Political Bands

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 80

Political Organization and Leadership

Bands

Political Organization and Leadership

V.B. Modern Microcultures

V.A. Modern Folk Societies

IIII. States

III.

Chiefdoms

II.

Tribes

I.

Bands

Political Organization and Leadership

I.

Bands
the political organization
of foraging groups

Political Organization and Leadership

II.

Tribes
a political group that
comprises several bands
or lineage groups, each
with similar language and
lifestyle and occupying a
distinct territory

Political Organization and Leadership

III.

Chiefdoms
a political unit of
permanently allied tribes
and villages under one
recognized leader

Political Organization and Leadership

IIII. States
a centralized political unit
encompassing many
communities and
possessing coercive
power

Political Organization and Leadership

V.A. Modern Folk Societies


a social type of rural
farmer associated with
preindustrial civilization,
dominated by the city and
its culture but marginal to
both

Political Organization and Leadership

V.B. Modern Microcultures


a distinct pattern of
learned and shared
behavior and thinking
found within larger
cultures such as ethnic
groups, and institutional
cultures

Political Organization and Leadership

I.

Bands
the political organization
of foraging groups
small groups of
households, between
twenty and a few hundred
people at most

Band Societies

Hunting / Gathering
99% of humans time has been
that of a hunter-gatherer

10, 000 B.C. 100 % Foragers


Ascent to Civilization, p. 10.

A.D. 1500 1 % Foragers


Ascent to Civilization, p. 10.

A.D. 1982 < 0.001 % Foragers


Ascent to Civilization, p. 11.

Band Societies
Until the mid-1980s the !Kung
model of the foraging lifeway
dominated the band paradigm
(Science, May 1988)

Map 12-3

Band Societies
Anthropologists no longer take
the !Kung as the model of preagricultural band societies

Band Societies
Anthropologists now recognize
a much greater variability
among foraging bands
(Science, May 1988)

Band Societies
The Hunters are hunters, for example . . .

But The Desert People are not hunters

Band Societies
The Desert People

Pfeiffer, Ch. 15

The Hunters

Pfeiffer, Ch. 16

Hunting / Gathering
The Desert People

Australian
aborigines

The Hunters

Bushmen

!Kung San

Khoisan

zhun/twasi
(ourselves)

desert dwellers

Aborigines of the
Western Australian Desert

!Kung San of the


Kalahari Desert

Band Societies
The Desert People

simple material
culture

The Hunters

simple material
culture

Band Societies
The households come together
at certain times of the year,
depending on their foraging
patterns and ritual schedule

Band Societies
Moving puts a premium
on multi-purpose tools
e.g.,

digging stick, blade tools . . .

Hunting / Gathering
While foraging groups are
usually bilineal in descent and
inheritance, some early hunting
groups may have been
patrilineal bands . . .

Hunting / Gathering
The Desert People

The Hunters

band society

band society

and many hunting band societies


are still patrilineal

Hunting / Gathering

patrilineal kinship

Hunting / Gathering

patrilineal kinship

Hunting / Gathering

patrilineal societies are patrilocal

patrilocal residence

Band Societies
simplest level of social organization

small groups of families


ca. 20 50 / group

Band Societies

!Kung San in Camps

Band Societies

20 500 persons integrated by a


shared language and a sense of
common identity

exact numbers depend on the carrying


capacity of their geographic area

Band Societies

magic numbers are 25 and 500

Band Societies
External

conflict between
groups is rare since
territories of different bands
are widely separated and the
population density is low

Band Societies
Band

Band

membership is flexible

composition is fluid as
people shift residence
frequently

Band Societies
If

a person has a serious


disagreement with another
person or a spouse, one
option is to leave that band
and join another

Band Societies
Leadership is charismatic:

no official leaders

leadership is informal

leader has no power and only limited


authority

position carries no rewards of power or


riches

Band Societies
Leadership

is based on the
quality of the individuals
advice and personality

Band Societies
Band

leaders have limited


authority or influence, but no
power

Band Societies
Age and sex
generally determine
who will exert influence:

strongly male dominated

but the old people -- male and


female -- are respected and are
influential

Band Societies
influence

may dissolve or be
created in an instant

person may come to the


fore as a leader for specific
tasks or events

Band Societies
status

positions are fluid from


generation to generation

Band Societies
There

is no social
stratification between leaders
and followers

Band Societies
Group

decisions are made by


consensus

Band Societies
Political

activity in bands
involves mainly decision
making about migration, food
distribution, and
interpersonal conflict
resolution

Band Societies
Marriages

are through
alliances with members of
other bands

Video: N!ai, The Story Of A !Kung Woman

hunting
Bands are often nomadic
hunting-gathering groups

hunting
When bands are hunters,
male male relationships
dominate

usually there are male


associations

hunting
Difference between
young males and old males
is intensified in hunting
societies

hunting
Ability to hunt signifies change
of status and may be required
for adulthood

hunting
Hunting intensifies
differences between sexes . . .

hunting
Hunting creates a male world
and a world of the women
and children

hunting
Hunting increases the division
of labor between sexes

hunting
But hunting thus also creates
more need for
cooperating between sexes

hunting
In hunting societies, sharing
becomes important
for survival

hunting
Females specialize
in collecting

hunting
75 % of hunters
rely more heavily on collecting
than on hunting
(Martin and Voorhies, 1975)

hunting
In the Gibson Desert, for e.g.,
90 % of the time
women furnish at least
80 % of the food

hunting
In hunting societies
females stay
in the home base more

hunting
Female division of labor
by age

hunting
Home base
changes socialization patterns

hunting
Delayed maturity is related to
home base
emphasis

is placed on learning

hunting
From the childs point of view
the home base
= a self-contained world

hunting
Home base
allows sick to survive

Paleopathologists Wil Salo (left) and Art Aufderheide (right).


Understanding Physical Anthropology and Archaeology, 8th Ed., p. 117.

Political Organization and Leadership

V.B. Modern Microcultures

V.A. Modern Folk Societies

IIII. States

III.

Chiefdoms

II.

Tribes

I.

Bands

You might also like