Methods Data Collection
Methods Data Collection
I. Observation Method
Observation becomes a scientific tool and the
method of data collection, when it serves a
formulated research purpose, is
systematically planned and recorded and is
subjected to checks and controls on validity
and reliability
Under observation the information is sought
by way of investigators own direct
observation without asking from the
respondent
Observation Method
Main advantages are:
Subjective bias is eliminated
The information relates to what is
currently happening
This method is independent of
respondents willingness to respond
Observation Method
Main Limitations are:
It is expensive
The information provided by this
method is very limited
Unforeseen factors may interfere with
the observation task
Types of Observation
Essentially two types:
1. Structured vs. Unstructured
Observation
2. Participant vs. Non-participant
Observation
Personal Interview
PI Method requires the interviewer
asking questions in a face-to-face
contact with the person
Collecting information thru PI is
structured the use of a set of
predetermined questions and highly
standardized techniques of recording
Personal Interview
Thus, the interviewer in a structured interview
follows a rigid procedure, asking questions
in a form and order prescribed
In unstructured interviews there is a
flexibility of approach to questioning
Unstructured interviews do not follow a
system of pre-determined questions and
standardized techniques of recording
information
Advantages
1. More information and in greater depth can
be obtained
2. Resistance may be overcome by a skilled
interviewer
3. Greater flexibility an opportunity to
restructure questions
4. Observation method can also be applied to
recording verbal answers
5. Personal information can be obtained
6. Possibility of spontaneous responses and
thus more honest responses
Disadvantages
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
Expensive method
Interviewer bias
Respondent bias
Time consuming
Under the interview method the
organization required for selecting,
training, and supervising the field staff is
complex with formidable problems
6. Establishing rapport to facilitate free and
frank responses is very difficult
Demerits
1. Low rate of return
2. Respondents need to be educated
and cooperative
3. Inbuilt inflexibility
4. Possibility of ambiguous replies or
omission of items
5. This method is slow
Features of a Questionnaire
Questionnaire is the heart of a survey
needs to be carefully constructed
Need to understand the features of the
Questionnaire its general form,
question sequence and question
formulation and the wording of the
questions
1. General Form
May be either structured or unstructured
Structured Questionnaires are those in
which there are definite, concrete,
predetermined questions
The questions are presented with exactly
the same wording and in the same order to
all respondents
The form of the questions may be either
closed (yes or no) or open (inviting free
responses
General Form
Structured Questionnaires may also have fixed
alternative questions in which responses are
limited to the stated alternatives
Thus, a highly structured Questionnaire is one
in which all the questions and answers are
specified and comments in the respondents
own words are held to the minimum
Unstructured Questionnaire when the above
characteristics are absent, it is known as a
unstructured Questionnaire
The Interviewer is provided with a general
guideline on the type of information to be
obtained
2. Question Sequence
Proper sequence is needed to elicit valid
responses
Sequence must be clear that is, the
relation of one question to the next
To establish rapport and to gain cooperation
from the respondent difficult questions,
personal questions etc should preferably
come at the appropriate time rather than at
the begining
Warranty Cards
Distributor or Store Audits
Pantry Audits
Consumer Panels
Mechanical Devices
Depth Interviews
Content Analysis
Projective Tests