Engineering Structures 101: Structural Engineering: From The Beginning

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 49

Engineering Structures 101

Structural Engineering:
From the Beginning
ProfessorMartinFahey
Head,SchoolofCivil&ResourceEngineering
UniversityofWesternAustralia
(email:[email protected])

Newgrange, Ireland, 3200 BC


80 m diameter burial mound, Boyne Valley (where I grew up!), 40 km
from Dublin, built by pre-Celtic neolithic people (Tuatha de Dannan?)

Newgrange, Ireland, 3200 BC


Exterior view of entrance, and interior of burial chamber. Note stone lintel.
At sunrise on summer solstice (21 June) sun shines through window above
entrance, down the long passage, and strikes an altar at the centre of the chamber.

Stonehenge, Salisbury Plain, England. Between 3000 BC


and 1500 BC. Purpose?

Stonehenge:
Stone beams supported by stone columns

Mesopotamia:
(Land between two rivers - the
Euphrates and the Tigris)
Start of modern civilisations?
about 7000 BC.
Very fertile then - now desert
(Iran/Iraq)

Ziggurat (temple) at Ur, 2125 BC


Mesopotamia
(Sumerians, 3500 to 1900 BC)

Pyramids of Khafre &


Khufu at Giza, Egypt
(Old Kingdom: 26862181BC)

Great Pyramid of Khufu, Giza, Egypt (Old Kingdom: 2686-2181BC). Angle 5152
146 m high, 2.3 million stone blocks, each 2.5 tonnes. Base is almost perfect square,
229 m sides. Aligned perfectly with cardinal points (N,S,E,W)

Climbers on the Great Pyramid at Giza (note sizes of blocks)


Originally, smooth surface - faced with limestone - now
weathered away

Bent Pyramid at Dahshur, Egypt, 2680-2565 B.C


Angle changes from 54 to 43 degrees (foundation/stability problems?). If it had
been completed to original plan, it would have been the biggest pyramid in
Egypt.

Temple of Horus, Edfu, Egypt (3 stages between 237 BC and 57 BC)

Beams: Tension and Compression


Top half of beam in compression:
Rock: strong in compression

Bottom half of beam is in tension:


Rock: weak in tension
Maximum tensile stress mid-span
Value varies in proportion to L2
Therefore, beams must be short if poor tensile
strength
Egyptian & Greek columns close together
- column spacing < 2 x beam depth
- very cluttered space

Galileo's Discorsi, his Dialogues Concerning Two New Sciences, were published in Leyden in
1638. The second new science is concerned with the mechanics of motion; the first gives the
first mathematical account of a problem in structurai engineering. Galileo wishes to compute
the breaking strength of a beam, knowing the strength of the material itself as measured in the
tension test shown in the illustration. The drawing does not encourage belief that Galileo ever
made such a test (although Galileo himself never saw the illustration - he was blind by the time
the book was printed). The hook at B would have pulled out of the stone long before the
column as a whole fractured. In the same way, it is thought that Galileo did not in fact drop
balis of diffrent weights from the Leaning Tower of Pisa. It is not known that Galileo ever
designed crucial experiments of this sort, in order to prove or disprove a theory. What he did
was to make crucial observations, from which ensued brilliant advances in every subject he
touched.
Jacques Heyman The Science of Structural Engineering Imperial College Press

This is the famous illustration for Galileo's basic


problem - the breaking strength of a beam. Again, the
drawing is not really representational, although there
is a wealth of circumstantial detail. In this case the
hook C may well have been able to carry the load, but
the masonry at AB looks insufficient to resist the
turning moment at the wall.
It is interesting to note that Galileo actually got the
statics completely wrong he did not understand that
the stresses on the cross section had to give zero net
horizontal force.

Temple of Horus, Edfu, Egypt

Temple of Horus, Edfu, Egypt


Hypostyle Hall
(hall of many columns)

Parthenon, Athens, Greece, 447 BC. Deep stone beams, over closely-spaced columns

The Parthenon stands atop the Acropolis, in Athens, Greece

Parthenon

Doric
capital

Ionic
capital

Corinthian
capital

Three types of columns (three orders) used in Greek buildings: Doric, Ionic and
Corinthian
The top (capital) of each column type is different
- in fact, whole style & proportions of each are different

Parthenon: Doric order; stone architrave, frieze and cornice

Compacted clay

Tiles
Wooden beams
Wooden planks

Stone architrave

Stone columns

Roof structure of Greek Temple - very short spans

A simple masonry arch is made from identical


wedge-shaped voussoirs - it is built on
falsework, since it cannot stand until the last
stone, the keystone, is in place.
Once
complete, the falsework (the centering) may
be removed, and the arch at once starts to thrust
at the river banks. Inevitably the abutments
will give way slightly, and the arch will spread.
Figure (b), greatly exaggerated, shows how the
arch accommodates itself to the increased span.
The arch has cracked between voussoirs - there
is no strength in these joints, and three hinges
have formed. There is no suggestion that the
arch is on the point of collapse - the three-hinge
arch is a well-known and perfectly stable
structure. On the contrary, the arch has merely
responded in a sensible way to an attack from a
hostile environment (gravity). In practice, the
hinges may betray themselves by cracking of
the mortar between the voussoirs, but larger
open cracks may often be seen.

Arches:
Achieving large spans while
avoiding tension

An arch supports vertical forces by generating compression between


the voissoirs of the arch. The arch abutment must be capable of
supporting the resulting horizontal thrust.

An arch with three hinges can be stable - in fact many arches are
built this way deliberately

Four hinges are required in an arch for collapse. Picture shows


snap-through failure

A stone beam with small span-to-depth ratio (such as those in the


Parthenon) may act as a three-pin arch if it cracks at the centre, and
may not necessarily collapse

Pont du Gard, Nimes, southern France. Aqueduct.


Built by Romans, -15 BC to 14 AD. The Romans
perfected the use of the arch, and used it widely.

This aqueduct, over the river Gard, is 275 metres long and 49 m high. Part of an aqueduct
nearly 50 km long that supplied Nimes with water. On its first level it carries a road and at
the top of the third level, a water conduit, which is 1.8 m high and 1.2 m wide and has a
gradient of 0.4 per cent.

Possible falsework (or centering) scheme used for the Pont du Gard

Pont du Gard: The three levels were built in dressed stone without mortar. The
projecting blocks supported the scaffolding during construction.

Elements of a Roman Arch Bridge

Aqueduct, Segovia, Spain. Built by Romans, 1st century AD.


39 m high

Segovia, Spain

Pons Fabricus (Ponte Fabrico), Rome, Tiber. Built in 62 B.C. by


L.Fabricius. Oldest surviving bridge in Rome. Still used by
pedestrians

Pons Fabricus (Ponte Fabrico), Rome, Tiber. Built in 62 B.C. by


L.Fabricius. Oldest surviving bridge in Rome. Still used by
pedestrians

Pont St Martin, Aosta, Italy. 25


BC. Longest span Roman Arch
bridge (32 m).

Anji, (or Great Stone) Bridge, Jiao River, China, 610 AD, Li Chun.
Still in use. Described by Ming Dynasty poet as new moon rising above
the clouds, a long rainbow drinking from a mountain stream.

Colleseum, Rome,
70-80 AD, Emperor
Vespasian

187 m long, 155 m wide, 49 m high

Arch of Titus, Rome, AD 81.


Triumphal Arch, celebrating victory in war

Arc de Triomphe, Paris


Commissioned in 1806 by
Napoleon I, shortly after his
victory at Austerlitz, it
was not finished until
1836

Culverts and underpasses: soil provides support (pressure from all


sides - circular shape efficient).

Roman Arch compared to Gothic Arch

4/5B
B
Roman Arch:
semi-circular
(Romanesque architecture)

B
Gothic Arch: Pointed.
Example shown is a quinto
acuto - two circular segments
with radius = 4/5 of the base

Gothic a quinto acuto arch


Inverted hanging chain shape
(pure compression - no bending). Arch in
this shape would have no bending in any
part.

Hanging chain (catenary) shape


(Pure tension - no bending)

An inverted catenary (chain) is the ideal shape for an arch. Gothic arch a quinto
acuto is very close to ideal shape - therefore can be very thin and still be stable

For stability, a circular Roman arch supporting only its own weight
must be thick enough to contain an equivalent inverted catenary
arch
Therefore, Romanesque architecture typically very massive (heavy)

Romanesque: Church of Sainte-Foy, Conques, France, 1050-1120

Romanesque: Church of Sainte-Foy, Conques, France, 1050-1120

La Madeleine, Vezelay,
France: interior, nave,
1120-1132. Typical
Romanesque church

Sources

The pictures contained in this presentation were either


downloaded from the Internet, or scanned in from books. The
sources are too numerous to list.

You might also like