Clean Edge Razor
Clean Edge Razor
Clean Edge Razor
EDGE
RAZOR
HAIRS IN PRODUCT POSITIONING
CASE SOLUTION
BY GROUP C2
Anubandh 14F112
Leela Mohit Chivukula 14F129
Moumita Dutta 14F132
Sai Alekya Edara 14F147
Sanjit Kumar Moharana 14F148
COMPETITORS
MARKET SHARE ($)
Brand Categories
Super-Premium
Companies
Prince
Benet and Klein
Moderate
Cogent Plus,
Cogent
Vitric Advanced,
Vitric Master
Value
23%
0%
PARAMOUNT
23%
PRINCE
1%
SIMPSON
Vitric
22%
31%
OTHERS
RADIANCE
Simpsons
Tempest
Radiance
Naiv
Analyzing completion
Market Share
NDR Brands
Volume(%)
$(%)
Unit Price($)
Cogent Plus
Cogent
Vitric
vitric Advanced
Vitric Master
Paramount Pro
Paramount Avail
Tempest
1
22.1
17.8
0.7
0.7
16.9
6.4
0.9
1.3
29.4
20
1.1
0.9
18.5
4.9
1.1
12.5
11.19
8.89
11.2
10.85
9.5
5.75
10.99
Naiv(Expected)
Clean Edge
2.6
11.8
11.19
Product Features
Product Benefits
BEHAVIORAL SEGMETS
value
32% volume
22% dollar
moderate
43% volume
44% dollar
Aesthetic shavers
Super premium
25% volume
34% dollar
Maintenance
shavers-un involved
Social/emotional
shavers
SYMPTOMS
Segment positioning of clean edge razor:
Niche segment
Main stream
Brand name positioning
How to associate paramount to clean edge
NICHE POSITIONING
Pros:
Cons:
Cons:
1
12.99
4
42
54.99
5
9.72
0.61
15
30.33
24.66
44.84
19.2465
5.4135
Mainstream
Year 2
1.5
19.485
10
105
124.485
7.5
24.3
0.87
16
48.67
75.815
60.90
43.56975
32.24525
Year 1
3.3
36.927
9.9
88.011
124.938
15.642
22.176
1.71
42
81.528
43.41
34.75
74.9628
-31.5528
Year 2
4
44.76
21.9
194.691
239.451
18.96
49.056
2.45
39
109.466
129.985
54.28
143.6706
-13.6856
LAUNCH DECISION
Launching in niche market :
Lower cannibalization costs
Lower advertising costs
Although lesser profits compared to mainstream without
considering expenses, after the above expenses niche will result
in better net results