Aes

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 25

Advanced Encryption

Standard

Origins

clear a replacement for DES was needed

have theoretical attacks that can break it


have demonstrated exhaustive key search attacks

can use Triple-DES but slow, has small blocks


US NIST issued call for ciphers in 1997
15 candidates accepted in Jun 98
5 were shortlisted in Aug-99
Rijndael was selected as the AES in Oct-2000
issued as FIPS PUB 197 standard in Nov-2001

AES Requirements
private key symmetric block cipher
128-bit data, 128/192/256-bit keys
stronger & faster than Triple-DES
active life of 20-30 years (+ archival use)
provide full specification & design details
both C & Java implementations
NIST have released all submissions &

unclassified analyses

AES Evaluation Criteria


initial criteria:

security effort for practical cryptanalysis


cost in terms of computational efficiency
algorithm & implementation characteristics

final criteria

general security
ease of software & hardware implementation
implementation attacks
flexibility (in en/decrypt, keying, other factors)

The AES Cipher - Rijndael

designed by Rijmen-Daemen in Belgium


has 128/192/256 bit keys, 128 bit data
an iterative rather than feistel cipher

processes data as block of 4 columns of 4 bytes


operates on entire data block in every round

designed to be:

resistant against known attacks


speed and code compactness on many CPUs
design simplicity

Rijndael

data block of 4 columns of 4 bytes is state


key is expanded to array of words
has 10/12/14 rounds in which state undergoes:

byte substitution (1 S-box used on every byte)


shift rows (permute bytes between groups/columns)
mix columns (subs using matrix multipy of groups)
add round key (XOR state with key material)
view as alternating XOR key & scramble data bytes

initial XOR key material & incomplete last round


with fast XOR & table lookup implementation

Rijndael

Byte Substitution

a simple substitution of each byte


uses one table of 16x16 bytes containing a
permutation of all 256 8-bit values
each byte of state is replaced by byte indexed by
row (left 4-bits) & column (right 4-bits)

eg. byte {95} is replaced by byte in row 9 column 5


which has value {2A}

S-box constructed using defined transformation


of values in GF(28)
designed to be resistant to all known attacks

Byte Substitution

Shift Rows

a circular byte shift in each each

1st row is unchanged


2nd row does 1 byte circular shift to left
3rd row does 2 byte circular shift to left
4th row does 3 byte circular shift to left

decrypt inverts using shifts to right


since state is processed by columns, this step
permutes bytes between the columns

Shift Rows

Mix Columns
each column is processed separately
each byte is replaced by a value

dependent on all 4 bytes in the column


effectively a matrix multiplication in GF(2 8)
using prime poly m(x) =x8+x4+x3+x+1

Mix Columns

Mix Columns

can express each col as 4 equations

decryption requires use of inverse matrix

to derive each new byte in col


with larger coefficients, hence a little harder

have an alternate characterisation

each column a 4-term polynomial


with coefficients in GF(28)
and polynomials multiplied modulo (x4+1)

Add Round Key


XOR state with 128-bits of the round key
again processed by column (though

effectively a series of byte operations)


inverse for decryption identical

since XOR own inverse, with reversed keys

designed to be as simple as possible

a form of Vernam cipher on expanded key


requires other stages for complexity / security

Add Round Key

AES Round

AES Key Expansion


takes 128-bit (16-byte) key and expands

into array of 44/52/60 32-bit words


start by copying key into first 4 words
then loop creating words that depend on
values in previous & 4 places back

in 3 of 4 cases just XOR these together


1st word in 4 has rotate + S-box + XOR round
constant on previous, before XOR 4th back

AES Key Expansion

Key Expansion Rationale


designed to resist known attacks
design criteria included

knowing part key insufficient to find many more


invertible transformation
fast on wide range of CPUs
use round constants to break symmetry
diffuse key bits into round keys
enough non-linearity to hinder analysis
simplicity of description

AES Decryption
AES decryption is not identical to

encryption since steps done in reverse


but can define an equivalent inverse
cipher with steps as for encryption

but using inverses of each step


with a different key schedule

works since result is unchanged when

swap byte substitution & shift rows


swap mix columns & add (tweaked) round key

AES Decryption

Implementation Aspects
can efficiently implement on 8-bit CPU

byte substitution works on bytes using a table


of 256 entries
shift rows is simple byte shift
add round key works on byte XORs
mix columns requires matrix multiply in GF(28)
which works on byte values, can be simplified
to use table lookups & byte XORs

Implementation Aspects
can efficiently implement on 32-bit CPU

redefine steps to use 32-bit words


can precompute 4 tables of 256-words
then each column in each round can be
computed using 4 table lookups + 4 XORs
at a cost of 4Kb to store tables

designers believe this very efficient

implementation was a key factor in its


selection as the AES cipher

Summary
have considered:

the AES selection process


the details of Rijndael the AES cipher
looked at the steps in each round
the key expansion
implementation aspects

You might also like