BMW PPT Final
BMW PPT Final
BMW PPT Final
B)
Group 4 Sec B
Background
Problem 1:
Cause :
Carl-Peter Forster, Director (Prototype and Pilot
Manufacturing) had explained about the time being spent on
major problems (e.g.. Part fit; need for redesign of tooling)
led to decrease in time left to spend on minor problems or
fine tuning(e.g. surface finish, alignment).
Consequence :
Higher number of customer complaints despite provision of
extra resources for quality assurance, inspection and
framework.
Problem 2:
Cause :
Prototyping done at a separate facility by handcraft artisans
and workers by general purpose tools (mallets, hammers).
Consequence :
Difficult to correctly know what a part is going to look like or
fit after manufacturing using production tooling.
Problem 3:
Cause :
Mixed model ramp up method.
Consequence :
Hindrance to smooth flow of assembly process/ logistics
because of confusion among factory workers.
Problem 4 :
Cause :
Suppliers involved in the process only after cubing
i.e. the final design approval by BMW top
management.
Consequence :
In case of changes in tools or materials is noted/or
identified during commercial production or pilot
production at factory, the supply of new tools either
takes time or are unable to do so, ultimately leading
to an increase in the lead time .
Problem 5 :
Cause :
Long development lead time-The lead time for new and
redesigned BMW series averaged at 6 years compared to
4 years for Japanese competitors;
Design strategy.
Consequence :
The longer lead time meant less frequency of introduction
of new models and this played on the minds of many
consumers who preferred to buy a new model with
incremental change than wait for a new model with bold
changes.
Launch Quality
Launch Quality
next.
Pilot production
is done in the
actual factory
Its done 3
months prior to
actual
production
The cars
produced here
are not for sale
Cars in very
small batches
like 20/40/60 are
manufactured
All the last
minute tool
changes and
other changes
are made before
full scale
production has
to begin
It is a simulation
of the actual
production facility
but much smaller
in size.
Conglomerate of
high skilled
workers and
production
workers works in
the pilot plant
75% of
production tools
are used and
rest are of pre
production stage
Several
problems
specially in
assembly, tooling
and design are
discovered in this
This is the
transition
from the
final
prototype
stage to the
full scale
production
scale and is
subdivided
into 3
stages that
would be
discussed
Hand made by
skilled craftsmen
with general
tools like chisel,
hammer, file etc.
to make the
components and
not using
conventional
tools
Parts of the
prototype and
not of same
material as the
final car to
reduce cost eg
dashboard made
of sheet plastic
and not PVC
Both the
methods help to
reduce time and
capital involved
Also the
minute
quality
details like
surface
finish,
aesthetics ,
etc.
Changes
are made at
this stage
too but
they come
at a great
cost
BMW should use pre production tools instead of hand-used tools. Why?
a) As till the very end the parts were not exactly as they should look like
Prototype parts should be procured by BMW vendors (suppliers) who supplied material for commercial
production. Why?
a) Consistency among design specifications would reduce on mass production
b) Vendors could foresee problems in production process.
Outsource it to a vendor to supply fully assembled segments of prototypes eg: BMW cockpit. Why?
a) In the future, the supplier can provide entire module of the desired segment.
b) The supplier could also be made in charge of of some engineering design work.
BMW should use pilot assembly plant workers instead of prototype specialists. Why?
a) Most of the assembly part workers are a part of main production cycle, hence their training would
be
nn better.
Some other changes that BMW can incorporate to increase in efficiency
Reducing the number of parts used in a product. How?
Using DFM (Design for Manufacturing) and DFA ( Design for Assembly) i.e. integration of
product design and process planning into one common activity.
Use of Concurrent Engineering.
Concurrent engineering
Concurrent Engineering:
Also known as simultaneous engineering, is a method of designing and developing
products, in which the different stages run simultaneously, rather than consecutively.
It decreases product development time and also the time to market, leading to improved
productivity and reduced costs.
In the long term, costs would reduce dramatically. As per internal research of BMW, if
only early tooling was employed in all parts of BMW 7-Series, the company would save
at-least 100 DM million.
There would be less complaints per car and the company would maintain a high quality
Image
It would reduce the problems associated with brining new models into production
New Product
Innovation
Strategy in BMW
Lessons Learnt
Involve all the stake holders at the
earliest
Assumptions were reduced
Reduced Rework
Getting things right from the outset
Better communication on part of every
verticals
Changes in the
Automotive Industry
Fuel
Materials and Forming
Electronics, Software and Controls
E-38
(post 1994)
E-32
(pre 1994)