Suspecting Pulmonary Hypertension in The Dyspneic Patient: Who, When, and How
Suspecting Pulmonary Hypertension in The Dyspneic Patient: Who, When, and How
Suspecting Pulmonary Hypertension in The Dyspneic Patient: Who, When, and How
Guest Presenter:
Arunabh Talwar, MD, FCCP
Housekeeping
Please mute your cellphones/pagers now
Syllabus folder contains slides,
agenda, CME information, and faculty
disclosures
PHA pamphlet contains valuable professional
and patient resource information
Please hand in CME evaluation form before
leaving; CME certificates will be mailed
Platinum
Gilead
Gold
United
Therapeutics
Silver
Bayer
Faculty Disclosure
Dr. Steier has [to be added]
Dr. Talwar has no relevant financial relationships to disclose.
www.PHAssociation.org
Case Presentations
2 Women With Dyspnea
Patient 2
Patient 2
Age: 57 years
Age: 48 years
Comorbidities:
Comorbidities:
HTN
HTN
Diabetes
CKD
CKD
Systemic sclerosis
Atrial fibrillation
Patient 2
BP: 172/65 mm Hg
BP: 120/84 mm Hg
JVP elevated
JVP elevated
Irregularly irregular
Loud P2
Loud P2
2/6 murmur
(holosystolic,
left sternal border)
3/6 murmur
(holosystolic,
left sternal border)
2+ leg edema
2+ leg edema
PH
PAH
Mean PAP 25 mm Hg
Mean PAP 25 mm Hg plus
PCWP/LVEDP 15 mm Hg
PH Lessons
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
PH Lessons (contd)
6.
7.
8.
9.
Lesson 1
Pulmonary Hypertension
Is Common
No Cardiopulmonary Disease
(N=778)
Cumulative survival
1.00
0.95
0.90
PASP quintile
1: 15-23 mm Hg
2: 24-25 mm Hg
3: 26-29 mm Hg
4: 30-32 mm Hg*
5: 34-66 mm Hg*
0.85
0.975
PASP tertile
1: 15-24 mm Hg
2: 24-28 mm Hg
3: 28-43 mm Hg*
0.950
0.925
0.900
Time (yr)
Time (yr)
Uptoto20%
20%ofofthe
theUS
USpopulation
populationhas
hasecho
echo
Up
evidenceofofPH
PH
evidence
*Bonferroni-adjusted p<0.05 in pairwise comparison with lowest tertile.
Lam CSP et al. Circulation. 2009;119:2663-2670.
Epidemiology of PH by Echo
Single echo lab / Australian community of 165,450
Etiology of PH noted on echocardiogram
PAH, 2.7%
Unknown,
15.4%
CTEPH, 2.0%
Lung disease,
Sleep-related
hypoventilation,
9.3%
Miscellaneous, 2.7%
N=936 of 10,314 patients with echo PASP >40 mm Hg.
Strange G et al. Heart. 2012;98:1805-1811.
Left heart
disease, 67.9%
100
Cumulative (%)
50
25
0
larger LA size
higher E/e ratio
HTN
HFpEF
10
30
50
70
90
PH prevalence (%)
older
higher systolic BP
p<0.001
75
100
83
75
50
25
0
p<0.001
8
HTN
HFpEF
110
Lesson 2
Percentage surviving
100
80
NIH registry
Sitbon historical control
ACCP estimate
60
40
20
0
0 0.5 1 1.5 2 2.5 3 3.5 4 4.5 5
Years of follow-up
Adapted from: Sitbon O et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2002;40:780-788. DAlonzo GE et al. Ann Intern Med.
1991;115:343-349. McLaughlin VV et al. Chest. 2004;126:78S-91S.
Observed
80
Survival
(%)
60
Predicted (NIH Registry)
40
20
0
No. at risk:
All patients
12
24
36
Time (mo)
56
69
98
113
120
127
133
Symptomatic/
Decompensating
Declining/
Decompensated
CO
Symptom Threshold
PAP
Right Heart
Dysfunction
PVR
CO=
TPG
PVR
TPG=transpulmonary gradient.
Time
Spans
broad age range
60
Delay in diagnosis persists
40
NIH Registry
(N=187)
French Registry
(N=674)
Badesch DB et al. Circulation. 2010;137:376-387. DAlonzo GE. Ann Intern Med. 1991;115:343-349.
Humbert M et al. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2006;173:1023-1030.
Lesson 3
Dyspnea (86%)
Fatigue (27%)
Chest pain (22%)
Edema (22%)
Syncope (17%)
Dizziness (15%)
Cough (14%)
Palpitations
(13%)
Exam (PH)
JVD; increased A
wave, V wave;
hepatojugular reflex
Pulsatile liver
Hepatomegaly
Edema
Ascites
Low BP, low PP, cool
extremities
Multiple
educational
efforts
Right Axis
Right
Atrial
Enlargement
RVH
RV Strain
Abnormal
Peripheral hypoPeripheral
hypovascularity
(pruning)
vascularity (pruning)
Prominent central
Prominent
central
pulmonary
artery
pulmonary artery
Adapted from McLaughlin VV et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1573-1619.
RV enlargement
RVinto
enlargement
retrosternal
into
retrosternal
clear space
clear space
RV enlargement
RA enlargement
Septal straightening
Loss of IVC inspiratory collapse
Tricuspid regurgitation
Pericardial effusion
Decreased RV systolic dysfunction
TAPSE (tricuspid annular plane systolic
excursion)
TAPSE 2.3 cm
TAPSE 1.5 cm
Relatively preserved
RV function
RV dysfunction
McLaughlin VV et al.
J Am Coll Cardiol.
2009;53:1573-1619.
Chronic
Pulmonary
Embolism
CTEPH: CT Angiogram
web or bands
stenosis
recanalization
fresh
thrombus
retraction with
partial obstruction
retraction with
total obstruction
PEA
PEA
Less
Less
subtle
subtle
thrombus
thrombus
Systemic Sclerosis
Further Assessment
Rationale
Known BMPR2
mutation
Systemic
sclerosis*
8% prevalence of PAH
HIV
Portal
hypertension
4% prevalence of PAH;
predictive of poor outcome
Congenital
heart disease
% FVC
% DLCO
Pivotal Tests
Contingent Tests
History
Exam
CXR
ECG
Echocardiogram
Index of Suspicion of PH
TEE
Exercise Echo
VQ Scan
Pulmonary Angiography
Chest CT Angiogram
Coagulopathy Profile
PFTs
ABGs
Overnight
Oximetry
Polysomnography
Ventilatory Function
Gas Exchange
Sleep Disorder
Scleroderma, SLE, RA
Establish Baseline
Prognosis
Functional Test
(6MWT, CPET)
Chronic PE
Portopulmonary Htn
LFTs
RH Cath
HIV Infection
HIV
ANA
Contribute to
Assessment of:
Vasodilator Test
Exercise RH Cath
Volume Loading
Left Heart Cath
Confirmation of PH
Hemodynamic Profile
Vasodilator Response
Lesson 4
LA
RV
LV
Cross section
PAH: RV Changes
LV
RV
LA
RA
TTE apical
4-chamber view
Normal
PH
Echocardiography in PH
Strengths
Best screening tool for PH
Inexpensive, portable, readily
available, non-invasive, no
radiation
Allows for serial assessment
Provides clues to other
diagnoses (eg, LHD, CHD)
Limitations
Experienced techs/MDs
essential
Imaging quality suboptimal in
patients with poor windows
(eg, lung disease, obesity)
Right ventricle not imaged
adequately in some labs
TR jet inadequate to
determine RVSP in
10%25% of patients
Mild PAH
RV
IVS
Mild PAH56.avi
Mild PAH20.avi
LV
Diastole in short-axis view
Mild PAH20.avi
TR jet
Moderate PAH16.avi
Moderate PAH16.avi
Moderate PAH 31
TR jet
Severe PAH29.avi
Severe PAH29.avi
TR jet
Lesson 5
VC
RA
RV
PA
PV
LA
LV
Ao
PC
PAH
PH with respiratory disease
CTEPH
Normal PCWP, elevated PVR
Other:
Other:
high CO
high CO
Post-capillary PH
PCWP >15 mm Hg
PVR <3 Wood units
RA
RV
PA
PC
PV
LA
LV
Ao
Mixed PH
PCWP >15 mm Hg
PVR 3 Wood units
Pre-capillary PH
PCWP <15 mm Hg
PVR 3 Wood units
Other:
High CO
PCWP <15 mm Hg
PVR <3 Wood units
Lesson 6
Pivotal Tests
Contingent Tests
History
Exam
CXR
ECG
Echocardiogram
Index of Suspicion of PH
TEE
Exercise Echo
VQ Scan
Pulmonary Angiography
Chest CT Angiogram
Coagulopathy Profile
PFTs
ABGs
Overnight
Oximetry
Polysomnography
Ventilatory Function
Gas Exchange
Sleep Disorder
Scleroderma, SLE, RA
Establish Baseline
Prognosis
Functional Test
(6MWT, CPET)
Chronic PE
Portopulmonary Htn
LFTs
RH Cath
HIV Infection
HIV
ANA
Contribute to
Assessment of:
Vasodilator Test
Exercise RH Cath
Volume Loading
Left Heart Cath
Confirmation of PH
Hemodynamic Profile
Vasodilator Response
Lesson 7
Treatment of PHGet the
Diagnosis Correct and
Determine Functional Status
Pre-proendothelin
Nitric Oxide
Pathway
Endothelial cells
Arachidonic acid
Proendothelin
L-arginine
Endothelin
receptor A
Prostacyclin
Pathway
L-citrulline
Endothelin-1
Endothelinreceptor
antagonists
Endothelin
receptor B
Vasoconstriction
and proliferation
Prostaglandin I2
cGMP
Exogenou
s nitric
oxide
SCG
stimulator
cAMP
Vasodilation
and antiproliferation
Phosphodiesterase
type 5
Vasodilation
and antiproliferation
Phosphodiesterase
type 5 inhibitor
Smooth muscle cells
Humbert M et al. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1425-1436.
Prostacyclin
derivatives
Prevent clinical
worsening
escalation of therapy
hospitalization
6MWD
lung transplantation
WHO functional
classification
death
Improve hemodynamics
Oxygen
Use to prevent hypoxic vasoconstriction
Consider exercise, sleep, altitude
Aim for target saturation >90%
May not correct hypoxia with shunt
McLaughlin VV et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1573-1619.
Badesch DB et al. Chest. 2007;131:1917-1928.
Diuretics
Poor CO
and hypotension
Anticoagulation
100
Recommended in IPAH
(60)
80
Improved CO
and BP
Anticoagulation
(49)
60
Percent
surviving
(21)
(36)
40
(14)
20
0
No Anticoagulation
0
2
Years
(7)
PAH Therapy
(+) Vasodilator Response
Calcium channel blockers
() Vasodilator Response or Non-sustained
Vasodilator Response
Endothelin receptor antagonists
Phosphodiesterase-5 inhibitors
SCG stimulator
Prostanoids
McLaughlin VV et al. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2009;53:1573-1619.
Choice of Therapy
Local Practitioners
Knowledge and management of comorbid illnesses
Geographically close to patients
Established therapeutic relationship
PH Centers
Experience with therapy escalation
Knowledge of drug-drug interactions; eg, PDE-5 inhibitors
and antiretroviral therapy
Nursing support for management of parenteral medications
Relationships with other subspecialists; eg, lung transplant
centers
DETERMINANTS OF RISK
HIGHER RISK
No
Clinical evidence of
RV failure
Yes
Gradual
Progression of symptoms
Rapid
II, III
WHO class
IV
Longer (>400 m)
6MWD
Shorter (<300 m)
CPET
Minimal RV dysfunction
Echocardiography
Pericardial effusion,
significant RV
enlargement/dysfunction;
RA enlargement
Hemodynamics
Minimally elevated
BNP
Significantly elevated
Positive
Oral CCB
Oral CCB
Sustained
Sustained
Response
Response
Yes
Continue
Continue
CCB
CCB
No
Negative
Lower Risk
Lower Risk
Higher Risk
Higher Risk
Reassess: consider
Reassess: consider
combo-therapy
combo-therapy
Investigational Protocols
Investigational Protocols
Atrial septostomy
Atrial
septostomy
Lung
transplant
Lung transplant
Lesson 8
PATIENT B
BASELINE
BASELINE
mPAP 45 mm Hg
mPAP 34 mm Hg
mPAP 45 mm Hg
mPAP 37 mm Hg
PCWP 10 mm Hg
PCWP 10 mm Hg
PCWP 10 mm Hg
PCWP 7 mm Hg
CO 5 L/min
CO 6 L/min
CO 5 L/min
CO 6 L/min
RESPONDER OR
NON-RESPONDER??
RESPONDER OR
NON-RESPONDER??
PATIENT B
BASELINE
BASELINE
mPAP 45 mm Hg
mPAP 34 mm Hg
mPAP 45 mm Hg
mPAP 37 mm Hg
PCWP 10 mm Hg
PCWP 10 mm Hg
PCWP 10 mm Hg
PCWP 7 mm Hg
CO 5 L/min
CO 6 L/min
CO 5 L/min
CO 6 L/min
NON-RESPONDER: STILL
TREATABLE, BUT NOT WITH
CALCIUM CHANNEL BLOCKER
Lesson 9
First Do No HarmLearn to
Differentiate WHO Group I
PAH From Other Forms
of PH
History
ECG
atrial fibrillation
absence of right axis
deviation
Echo
diabetes
hypertension
obesity
left ventricular
hypertrophy
normal RA, RV
metabolic syndrome
Lesson 10
Appropriate, Timely, and
Collaborative Care:
Key to Early and Effective
Treatment of PH in the
Dyspneic Patient
Local Practitioners
PH Specialists
Best Practice
Local Care
Diagnostic dilemmas
Diagnostic cath/
vasodilator trial
Complex comorbidities
Failure to achieve Rx
goals
Considering prostanoids
Considering combination
Rx
Clinical trials
PH Center
Local Care
Symptom evaluation
Titrate diuretics
Monitor Rx
Need to change Rx
Manage SEs
? Transplant
Evaluate acute issues
Acute hospital care
Emotional support
PH Center
PH Center
Case Resolutions
2 Women With Dyspnea
Patient 2
Echo
Echo
LV: EF 65%
LV: EF 58%
Grade 3 diastolic
dysfunction
Grade 1 diastolic
dysfunction
RV: size
RV: size
Normal RV function
3+ RV dysfunction
PASP: 60 mm Hg
PASP: 76 mm Hg
RA: 10 mm Hg
RA: 10 mm Hg
1+ TR
2+ TR
Patient 2
Invasive
Hemodynamics
Invasive
Hemodynamics
RA: 15 mm Hg
RA: 12 mm Hg
mPAP: 42 mm Hg
mPAP: 41 mm Hg
PCWP: 29 mm Hg
PCWP: 10 mm Hg
BP: 172/65 mm Hg
BP: 93/69 mm Hg
Patient 2
Final Diagnosis
Final Diagnosis
WHO Group II
pulmonary venous
hypertension (PVH)
WHO Group I
pulmonary arterial
hypertension (PAH)
Patient 2: PAH
Clinical Course
Clinical Course
Carvedilol
Furosemide
PDE-5 inhibitor:
no improvement
Co-managed with
nephrology
ERA added
symptoms over time
Improved symptoms
Now on parenteral
prostanoid with
improved symptoms
NYHA II
NYHA II
Summary: PH Lessons
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
7.
8.
9.
www.PHAssociation.org