Argumentative /persuasive Reading & Writing
Argumentative /persuasive Reading & Writing
/Persuasive
& writing
Reading
Reading an Argument
Considering Rhetorical
Context
(Author,Audience,Date/Place
of Publication)
A Step-By-Step analysis of
Toulmin Method of
evaluation
of logical
pattern
Analyze the Claim
Argumentation versus
Persuasion
Argument
Styles of argumentative of
writing
Toulmin model:
Rogers model:
the uses.
Everyday life
Workplace
Academic environment
Reading and Listening- (current
events)
Audience
Write with sincerity towards audience
using an ethical appeal
Dont write with an arrogance or with
disregard to opposing views
Try starting in introduction, gaining
confidence of audience
This approach will show your concern
and fair-minded purpose
Writing an argumentative
I- Introduction:
A. Hook
B. Background Information if necessary
C.Thesis or focus statement
VI. Conclusion:
A. Summary of main points or
reasons
The Thesis
Introduction in
Argumentative/Persuasive
essays include:
Example Introduction:
Conclusion
Obtaining information
By reading
Conversation with others
Use your own observations
Questionnaire
Periodicals
Always cite sources used
Make sure the information you receive is
relevant and credible and valid
Evidence
Includes:
Established Truths
Historical, scientific, and geographical facts
Managing evidence
Reliability
How much endorsing evidence?
Contradictory
How well established is evidence?
Does it support/fit your claim?
Allow it to be conclusive
Logos:
Logic- the appeal to reason
Pathos:
Emotion- the appeal to emotion
Ethos:
Credibility- the appeal of ones
character
Logos: reasoning
strategies
Questions of Credibility
Logic
Rely primarily on
facts
Use deductive or
inductive
reasoning to
reach your
conclusion
Use classical
argument,
including reason
and evidence to
support your
claim
Emotion
Use emotionally
charged or
highly
connotative
words
Appeal to
peoples fears,
concerns,
passions, vanity,
sense of justice,
and so forth
Take advantage
of rhythm and
refrain in
Syllogism
Enthymeme
Stereotyping
Fallacies (cont.)
Either/Or
Begging the claim- conclusion that the writer should
prove is validated within the claim( Circular argument)
Arguing Off the point
The argument ad Hominem- attack the persons
character than their opinion
Appeal to crowd
Guilt by association
Post Hoc, ergo Propter Hoc-after this, therefore
because of this
Faulty analogy: assuming two unlike things are similar
when in fact they are not
Red Herring
Avoid also
Revising
Concluding
The End!