Suspecting Pulmonary Hypertension in The Dyspneic Patient: Who, When, and How

Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
Download as pptx, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 92

Suspecting Pulmonary Hypertension

in the Dyspneic Patient:


Who, When, and How
New York, New York
October 21, 2013

Suspecting Pulmonary Hypertension


in the Dyspneic Patient:
Who, When, and How
Host:
Kenneth J. Steier, DO, FACOI, FCCP, MBA, MPH, MHA, MGH

Guest Presenter:
Arunabh Talwar, MD, FCCP

Suspecting Pulmonary Hypertension


in the Dyspneic Patient:
Who, When, and How
Host:

Kenneth J. Steier, DO, FACOI, FCCP, MBA, MPH, MHA, MGH


Dean, TouroCOM-Middletown Campus
Clinical Dean, TouroCOM-Harlem Campus
Internal Medicine, Pulmonary and Critical Care
Touro College of Osteopathic Medicine
New York, New York

Housekeeping
Please mute your cellphones/pagers now
Syllabus folder contains slides,
agenda, CME information, and faculty
disclosures
PHA pamphlet contains valuable professional
and patient resource information
Please hand in CME evaluation form before
leaving; CME certificates will be mailed

This live activity is jointly sponsored


by Washington University School of
Medicine, Continuing Medical
Education and PHA
Supported in part by educational grants from:
Diamond
Actelion

Platinum
Gilead

Gold
United
Therapeutics

Silver
Bayer

Accreditation and Credit Designation


This live activity has been planned and implemented in accordance with the Essential
Areas and Policies of the Accreditation Council for Continuing Medical Education
(ACCME) through the joint sponsorship of Washington University School of Medicine,
Continuing Medical Education and the Pulmonary Hypertension Association.
Washington University is accredited by the ACCME to provide continuing medical
education for physicians.
Washington University designates this live activity for a
maximum of 1.5 AMA PRA Category 1 Credits.
Physicians should claim only the credit commensurate
with the extent of their participation in the activity.

Faculty Disclosure
Dr. Steier has [to be added]
Dr. Talwar has no relevant financial relationships to disclose.

Lets get started

Suspecting Pulmonary Hypertension


in the Dyspneic Patient:
Who, When, and How
Guest Presenter:
Arunabh Talwar, MD, FCCP
Associate Professor of Clinical Medicine
Albert Einstein College of Medicine
Director, Pulmonary Hypertension and Interventional Bronchoscopy Program
North Shore University Hospital
Manhasset, New York

The Pulmonary Hypertension Association (PHA)


is the leading non-profit organization for PH
research, public awareness, and services. The
organization has over 12,000 members, including
patients, family members, and medical
professionals.

www.PHAssociation.org

Case Presentations
2 Women With Dyspnea

2 Women With Dyspnea


Patient 1

Patient 2

2 Women With Dyspnea


Patient 1

Patient 2

Age: 57 years

Age: 48 years

Comorbidities:

Comorbidities:

HTN

HTN

Diabetes

CKD

CKD

Systemic sclerosis

Atrial fibrillation

2 Women With Dyspnea


Patient 1

Patient 2

NYHA Class III

NYHA Class III

BP: 172/65 mm Hg

BP: 120/84 mm Hg

JVP elevated

JVP elevated

Irregularly irregular

Regular rate, rhythm

Loud P2

Loud P2

2/6 murmur
(holosystolic,
left sternal border)

3/6 murmur
(holosystolic,
left sternal border)

2+ leg edema

2+ leg edema

Pulmonary Arterial Hypertension (PAH):


Key
Average
14-mo delay from initial presentation to
Points
diagnosis: need to diagnose early
Evaluation must be methodical and include
echocardiography and right heart catheterization
To treat effectively and avoid harm, PAH must be
differentiated from pulmonary venous hypertension
Prognosis improves with therapy, but PAH remains a
progressive fatal disease
Therapies and management strategies continue to
evolve

Hemodynamic Definition of PH/PAH

PH
PAH

Mean PAP 25 mm Hg
Mean PAP 25 mm Hg plus
PCWP/LVEDP 15 mm Hg

ACCF/AHA includes PVR >3 Wood Units


Badesch D et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54:S55-S66.
Gali N et al. Eur Heart J. 2009;30:2493-2537.
McLaughlin VV et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1573-1619.

Clinical Classification of Pulmonary


Hypertension (Dana Point)
1. PAH
Idiopathic PAH
Heritable
Drug- and toxin-induced
Persistent PH of newborn
Associated with:
CTD
HIV infection
portal hypertension
CHD
schistosomiasis
chronic hemolytic anemia

3. PH Owing to Lung Diseases and/or Hypoxia


COPD
ILD
Other pulmonary diseases with mixed
restrictive and obstructive pattern
Sleep-disordered breathing
Alveolar hypoventilation disorders
Chronic exposure to high altitude
Developmental abnormalities
4. CTEPH

1. PVOD and/or PCH


2. PH Owing to Left Heart Disease
Systolic dysfunction
Diastolic dysfunction
Valvular disease

5. PH With Unclear Multifactorial Mechanisms


Hematologic disorders
Systemic disorders
Metabolic disorders
Others

Simonneau G et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;54;S43-S54.

PH Lessons
1.

Pulmonary Hypertension Is Common

2.

WHO Group I PAH Is Rare but Deadly


Make the Diagnosis Early

3.

Know the PH Clinical Clues in the Dyspneic


Patient

4.

Look Beyond the PA Pressure on


Echocardiography

5.

Definitive Diagnosis of PAH Requires Invasive


Hemodynamic Testing

PH Lessons (contd)
6.

Always Look for the Underlying Cause of PH

7.

Treatment of PHGet the Diagnosis Correct


and Determine Functional Status

8.

Lack of Response to Acute Vasodilator


Challenge in PAH Untreatable

9.

First Do No HarmLearn to Differentiate WHO


Group I PAH From Other Forms of PH

10. Appropriate, Timely, and Collaborative Care:


Key to Early and Effective Treatment of PH in
the Dyspneic Patient

Lesson 1

Pulmonary Hypertension
Is Common

PH in the Community: PASP and Survival


All Participants
(N=1413)

No Cardiopulmonary Disease
(N=778)

Overall Log Rank p<0.001

Overall Log Rank p=0.002


1.000
Cumulative survival

Cumulative survival

1.00
0.95
0.90

PASP quintile
1: 15-23 mm Hg
2: 24-25 mm Hg
3: 26-29 mm Hg
4: 30-32 mm Hg*
5: 34-66 mm Hg*

0.85

0.975
PASP tertile
1: 15-24 mm Hg
2: 24-28 mm Hg
3: 28-43 mm Hg*

0.950
0.925
0.900

Time (yr)

Time (yr)

Uptoto20%
20%ofofthe
theUS
USpopulation
populationhas
hasecho
echo
Up
evidenceofofPH
PH
evidence
*Bonferroni-adjusted p<0.05 in pairwise comparison with lowest tertile.
Lam CSP et al. Circulation. 2009;119:2663-2670.

Epidemiology of PH by Echo
Single echo lab / Australian community of 165,450
Etiology of PH noted on echocardiogram
PAH, 2.7%

Unknown,
15.4%

CTEPH, 2.0%
Lung disease,
Sleep-related
hypoventilation,
9.3%

Miscellaneous, 2.7%
N=936 of 10,314 patients with echo PASP >40 mm Hg.
Strange G et al. Heart. 2012;98:1805-1811.

Left heart
disease, 67.9%

PH Is Common in Elderly Patients With


Heart Failure With Preserved EF
heart failure with preserved
EF: 83% with PH
HTN but no CHF (control):
8% with PH

100
Cumulative (%)

PH by echo in a communitybased sample:

50
25
0

Patients with PH:

larger LA size
higher E/e ratio

Lam CS. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1119.

HTN
HFpEF
10

30

50

70

90

PASP (mm Hg)

PH prevalence (%)

older
higher systolic BP

p<0.001

75

100

83

75
50
25
0

p<0.001

8
HTN

HFpEF

110

Lesson 2

WHO Group I PAH Is Rare


but Deadly
Make the Diagnosis Early

Idiopathic PAH: Survival If Untreated

Percentage surviving

100
80

NIH registry
Sitbon historical control
ACCP estimate

Incidence: 2-6 cases per


million in US
Poor prognosis in an era
lacking therapy

60

Therapeutic options and


research efforts now offer
more hope

40
20
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Years of follow-up

Adapted from: Sitbon O et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:780-788. DAlonzo GE et al. Ann Intern Med.
1991;115:343-349. McLaughlin VV et al. Chest. 2004;126:78S-91S.

French Registry: Kaplan-Meier Survival Estimates


in Combined PAH Population vs NIH-predicted
100

Observed

80

Survival
(%)

60
Predicted (NIH Registry)

40
20
0

No. at risk:
All patients

12

24

36

Time (mo)
56

69

98

Humbert M et al. Circulation. 2010;122:156-163.

113

120

127

133

Schematic Progression of PAH


Presymptomatic/
Compensated

Symptomatic/
Decompensating

Declining/
Decompensated

CO
Symptom Threshold

PAP

Right Heart
Dysfunction

PVR
CO=

TPG
PVR

TPG=transpulmonary gradient.

Time

Percent of patients FC III/IV at diagnosis

Advanced Functional Class at


Diagnosis Common and Indicates
Delayed Recognition
100

Approximate prevalence: 15 cases/million


80
More
common in women

Spans
broad age range
60
Delay in diagnosis persists
40

Most patients diagnosed with late symptoms


20
Poor
prognosis if untreated (median survival <3 yr)
0
REVEAL Registry
(N=1831)

NIH Registry
(N=187)

French Registry
(N=674)

Badesch DB et al. Circulation. 2010;137:376-387. DAlonzo GE. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115:343-349.
Humbert M et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;173:1023-1030.

Lesson 3

Know the PH Clinical Clues


in the Dyspneic Patient

Is There a Reason to Suspect PAH?


Clinical Presentation
History

Dyspnea (86%)
Fatigue (27%)
Chest pain (22%)
Edema (22%)
Syncope (17%)
Dizziness (15%)
Cough (14%)
Palpitations
(13%)

Exam (PH)

Exam (RV Failure)

Loud P2 (listen at apex)


RV lift (left parasternal
fingertips)
RV S3, S4
Systolic murmur (TR;
inspiratory augmentation)
Early systolic click
Midsystolic ejection
murmur
Diastolic murmur (PR)

JVD; increased A
wave, V wave;
hepatojugular reflex
Pulsatile liver
Hepatomegaly
Edema
Ascites
Low BP, low PP, cool
extremities

REVEAL. Brown LM et al. Chest. 2011;140:19-26.


Adapted from McLaughlin VV et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1573-1619.

Patient Presentation: Nonspecific


Symptoms
Dyspnea
Fatigue
Near syncope/syncope
Chest pain
Palpitations
Edema
0 10 20 30 40 50 60 70
Patients (%)

Median Time From Symptom Onset to Diagnosis


NIH Registry (1981 to 1985) 1.3 years
REVEAL Registry (2006 to 2007) 1.1 years
Rich A et al. Ann Intern Med. 1987;107:216-223.
Badesch DB et al. Chest. 2010;137:376-387.

Multiple
educational
efforts

Is There a Reason to Suspect PAH?


Risk Factors
Family history
Connective tissue disease
Congenital heart disease
Portal hypertensionorthotopic liver transplant
candidate
Environmental/drug factors
HIV

Is There a Reason to Suspect PAH?


ECG

Right Axis

Right
Atrial
Enlargement

RVH

RV Strain

Is There a Reason to Suspect PAH?


Chest X-ray
Normal

Abnormal
Peripheral hypoPeripheral
hypovascularity
(pruning)
vascularity (pruning)
Prominent central
Prominent
central
pulmonary
artery
pulmonary artery
Adapted from McLaughlin VV et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1573-1619.

RV enlargement
RVinto
enlargement
retrosternal
into
retrosternal
clear space
clear space

Is There a Reason to Suspect PAH?


Echo

RV enlargement
RA enlargement
Septal straightening
Loss of IVC inspiratory collapse

Tricuspid regurgitation
Pericardial effusion
Decreased RV systolic dysfunction
TAPSE (tricuspid annular plane systolic
excursion)

TAPSE 2.3 cm

TAPSE 1.5 cm

Relatively preserved
RV function

RV dysfunction

McLaughlin VV et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
2009;53:1573-1619.

Is There a Reason to Suspect PAH?


Evaluation for CTEPH
Not a PAH subgroup, but:
Should not be missed
Is potentially curable with thromboendarterectomy (PEA)
3% to 4% of acute PE do not entirely resolve
One half of those with CTEPH do not have an apparent
history of acute PE
Normal VQ scan excludes chronic PE
CT angiogram can detect chronic clot (but the radiologist
should be experienced when interpreting the imaging
distal disease can be subtle)
McLaughlin VV et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1573-1619.

Is There a Reason to Suspect PAH?


VQ Scan
Idiopathic
Pulmonary
Arterial
Hypertension

Chronic
Pulmonary
Embolism

CTEPH: CT Angiogram
web or bands
stenosis

recanalization

fresh
thrombus
retraction with
partial obstruction

retraction with
total obstruction

Disturbed resolution of thrombus*

PEA
PEA

*Castaer E et al. Radiographics. 2009;29:31-53.

Less
Less
subtle
subtle
thrombus
thrombus

Is There a Reason to Suspect PAH?


Pulmonary Function
Underlying lung disease (diagnostic group III)
Abnormalities consistent with PH
IPAH and CTEPH

Systemic Sclerosis

20% have an isolated reduction


in DLCO

20% have an isolated reduction


in DLCO

DLCO mildly reduced


(60%-80% predicted NIH registry)

Severity predicts future PAH

PVR correlates with reduction in


DLCO

DLCO correlates inversely with


PASP

DLCO=diffusing capacity of the lungs for carbon monoxide

Is There a Reason to Suspect PAH?


Overnight Oximetry
Hypoxia may signal underlying sleep apnea
In patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA),
pulmonary artery pressures (PAP) are reported to
decrease in response to CPAP therapy
Untreatedresponse to other treatment likely to be
less effective

Somers VK et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;52:686-717.

Screening Guidelines: Patients With


Known PAH Risk
Substrate

Further Assessment

Rationale

Known BMPR2
mutation

Echo yearly; RHC if echo shows


evidence of PAH

Early PAH detection; 20%


chance of developing PAH

Systemic
sclerosis*

Echo yearly; RHC if echo shows


evidence of PAH

8% prevalence of PAH

HIV

Echo if symptomatic; RHC if echo


shows evidence of PAH

0.5% prevalence of PAH

Portal
hypertension

Echo if OLT considered; RHC if


echo shows evidence of PAH

4% prevalence of PAH;
predictive of poor outcome

Congenital
heart disease

Echo and RHC at diagnosis;


consider repair of L-R shunt defect

High PAH probability if


unrepaired (Eisenmenger)

*Systemic sclerosis: consider echocardiogram if

% FVC
% DLCO

>1.6 or unexplained declining DLCO.

McLaughlin VV et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1573-1619.

Diagnostic Algorithm for PH


Identical for local practitioners and PH specialists
Requirements:
thorough evaluation
high quality studies and interpretation
Establish a suspicion of PAH
Confirm the diagnosis (right heart catheterization)
Classify the type of PH (Group I-V)
Determine the disease severity
Select the appropriate treatment for patients with PAH
McLaughlin VV et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1573-1619.

Pivotal Tests

Contingent Tests

ACCF/AHA Diagnostic Algorithm

History
Exam
CXR
ECG

Echocardiogram

Index of Suspicion of PH

TEE
Exercise Echo

VQ Scan

Pulmonary Angiography
Chest CT Angiogram
Coagulopathy Profile

PFTs

ABGs

Overnight
Oximetry

Polysomnography

Other CTD Serologies

Ventilatory Function
Gas Exchange
Sleep Disorder

Scleroderma, SLE, RA

Establish Baseline
Prognosis

Functional Test
(6MWT, CPET)

McLaughlin VV et al. J Am Coll Cardiol.


2009;53:1573-1619.

Chronic PE

Portopulmonary Htn

LFTs

RH Cath

RVE, RAE, RVSP, RV


Function
Left Heart Disease
VHD, CHD

HIV Infection

HIV
ANA

Contribute to
Assessment of:

Vasodilator Test
Exercise RH Cath
Volume Loading
Left Heart Cath

Confirmation of PH
Hemodynamic Profile
Vasodilator Response

Lesson 4

Look Beyond the PA Pressure


on Echocardiography

The Right Ventricle in PAH


RV pressure/volume overload
RV failure

Progressive structural changes in the RV


due to poor adaptation to increasing PVR
RA

LA

RV

LV

Cross section

PAH: RV Changes

LV
RV

LA
RA

TTE apical
4-chamber view

Normal

PH

Echocardiography in PH
Strengths
Best screening tool for PH
Inexpensive, portable, readily
available, non-invasive, no
radiation
Allows for serial assessment
Provides clues to other
diagnoses (eg, LHD, CHD)

Limitations
Experienced techs/MDs
essential
Imaging quality suboptimal in
patients with poor windows
(eg, lung disease, obesity)
Right ventricle not imaged
adequately in some labs
TR jet inadequate to
determine RVSP in
10%25% of patients

McLaughlin VV et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1573-1619.


Bossone E et al. Chest. 2005;127:1836-1843.
Brecker SJ. Br Heart J. 1994;72:384-389.

Essential Components of the


Echocardiogram in PH
Doppler estimate of RVSP
Assess biventricular size and systolic function
Look for interventricular septal shift
Discriminate between pulmonary arterial and pulmonary
venous causes of PH (if possible)
Assess for congenital heart shunt lesions
Document pericardial effusion

Bossone E et al. Chest. 2005;127:1836-1843.


McLaughlin VV et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1573-1619.

Key Features of PAH on Echo


Enlarged RV with normal or small LV
RA, RV, and PA enlargement
RV dysfunction
Increased RVSP
Interventricular septal flattening during systole
diastole
Mitral E/A wave ratio <1.0
Bossone E et al. Chest. 2005;127:1836-1843.
McLaughlin VV et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1573-1619.

Estimation of RV Systolic Pressure


(RVSP)

IVC Collapse PH.avi

RVSP = 4(velocity of TR)2 + RA pressure


= 4(4)2 + 20
= ~84 mm Hg

Mild PAH

Systole in short-axis view

Apical 4-chamber view

RV
IVS

Mild PAH56.avi

Mild PAH20.avi

LV
Diastole in short-axis view

Mild PAH20.avi

TR jet

Moderate PAH Disease


Systole in short-axis view

Moderate PAH16.avi

Diastole in short-axis view

Moderate PAH16.avi

Apical 4-chamber view

Moderate PAH 31

TR jet

Severe PAH and RV Failure


Systole in short-axis view

Apical 4-chamber view

Severe PAH29.avi

Severe PAH 34.avi

Diastole in short-axis view

Severe PAH29.avi

TR jet

Lesson 5

Definitive Diagnosis of PAH


Requires Invasive
Hemodynamic Testing

Diagnostic Cardiac Catheterization


Establish the presence of PH
Make the diagnosis of PAH
measure wedge pressure and/or LVEDP
Determine severity and prognosis of disease
Exclude congenital heart disease
Perform acute vasodilator test
Catheterizationisisrequired
requiredwhen
whenpulmonary
pulmonary
Catheterization
hypertensionisissuspected
suspected
hypertension

PH: The Importance of Hemodynamics


Pulmonary venous hypertension
Elevated PCWP, normal PVR

VC

RA

RV

PA

PV

LA

LV

Ao

PC

PAH
PH with respiratory disease
CTEPH
Normal PCWP, elevated PVR

Other:
Other:
high CO
high CO

PH: Define the Lesion


(mean PAP 25 mm Hg)

Post-capillary PH
PCWP >15 mm Hg
PVR <3 Wood units

RA

RV

PA

PC

PV

LA

LV

Ao

Mixed PH

PCWP >15 mm Hg
PVR 3 Wood units

Pre-capillary PH
PCWP <15 mm Hg
PVR 3 Wood units

Other:
High CO
PCWP <15 mm Hg
PVR <3 Wood units

Lesson 6

Always Look for the


Underlying Cause of PH

Pivotal Tests

Contingent Tests

ACCF/AHA Diagnostic Algorithm

History
Exam
CXR
ECG

Echocardiogram

Index of Suspicion of PH

TEE
Exercise Echo

VQ Scan

Pulmonary Angiography
Chest CT Angiogram
Coagulopathy Profile

PFTs

ABGs

Overnight
Oximetry

Polysomnography

Other CTD Serologies

Ventilatory Function
Gas Exchange
Sleep Disorder

Scleroderma, SLE, RA

Establish Baseline
Prognosis

Functional Test
(6MWT, CPET)

McLaughlin VV et al. J Am Coll Cardiol.


2009;53:1573-1619.

Chronic PE

Portopulmonary Htn

LFTs

RH Cath

RVE, RAE, RVSP, RV


Function
Left Heart Disease
VHD, CHD

HIV Infection

HIV
ANA

Contribute to
Assessment of:

Vasodilator Test
Exercise RH Cath
Volume Loading
Left Heart Cath

Confirmation of PH
Hemodynamic Profile
Vasodilator Response

Lesson 7
Treatment of PHGet the
Diagnosis Correct and
Determine Functional Status

Mechanisms of Action of Approved


Therapies for PAH
Endothelin
Pathway
Endothelial cells

Pre-proendothelin

Nitric Oxide
Pathway

Endothelial cells

Arachidonic acid

Proendothelin

L-arginine
Endothelin
receptor A

Prostacyclin
Pathway

L-citrulline

Endothelin-1

Endothelinreceptor
antagonists

Endothelin
receptor B

Vasoconstriction
and proliferation

Prostaglandin I2

Prostacyclin (prostaglandin I2)


Nitric Oxide

cGMP

Exogenou
s nitric
oxide
SCG
stimulator

cAMP
Vasodilation
and antiproliferation

Phosphodiesterase
type 5
Vasodilation
and antiproliferation

Phosphodiesterase
type 5 inhibitor
Smooth muscle cells
Humbert M et al. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1425-1436.

Smooth muscle cells

Prostacyclin
derivatives

PAH Treatment Goals


Improve survival
Improve quality of life
Improve exercise
capacity

Prevent clinical
worsening
escalation of therapy
hospitalization

6MWD

lung transplantation

WHO functional
classification

death

Improve hemodynamics

Chronic Adjuvant Treatment


Digoxin
Variable inotropic effect and use
No long-term data; need to balance unproven benefits
with known risks

Oxygen
Use to prevent hypoxic vasoconstriction
Consider exercise, sleep, altitude
Aim for target saturation >90%
May not correct hypoxia with shunt
McLaughlin VV et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1573-1619.
Badesch DB et al. Chest. 2007;131:1917-1928.

Chronic Adjuvant Treatment


Diuretics
Most patients need

Diuretics

Hypotension not a contraindication


Renal function and electrolytes
must be monitored closely

Poor CO
and hypotension

Observed Survival in IPAH Patients


With and Without Anticoagulation

Anticoagulation

100

Recommended in IPAH

INR goal 1.5 2.5


Fuster V et al. Circulation. 1984;70:580-587.
Badesch DB et al. Chest. 2004;126:35S-62S.

(60)

80

Observational data only


Need to balance unproven
benefits with known risks

Improved CO
and BP

Anticoagulation
(49)

60
Percent
surviving

(21)

(36)

40
(14)

20
0

No Anticoagulation
0

2
Years

(7)

PAH Therapy
(+) Vasodilator Response
Calcium channel blockers
() Vasodilator Response or Non-sustained
Vasodilator Response
Endothelin receptor antagonists
Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors
SCG stimulator
Prostanoids
McLaughlin VV et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1573-1619.

Choice of Therapy
Local Practitioners
Knowledge and management of comorbid illnesses
Geographically close to patients
Established therapeutic relationship

PH Centers
Experience with therapy escalation
Knowledge of drug-drug interactions; eg, PDE-5 inhibitors
and antiretroviral therapy
Nursing support for management of parenteral medications
Relationships with other subspecialists; eg, lung transplant
centers

Initial Therapy: Making the Right


Decision
Make sure the patient truly has PAH and not
another type of PH (especially pulmonary venous
hypertension)
Severity of disease
Patient preference
Trying to weigh the data
When comparing trials, examine objective
baseline characteristics (6MWD, hemodynamics)

PAH Determinants of Risk


LOWER RISK

DETERMINANTS OF RISK

HIGHER RISK

No

Clinical evidence of
RV failure

Yes

Gradual

Progression of symptoms

Rapid

II, III

WHO class

IV

Longer (>400 m)

6MWD

Shorter (<300 m)

Peak VO2 >10.4 mL/kg/min

CPET

Peak VO2 <10.4 mL/kg/min

Minimal RV dysfunction

Echocardiography

Pericardial effusion,
significant RV
enlargement/dysfunction;
RA enlargement

RAP <10 mm Hg;


CI >2.5 L/min/m2

Hemodynamics

RAP >20 mm Hg;


CI <2.0 L/min/m2

Minimally elevated

BNP

Significantly elevated

McLaughlin VV et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1573-1619.

ACCF/AHA Consensus PAH Treatment


Algorithm (Modified)
Anticoagulate Diuretics
Anticoagulate Diuretics
Oxygen Digoxin
Oxygen Digoxin

Acute Vasoreactivity Testing


Acute Vasoreactivity Testing

Positive
Oral CCB
Oral CCB
Sustained
Sustained
Response
Response
Yes

Continue
Continue
CCB
CCB

No

Negative

Lower Risk
Lower Risk

Higher Risk
Higher Risk

ERAs or PDE-5 Is or SCG


ERAs or
PDE-5 Is or
SCG
stimulators
(oral)
stimulators (oral)
Epoprostenol or Treprostinil (IV)
Epoprostenol or Treprostinil (IV)
Iloprost (inhaled)
Iloprost (inhaled)
Treprostinil (SC, inhaled)
Treprostinil (SC, inhaled)

Epoprostenol or Treprostinil (IV)


Epoprostenol or Treprostinil (IV)
Iloprost (inhaled)
Iloprost (inhaled)
ERAs or PDE-5 Is (oral)
ERAs or PDE-5 Is (oral)
Treprostinil (SC)
Treprostinil (SC)

Reassess: consider
Reassess: consider
combo-therapy
combo-therapy
Investigational Protocols
Investigational Protocols

Modified from McLaughlin VV et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1573-1619.

Atrial septostomy
Atrial
septostomy
Lung
transplant
Lung transplant

Lesson 8

Lack of Response to Acute


Vasodilator Challenge in
PAH Untreatable

Acute Vasodilator Trial


Purpose:
identify vasodilator responders who are candidates
for CCB therapy
Short-acting vasodilators
inhaled nitric oxide is preferred
Definition of response
decrease in mPAP by 10 mm Hg down to
mPAP of 40 mm Hg
with improvement or maintenance of
cardiac output
Rubin LJ. Chest. 2004;126:4S-6S.

Sample Acute Vasodilator Responses


PATIENT A

PATIENT B

BASELINE

AFTER 40 PPM iNO

BASELINE

AFTER 40 PPM iNO

mPAP 45 mm Hg

mPAP 34 mm Hg

mPAP 45 mm Hg

mPAP 37 mm Hg

PCWP 10 mm Hg

PCWP 10 mm Hg

PCWP 10 mm Hg

PCWP 7 mm Hg

CO 5 L/min

CO 6 L/min

CO 5 L/min

CO 6 L/min

PVR 7 Wood units

PVR 4 Wood units

PVR 7 Wood units

PVR 5 Wood units

RESPONDER OR
NON-RESPONDER??

RESPONDER OR
NON-RESPONDER??

Sample Acute Vasodilator Responses


PATIENT A

PATIENT B

BASELINE

AFTER 40 PPM iNO

BASELINE

AFTER 40 PPM iNO

mPAP 45 mm Hg

mPAP 34 mm Hg

mPAP 45 mm Hg

mPAP 37 mm Hg

PCWP 10 mm Hg

PCWP 10 mm Hg

PCWP 10 mm Hg

PCWP 7 mm Hg

CO 5 L/min

CO 6 L/min

CO 5 L/min

CO 6 L/min

PVR 7 Wood units

PVR 4 Wood units

PVR 7 Wood units

PVR 5 Wood units

RESPONDER: TREAT WITH


CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKER

NON-RESPONDER: STILL
TREATABLE, BUT NOT WITH
CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKER

Lesson 9

First Do No HarmLearn to
Differentiate WHO Group I
PAH From Other Forms
of PH

Is It Left Heart Disease?


Symptoms
paroxysmal nocturnal
dyspnea
orthopnea

History

ECG
atrial fibrillation
absence of right axis
deviation

Echo

diabetes

left atrial enlargement

hypertension
obesity

left ventricular
hypertrophy

coronary artery disease

normal RA, RV

metabolic syndrome

abnormal diastolic filling

Problems With Incorrect Treatment


WHO Group 1 PAH: True PAH
incorrect treatment with systemic vasodilators could lead to
profound hypotension, death
WHO Group 2 PH: PH due to LHD
incorrect treatment with pulmonary vasodilators could lead to
pulmonary edema, CHF exacerbation
WHO Group 3 PH: PH due to hypoxemia/lung disease
incorrect treatment with pulmonary vasodilators could lead to
increased V/Q mismatch, worsening hypoxemia
WHO Group 4 PH: CTEPH
treating with pulmonary vasodilators likely not harmful, but
dont delay referral for potentially curative surgical
thromboendarterectomy (if indicated)

Lesson 10
Appropriate, Timely, and
Collaborative Care:
Key to Early and Effective
Treatment of PH in the
Dyspneic Patient

Goals of Collaborative Care


Clinical Practice Guidelines

Local Practitioners
PH Specialists

Best Practice

Clinical Trial Evidence

Collaborative Care With PH Centers:


Initial Steps

Local Care

Diagnostic dilemmas
Diagnostic cath/
vasodilator trial
Complex comorbidities
Failure to achieve Rx
goals
Considering prostanoids
Considering combination
Rx
Clinical trials

PH Center

Collaborative Care With PH Centers:


Ongoing Care

Local Care

Symptom evaluation
Titrate diuretics
Monitor Rx
Need to change Rx

Manage SEs
? Transplant
Evaluate acute issues
Acute hospital care
Emotional support

PH Center

Timing of Referral to a PH Center


Dependent on a local physicians level of comfort
Referral can occur at multiple junctures
Abnormal symptoms, exam, and initial screening (echo)
PH Center
Pivotal tests (without RHC)
PH Center
Diagnosis (RHC with vasodilator challenge)
PH Center
Treatment
PH Center
Treatment escalation

PH Center

Case Resolutions
2 Women With Dyspnea

2 Women With Dyspnea


Patient 1

Patient 2

Echo

Echo

LV: EF 65%

LV: EF 58%

Grade 3 diastolic
dysfunction

Grade 1 diastolic
dysfunction

RV: size

RV: size

Normal RV function

3+ RV dysfunction

PASP: 60 mm Hg

PASP: 76 mm Hg

RA: 10 mm Hg

RA: 10 mm Hg

1+ TR

2+ TR

2 Women With Dyspnea


Patient 1

Patient 2

Invasive
Hemodynamics

Invasive
Hemodynamics

RA: 15 mm Hg

RA: 12 mm Hg

mPAP: 42 mm Hg

mPAP: 41 mm Hg

PCWP: 29 mm Hg

PCWP: 10 mm Hg

CO: 6.7 L/min

CO: 2.6 L/min

PVR: 1.8 Wood units

PVR: 11.9 Wood units

BP: 172/65 mm Hg

BP: 93/69 mm Hg

Vasodilator challenge with iNO:


not indicated (high
PCWP)

Vasodilator challenge with iNO:


non-responder

2 Women With Dyspnea


Patient 1

Patient 2

Final Diagnosis

Final Diagnosis

WHO Group II
pulmonary venous
hypertension (PVH)

WHO Group I
pulmonary arterial
hypertension (PAH)

Heart failure with


preserved EF (HFpEF)

PAH due to connective


tissue disease

2 Women With Dyspnea


Patient 1: PVH

Patient 2: PAH

Clinical Course

Clinical Course

Carvedilol
Furosemide

PDE-5 inhibitor:
no improvement

Co-managed with
nephrology

ERA added
symptoms over time

Improved symptoms

Now on parenteral
prostanoid with
improved symptoms

NYHA II

NYHA II

Summary: PH Lessons
1.

PH is common, but most often due to LHD or


chronic lung disease: selective pulmonary
vasodilators are not proven in these patients

2.

PAH is rare but deadly: outcomes have


improved but not as much as we would like;
diagnosis must be made earlier

3.

Know the PH clinical clues in the dyspneic


patient

4.

Know the limitations of echo, and look beyond


PA pressure to the RV to evaluate size/function

5.

Definitive diagnosis of PH requires heart cath

Summary: PH Lessons (contd)


6.

Identify underlying cause of PH: etiology


important = prognostic and Rx implications

7.

Treatment of PH is based on correct diagnosis


and functional status

8.

Lack of response to acute vasodilator challenge


in PAH does not mean the patient is untreatable

9.

Learn to differentiate Group I PAH from other


forms of PH: when in doubt, ask for help

10. Collaborative care: key to early and effective


treatment of PH in the dyspneic patient

Thank you for your participation!


For more information on upcoming PHA
Medical Education Programs, please visit:

www.PHAssociation.org

You might also like