Rabia Muneer (M.SC), Sidra Liaquat (Mphil) : Department of Applied Psychology Bahauddin Zakaryia University, Multan

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 30

Rabia Muneer (M.

Sc), Sidra Liaquat(MPhil)


Department of Applied Psychology
Bahauddin Zakaryia University, Multan

Job satisfaction is function of persons characteristics

such as career interest and personality variables and


environment characteristics such as situation of
atmosphere that are formed by people that are dominant in
that environment. (Holland, 1985)
it is the extent to which one feels good about the job. Job
satisfaction is in regard to ones feelings or state of mind
regarding to the nature of their work. The source of job
satisfaction is not only the job; it also creates from
working environment, supervision
style, interpersonal relationship,
and organizational culture also
(Tasnim, S. 2006)

An attitude or an orientation toward the


organization which links are attaches the identity of
the person to the organization.
(Mowday, 1982)
Meyer and Allen (1994) state
"a psychological state that
characterizes the employee's relationships with the
organization and has implications for the decision to
continue membership in the organization is
organizational commoitment".

Job commitment refers to an employee's attachment, goal


congruency, identification, loyalty and allegiance to their
organization.
(Williamss j. May 22, 2004)
Strongly committed employees are more likely to remain
with the organization than are those with weak
commitment. Commitment may be better predictor of job
satisfaction because it is influenced more by day to day
happenings (Gupta , 2008).
With respect to organizational commitment, studies using
the Organizational Commitment Questionnaire (OCQ)
highlight that private sector was more committed than
their public sector counterparts (Rachid, 1995).

Affective organizational commitment was


found to be most influential with respect to
levels of intrinsic and extrinsic job
satisfaction. This concurs with other studies of
the behavioral outcomes of commitment.
(Markovits et al, 2007)
Age was found a major factor of
organizational commitment because the older
teachers have spent a longer time in the
organization that is why they may better
understand the environment of it (DoddMcCue & Wrigh, 1996)

The present research was aimed to discover the


relationship between job satisfaction and
organizational commitment.
According to researchers observation job
satisfaction is considered more in public
employees and organizational commitment more
in private employees.
Previous researches conducted in Pakistan also
support these conceptions. This research has been
conducted to evaluate these tendencies.
This research will help to determine the
relationship between job satisfaction and
organizational commitment in Pakistan especially
in the content of Multan city.

The sample of 200 teachers of Multan city was


selected (50 private male, 50 female and 50
governments male and 50 female).The age range
was 25-65 with 3 categories(category 1 25-35.
Category 2: 36-45, category 3 46-65).
Convenient technique in non-probability
sampling was used to collect the data.

Table 1
Correlation coefficient on the scale of job Satisfaction and
Organizational commitment (N= 200).

Scale

Organizational
commitment

*P<0.05

Organization
al
commitment
1

Job
Satisfaction
.146*

Relationship of Job Satisfaction and Organizational


commitment in term of gender among teachers (N=200).

Job Satisfaction

Organizational
Commitment

Males
.127

p > 0.05 (n.s), **p < 0.01

Females
.370**

Relationship of Job Satisfaction and Organizational


commitment among public and private teachers (N=200)

Job Satisfaction

Organizational
Commitment

Public

Private

.591**

.079

**p < 0.01, p > 0.05(n.s)

Mean, Standard Deviation, t-test and Cohens d on the scale of Job


Satisfaction among male and female teachers (N= 200).
Scales

Gender

SD

Cohens
d

Job
Satisfaction

Male

100

43.12

8.503
-.418

Female

100

df = 198, p > 0.05 (n.s)

42.67

6.612

.677

0.06

Mean, Standard Deviation, t-test and Cohens d on the scale


of Organizational commitment among male and female teachers (N=
200).
Scales

Gender

SD

Organizational
commitment

Male

100

41.65

33.76

Female

100

44.02

df = 198, p > 0.05 (n.s)

7.261

Cohens d

.185

.855

0.018

Mean, Standard Deviation and t-test on the scale of Job


Satisfaction among public and private teachers (N= 200).
Scales

Organization

SD

100

44.34

8.1

Cohens d

-.2.94

.004

0.380

type
Job
Satisfaction

Public

Private

df = 198 p < 0.05

100

41.45

6.75

Table 7
Mean, Standard Deviation and t-test on the scale of Organizational
commitment among public and private teachers (N= 200).
Scales

Organizational

SD

type
Organizational
commitment

Public

d
100

41.53

6.05
-1.635

Private

p > 0.05(n.s)

Cohens

100

47.14

33.76

.104

0.22

Table 8(a)
One way Analysis of Job Satisfaction and Organizational commitment for their scores
on categories of Age (25 35, 36 45, 46 65) (N = 200).
Scales
Scales of
SS
df
MS
F
P
Variation

Job

Between Groups

1245.441

622.720

Within Groups

8753.154

197

44.432

Total

9998.595

199

Between Groups

1050.254

525.127

Within Groups

7009.141

197

35.579

8059.395

199

14.015

.001

14.759

.001

Satisfaction

Organizational
commitment

Total
df= 198, ***p< 0.001

Table 8(b)
Post Hoc Multiple Comparisons of Job Satisfaction and Organizational commitment
with age categories.
Dependent
variable

(I)Age

(J)Age

Mean
Difference(IJ)

Standard
Error

25 35

36 45

2.250

1.228

.068

46 65

6.319*

1.258

.001

36 45

46 65

4.069*

1.077

.001

25 35

36 45

5.650*

1.099

.001

46 65

5.161*

1.126

.001

46 65

.489

.963

.612

Job Satisfaction

Organizational
commitment
36 45

***p< 0.001

Over all the results show a significant positive


relationship between employees job
satisfaction and organizational commitment.
It is concluded that public employees showed
more job satisfaction as compare to private
employees. And private employees are more
committed to their jobs.
Well it is true that private teachers have more
organizational commitment and they are
highly motivated and determined towards their
duties.

The current study demonstrates that


oResearch has contributed to the current theory and
research shows that it is useful for the research
purpose.
oThe findings are also very informative in
explaining and solving problems related to
behavioral aspects of organizations particularly
factors that contribute towards organizational
commitment among employees.
oFurthermore, the findings of this study can be of
great help in designing polices for improving
organizational commitment.

The study entails some limitations that should be


considered before evaluating the research findings.
oAs with most self-administered survey methodology,
response bias was an important concern. This is mostly
with employee surveys that they hesitate to show their
negative feelings about their organization because in this
way their jobs can be at a risk.
oTime shortage was another limitation. Due to this it
wasnt possible for the researcher to have full command
over it.
oAnother limitation was that sample was taken only from
the only Multan city and cannot be generalize to the
whole teachers.

There are some suggestions to the researches who


want to do their research on the same topic in the future.
By following these suggestions they can have better
internal and external validity.
oFindings of the study suggest that organizations should
deliberate some factors that have been identified to have
strong consequence on organizational commitment and
include them in employees development programs to
improve their attitude in the workplace. It is the primary
stage of behavioral research in the area. In future an in
depth study is requisite to be conducted to identify other
factors which contribute to organizational commitment.
oSample should be large and enough to represent the
whole

You might also like