Performance

Evaluation System (PES)

Topics of Discussion
PES Objectives
Organization and Mission
Automated Performance Evaluation System (A-PES)
General Rules
Responsibilities
Compliance Issues
Selection Board Information
Points of Contact
2

References
U. S. Navy Regulations 1990, Article 1129 and 1122
Marine Corps Manual
Performance Evaluation System (PES) Manual
(MCO P1610.7E)
Performance Evaluation Appeals (MCO 1610.11C)
Marine Corps Physical Fitness Test/Body Composition
Program (MCPFTBCP)(MCO P6100.12)

PES Objectives
Ensure accurate, honest, and consistent
reporting.
Prevent inflation.
Ensure timely receipt of reports.
Ensure accuracy of official records.
Provide info for selection boards.

Personnel Management Division

(MM) Organization
Manpower Management, under the direction of the Director,
Personnel Management Division, is responsible for the
administration, retention, distribution, appointment, evaluation,
awarding, promotion, retirement, discharge, separation, and service
records of commissioned officers, warrant officers, and enlisted
personnel of the Marine Corps and Marine Corps Reserve.
P e r s o n n e l M a n a g e m e n t D iv is io n ( M M )
MMOA
O f f ic e r
A s s ig n m e n t
B ra n c h

MMEA
E n lis t e d
A s s ig n m e n t
B ra n c h

MMSB
P e rs o n n e l
M anagem ent
S u p p o rt B r a n c h

M M IA
I n t e g ra tio n a n d
A d m in is t r a t io n
B ra n c h

MMER
P e r fo r m a n c e
E v a lu a tio n
R e v ie w B r a n c h

MMPR
P r o m o t io n s
B ra n c h

MMMA
M ilit a r y
A w a rd s
B ra n c h

MMSR
S e p a ra t io n a n d
R e t ir e m e n t
B ra n c h

MMSB Mission
The Personnel Management Support Branch (MMSB)
directs and controls the functions necessary to create,
maintain, and archive official military personnel files
(OMPFs) and directs and controls the functions and
operation of the performance evaluation system
(PES). In addition, our mission includes unit diary
research activities and worldwide locator services for
the Marine Corps.

MMSB Organizational
Structure
MMSB
P e r s o n n e l M a n a g e m e n t S u p p o rt B ra n c h
M M S B -1 0
R e c o rd s
C o r re s p o n d e n c e
S e c t io n

M M S B -2 0
R e c o rd s M a n a g e m e n t
S e c t io n

Discharge Certificate OMPF Inputs

DD 214s
OMPF/MBS
RS/RO Profiles

M M S B -3 0
P e r fo r m a n c e
E v a lu a t io n
S e c t io n
Fitness Reports
Master Brief Sheets

M M S B -4 0
S y s t e m s S u p p o rt
S e c t io n

Computer Support

M M S B L ia is o n
N P R C - S t . L o u is

Archives

MMSB-30 Organization
M M S B -3 0
P e r f o r m a n c e E v a l u a t i o n S e c t io n
M M S B -3 1
P o li c y a n d
R e s e a rc h
U n it
Compliance
Corrections
Education

M M S B -3 2
F it n e s s R e p o rt
P r o c e s s in g
U n it
Receipt
Audit
Corrections

M M S B -3 4
R e s e r v e M a t t e r s U n it

Compliance
Corrections
Education

A-PES
Web-based assessable via Marine On Line
(MOL)
70% of total force (95% of active units)
Non-Marines can obtain MOL accounts
A-PES FOC estimated during 2005

A-PES Features
MCTFS Interface - Section A pre-populated
Improves administrative accuracy
97% of A-PES reports are accurate
50% of WinFE reports are accurate

Worksheets retained for 18 months

Reports retained for 90 days after completion
Command Reviewer, Trusted Assistant, and
Batch Processing Functionality

A-PES Access

11

A-PES Welcome Page

12

MRO MROW Creation Page

13

MROW - 1st Page of MROW

14

MRO - 2nd Page of MROW

15

Create Fitness Report

16

Create Fitness Report

From MROW

17

Section A Data

18

Section A Data (cont)

19

Page 2- 4/Sections D-H

20

Section I and RS Certification

21

Command Review Option

22

Status Page

23

Printed Fitness Report

24

Route to Reviewing Officer

25

RS Logout

26

Page 5 / Section K

27

Reviewing Officer Certification

28

Send for Command Review

29

Submission to MMSB

30

Acknowledgment of Submission to
MMSB

31

Trusted Assistant

32

General Rules
A-PES does not nullify requirement to counsel MRO
throughout reporting period.
90 or more days normally required for an observed
fitness report.
Justification required for observed fitness reports of
89-days or less.
Not observed reports can be rendered adverse.
Completed reports due to HQMC 30-days after
reporting period ends.
33

Reporting Chain
Reporting Senior (RS)
Reviewing Officer (RO)
Third Officer Sighter (3OS)
Adverse reports only

Senior Marine Representative (SMR)

Non-Marine RS and RO external to the Marine Corps reports only

Commandant of the Marine Corps (MMSB-30)

Note: The MRO is not part of the reporting chain.

34

Command Responsibilities

Review reports at command level.

Ensure reports adhere to PES policy.
Ensure reports do not contain inflated markings.
Ensure reports contain sufficient justifications, as
applicable.
Ensure reports do not contain unwarranted
comments.
Free of ambiguities
Free of innuendos
No velvet knives

Ensure reports arrive to HQMC on time.

MRO Responsibilities
Possess a clear understanding of his or her role in
accomplishing the units mission.
Possess a general understanding of the PES.
Submit billet description to RS within the first 15days of the reporting period.
Submit summary of accomplishments to RS prior to
end of reporting period.

RS Responsibilities
Establish, formalize, and review billet description at
outset of reporting period utilizing MRO worksheet.
Counsel MRO on duties, responsibilities, and
RSs expectations throughout the reporting
period.
Provide in-depth observation of MROs
performance, professional qualities, and potential.
Ensure accuracy of sections A thru I.
Forward report to RO in a timely manner.

RO Responsibilities
Educate subordinates on fitness report
responsibilities, PES policy, and proper evaluation
methods.
Make every effort to know professional capabilities of
the MRO.
Take corrective action to eliminate inflated and late
reports.
Complete section K, as applicable.
Ensure accuracy and timely submission of reports.

RO Responsibilities (cont)
Non-Marine RS/RO (external to USMC)
Forward report to SMR for review

Assess adverse reports and adjudicate

factual differences between RSs evaluation
and MROs statement.
Forward adverse report to Third Officer
Sighter.

3OS Responsibilities
Sight all adverse fitness reports.
Take action to resolve inconsistencies and
disagreements when MROs statement disagrees
with RO as to matters of fact.
Take action to determine validity of new info when
MROs statement adds new info that RO did not
previously address.
If 3OS comments add new adversity refer report to
MRO for acknowledgment.

SMR Responsibilities
Provide non-Marine RSs and ROs guidance and
education on PES policy.
Review all reports for administrative correctness.
May comment on the MRO, if desired.
Observation pertinent to billet assignment and mission
accomplishment.
Whole Marine Concept
Marine Corps standards, values, and professional growth
exhibited.

CMC Policy Compliance

To maintain the integrity of the PES MMSB-30 will
monitor how well reporting officials are performing
their duties and proactively identify, notify, and
educate reporting officials displaying undesirable
reporting trends indicating gaming, inflation,
untimely submission of reports, inaccurate reporting,
and procedural errors.

42

Trends
Failure to provide MRO copy of report
Failure to use the MMSB website to eliminate
date gaps (Proceed/Travel/Delay)
Failure to use of proper occasion codes
Failure to generate To Temporary Duty (TD) reports
Inaccurate and incomplete height/weight/BF
Failure to complete sections B and C
Negative and evaluative comments made in
section C (Billet Accomplishments)

Trends (cont)
Effectiveness Under Stress and Courage not
evaluated.
Adverse reports not referred to MRO for
acknowledgment
Adverse report not adjudicated properly by RO or
3OS.
Adverse reports not referred to 3OS for action.
Failure to use senior enlisted advisors in evaluation
process.
Superior marking justifications not concrete,
substantive, verifiable, or quantitative.

Marking Philosophy Considerations

Grade, experience in grade, and accumulated
experience as a Marine.
Performance for a defined period and specific set of
duties and responsibilities.
Understand personal ability and individual
performance over a course of career develops a record
of merit.
No deficiencies in any given area does not mean a
Marine rates an F or G.
45

Marking Philosophy Considerations

(cont)
RS must accurately evaluate each Marine in context of
time and circumstance to provide the CMC a clear
picture of MROs performance.
RS must not inflate performance.
RS must understand D thru G not to find fault, nor
to puff-up competency, but objectively evaluate
Marines on their own merits.

46

Performance Anchored Rating

Scales (PARS)

Adverse Markings
Attribute marking of A must clearly describe nature and
condition of the observed poor performance.
Do not use the report as a counseling tool to address poor
performance.
Do not report minor flaws or mistakes unless they are
significant enough to effect MROs initiative and leadership
potential or hinder mission accomplishment.
Do not comment on minor limitations, shortcomings, and
occasional lapses, or weaknesses in an overall positive
performance.

48

Adverse Comments
Sometimes he is absolutely brilliant in the things he did,
and at an equal number of times he was terribly
disappointing.
Although MRO puts forth efforts, he is well behind his
peer group.
has ability to become a good NCO if he applies himself
and utilizes initiative.
needs to learn to delegate, rather than trying to do
everything himself.
Working on honing skills required of a staff officerespecially commanders intent.
has reached his culminating point as a Marine Corps
49
Officer.

Distinguished Marks
F and G mean exceptional sustained performance
throughout reporting period.
Support superior markings with concrete examples.
Do not restate the attribute!!!!

Require justifications that withstand three tests:

Verifiable
Substantive
Quantifiable (Where Possible)

50

Distinguished Marks (cont)

Rarely should isolated incidents merit a
marking in either block.
G marking should reflect a truly
extraordinary level or performance
observed.

51

Examples of Unacceptable
Justifications
PERFORMANCE: "F" MARKED
Superb performance during this period that exceeded expectations. Best
Marine I have observed in my 22 years in the Corps. Can be counted on
to accomplish any mission with minimal supervision. MROs efforts
during this period was outstanding and led to success levels never seen
by the FDC in this command. Peerless. Promote.
INITIATIVE: "F" MARKED
Distinctly observed by myself as the one disbursing chief in this
command that is not afraid to make a decision without asking questions
on the proper course of action. He is confident in his abilities and can
back it up with action. Solves critical issues before they become serious
problems.

Examples of Acceptable
Justifications
PERFORMANCE : "F" MARKING
Implemented procedural changes within the FDC that resulted in an increase in
timeliness and safety of computations. Instituted a policy that required gun
sections to read back the announced firing charge. As a result, the Battery had
zero firing incidents. Developed a method of transmitting firing timeliness to gun
sections via gun display units that increased speed of the batterys fire support
and prevented transposition of digits that occur during transmission of voice fire
commands.
INITIATIVE: "F" MARKING
Pensacola, NAS caused unexpected travel settlements to post to T&E acct.
Contacted HQMC/Pensacola and adjusted T&E procedure for aviation students to
allow schoolhouse to request appropriation data directly from T&E, where others
are required to make requests through HQMC. Efforts led to 100% reduction in
unexpected travel orders originating at Pensacola. Solution will remain in place
until HQMC adjusts travel regulations associated with Marines in initial
accession training pipeline.

RS Profile
Reporting Senior
Fitness Report List
CWO3 JOHNNY B. GOODE
Reporting Senior SSN: 000000000
As of: 20030602
MRO SSN
(Last Four)

Last Name

From Date

To Date

Occ FitRep Avg

Smith
Jones
Thomas
Brown

01 Dec 01
01 Oct 01
01 Dec 00
01 Sep 99

08 Jun 02
30 Nov 01
17 Sep 01
30 Nov 00

AN
TR
TR
GC

4.85
4.36
2.92
2.54

Green
Black
White
White

22 Jan 01
01 May 02
01 Jul 01
03 Jul 00

20 Jun 01
31 Aug 02
01 Oct 01
30 Jun 01

AN
CH
GC
AN

5.79
5.07
4.85
4.07

MSGT
1234
2235
3456
4432
GYSGT
9876
8765
7676
7676

RO Profile
Reviewing Officer
Fitness Report List
COL JOHNNY B. GOODE
Reporting Senior SSN: 000000000
As of: 20040602
MRO SSN
(Last Four)

Last Name

From Date

To Date

RO
Occ Assessment
Mark

Smith
Jones
Thomas
Brown

01 Dec 01
01 Oct 01
01 Dec 00
01 Sep 99

08 Jun 02
30 Nov 01
17 Sep 01
30 Nov 00

AN
TR
TR
GC

6
5
5
4

Green
Black
White
White

22 Jan 01
01 May 02
01 Jul 01
03 Jul 00

20 Jun 01
31 Aug 02
01 Oct 01
30 Jun 01

AN
CH
GC
AN

7
5
4
4

MAJ
1234
2235
3456
4432
CAPT
9876
8765
7676
7676

MASTER BRIEF SHEET

PAGE 1 OF 1
CREATED: 26 APR 2005

******* ADMINISTRATIVE INFORMATION (ORIGINATES FROM MCTFS - CONTACT YOUR ADMIN SECTION FOR CORRECTIONS) *******
NAME
MARINE, JOHN S.

SSN
123456789

KEY DATE SUMMARY

GRADE
O4

RANK
MAJ

AWARDS

DEAF

19890702

TIS
PEBD

15yr. 11mo.
19890520

AFADBD

19890520

OSCD
ACC COMM

19950115
19890520

DOR COMM
DOR LDO

19890531

MM
NC
NA

1
2
1

DOR
19990501

TIG
5yr. 11mo.

CURRENT DUTY ASSIGNMENT

US Central Command

BILLET DESCRIPTION
J-3 Future Ops Officer

MILITARY OCCUPATIONAL SPECIALTIES

PMOS
AMOS1
AMOS2
AMOS3

0302
0602

Infantry Officer
Communications Officer

AMOS4
ACQ
JOINT
BMOS

DCTB
20030717

TRAINING SUMMARY

9910

RIFLE
PISTOL
PFT
MCMAP

Unrestricted Officer

E/340
M/340
A/289
TAN

LANGUAGES

19980915
19980915
20030922
20030815

1994
1990

French
Spanish

EDUCATION SUMMARY
CIVILIAN
1990
1986
1982

BA, Biology
Associates Deg
HS

DSG PILOT
DCADB
EAS

LCN
12345678

19890520

MILITARY
1993
1993
1987
1990
1990
1989

PME

Winter Mountain Leader

Summer Mountain Leader
Airborne
Assault Climbers
Infantry Officer (TBS)
Basic School

2002
1997
1995
1994

Command & Staff Non-Res

AWS Ph II
AWS Ph I
Warfighting Skills Prog

******* PERFORMANCE EVALUATION SUMMARY *******

ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY
Grade

OCC

From

BMOS

Type

To

Capt

GC 19980801

0302

Maj

AN 19990504

0302

Maj

19990503

Maj

TR 20000120

0302

Maj

Maj

1st Battalion 2d Marines

3

12
X

CH 20010508
N

Maj

TR 20020703

9910

BN Executive Officer

Commanding Officer
MCRS Pittsburg

14

Commanding Officer
MCRS Pittsburg

20020702

20030630

Operations Officer

1st Battalion 2d Marines

20000414

9910

1st Battalion 2d Marines

1st Battalion 2d Marines

20000119

20010507

Operations Officer
X

CH 20000415
N

Company Commander

CH 19990801
N

Billet Description

Com Adv Command

19990801

0302

9910

Months

12
X

Commanding Officer
MCRS Pittsburg

REPORTING SENIOR MARKINGS

Reporting Senior
Promote

Reports

LtCol Amaknife
Yes

Yes

5 of 8

D
3.79

Lea

Co

PME

Dec

D
4.42

B
2.82

D
5.00

C
1

D
83.67

80.00

Concur

Col Curly
Yes

Col Curly
Suff

Yes

Col Moe
No

Col Moe
Suff

86.44
D

Obser

Suff

93.68
E

Reviewing Officer

Suff

N/A

83.87
D

Cum RV

81.89

93.68
E

Eval

89.76

N/A
E

Jud

96.00

83.70

1
D

89.76

5.86
D

5.57
E

B
94.60

2.30
E

6.38
B

C
1

3.50

5.33
D

REVIEWING OFFICER MARKINGS

Ens

RPT at High RV at Proc

5.12
E

Set

Rs High

2.30
F

Dev

RS Avg

5.95

5.14
C

Ini

2.93

5.29
E

Eff

2.25

2.30

7 of 12

4.46

Col Gofigure
Yes

21 of 21

Col Tellall

2.88

1 of 1

Col Amaker

Yes

Yes

Cou

2.53

11 of 16

LtCol Solo

Yes

8 of 8

LtCol Inflated

Pro

RPT Avg

14 of 17

LtCol Butcher

Yes

Per

Yes

BGen Joe
Suff

Yes

BGen Mooney
Suff

No

RO marks - same grade at processing

RO marks - same grade cumulative
0/1

0/2

1/3

0/1

0/2

9/3 12/4

3/4

1/6

0/7

0/8

23/5 11/6

2/5

3/7

0/8

0/1

0/2

1/3

2/4

2/5

0/1

1/2

2/3

7/4

7/5

2/6

0/7

0/8

5/6

0/7

0/8

0/1

0/2

1/3

3/4

2/5

1/1

1/2

2/3

4/4

0/1

1/2

1/1

1/2

2/3

1/1

0/2

2/1

0/2

0/1
0/1

1/6

0/7

0/8

17/5 12/6

7/7

1/8

3/4

2/5

1/6

0/7

0/8

4/4

17/5 12/6

7/7

1/8

3/3

3/4

18/5

20/6 12/7 0/8

5/3

7/4

24/5

26/6 16/7 1/8

1/2

0/3

7/4

38/5

17/6

4/7

0/8

1/2

0/3

9/4

46/5 19/6

5/7

1/8

1/3

BGen Panzer
Insuff

56

Administrative Summary
ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY
Grade

OCC

From

BMOS

Type

To

Capt

GC

19980801

0302

19990503

AN

19990504

19990801

CH

19990801

20000119

TR

20000120

20000414

Maj
0302
Maj
0302
Maj
0302

Months
Co

Billet Description

Ad
9

Command
Company Commander

1st Battalion 2d Marines

3

Operations Officer
X

1st Battalion 2d Marines

Operations Officer
1st Battalion 2d Marines

BN Executive Officer
1st Battalion 2d Marines

57

Administrative Summary (cont)

ADMINISTRATIVE SUMMARY
Grade

OCC

From

BMOS

Type

To

Capt

GC

19980801

0302

19990503

AN

19990504

19990801

CH

19990801

20000119

TR

20000120

20000414

Maj
0302
Maj
0302
Maj
0302

Months
Co

Billet Description

Ad
9

Command
Company Commander

1st Battalion 2d Marines

3

Operations Officer
X

1st Battalion 2d Marines

Operations Officer
1st Battalion 2d Marines

BN Executive Officer
1st Battalion 2d Marines

58

Reporting Senior Markings

REPORTING SENIOR MARKINGS
Reporting Senior Per Pro Cou Eff Ini
Promote

Reports

LtCol Amaknife
Yes

Yes

11 of 16

LtCol Solo

RS Avg RS High RPT at High RV at Proc

Cum RV

2.25

2.88

2.93

4.46
B

1 of 1

C
2.53

8 of 8

LtCol Inflated
Yes

14 of 17

LtCol Butcher
Yes

RPT Avg

B
2.30

B
2.30

2.82
C

C
2.30

C
1

B
NA

89.76
E

83.70
B

96.00

89.76

2
B

B
94.60

6.38
B

C
1

3.50

5.95
C

Lea Dev Set Ens Co PME Dec Jud Eval

81.89
C

H
NA

59

Reporting Senior Markings (cont)

REPORTING SENIOR MARKINGS
Reporting Senior Per Pro Cou Eff Ini
Promote

Reports

LtCol Amaknife
Yes

Yes

11 of 16

LtCol Solo

RS Avg RS High RPT at High RV at Proc

Cum RV

2.25

2.88

2.93

4.46
B

1 of 1

C
2.53

8 of 8

LtCol Inflated
Yes

14 of 17

LtCol Butcher
Yes

RPT Avg

B
2.30

B
2.30

2.82
C

C
2.30

C
1

B
NA

89.76
E

83.70
B

96.00

89.76

2
B

B
94.60

6.38
B

C
1

3.50

5.95
C

Lea Dev Set Ens Co PME Dec Jud Eval

81.89
C

H
NA

60

Reporting Senior Markings (cont)

REPORTING SENIOR MARKINGS
Reporting Senior Per Pro Cou Eff Ini
Promote

Reports

LtCol Amaknife
Yes

Yes

11 of 16

LtCol Solo

RS Avg RS High RPT at High RV at Proc

Cum RV

2.25

2.88

2.93

4.46
B

1 of 1

C
2.53

8 of 8

LtCol Inflated
Yes

14 of 17

LtCol Butcher
Yes

RPT Avg

B
2.30

B
2.30

2.82
C

C
2.30

C
1

B
NA

89.76
E

83.70
B

96.00

89.76

2
B

B
94.60

6.38
B

C
1

3.50

5.95
C

Lea Dev Set Ens Co PME Dec Jud Eval

81.89
C

H
NA

61

Reporting Senior Markings (cont)

REPORTING SENIOR MARKINGS
Reporting Senior Per Pro Cou Eff Ini
Promote

Reports

LtCol Amaknife
Yes

Yes

11 of 16

LtCol Solo

RS Avg RS High RPT at High RV at Proc

Cum RV

2.25

2.88

2.93

4.46
B

1 of 1

C
2.53

8 of 8

LtCol Inflated
Yes

14 of 17

LtCol Butcher
Yes

RPT Avg

B
2.30

B
2.30

2.82
C

C
2.30

C
1

B
NA

89.76
E

83.70
B

96.00

89.76

2
B

B
94.60

6.38
B

C
1

3.50

5.95
C

Lea Dev Set Ens Co PME Dec Jud Eval

81.89
C

H
NA

62

Reviewing Officer Markings

REVIEWING OFFICER MARKINGS
Reviewing Officer
Obser

Concur

Col Curly
Suff

Yes

Col Curly
Suff

Yes

Col Moe
Suff

No

Col Moe
Suff

Yes

RO marks - same grade at processing

RO marks - same grade cumulative
0/1

0/2

1/3

3/4

2/5

1/6

0/7

0/8

0/1

0/2

9/3

12/4

23/5

11/6

3/7

0/8

0/1

0/2

1/3

4/4

9/5

2/6

0/1

1/2

9/3

17/4

27/5

11/6

0/1

0/2

1/3

3/4

2/5

1/6

0/7

0/8

1/1

1/2

2/3

4/4

17/5

12/6

7/7

1/8

0/1

1/2

1/3

3/4

2/5

1/6

0/7

0/8

1/1

1/2

2/3

4/4

17/5

12/6

7/7

1/8

0/7
3/7

0/8
0/8

63

SECTION K: Reviewing Officers

Comparative Assessment
K. REVIEWING OFFICER COMMENTS
1. OBSERVATION:

Sufficient

Insufficient

2. EVALUATION:

X Concur

DESCRIPTION
3. COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT: Provide
a comparative assessment of potential by
placing an "X" in the appropriate box. In
marking the comparison, consider all
Marines of this grade whose professional
abilities are known to you personally.

COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT

THE EMINENTLY QUALIFIED MARINE

ONE OF THE FEW EXCEPTIONALLY QUALIFIED

MARINES

X
ONE OF THE MANY HIGHLY QUALIFIED
PROFESSIONALS WHO FORM THE MAJORITY OF
THIS GRADE

*NUMBERS ELECTRONICALLY
OVERLAID AT TIME OF PROCESSING
*INFORMATION EFFECTIVE AT TIME
PROCESSING AND WILL NOT CHANGE
*INFORMATION WILL SHOW UP ON
OMPF AND DIGITAL BOARDROOM
COPIES OF FITREP

Do Not Concur

6
2
0
0

A QUALIFIED MARINE

UNSATISFACTORY

0
0

NUMBERS INDICATE TOTAL ASSESSMENTS AND HOW MANY TIMES RO HAS MARKED
MARINES OF SAME GRADE ON THAT PORTION OF COMPARATIVE ASSESSMENT TREE.

64

HQMC Points of Contact

DSN 278 -XXXX, COMM (703) 784 - XXXX
Section Head: x3989
Deputy: x3994
SgtMaj: x3996
Head, Policy and Research Unit: x3991
Head, Reserve Matters Unit: 3991
WEBSITE

Head, Processing Unit: x3442

HTTPS://WWW.MMSB.USMC.MIL
MMSB-30 1-877-301-9953
MMSB-10 1-800- 268-3710
(After Hours & Weekends)

Questions??????