Assessment of Clinical Reasoning
Assessment of Clinical Reasoning
Assessment of Clinical Reasoning
INTRODUCTION
Todays nurses are facing very complex and challenging clinical
situations in an uncertain environment due to
- changing healthcare settings
- higher patient acuity levels
- shortage of nurses belonging to all categories
- increased use of technology
INTRODUCTION- CONTD
- greater emphasis on cost containment,
and
- emergence of new illnesses.
As a result, nurses must be able to quickly analyze clinical
situations and make best decisions in time to ensure high
quality patient care.
CLINICAL REASONING
The process by which nurses (and other clinicians) collect
cues, process the information, come to an understanding
of a patient problem or situation, plan and implement
interventions, evaluate outcomes, and reflect on and learn
from the process. Levett-jones, T
CLINICAL REASONING
Clinical reasoning is central to clinical Practice. Health
professionals often need to make decisions based on their
professional knowledge and judgment in situations
where there are no right answers, and where textbook
and research knowledge is insufficient or needs to be
adapted to the particular client.
OBJECTIVES
1. Assess the clinical reasoning skills among B.Sc.Nursing
students.
2. Find out the association between clinical reasoning
skills and selected variables.
DATA COLLECTION
Formal permission from Principal of the college and
informed consent from students were obtained. Sociopersonal data was collected, followed by the
administration of script concordance test to assess the
clinical reasoning skills.
ANALYSIS
The data were analysed and presented in the form of
frequency, percentage and mean
FINDINGS
All the students were in the age group of 19-20 years.
Only 6.67% of the students were boys.
Majority (86.67%) of the students had cleared the
previous years university examination.
FINDINGS
The mean scores obtained for clinical reasoning was 24.58.
None of the students were having good clinical reasoning
skill.
Students having moderate and poor clinical reasoning were
53.33% and 46.67% respectively.
No significant association was found between clinical
reasoning and variables such as gender and previous years
academic performance
CONCLUSION