Negotiation
Negotiation
Negotiation
What is negotiation?
Ø Negotiation.
The process of making joint decisions when the parties
involved have different preferences.
Workplace disagreements arise over a variety of
matters.
2
What is Negotiation?
4
Everyone Negotiates
Buying a car, house or other object for which the
price may not be fixed
Establishing a salary, workplace tasks, office
conditions, etc.
Organizing team tasks or priorities
Allocating household tasks
Deciding how to spend a free evening
Conflict Resolution Options
Avoidance
Capitulation (surrender )
Suppression
Accommodation
Problem solving (e.g. negotiation, mediation,
facilitation)
Escalation (develop)
Confrontation
Conflict & Negotiation
Conflict can be solved through negotiation when:
There are two are more parties
There is a conflict of interest between the parties
The parties are willing to negotiate to seek a better
position
Both parties believe that entering negotiations as a
better solution than breaking contact
Types of Negotiations
Day-to-Day Managerial
Job Roles
Pay
Commercial
Contracts
Quality
Legal
Compliance with Governmental Regulations
Characteristics of a Successful
Negotiation
It should:
Be timely and effective with the parties
Produce an agreement that results in a resolution
of the conflict and a revitalized team process
Improve the relationships between the individuals,
strengthening the team
9
Negotiation Skills
In “Principled” Negotiation, a negotiator should:
Help the parties develop objective criteria for solutions
Separate the members from the issue – be tough on
the issue not the members.
Focus on the issue not the different viewpoints.
Develop different solutions that are satisfactory to all.
Think about the consequences of the decision among
team members and outside the team.
Do not just try to win. Work on finding an acceptable
resolution for all involved.
10
Negotiation - Challenges
Challenges that may impact the negotiation
may include
• A re-statement of confrontational positions
• Personal agendas that are not acknowledged
• Psychological and emotional makeup of team
members, including their past conflict
management styles
• Communication breakdown due to language
barriers or misunderstanding or…
11
When Negotiation Fails
• A negotiation process may not lead to consensus
within the time allowed
• Resolution of the problem is still required, so the team
moves to another form of intervention (i.e.,
arbitration or external ruling)
• Remember: it’s okay to request instructor intervention
if team facilitated interventions are not successful
12
Bargaining Strategies
Ø Distributive negotiation.
The key questions is: “Who is going to get this
resource?”
“Hard” distributive negotiation.
Each party holds out to get its own way.
“Soft” distributive negotiation.
One party is willing to make concessions to the other
party to get things over.
14
Ø Distributive negotiation — cont.
Bargaining zone.
The range between one party’s minimum reservation
point and the other party’s maximum reservation
point.
A positive bargaining zone exists when the two parties’
points overlap.
A positive bargaining zone provides room for
negotiation.
15
Ø Integrative negotiation.
The key questions is: “How can the resource
best be utilized?”
Is less confrontational than distributive
negotiation, and permits a broader range of
alternative solutions to be considered.
Opportunity for a true win-win solution.
16
Ø Integrative negotiation — cont.
Range of feasible negotiation tactics.
Selective avoidance.
Compromise.
True collaboration.
17
Distributive versus Integrative
Bargaining
Staking Out the Bargaining Zone
Bargaining Zone Model
Your Positions
Initial Target Resistance
Area of
Potential
Agreement
25
Ø Ethical aspects of negotiation.
To maintain good working relationships,
negotiating parties should strive for high ethical
standards.
The negotiating parties should avoid being side
tracked by self-interests, thereby being tempted
to pursue unethical actions.
26
Ø Organizational settings for negotiation.
Two-party negotiation.
Group negotiation.
Intergroup negotiation.
Constituency negotiation.
27
Ø Culture and negotiation.
Differences in negotiation approaches and
practices are influenced by cultural differences
in:
Time orientation.
Individualism-collectivism.
Power distance.
28
Third-Party Negotiations
Third-Party Negotiations (cont’d)
Types of Third-Party Intervention
Mediation – A neutral third party who facilities a
negotiated solution by using reasoning,
persuasion, and suggestions for alternatives
In labor disputes, international relations, and marital
counseling
What Do Mediators do?
Almost anything that aids the process or atmosphere of
negotiation can be helpful
The mediator might also intervene in the content of the
negotiation, highlighting points of agreement, pointing
new options, or encouraging concessions
Types of Third-Party Intervention
(cont.)
Mediation (cont.)
Best for everyday disputes between two
employees as gives employee more
responsibility for resolving their own disputes
Most effective under moderate level of conflict
The mediator must be perceived as neutral and
non-coercive
Types of Third-Party Intervention
(cont.)
Arbitration – The process of arbitration occurs
when a third party is given the authority to
dictate the terms of settlement of a conflict
When employee cannot resolve their differences
Seems to work best because the predetermined
rules of evidence and other process create a
higher sense of procedural fairness
What are the different strategies involved
in negotiation?
Ø Gaining truly integrative agreements rests on:
Supportive attitudes.
Constructive behaviors.
Good information.
34
What are the different strategies involved
in negotiation?
Ø Supportive attitudes.
Integrative agreements require that each party
must:
Approach the negotiation with a willingness to trust the
other party.
Convey a willingness to share information with the
other party.
Show a willingness to ask concrete questions of the
other party.
35
What are the different strategies involved
in negotiation?
Ø Constructive behaviors.
Reaching integrative agreements depends on the
negotiator’s ability to:
Separate the people from the problem.
Focus on interests rather than positions.
Avoid making premature judgments.
Keep alternative creation separate from evaluation.
Judge possible agreements on an objective set of
criteria or standards.
36
What are the different strategies involved
in negotiation?
Ø Good information.
Each negotiation party must know what he/she
will do if an agreement can’t be reached.
Each party must understand the relative
importance of the other party’s interests.
37
USE….Competition
When quick, decisive action is vital (in
emergencies); on important issues.
Where unpopular actions need implementing (in
cost cutting, enforcing unpopular rules,
discipline).
On issues vital to the organization’s welfare.
When you know you’re right.
Against people who take advantage of
noncompetitive behavior.
USE …..Collaboration
To find an integrative solution when both sets of
concerns are too important to be compromised.
When your objective is to learn.
To merge insights from people with different
perspectives.
To gain commitment by incorporating concerns into
a consensus.
To work through feelings that have interfered with a
relationship.
USE….Avoidance
When an issue is trivial, or more important issues are
pressing.
When you perceive no chance of satisfying your
concerns.
When potential disruption outweighs the benefits of
resolution.
To let people cool down and regain perspective.
When gathering information supersedes immediate
decision.
When others can resolve the conflict effectively.
When issues seem tangential or symptomatic of other
issues.
USE….Accommodation
When you find you’re wrong and to allow a better
position to be heard.
To learn, and to show your reasonableness.
When issues are more important to others than to
yourself and to satisfy others and maintain
cooperation.
To build social credits for later issues.
To minimize loss when outmatched and losing.
When harmony and stability are especially important.
To allow employees to develop by learning from
mistakes.
USE…Compromise
When goals are important but not worth the effort
of potential disruption of more assertive
approaches.
When opponents with equal power are committed
to mutually exclusive goals.
To achieve temporary settlements to complex
issues.
To arrive at expedient solutions under time
pressure.
As a backup when collaboration or competition is
unsuccessful.