Strain Gages: Log Log Log
Strain Gages: Log Log Log
Strain Gages: Log Log Log
R
A
R Resistance
Resistivity
l Length
A Cross-sectional area
dR d d A
A
For linear deformations
R
Ss
R
Change in resistance is
from change in shape as
well as change in
resistivity
strain
Ss sensitivity or gage factor
(2-6 for metals and 40 200 for
semiconductor)
Strain
Gage
m
Seismic
Mass
Strain Member
Cantilever
Base
Mounting
Threads
Direction of
Sensitivity
(Acceleration)
Single Element
Two-Element Rosette
Backing
Film
Solder Tabs
(For Leads)
Three-Element Rosettes
Phenolic
Glass
Backing
Plate
Welded
Gold Leads
Nickle-Plated
Copper Ribbons
Strain Gage
vref
(Supply
)
R
Rc
R
vo
vref
R Rc
Small i
R1
R2
RL
R4
R3
vo
Load
(High)
vref
(Constant Voltage)
vo
R1vref
(R1 R2 )
R3vref
(R3 R4 )
(R1 R4 R2 R3 )
vref
(R1 R2 )(R3 R4 )
R1 R3
R2 R4
True for
any RL
v o R2 R1 R1R2 R4 R3 R3 R4
2
v ref
R1 R2
R3 R4 2
To compensate for temperature changes, temperature coefficients of adjacent pairs
should be the same
vo
R
k
vref
4R
Bridge Constant k
Example 4.4
A strain gage load cell (force sensor) consists of four identical strain gages, forming
a Wheatstone bridge, that are mounted on a rod that has square cross-section.
One opposite pair of strain gages is mounted axially and the other pair is mounted
in the transverse direction, as shown below. To maximize the bridge
sensitivity, the strain gages are connected to the bridge as shown. Determine
the bridge constant k in terms of Poissons ratio v of the rod material.
Axial
Gage
1
2
3
Cross Section
Of Sensing
Member
+
vo
Transverse
Gage
vref
Calibration Constant
v o
C
v ref
R
Ss
R
k
C Ss
4
vo
R
k
vref
4R
k Bridge Constant
Ss Sensitivity or gage factor
Example 4.5
A schematic diagram of a strain gage accelerometer is shown below. A point mass
of weight W is used as the acceleration sensing element, and a light cantilever with
rectangular cross-section, mounted inside the accelerometer casing, converts
the inertia force of the mass into a strain. The maximum bending strain at the root of
the cantilever is measured using four identical active semiconductor strain
gages. Two of the strain gages (A and B) are mounted axially on the top surface of
the cantilever, and the remaining two (C and D) are mounted on the bottom
surface. In order to maximize the sensitivity of the accelerometer, indicate the
manner in which the four strain gages A, B, C, and D should be connected to a
Wheatstone bridge circuit. What is the bridge constant of the resulting circuit?
A
Strain Gages
A, B
C
+
vo
C, D
l
b
h
A
B
C
D
vref
If M = 5 gm, E = 5x1010 N/m2, l = 1 cm, b = 1 mm, h = 0.5 mm, Ss = 200, and vref =
20 V, determine the sensitivity of the accelerometer in mV/g.
If the yield strength of the cantilever element is 5xl07 N/m2, what is the maximum
acceleration that could be measured using the accelerometer?
If the ADC which reads the strain signal into a process computer has the range 0 to
10 V, how much amplification (bridge amplifier gain) would be needed at the bridge
output so that this maximum acceleration corresponds to the upper limit of the ADC
(10 V)?
Is the cross-sensitivity (i.e., the sensitivity in the two directions orthogonal to the
direction of sensitivity small with this arrangement? Explain.
Hint: For a cantilever subjected to force F at the free end, the maximum stress
at the root is given by 6 F
2
bh
MEMS Accelerometer
Signal Conditioning
Mechanical Structure
Data Acquisition
Dynamic
Strain
AC
Bridge
Amplifier
Oscillator
Power Supply
Demodulator
And Filter
Calibration
Constant
Foil gages - 50 k
Power consumption decreases with resistance
Resolutions on the order of 1 m/m
Strain
Reading
Single Crystal of
Semiconductor
Gold Leads
Phenolic Glass
Backing Plate
Composition
Gage Factor
(Sensitivity)
Temperature
Coefficient of
Resistance (10-6/C)
Constantan
2.0
15
Isoelastic
3.5
200
Karma
2.3
20
Monel
1.9
2000
Silicon
p-type
100 to 170
70 to 700
Silicon
n-type
-140 to 100
70 to 700
R
R
Resistance
Change
P-type
R
R 0.4
0.4
= 1 Microstrain
= Strain of 110-6
0.3
0.2
0.3
0.2
0.1
0.1
3
1
0.1
N-type
Strain
3 103
1
0.1
0.2
0.2
0.3
0.3
3 103
Strain
R
S1 S2 2
R
S1 linear sensitivity
Positive for p-type gages
Negative for n-type gages
Magnitude is larger for p-type
S2 nonlinearity
Positive for both types
Magnitude is smaller for p-type
Linear Approximation
R
R
Change in
Resistance
R
R
Quadratic
Curve
max
0
Linear
Approximation
max
Strain
Error e
Ss
R R
R R
S1 S2 2 Ss
S1 S s S2 2
Quadratic Error
J
0.
Minimize Error
Ss
max
max
(2 ) S1 S s S 2 2 d = 0
S1 S s
max
e d
max
S1 Ss S2
max
max
Maximum Error
e max S2 2max
2 2
R
S1 max S2 2max S1 max S2 2max
R
2 S1 max
N p 50 S 2 max S1 %
Temperature Compensation
= Temperature Coefficient of Resistance
= Temperature Coefficient of Gage Factor
Compensation
Feasible
()
Compensation
Not Feasible
Compensation
Feasible
0
Concentration of Trace Material (Atoms/cc)
Sensitivity
change due to
temperature
R Ro 1 .T
S s Sso 1 .T
Resistance
change due to
temperature
R1
R2
+
vo
R4
R3
vi
vi
+
Compensating
Resistor
Rc
vref
vi
R
vref
R Rc
v o
kSs
R
v ref R Rc 4
Possible only for certain ranges
vref
+
Rc
o c
Ro 1 .T Rc
Ro Rc ( ) Ro Rc T
Rc
Ro