DOE Course - Lecture #1

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 27

Design and Analysis of

Engineering Experiments

DOE - I
Introduction

Design of Engineering
Experiments
Introduction

Goals of the course and assumptions


An abbreviated history of DOE
The strategy of experimentation
Some basic principles and
terminology
Guidelines for planning, conducting
and analyzing experiments
3

Assumptions
You have

a first course in statistics


heard of the normal distribution
know about the mean and variance
have done some regression analysis or heard of it
know something about ANOVA or heard of it

Have used Windows or Mac based computers


Have done or will be conducting experiments
Have not heard of factorial designs, fractional
factorial designs, RSM, and DACE.

Some major players in DOE


Sir Ronald A. Fisher - pioneer
invented ANOVA and used of statistics in
experimental design while working at Rothamsted
Agricultural Experiment Station, London, England.

George E. P. Box - married Fishers daughter


still active (86 years old)
developed response surface methodology (1951)
plus many other contributions to statistics

Others
Raymond Myers, J. S. Hunter, W. G. Hunter, Yates,
Montgomery, Finney, etc..

Four eras of DOE

The agricultural origins, 1918 1940s


R. A. Fisher & his co-workers
Profound impact on agricultural science
Factorial designs, ANOVA
The first industrial era, 1951 late 1970s
Box & Wilson, response surfaces
Applications in the chemical & process industries
The second industrial era, late 1970s 1990
Quality improvement initiatives in many companies
Taguchi and robust parameter design, process
robustness
The modern era, beginning circa 1990
Wide use of computer technology in DOE
Expanded use of DOE in Six-Sigma and in business
Use of DOE in computer experiments
6

Course References
D. G. Montgomery (2008): Design and Analysis
of Experiments, 8th Edition, John Wiley and
Sons
one of the best book in the market. Uses DesignExpert software for illustrations. Uses letters for
Factors.

G. E. P. Box, W. G. Hunter, and J. S. Hunter


(2005): Statistics for Experimenters: An
Introduction to Design, Data Analysis, and
Model Building, John Wiley and Sons. 2 nd Edition
Classic text with lots of examples. No computer aided
solutions. Uses numbers for Factors.

Journal of Quality Technology, Technometrics,


American Statistician, discipline specific
journals
7

Introduction: What is meant


by DOE?

Experiment -

a test or a series of tests in which purposeful


changes are made to the input variables or factors
of a system so that we may observe and identify
the reasons for changes in the output response(s).
Question: 5 factors, and 2 response variables
Want to know the effect of each factor on the
response and how the factors may interact with
each other
Want to predict the responses for given levels of
the factors
Want to find the levels of the factors that
optimizes the responses - e.g. maximize Y 1 but
minimize Y2
Time and budget allocated for 30 test runs only.
8

Example
A metallurgical engineer is interested in
studying the effect of two different
hardening processes, oil quenching and
saltwater quenching, on an aluminum
alloy.
The objective of the experimenter (the
engineer)
is
to
determine
which
quenching
solution
produces
the
maximum hardness for this particular
alloy.
9

Example (Cont.)
As we consider this simple experiment, a number of
important questions come to mind:
Are these two solutions the only quenching media of
potential interest?
Are there any other factors that might affect hardness that
should be investigated or controlled in this experiment
(such as, the temperature of the quenching media)?
How many coupons of alloy should be tested in each
quenching solution?
How should the test coupons be assigned to the quenching
solutions, and in what order should the data be collected?
What method of data analysis should be used?
What difference in average observed hardness between
the two quenching media will be considered important?

10

Strategy of Experimentation
Strategy of experimentation
Best guess approach (trial and error)
can continue indefinitely
cannot guarantee best solution has been found

One-factor-at-a-time (OFAT) approach


inefficient (requires many test runs)
fails to consider any possible interaction between
factors

Factorial approach (invented in the 1920s)


Factors varied together (In a factorial experiment, all
possible combinations of factor levels are tested)
Correct, modern, and most efficient approach
Can determine how factors interact
Used extensively in industrial R and D, and for
process improvement.
11

Statistical Design of Experiments


All experiments should be designed
experiments
Unfortunately, some experiments are
poorly designed - valuable resources are
used ineffectively and results
inconclusive
Statistically designed experiments permit
efficiency and economy, and the use of
statistical methods in examining the data
result in scientific objectivity when
drawing conclusions.
12

DOE is a methodology for systematically


applying statistics to experimentation.
DOE lets experimenters develop a
mathematical model that predicts how
input variables interact to create output
variables or responses in a process or
system.
DOE can be used for a wide range of
experiments for various purposes including
nearly all fields of engineering and even in
business marketing.
Use of statistics is very important in DOE
and the basics are covered in a first course
in an engineering program.
13

In general, by using DOE, we can:


Learn about the process we are
investigating
Screen important variables
Build a mathematical model
Obtain prediction equations
Optimize the response (if required)
Statistical significance is tested using
ANOVA, and the prediction model is
obtained using regression analysis.
14

Applications of DOE in Engineering


Design
Experiments are conducted in the field of
engineering to:
evaluate and compare basic design
configurations
evaluate different materials
select design parameters so that the design
will work well under a wide variety of field
conditions (robust design)
determine key design parameters that
impact performance

15

INPUTS
(Factors)
X variables

OUTPUTS
(Responses)
Y variables

People

Materials

PROCESS:
Equipment

responses related
to performing a
service

Policies

responses related
to producing a
produce

Procedures

A Blending of
Inputs which
Generates
Corresponding
Outputs

responses related
to completing a task

Methods

Environment

Illustration of a Process

16

INPUTS
(Factors)
X variables

OUTPUTS
(Responses)
Y variables

Type of
cement

compressive
strength

Percent water

PROCESS:
Type of
Additives

Percent
Additives

Mixing Time

modulus of elasticity

Discovering
Optimal
Concrete
Mixture

modulus of rupture

Poisson's ratio

Curing
Conditions

% Plasticizer

Optimum Concrete Mixture

17

INPUTS
(Factors)
X variables

OUTPUTS
(Responses)
Y variables

Type of Raw
Material

Mold
Temperature

Holding
Pressure

PROCESS:

% shrinkage from
mold size

Holding Time

Gate Size

thickness of molded
part

Manufacturing
Injection
Molded Parts

number of defective
parts

Screw Speed

Moisture
Content

Manufacturing Injection Molded


Parts

18

INPUTS
(Factors)
X variables

OUTPUTS
(Responses)
Y variables

Brand:
Cheap vs Costly

PROCESS:

Taste:
Scale of 1 to 10

Time:
4 min vs 6 min

Power:
75% or 100%

Height:
On bottom or raised

Making the
Best
Microwave
popcorn

Bullets:
Grams of unpopped
corns

Making microwave popcorn


19

Examples of experiments from daily


life

Photography

Factors: speed of film, lighting, shutter speed


Response: quality of slides made close up with flash
attachment

Boiling water
Factors: Pan type, burner size, cover
Response: Time to boil water

Mailing
Factors: stamp, area code, time of day when letter
mailed
Response: Number of days required for letter to be
delivered

20

More examples
Cooking
Factors: amount of cooking wine, oyster sauce,
sesame oil
Response: Taste of stewed chicken

Basketball
Factors: Distance from basket, type of shot, location
on floor
Response: Number of shots made (out of 10) with
basketball

Skiing
Factors: Ski type, temperature, type of wax
Response: Time to go down ski slope

21

Basic Principles
Statistical design of experiments
(DOE)
the process of planning experiments
so that appropriate data can be
analyzed by statistical methods that
results in valid, objective, and
meaningful conclusions from the data
involves two aspects: design and
statistical analysis
22

Three basic principles of Statistical DOE


Replication
allows an estimate of experimental error
allows for a more precise estimate of the
sample mean value

Randomization
cornerstone of all statistical methods
average out effects of extraneous factors
reduce bias and systematic errors

Blocking
increases precision of experiment
factor out variable not studied
23

Guidelines for Designing


Experiments

Recognition of and statement of the problem


need to develop all ideas about the objectives of
the experiment - get input from everybody - use
team approach.

Choice of factors, levels, ranges, and response


variables.
Need to use engineering judgment or prior test
results.

Choice of experimental design


sample size, replicates, run order, randomization,
software to use, design of data collection forms.

24

Performing the experiment


vital to monitor the process carefully. Easy to
underestimate logistical and planning aspects
in a complex R and D environment.

Statistical analysis of data


provides objective conclusions - use simple
graphics whenever possible.

Conclusion and recommendations


follow-up test runs and confirmation testing to
validate the conclusions from the experiment.

Do we need to add or drop factors, change


ranges, levels, new responses, etc.. ???

25

Factorial Design

26

27

You might also like