Sig Figs
Sig Figs
Sig Figs
N x 10x
Are the following in scientific notation?
Examples
Given: 289,800,000
Use: 2.898 (moved 8 places)
Answer: 2.898 x 108
Given: 0.000567
Use: 5.67 (moved 4 places)
Answer: 5.67 x 10-4
Example
Given: 5.093 x 106
Answer: 5,093,000 (moved 6 places
to the right)
Given: 1.976 x 10-4
Answer: 0.0001976 (moved 4 places
to the left)
Learning Check
Express these numbers in Scientific
Notation:
1)
2)
3)
4)
5)
405789
0.003872
3000000000
2
0.478260
How do
they
compare?
Both
accurate
and precise
Precise
but not
accurate
Neither
accurate
nor precise
Significant Figures
Significant figures in a
measurement include the known
digits plus one estimated digit
38.15 cm
5.6 ft
65.6 lb
122.55 m
4
2
___
___
Leading Zeros
RULE 2. Leading zeros in decimal numbers are
NOT significant.
Number of Significant Figures
0.008 mm
0.0156 oz
0.0042 lb
____
0.000262 mL
____
Sandwiched Zeros
RULE 3. Zeros between nonzero numbers are significant.
(They can not be rounded unless they are on an end of a
number.)
Number of Significant Figures
50.8 mm
2001 min
0.702 lb
____
0.00405 m
____
Trailing Zeros
RULE 4. Trailing zeros in numbers without decimals are
NOT significant. They are only serving as place holders.
25,000 in.
200. yr
48,600 gal
____
25,005,000 g
____
O.245050 mole
____
Learning Check
A. Which answers contain 3 significant figures?
1) 0.4760
2) 0.00476
3) 4760
1) 535
2) 535,000
3) 5.35 x 105
Learning Check
In which set(s) do both numbers contain the same
number of significant figures?
1) 22.0 and 22.00
2) 400.0 and 40
3) 0.000015 and 150,000
Learning Check
State the number of significant figures in each of
the following:
A. 0.030 m
1
2
3
B. 4.050 L
C. 0.0008 g
D. 3.00 m
E. 2,080,000 bees
Significant Numbers in
Calculations
A calculated answer cannot be more precise
than the measuring tool.
A calculated answer must match the least
precise measurement.
Significant figures are needed for final
answers from
1) adding or subtracting
2) multiplying or dividing
Learning Check
In each calculation, round the answer to the correct
number of significant figures.
A. 235.05 + 19.6 + 2.1 =
1) 256.75
2) 256.8
3) 257
B.
58.925 - 18.2
=
1) 40.725
2) 40.73
3) 40.7
Learning Check
A. 2.19 X 4.2 =
1) 9
B.
C.
4.311 0.07 =
1) 61.58
2) 9.2
3) 9.198
2) 62
2.54 X 0.0028 =
0.0105 X 0.060
1) 11.3
2) 11
3) 60
3) 0.041
Reading a Meterstick
. l2. . . . I . . . . I3 . . . .I . . . . I4. .
First digit (known)
=2
2.?? cm
2.7? cm
2.76 cm
or
2.77 cm
or
2.78 cm
cm
Learning Check
. l8. . . . I . . . . I9. . . . I . . . . I10. .
cm
cm
Significant Figures
Definition: Minimum # of digits needed to express a
number in scientific notation without a loss of accuracy
Example: Partial pressure of CO2 in atmosphere
0.000356 atm. This number has 3 sig. figs., but leading
zeros are only place-keepers and can cause some
confusion. So express in scientific notation:
3.56 x 10-4 atm
This is much less ambiguous, as the 3 sig. figs. are clearly
shown.
32.33 oC
32.3 oC
Sample Problem
(b) 0.1044 g
(c) 53,069 mL
(d) 0.00004715 m
(e) 57,600. s
(a) 2sf
(b) 4sf
(c) 5sf
(d) 4sf
(e) 5sf
(f) 4sf
SOLUTION:
Figure
1.16
Figure
1.16
continued
random error
systematic error
Avoiding ambiguity
Consider the quantity 1000 g. A little ambiguoushow
many sig. figs. are intended to be in this number?
1.000 x 103 g
1.00 x 103 g
1.0 x 103 g
1 x 103 g
(4 sf)
(3 sf)
(2 sf)
(1 sf)
Example of subtraction:
4.5237 1.06 = 3.4637 round to 3.46
1.032 x 104
26.72 x 104
319.1 x 104
---------------346.852 x 104 round to
346.9 x 104
About rounding
When rounding, look at all digits to the right of the last
digit you want to keep. If more than halfway to the next
digit, round up. If more than halfway down to next digit,
round down.
Examples:
(A) 4.9271 (round to 3 sf) 4.93
(B) 39.0324 (round to 4 sf) 39.03
(C) 5.43918 x 10-2 (round to 4 sf) 5.439 x 10-2
About rounding
If exactly halfway, round to the nearest even digit. This
avoids systematic round-off error.
Examples:
(A) 4.25 x 10-2 (round to 2 sf) 4.2 x 10-2
(B) 17.87500 (round to 4 sf) 17.88
Statistics
Are a tool to answer questions:
How accurate is the analyses?
How many analyses do I have to make to
overcome problems of inhomogeneity or
imprecision?
Does the product meet the specification?
With what confidence is the limit
exceeded?