Hull RMFI4 e CH 10

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 36

Volatility

Chapter 10

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 10, Copyright John C. Hull 2015

Definition of Volatility

Suppose that Si is the value of a variable on


day i. The volatility per day is the standard
deviation of ln(Si /Si-1)

Normally days when markets are closed are


ignored in volatility calculations (see Business
Snapshot 10.1, page 207)
The volatility per year is 252 times the daily
volatility
Variance rate is the square of volatility

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 10, Copyright John C. Hull 2015

Implied Volatilities
Of

the variables needed to price an option


the one that cannot be observed directly is
volatility
We can therefore imply volatilities from
market prices and vice versa

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 10, Copyright John C. Hull 2015

VIX Index: A Measure of the Implied


Volatility of the S&P 500 (Figure 10.1, page
208)

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 10, Copyright John C. Hull 2015

Are Daily Changes in Exchange Rates


Normally Distributed? Table 10.1, page 209
Real World (%)

>1 SD
>2SD
>3SD
>4SD
>5SD
>6SD

25.04
5.27
1.34
0.29
0.08
0.03

Normal Model (%)

31.73
4.55
0.27
0.01
0.00
0.00

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 10, Copyright John C. Hull 2015

Heavy Tails

Daily exchange rate changes are not normally


distributed

The distribution has heavier tails than the normal


distribution
It is more peaked than the normal distribution

This means that small changes and large changes


are more likely than the normal distribution would
suggest
Many market variables have this property, known
as excess kurtosis

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 10, Copyright John C. Hull 2015

Normal and Heavy-Tailed


Distribution

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 10, Copyright John C. Hull 2015

Alternatives to Normal Distributions:


The Power Law (See page 211)
Prob(v > x) = Kx-
This seems to fit the behavior of the
returns on many market variables better
than the normal distribution

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 10, Copyright John C. Hull 2015

Log-Log Test for Exchange Rate Data (v


is number of standard deviations which
the exchange rate moves)

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 10, Copyright John C. Hull 2015

m
1
2
2

(
u

u
)

n
n

i
m

1
m
ui1n

Standard Approach to Estimating


Volatility
Define n as the volatility per day between

day n-1 and day n, as estimated at end of day


n-1
Define Si as the value of market variable at
end of day i
Define ui= ln(Si/Si-1)

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 10, Copyright John C. Hull 2015

10

1
m
u

m
22
ni1ni

Simplifications Usually Made in


Risk Management
Define

ui as (SiSi-1)/Si-1

Assume

that the mean value of ui is zero

Replace

m-1 by m

This gives

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 10, Copyright John C. Hull 2015

11

w
h
r
e
1
m
22
n
i
n

i
i

1
m
ii
1

Weighting Scheme

Instead of assigning equal weights to the


observations we can set

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 10, Copyright John C. Hull 2015

12

w
r
h
e

1
m
2
2
n
L
i
n

i
i

1
m
ii
1

ARCH(m) Model

In an ARCH(m) model we also assign


some weight to the long-run variance rate,
VL:

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 10, Copyright John C. Hull 2015

13

(1)u

2n2n1n21

EWMA Model
In

(page 216)

an exponentially weighted moving


average model, the weights assigned to
the u2 decline exponentially as we move
back through time
This leads to

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 10, Copyright John C. Hull 2015

14

Attractions of EWMA
Relatively

little data needs to be stored


We need only remember the current
estimate of the variance rate and the most
recent observation on the market variable
Tracks volatility changes
= 0.94 has been found to be a good
choice across a wide range of market
variables
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 10, Copyright John C. Hull 2015

15

V
u

2nLn212n1

GARCH (1,1), page 218

In GARCH (1,1) we assign some weight to


the long-run average variance rate

Since weights must sum to 1

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 10, Copyright John C. Hull 2015

16

2nV
2
2
n

1
n

L
1

GARCH (1,1) continued

Setting VL the GARCH (1,1) model is

and

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 10, Copyright John C. Hull 2015

17


0...2013u086

2nnn
2121

Example

Suppose

The

long-run variance rate is 0.0002 so


that the long-run volatility per day is 1.4%

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 10, Copyright John C. Hull 2015

18

0..2013.086.2560.236

Example continued
Suppose

that the current estimate of the


volatility is 1.6% per day and the most
recent percentage change in the market
variable is 1%.
The new variance rate is
The new volatility is 1.53% per day

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 10, Copyright John C. Hull 2015

19

p
q
22
2
nii
i1j
n

j1n
j

GARCH (p,q)

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 10, Copyright John C. Hull 2015

20

Other Models
Many

other GARCH models have been


proposed
For example, we can design a GARCH
models so that the weight given to ui2
depends on whether ui is positive or
negative

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 10, Copyright John C. Hull 2015

21

Maximum Likelihood Methods


In

maximum likelihood methods we


choose parameters that maximize the
likelihood of the observations occurring

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 10, Copyright John C. Hull 2015

22

p(1)

Example 1 (page 220)


We

observe that a certain event happens


one time in ten trials. What is our estimate
of the proportion of the time, p, that it
happens?
The probability of the outcome is

We

maximize this to obtain a maximum


likelihood estimate: p = 0.1

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 10, Copyright John C. Hull 2015

23

Example 2 (page 220-221)


Estimate the variance of observations
from a normal distribution with mean zero
ui2
1

Maximize :
exp
2v
i 1
2v
n

ui2
Same as maximizing : ln( v)
v
i 1
1 n 2
Maximum value when v ui
n i 1
n

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 10, Copyright John C. Hull 2015

24

1
u

r
e
x
p

2
v
2

v
ln
(v)

u
2
m
i
iim

1
i
2
i
i

Application to EWMA and


GARCH

We choose parameters that maximize

Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 9th Edition, Copyright John C. Hull 2014

25


ln(v)
u
2
m
i
i
1i

S&P 500 Excel Application

Start with trial values of parameters ( for EWMA


and , , and for GARCH(1,1)
Update variances
Calculate

Use solver to search for values of parameters that


maximize this objective function
For efficient operation of Solver: set up spreadsheet
so that ensure that search is over parameters that
are of same order of magnitude and test alternative
starting conditions

Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 9th Edition, Copyright John C. Hull 2014

26

S&P 500 Excel Application (Table 10.4)

vi =i2

ln(vi ) ui2 /vi

0.004759

0.00004531

9.5022

0.006606

0.00004447

9.0393

0.00016327

8.6209

Date

Day

Si

18-Jul-2005

1221.13

19-Jul-2005

1229.35

0.006731

20-Jul-2005

1235.20

21-Jul-2005

1227.04

..

13-Aug-2010

1279

1079.25

Total

ui=(SiSi-1)/Si-1

..
0.004024

10,228.2349

Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 9th Edition, Copyright John C. Hull 2014

27

The S&P 500 (Figure 10.4)

Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 10, Copyright John C. Hull 2015

28

The GARCH Estimate of


Volatility of the S&P 500 (Figure 10.5, page
530)

Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 9th Edition, Copyright John C. Hull 2014

29

Variance Targeting
One

way of implementing GARCH(1,1)


that increases stability is by using variance
targeting
The long-run average variance equal to
the sample variance
Only two other parameters then have to
be estimated
Risk Management and Financial Institutions 4e, Chapter 10, Copyright John C. Hull 2015

30

How Good is the Model?


The

Ljung-Box statistic tests for


autocorrelation
We compare the autocorrelation of the
ui2 with the autocorrelation of the ui2/i2

Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 9th Edition, Copyright John C. Hull 2014

31

E
[]V
()(V)

2nkm
k
2
L
n
L
m

1
1
2
E

k
k
0

Forecasting Future Volatility


(equation 10.14, page 532)

A few lines of algebra shows that

The variance rate for an option expiring on


day m is

Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 9th Edition, Copyright John C. Hull 2014

32

Forecasting Future Volatility


continued (equation 10.15, page 534)

Define
a ln

The estimated volatility per annum for an option lasting T days is

1 e aT
252 VL
V
(0)

L
aT

Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 9th Edition, Copyright John C. Hull 2014

33

S&P Example

1
a ln
0.006511
0.083394 0.910116
Option Life
(days)

10

30

50

100

500

Est. Volatility
(% per annum)

27.36

27.10

26.87

26.35

24.32

Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 9th Edition, Copyright John C. Hull 2014

34

Volatility Term Structures

GARCH (1,1) suggests that, when calculating vega,


we should shift the long maturity volatilities less than
the short maturity volatilities
When instantaneous volatility changes by (0),
volatility for T-day option changes by
1 e aT (0)
(0)
aT (T )

Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 9th Edition, Copyright John C. Hull 2014

35

Results for S&P 500 (Table 10.7)


When

instantaneous volatility changes by

1%
Option Life
(days)

10

30

50

100

500

Volatility
increase (%)

0.97

0.92

0.87

0.77

0.33

Options, Futures, and Other Derivatives, 9th Edition, Copyright John C. Hull 2014

36

You might also like