0% found this document useful (0 votes)
102 views18 pages

EMF: Biologist's View: Shanti N. Dessai

This document discusses electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and their potential health effects from a biologist's perspective. It begins by defining EMFs as non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation emissions lower than visible light. It then asserts that EMFs can interfere with the electrical cells of our bodies. The document recommends ways to reduce EMF exposure, such as keeping phones away from the body and turning off WiFi at night. It concludes by stating that the World Health Organization has classified low frequency EMFs as a possible carcinogen, so EMFs should be considered a type of pollution.

Uploaded by

desaishanti
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
102 views18 pages

EMF: Biologist's View: Shanti N. Dessai

This document discusses electromagnetic fields (EMFs) and their potential health effects from a biologist's perspective. It begins by defining EMFs as non-ionizing electromagnetic radiation emissions lower than visible light. It then asserts that EMFs can interfere with the electrical cells of our bodies. The document recommends ways to reduce EMF exposure, such as keeping phones away from the body and turning off WiFi at night. It concludes by stating that the World Health Organization has classified low frequency EMFs as a possible carcinogen, so EMFs should be considered a type of pollution.

Uploaded by

desaishanti
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PPTX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 18

EMF: Biologists view

Shanti N. Dessai
89th

Participant
Orientation Programme, ASC,GU
(23rd Sept to 20th Oct, 2014)

Dedicated to Mrs. Maithili Naik

What is
EMF
Electromagnetic
fields (EMFs)
?
Low-frequency electromagnetic radiation emitions (LEMFs).
Lower than visible light, called "non-ionizing" radiation. called
"ionizing" radiation.

Is
in the
EM re
F a
IS ne
SU e
E df
or
?
bi
ol
og
is

tt
o

in

te

rf
er
e

Yes and absolute


yes!!

Yes and
absolute yes!

Yes and absolute


yes!!

Yes!!!!
Why ?

ELECTRICAL CELLS OF OUR


BODY

Electromagnetic
Hypersensitivity Test

http://www.radiationresearch.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=a

How to reduce your EMF exposure ?


Possible minimums

Keep your phone away from your body.


Turn your cell off (or put it on airplane mode) at night and
NEVER be used as an alarm clock.
Turn off the WiFi at night. Its our housekeeping time.
Install Stertzerizer Filters to reduce
electricity.

amplitudes of dirty

Protect and educate your kids and teens.


Switch out your wireless home phones for the old-fashioned
corded phones.
Connect regularly with the earths electrical charge.
Promote wired (not wireless) alternatives for Internet access
in your city. Citywide Wi-Fi .
And follow the exposure limits for EMF fields developed by

Conclusi
World Health Organization, classified low frequency
ons
carcinogen (cigarettes are in the class). So also EPA.

EMF as a Group 2B

EMFs are Pollutants?? Yes


Pollution is deliberate or accidental introduction of a substance or a form of
energy of such a quality and quantity into an environment at wrong place and
at wrong time that will bring about undesirable change in the physical,
chemical or biological characteristics of our environment making it unfit for its
inhabitants.
Electropollution is deliberate or accidental introduction of electromaganetic
frequencies (EMF) of such a quality and quantity into an environment at wrong
place and at wrong time that will bring about undesirable change in the
physical, chemical or biological characteristics of our environment making it
unfit for its inhabitants.
Electropollution introduces biologically toxic electrical frequencies into our
environment. These frequencies, called electromagnetic frequencies or EMFs,
clouds up the electrical communication in the human body. This has been
shown to cause serious health issues ranging from diabetes to cancer. They
also interfere with other inhabitants of our environment such as birds, other
animals etc.

Referenc
es

Repacholi MH, Cardis E (1997)Criteria for EMF health risk assessment.Radiation Protection Dosimetry,72:305-312.
Repacholi MH (ed) (1998)Low-level exposure to radiofrequency electromagnetic fields: health effects and research needs.Bioelectromagnetics,19:1-19.
McKinlay AF and Repacholi MH (eds) (1999)Exposure metrics and dosimetry for EMF epidemiology.Radiation Protection Dosimetry,83(1-2):194.
Repacholi MH and Greenebaum B (eds) (1999)Interaction of static and extremely low frequency electric and magnetic fields with living systems: Health effects
and research needs.Bioelectromagnetics,20:133-160.
Foster KH, Vecchia P, Repacholi MH (2000)Science and the precautionary policy.Science,288:979-981.
Kheifets L (2001)Electric and magnetic field exposure and brain cancer.Bioelectromagnetics5: S120-S131.
Kheifets L (2001)Electric and Magnetic Fields and Occupational Health.Patty's Industrial Hygiene and Toxicology, Fifth Edition 100: 141-198.
Kheifets L, Greenberg R, Neutra R, Hester G, Poole C, Rall D, Banerjee G (2001)From epidemiology to policy: An EMF case study.American Journal of
Epidemiology154(12): S50-59.
Kheifets L, Hester G, Banerjee G (2001)The Precautionary Principle and EMF: Implementation and Evaluation.Journal of Risk Research4(2): 113-125.
Mezei G, Kheifets L (2001)"Is There any Evidence for Differential Misclassification or Bias Away from the Null in the Swedish Childhood Cancer Study?" Letter to
the Editor,Epidemiology12(6):750.
Repacholi MH (2001)Health risks from the use of mobile phones.Toxicology Letters120: 323-331.
Foster KR, Osepchuk JM, and Repacholi MH (2002)Environmental impacts of electromagnetic fields from major electrical technologies.Environmental Health
Perspectives
Goldstein LS, Kheifets L, van Deventer TE, Repacholi MH (2002)Comments on the paper "Long-term exposure of Em -Pim1 transgenic mice to 898.4 MHz
microwaves does not increase lymphoma incidence" Radiation Research.Radiation Research158: 357-364.
Goldstein LS, Kheifets L, van Deventer TE, Repacholi MH (2002)Further comments on "Long-term Exposure of E&mgr;-Pim1 Transgenic Mice to 898.4 MHz
Microwaves Does Not Increase Lymphoma Incidence" by Utteridge et al.,Radiation Research158, 357-364 (2002)
Kheifets L, Thrall N (2002)Electromagnetic Fields and Health.Macmillians Guide to Pollution
Litvak E, Foster KR, and Repacholi MH (2002)Health and safety implications of exposure to electromagnetic fields in the frequency range 300 Hz to 10
MHz.,Bioelectromagnetics,23(1):68-82.
Mezei G, Kheifets L (2002)Clues to the possible viral etiology of childhood leukemia.Technology9: 3-14.
Repacholi MH (2002)Assessment of the Health Effects of EMF Exposure.The Radio Science Bulletin301: 14-24.
Sahl J, Mezei G, Kavet R, McMillan A, Silvers A, Sastre A, Kheifets L (2002)Occupational magnetic field exposures and cardiovascular mortality in a cohort of
electric utility workers.American Journal of Epidemiology156:913-918.
Dewhirst MW, Lora-Michiels M, Viglianti BL, Dewey WC, and Repacholi MH (2003)Carcinogenic effects of hyperthermia.International Journal of
Hyperthermia,19(3):236-251
Goldstein LS, Dewhirst MW, Repacholi MH, and Kheifets L (2003)Summary, conclusions and recommendations: adverse temperature levels in the human
body,International Journal of Hyperthermia,19(3):373-384
Kheifets L, Repacholi MH, and Saunders R (2003)Thermal stress and radiation protection principles.International Journal of Hyperthermia,19(3):215-224
McKinlay A, Repacholi MH (2003)(eds) Weak electric fields effects in the body.Radiation Protection Dosimetry106 (4) 2003
Repacholi MH (2003)WHO's health risk assessment of ELF fields.Radiation Protection Dosimetry,106(4):297-299
Riadh W. Habash Y, Brodsky LM, Leiss W, Krewski D, Repacholi MH (2003)Health Risks of Electromagnetic Fields. Part I: Evaluation and Assessment of
Electric and Magnetic Fields.Critical Review in Biomedical Engineering, 31(3&4):219273
van Deventer TE, Repacholi MH (2004)Effet de la Tlphonie mobile su la sant humaine: tat des connaissances scientifiques,Droit de l'environnement dans la
pratique, 8, 708-724
Kheifets L, Repacholi M, Saunders R, van Deventer TE (2005)Sensitivity of Children to Electromagnetic Fields,Pediatrics, August 2005, 303-313
Kheifets L, Sahl J, Shimkhada R, Repacholi MH (2005)Developing policy in the face of scientific uncertainty: interpreting 0.3 T or 0.4 T cut points from EMF
epidemiologic studies,Risk Analysis, 25 (4), vol. 5, no.1, 927-935
van Deventer TE, Saunders R, Repacholi MH (2005)WHO health risk assessment process for static fields,Progress in Biophysics and Molecular Biology, 87,
355-363
Kheifets L, van Deventer TE, Lundel G, Swanson J (2006)Le principe de prcaution et les champs lectriques et magntiques : mise en uvre et
valuation,Environnement, risques et sant, Jan-Feb 2006, 43-53
van Rongen E, Saunders R, van Deventer TE, Repacholi MH (2006)Static fields: Biological effects and mechanisms relevant to exposure limits.Health
Physics, June 2007, vol. 92, no. 6, 584-590
Valberg P, van Deventer TE, Repacholi MH (2007)Workgroup Report: Base Stations and Wireless Networks: Radiofrequency (RF) Exposures and Health
Consequences.Environmental Health Perspectives, March 2007, vol. 115, no. 3, 416-424

????
?

Thank You!
Shanti N. Dessai
89th

Participant
Orientation Programme, ASC,GU
(23rd Sept to 20th Oct, 2014)

[email protected]

You might also like