EMH Corporate Finance
EMH Corporate Finance
EMH Corporate Finance
and Finance
Just Crowed
Concept that Stock price movements follow
Brownian Motion and are thus Random Walk
was presented in 1900 by Louis Bachillier in his
PhD Thesis at Sorbonne : Thorie de la
Speculation .
In 1905 Albert Einstien, INTRODUCED the
Brownian Motion in Gas Particles.
In 1906, Karl Pearson, argued that STOCK PRICES
FOLLOW RANDOM WALK
The weak form of the EMH says that past prices, volume, and
other market statistics provide no information that can be
used to predict future prices.
If stock price changes are random, then past prices cannot be
used to forecast future prices.
Price changes should be random because it is information that
drives these changes, and information arrives randomly.
Prices should change very quickly and to the correct level
when new information arrives (see next slide).
This form of the EMH, if correct, repudiates technical analysis.
Most research supports the notion that the markets are weak
form efficient.
Technical Analysis
Notes: Each bar represents high, low, and close for one-minute. Each solid gridline represents the top of an hour, and each
dotted gridline represents a half-hour.
Fundamental Analysis
Fundamental Analysis
Fundamental
Analysis
Fundamental analysis varies in
technique but generally focuses on
forecasting the firm's future dividends
or earnings, discounting those future
cash flows by the required rate of
return (usually obtained from the
CAPM), and comparing the resulting
estimated price with the current stock
price.
Decision-Mispricing:
Undervalued / Overvalued
The EMH
Graphically
All historical prices and
returns
Strong Form
Semi-Strong
Weak Form
Analysts
Performance
This chart from the Wall Street Journal, shows that when analysts issue
sell recommendations, those stocks frequently outperform those with
buy or hold ratings. If the professionals cant get it right, who can?
Informational Efficiency
Are price changes consistently predictable
Anomalies
The Incredible
January Effect
Summary of Tests of
the EMH
Weak form is supported, so technical analysis
cannot consistently outperform the market.
Semi-strong form is mostly supported , so
fundamental analysis cannot consistently
outperform the market.
Strong form is generally not supported. If you have
secret (insider) information, you CAN use it to
earn excess returns on a consistent basis.
Ultimately, most believe that the market is very
efficient, though not perfectly efficient. It is
unlikely that any system of analysis could
consistently and significantly beat the market
(adjusted for costs and risk) over the long run.
Passive Management
Buy and Hold portfolios
Assumes inefficiency,
use technical and/or
fundamental analysis
to pick securities
Consistent with
semi-strong
efficiency
Mini Case 1
If Markets are efficient, what should be the
correlation coefficient between stock returns for two
non overlapping time periods.
Mini Case 2
A successful firm like intel has consistently
generated large profits for years. Is this a
violations of the EMH?
No. Why?
Maybe due to a higher
risk?
Maybe due to constant
surprises beyond
expected surprise
earnings.
Mini Case 3
Prices of Stock before stock splits show on
average consistently positive abnormal returns. Is
this a violation of the EMH?
Mini Case 4
If the business cycle is predictable, and a stock
has a positive beta, the stocks returns also must
be predictable. Respond
No, Why?
You wont get + abnormal returns if the economic
cycle is predictable, the news will already be
incorporated in the stocks price.
Mini Case 5
You know that firm XYZ is very poorly run. On a
management scale of 1 (worst) to 10 (best), you
would give it a score of 3. The market consensus
evaluation is that the management score is only
2. Should you buy or sell the stock?
No, Why?
You wont get + abnormal returns if the economic
cycle is predictable, the news will already be
incorporated in the stocks price.
37
Technical
Short-term positive correlations
Long-term negative correlations
Small Firms in January effect
Fundamental
Investing for value v. growth
Vishny and Lalinshock
Fama and French
Intermediate Investments F305
38