Unemployment and Inflation
Unemployment and Inflation
Unemployment and Inflation
Chapter Outline
9.1 Measure the Unemployment Rate, the Labor
Force Participation Rate, and the Employment
Population Ratio
9.2 Types of Unemployment
9.3 Measure Inflation
9.4 Use Price Indexes to Adjust for the Effects of
Inflation
9.5 Cost of Inflation on the Economy
3 of 49
Figure 9.1
The Employment
Status of the
Civilian WorkingAge Population,
InSeptember
September2011
2011,
the working-age
population of the
United States was
240.1 million.
The working-age
population is
divided into those
in the labor force (154.0 million)
and those not in the labor force (86.1 million).
The labor force is divided into the employed (140.0 million)
and the unemployed (14.0 million).
Those not in the labor force are divided into those
not available for work (79.9 million)
and those available for work but not currently working (6.2 million).
Finally, those available for work but not in the labor force are divided into
discouraged workers (1.0 million)
and those not currently looking for work for other reasons (5.2 million).
2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
4 of 49
Number of unemployed
100 Unemployme nt rate
Labor force
Using the numbers from Figure 9.1, we can calculate the
unemployment rate for September 2011:
14.0 million
100 9.1%
154.0 million
The percentage of
Labor force
100 Labor force participat ion rate
Working - age population
2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
5 of 49
154.0 million
100 64.1%
240.1 million
The
percentage of the working-age population that is employed:
Employment
100 Employment population ratio
Working - age population
140.0 million
100 58.3%
240.1 million
2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
6 of 49
Number of unemployed
100
Labor force
Including people in the military would increase the number of people counted as
being in the labor force but would leave unchanged the number of people
counted as unemployed.
Therefore, the unemployment rate would decrease.
2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
7 of 49
Labor force
100
Working - age population
and the employmentpopulation ratio is calculated as
Employment
100
Working - age population
Including people in the military would increase the number of people in the
labor force, the number of people employed, and the number of people in the
working-age population all by the same amount.
This change would increase the labor force participation rate and the
employmentpopulation ratio because adding the same number to both the
numerator and the denominator of a fraction that is less than one increases the
value of the fraction.
2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
8 of 49
50,000,000
100 50%
100,000,000
and the labor force participation rate including the military is
51,000,000
100 50.5%
101,000,000
A similar calculation shows that including the military would increase the
employmentpopulation ratio.
9 of 49
10 of
Figure 9.2
The red line shows the usual measure of the unemployment rate.
The blue line shows what it would be if the BLS had counted as unemployed all
people who were available for work but not actively looking for jobs and all
people who were in part-time jobs but wanted full-time jobs.
The difference between the measures was particularly large during the 2007
2009 recession and the weak recovery that followed.
Shaded areas indicate months of recession.
2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
11 of
Figure 9.3
Trends in the Labor Force: Participation Rates of Adult Men and Women
since 1948
The labor force participation rate of adult men has declined gradually since
1948,
but it has increased significantly for adult women, making the overall rate
higher today than it was then.
12 of
Making
the
Connection
13 of
Making
the
Connection
14 of
Figure 9.6
The unemployment rate rises during recessions and falls during expansion.
Shaded areas indicate recessions.
2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
15 of
16 of
Table 9.1
September
Change
Employed
139,627,00
0
140,025,000
398,000
Unemployed
13,967,000
13,992,000
25,000
Labor force
153,594,00
0
154,017,000
423,000
August
September
Change
131,231,000 131,334,000
103,000
Note: The sum of employed and unemployed may not equal the labor
Unemployment
9.1%
9.1%
0%
force
due torate
rounding.
The discrepancy between the two surveys is partly due to the slightly
different groups they cover and partly to inaccuracies.
17 of
Most workers spend at least some time engaging in job search, just
as most firms spend time searching for a new person to fill a job
opening.
Frictional unemployment
Seasonal unemployment
18 of
Structural unemployment
Cyclical unemployment
Unemployment caused by a
Full
Employment
When
the only remaining unemployment is structural and frictional
unemployment, the economy is said to be at full employment.
full-employment rate of
unemployment.
sometimes called the
19 of
Labor Unions
Labor unions are organizations of workers that bargain with
employers for higher wages and better working conditions for their
members. About 9 percent of workers outside the government sector
are unionized.
Efficiency Wages
21 of
22 of
23 of
Price
Expenditures
(on base-year
quantities)
$100.00
$85.00
$85.00
15.00
300.00
14.00
280.00
25.00
500.00
27.50
550.00
Price
Expenditures
Price
$50.00
$50.00
$100.00
Pizzas
20
10.00
200.00
Books
20
25.00
500.00
Eye
examinations
TOTAL
Quantity
$750.00
Expenditures
(on base-year
quantities)
2013
$900.00
$915.00
Assuming that households buy the same market basket of products each
month, the quantities of the products purchased in 2012 and 2013 are
irrelevant in calculating the CPI. The numbers in the table can give us
the
CPI
for those
years.
2013
Pearson
Education,
Inc. Publishing
as Prentice Hall
24 of
Formula
Applied to 2012
Applied to 2013
$900
100 120
$
750
$915
100 122
$
750
The values of 120 and 122 are index numbers, which means they are not
measured in dollars or any other units.
The CPI is intended to measure changes in the price level over time. Thus,
the inflation rate in 2013 would be the percentage change in the CPI from
2012 to 2013:
122 120
100 1.7%
120
25 of
Is the CPI
Accurate?
There
are four biases that cause changes in the CPI to overstate the
true inflation rate by 0.5 percentage point to 1 percentage point,
according to most economists, which the BLS continues to take steps
to reduce:
Substitution bias. In constructing the CPI, the BLS assumes
that consumers purchase the same monthly amount of each product in
the market basket, but consumers actually buy fewer of those
products that increase most in price.
Increase in quality bias. The BLS attempts to make
adjustments so that only the pure inflation part of price increases is
included in the CPI, but some price increases are included that partly
reflect an improved quality of products.
New product bias. For many years, the BLS updated the
market basket of goods used in computing the CPI only every 10
years, which excluded new products introduced between updates.
Outlet bias.
CPI in 2010
CPI
in
1984
219
$42,115
104
$20,000
27 of
real
variables.
Real Value of a variable in year t
= (Nominal value of the variable in year t / price index of year t) x
100
Real variable gives the value of a variable measured in base year
Once
we convert
all years nominal values into their real
2013 prices.
Pearson Education,
Inc. Publishing
as Prentice Hall
28 of
CPI
(19821984 = 100)
2008
$21.62
216.2
2009
22.21
215.9
2010
22.59
218.6
What was the percentage change in real average hourly earnings between 2009
and 2010?
100 $10.00
216.2
2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
29 of
Nominal Average
Hourly Earnings
CPI
(19821984 = 100)
2008
$21.62
216.2
$10.00
2009
22.21
215.9
10.29
2010
22.59
218.6
10.33
Step 3: Calculate the percentage change in real average earnings from 2009 to
2010.
This percentage change is equal to
$10.33 $10.29
100 0.4%
$
10
.
29
We can conclude that real average hourly earnings increased slightly between
2009
and 2010.
For purposes of calculating the change in the value of real average hourly
earnings over time, the base year of the price index doesnt matter.
To prove it, try calculating real average hourly earnings for 2009 and 2010 in
2010 dollars, and then calculate the percentage change.
Unless you make an arithmetic error, you should find that the answer is still 0.4
percent.
2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
30 of
imately,
Deflation
Disinflation
rises.
31 of
Figure 9.8
32 of
When the actual inflation rate turns out to be very different from the
expected inflation rate, some people gain, and other people lose.
For example, lenders lose and debtors gain; workers lose and
employers gain; retirees on pensions lose and their former
employers gain, etc.
2013 Pearson Education, Inc. Publishing as Prentice Hall
33 of
1930
1931
1932
1933
5%
5%
5%
5%
9.0
9.9
5.1
14.00
14.90
10.10
2.3
7.30
34 of