0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1K views25 pages

Lossless Decomposition

Uploaded by

Lakhveer Kaur
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
1K views25 pages

Lossless Decomposition

Uploaded by

Lakhveer Kaur
Copyright
© Attribution Non-Commercial (BY-NC)
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPT, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 25

Lossless Decomposition

By Chi-Shu Ho
For CS157A
Prof. Sin-Min Lee
Decomposition
 Goal: Eliminate redundancy by decomposing a
relation into several relations in a higher normal
form.
 It is important to check that a decomposition does
not introduce new problems.
-- A good decomposition allows us to recover the
original relation
Decompositions in General

Let R be a relation with attributes A1 ,A2 ,…An


Create two relations R1 and R2 with attributes
B1 , B2 ,…Bm C1 ,C2 ,…Ci
Such that:
B1 , B2 ,…Bm ∪ C1 ,C2 ,…Ci = A1 ,A2 ,…AN
And
R1 is the projection of R on B1 , B2 ,…Bm
R2 is the projection of R on C1 ,C2 ,…Ci
Problems with Decomposition
 Some queries become more expensive
 Given instances of the decomposed
relations, we may not be able to reconstruct
the corresponding instance of the original
relation – information loss.
Certain Decomposition May Cause Problem

R Name Price Category


Gizmo 19.99 Gadget
OneClick 24.99 Camera
DoubleClick 29.99 Camera

R1 Name Category R2 Price Category


Gizmo Gadget 19.99 Gadget
OneClick Camera 24.99 Camera
DoubleClick Camera 29.99 Camera
R’ Name Price Category
Gizmo 19.99 Gadget
OneClick 24.99 Camera
OneClick 29.99 Camera
DoubleClick 29.99 Camera
DoubleClick 29.99 Camera

R Name Price Category


Gizmo 19.99 Gadget
OneClick 24.99 Camera
DoubleClick 29.99 Camera
Lossy Decomposition
T
Employee Project Branch
Brown Mars L.A.
Green Jupiter San Jose
Green Venus San Jose
Hoskins Saturn San Jose
Hoskins Venus San Jose
Functional dependencies:
Employee Branch, Project Branch
Lossy Decomposition
Decomposition of the previous relation

T1 T2
Employee Branch Project Branch
Brown L.A Mars L.A.
Green San Jose Jupiter San Jose
Hoskins San Jose Saturn San Jose
Venus San Jose
Lossy Decomposition
After Natural Join Original Relation
Employee Project Branch Employee Project Branch
Brown Mars L.A. Brown Mars L.A.
Green Jupiter San Jose Green Jupiter San Jose
Green Venus San Jose Green Venus San Jose
Hoskins Saturn San Jose Hoskins Saturn San Jose
Hoskins Venus San Jose Hoskins Venus San Jose
Green Saturn San Jose
Hoskins Jupiter San Jose

The result is different from the original relation: the information


can not be reconstructed.
Lossless Decompostion
A decomposition is lossless if we can recover:
R(A, B, C)
Decompose
R1(A, B) R2(A, C)
Recover
R’(A, B, C)

R’ = R
What is lossless decomposition?
 The decomposition of a relation R on X 1
and X2 is lossless if the join of the
projections of R on X1 and X2 is equal to R
itself (that is, not containing false tuples).
Lossless Decomposition Property
 The decomposition of R into X and Y is
lossless with respect to F if and only if the
closure of F contains either:
– X ∩ Y (X intersect Y)  X, that is: all
attributes common to both X and Y functionally
determine ALL the attributes in X OR
– X ∩ Y (X intersect Y)  Y, that is: all
attributes common to both X and Y functionally
determine ALL the attributes in Y
Armstrong’s Axioms
X, Y, Z are sets of attributes

1. Reflexivity: If X  Y, then X  Y
2. Augmentation: If X  Y, then XZ  YZ for
any Z
3. Transitivity: If X  Y and Y  Z, then
XZ
4. Union: If X  Y and X  Z, then X  YZ
5. Decomposition: If X  YZ, then X  Y and
XZ
Example of Lossless Decomposition
GIVEN:
LENDINGSCHEME=(BRANCHNAME, ASSETS,
BRANCHCITY, LOANNUMBER, CUSTOMERNAME,
AMOUNT)
REQUIRED FD'S:

BRANCHNAME  ASSETS BRANCHCITY

LOANNUMBER  AMOUNT BRANCHNAME
DECOMPOSE LENDINGSCHEME INTO:
1. BRANCHSCHEME=(BRANCHNAME, ASSETS,
BRANCHCITY)
2. BORROWSCHEME=(BRANCHNAME,
LOANNUMBER, CUSTOMERNAME, AMOUNT)
Example of Lossless Decomposition
SHOW THAT THE DECOMPOSITION IS A LOSSLESS
DECOMPOSITION

1. USE AUGMENTATION RULE ON FIRST FD TO


OBTAIN:
BRANCHNAME  BRANCHNAME ASSETS
BRANCHCITY
2. INTERSECTION OF BRANCHSCHEME AND
BORROWSCHEME IS BRANCHNAME
3. BRANCHNAME  BRANCHSCHEME
4. SO, INITIAL DECOMPOSITION IS A LOSSLESS
Example 2

GIVEN:
BORROWSCHEME=(BRANCHNAME, LOANNUMBER,
CUSTOMERNAME, AMOUNT)
REQUIRED FD'S:

LOANNUMBER  AMOUNT BRANCHNAME
DECOMPOSE LENDINGSCHEME INTO:
1. LOAN-INFO-SCHEME=(BRANCHNAME,
LOANNUMBER, AMOUNT)
2. CUSTOMER-LOAN-SCHEME=(LOANNUMBER,
CUSTOMERNAME)
Example 2 (con’t)

SHOW THAT THE DECOMPOSITION IS A LOSSLESS


DECOMPOSITION

1. USE AUGMENTATION RULE ON FD TO OBTAIN:


LOANNUMBER  LOANNUMBER AMOUNT
BRANCHNAME
2. INTERSECTION OF LOAN-INFO-SCHEME AND
CUSTOMER-LOAN-SCHEME IS LOANNUMBER
3. LOANNUMBER  LOAN-INFO-SCHEME
4. SO, INITIAL DECOMPOSITION IS A LOSSLESS
Example

R1 (A1, A2, A3, A5)


R2 (A1, A3, A4)
R3 (A4, A5)
FD1: A1  A3 A5
FD2: A5  A1 A4
FD3: A3 A4  A2
Example (con’t)

A1 A2 A3 A4 A5
R1 a(1) a(2) a(3) b(1,4) a(5)
R2 a(1) b(2,2) a(3) a(4) b(2,5)
R3 b(3,1) b(3,2) b(3,3) a(4) a(5)
Example (con’t)
By FD1: A1  A3 A5

A1 A2 A3 A4 A5
R1 a(1) a(2) a(3) b(1,4) a(5)
R2 a(1) b(2,2) a(3) a(4) b(2,5)
R3 b(3,1) b(3,2) b(3,3) a(4) a(5)
Example (con’t)
By FD1: A1  A3 A5
we have a new result table
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5
R1 a(1) a(2) a(3) b(1,4) a(5)
R2 a(1) b(2,2) a(3) a(4) a(5)
R3 b(3,1) b(3,2) b(3,3) a(4) a(5)
Example (con’t)

By FD2: A5  A1 A4

A1 A2 A3 A4 A5
R1 a(1) a(2) a(3) b(1,4) a(5)
R2 a(1) b(2,2) a(3) a(4) a(5)
R3 b(3,1) b(3,2) b(3,3) a(4) a(5)
Example (con’t)
By FD2: A5  A1 A4
we have a new result table
A1 A2 A3 A4 A5
R1 a(1) a(2) a(3) a(4) a(5)
R2 a(1) b(2,2) a(3) a(4) a(5)
R3 a(1) b(3,2) b(3,3) a(4) a(5)
Conclusions
 Decompositions should always be
lossless:
-- Lossless decomposition ensure that the
information in the original relation can be
accurately reconstructed based on the
information represented in the
decomposed relations.

You might also like