMATION COST


Cost

of HMI = 10,000/-

Cost

of control system = 3,00,000/-

Cost

of sensors = 9,000/-

Cost

of RTU = 27,000/-

Cost

of solenoid operated valves =18,000/-

Total

cost of components = 3,64,000/-

Cost

of implementation of automation as per Autromatrix INC. =


20,00,000/Total

cost = cost of implementation of automation + cost of components.


= 20,00,000 + 3,64,000
= 23,64,000/-

5S SUGGESTIONS
1.

Mark reference materials with an oblique line to detect disorder from a distance.

2.

Store tools beside the machine with which they will be used according to
operations.
3. Organize files and store using color code to make it easy to identify.
4. Store similar items together.
5. Operators need to be trained to carry out routine maintenance of
machine.
7. Markings on the road separately for workers and vehicles.
8. Safety charts need to be put up everywhere.

sequence of work

RAW MATERIAL STORES PRESENT LAYOUT

Present height of racks = 3.27m


Height which can be utilized = 5m
Area of raw material store = 658.84sq m
Volume of raw material store =3294.2 m3
Calculations for the height of 3.27m.
Area of racks = 26.56+26.56*2+23.86*2
= 127.4sq m
Volume of racks = 416.598 cubic m

Volume Ratio = 416.598/3294.2


= 0.1264

Calculations for the height of 5m

Volume of racks if 5 m is utilized = 637 cubic m

Ratio volume = 0.19337

% increase in storage w.r.t present = (637-416.598)*100/416.598

% increase in storage w.r.t present = 52.9%

RAW MATERIAL STORE REVISED LAYOUT

Area of racks = (22.09*1)*2 + (22.09*2)*2+ (13.53*2)


= 44.18+88.36+27.06
=159.6sq. m
Calculations for the height of 3.27m with revised layout
For height = 3.27 m
Volume = 521.892 cubic m
Ratio of volume = 0.1584

increase w.r.t present = 25.274%

Calculations for the height of 5m with revised layout


Volume = 798 cubic m
Ratio of volume = 0.2422

increase w.r.t present = 91.55%

Ratio of volume=0.2422

% increase w.r.t present=91.55%

Volume ratio with original layout of raw material store =0.1264.

After revising the stack height to 5 m the volume ratio = 0.19337.

After changing the arrangement of racks ,% increase = 91.55 % .

If we incorporate the 5m stack height in the new arrangement


maximum achievable volume ratio = 0.2422.

You might also like