Professional Responsibility

Summary of different senses of

responsibility
Reactive Senses of Responsibility
Causal
Physical motions produce
an event

Role
individual stands
committed to carry out
common goods around
which a social or
professional role is
oriented
Capacity
Determining the conditions
under which someone can
be held responsible for
their actions

Blame
Praising or blaming
someone for what they
have done
Proactive Senses of Responsibility
Sharing
Responsibility

Answering for the actions of
others within ones group.
(Share action-causing
attitudes)

Providing moral support to
group members when they
have gone astray.

Does not entail accepting
blame for their actions
Responsibility as a
Virtue

When responsibility becomes proactive
and supererogatory (i.e., goes beyond
what is minimally required)

Uncovering risk and preventing harm
Recognizing and taking advantage of
opportunities to promote value,
Expanding range of control,
Caring for stakeholders and their goods,
and
Also indignation, shame, guilt, pride
and other participatory, self-referential
emotions
Developing overlapping role
responsibilities

Where one falls below the moral
minimum
Prerequisites for Blaming
Capacity Responsibility
Conditions that connect an agent with an
action for moral evaluation

When one is capacity responsible, one is

capable of acting freely and knowingly in a given
situation
Acting Freely
When we act freely, we act without compulsion

Compulsion is the production of a state of mind or
body independently of the will (F. H. Bradley)

Overwhelming fear compels me to do something that I
would not do in a calm state of mind

When somebody pushes me, they create a state of body
(my falling toward the floor) which runs contrary to my
actual will (remaining standing)
Acting knowingly
Acting knowingly means acting free from two
kinds of ignorance:

Moral ignorance (Not being able to appreciate the
moral quality of my actions)

Specific ignorance (Not knowing important details
in the situation in which I am acting)
Moral Ignorance

Moral sense (the ability to appreciate the
moral quality of my actions) includes

bringing moral concepts, rules, and principles to bear on
the situation (social injustice)

responding in an emotionally appropriate way to the
situation (indignation and rightful resentment)

shaping ones actions in accordance with moral
understanding and moral emotion (opposing injustice with
justice)
Specific Ignorance
One fails to act responsibly in a situation
because one lacks crucially relevant
situational details

I betray my sisters secret

But I am not responsible because I did not know that what
I told was in fact a secret

My ignorance of that crucial detail relieves me of
responsibility in this situation
Not satisfying the knowledge and volitional
conditions allows for excuses
ConditionPerforming the action knowingly

ExcuseI didnt know what I was doing or I couldnt
appreciate the moral quality of what I was doing

ConditionPerforming the action willingly

ExcuseI was forced to do it (I couldnt have done
otherwise)
Exception for Excuses
Excuses based on ignorance and compulsion both have an
important qualification

I am responsible for what I do under ignorance and under
compulsion if I got myself into the excuse-generating
situations in the first place

Examples:

My ignorance was caused by past negligence
My being compelled was caused by past recklessness (I recklessly took
another drink and lost control)
Mitigating or exculpating conditions
Excuse Source Excuse Statement
1. Conflicts within a role responsibility and
between different role responsibilities
I cannot, at once, carry out all my conflicting
role responsibilities.
2. Overwhelming situational constraints:
hostile social surround or moral ecology
The moral ecology in which I act makes it
impossible to act responsibly. (Central
commitments exclude moral values)
3. Overwhelming situational constraints:
Money and Time
I lack time and money to carry out my role
responsibility.
4. Overwhelming situational constraints:
technical and manufacturing limits
Carrying out my role responsibility goes
beyond technical and manufacturing limits
5. Overwhelming social constraints: persons,
societies, legal, and political
Personalities, societies, laws, or political
climate set forth overwhelming obstacles to
my carrying out my role responsibilities
6. Knowledge limitations: general and
situation-based ignorance

I lack the knowledge (general or specific) to
act effectively and responsibly in this
situation.
Blame Responsibility
When one runs out of excuses
Blame Responsibility: Prerequisites

1. Untoward Event
A wrong or harm has occurred

2. Causal Connection
The agent identified is the one who has brought
about the untoward event
Blame Responsibility: Prerequisites

3. Moral Fault
A moral fault contributed directly to the occurrence of the
untoward event
The moral fault can be attributed to the agent in question

Examples of Moral Fault
Intentional Wrongdoing
Negligence
Recklessness
Blame Responsibility: Prerequisites
4. Capacity Responsibility

The agent satisfies the requirements of capacity
responsibility

Acted free from compulsion

Action free from general and particular ignorance
Blame Responsibility: Results
Agent is answerable for the action and subject
to punishment
Agent must answer for action by explaining it,
justifying it, or excusing it

Obligation to responsively adjust to avoid
action in future
Taking measures to prevent the act from
reoccurring
A Brief Excursion on Moral Fault
Intentional Wrongdoing
Negligence
Recklessness
Moral Fault: Intentional Wrongdoing

Agent intends, through the untoward action, to bring
about a wrong or harm

The intended harm or wrong contributes to the
untowardness of the action

A disgruntled employee intentionally introduces a virus
into the companys computer system which causes the
system to break down and produces severe financial
harm
Moral Fault: Negligence

No harm or wrong is intended but nevertheless occurs
because the agent did not exercise minimal care

A software program malfunctions producing harm. The
programmer did not know of the error that produced the
malfunction but normal testing would have exposed this error

The programmer failed to subject the program to normal
testing and was, therefore, negligent
Moral Fault: Recklessness
Agent does not intend the harm but foresaw it and
was willing to risk it in pursuit of another intention

Frenchs Example:

The pianist practices at 2:00 a.m. in his apartment with its
paper thin walls
His primary intention is to improve his playing skills
But he is willing to risk disturbing his neighbor in pursuit of
his primary intention
Feinberg on Negligence and Recklessness

When one knowingly creates an unreasonable risk
to self or others, one is reckless;

when one unknowingly but faultily creates such a
risk, one is negligent.

Joel Feinberg, Doing and Deserving, 193
Role Responsibility
Sources
Ties to Codes
Role Responsibility
Commitment to carry out common goods
around which a professional or social role is
oriented
Goods arise in relations
Example:
Relationprofessional to public
Goodswell-being, health, and safety
Professionals should not deprive the public of goods,
work to prevent others from depriving, and strive
(through their work) to increase goods
Sources of Role Responsibilities
1. Explicit commitments such as contractual
obligations and promises

2. Implicit commitments embedded in our social
relations and roles

3. Legal Responsibilities
Due care, avoiding conflicts of interests, maintaining
confidences, and faithful agency (law of agency)
Professionals: Due care
Employees: Faithful agency as specified under law of
agency
Sources of Role Responsibilities
4. Job Description

5. Codes of Ethics (Professional and
Corporate)
Arise from professional relations and the goods
involved
Public, Client, Employers, Peers, Profession
Role Responsibilities arise out of key relations of
computing professional (AMC/IEEE Code)
Public
Contribute to society and human well-being (1.1)
Protect fundamental human rights
Respect the diversity of all cultures
Minimize negative consequences of computing systems
including threats to health and safety
Ensure that CT and CS are used in socially responsible
ways

http://www.acm.org/about/code-of-ethics/#sect2 Accessed 10/14/10
Role Responsibilities in Code
Public
Avoid harm to others (1.2)
Injury or negative consequences
Generally accepted standards for system design and
testing
Credible assessment of risk and responsibility
Report any signs of system dangers
May require whistle blowing
Other Responsibilities to Public
Respect the privacy of others (1.5)

Honor property rights including copyrights and
patents (1.6)

Improve public understanding of computing
and its consequences (2.7)
Responsibilities as Employees
Contractual
obligations

Working hours
Job responsibilities
Codes of ethics
Position in org decision
structure
HR issues
As Employees (law
of agency)

Honor Employer interests
Follow legal orders
Avoid conflicts of interests
Maintain confidences
Responsibilities to Client
Exercise due care in carrying out interests of client
Due care defined in terms of professional standards
Avoiding bad faith, negligence or recklessness

Avoid conflicts of interests

Maintain confidences

When professional judgment is overruled, notify client of
consequences
Includes dissent when issues of public health and safety are involved
May require that engineers do not approve plans even when public
safety is not involved

Maintaining trust
Responsibilities to Peers
Give peers due credit for their work

Refrain from slandering peers

Share research and innovation

Refrain from disloyal competition
Responsibilities to Profession
Work to uphold the reputation and integrity
of the profession

Support ethical professionals

Honor and support professional standards and
professional codes of ethics
Proactive Responsibility
Going Above and Beyond the
Minimum
Responsibility as a Virtue
Responsibility as a Virtue
Proactive

Future-oriented, focusing on preventing harm and
realizing value

Supererogatory

Goes above and beyond what is minimally
required for avoiding blame
Responsibility as a Virtue
Uncovering risk and preventing harm

Uncovering risk
Imaginatively reconstructing ordinary situations to
produce scenarios in which normal events take on unusual
configurations and produce harm

Preventing harm
Developing/designing effective counter-measures to these
scenarios to prevent the latent harms from occurring
Responsibility as a Virtue
Recognizing and taking advantage of
opportunities to promote value

Developing an expertise in participatory design
methodologies

Working to uncover community needs

Creatively using ones professional knowledge and skill
to respond to these needs
Responsibility as a Virtue
Expanding area of control

Not giving way to the temptation to retreat from action in
order to avoid blame

Extending knowledge and skills to fill in gaps that can lead to
loss of control accidents

See Ladd, Perrow, and Reason for description of loss of control
accidents
Perrow: Chain reaction metaphor
Reason: Disease metaphor
Ladd: Accidents caused by lack of care
Responsibility as a Virtue
Caring for stakeholders and their goods

Lack of care is at the root of many normal accidents

Boisjoly tests:
Is it safe enough for someone I care about?
Identify oneself with ones designs and actions
Responsibility as a Virtue
Developing overlapping of role responsibilities

The scope or range of ones role responsibilities overlap
with others

One takes up task-responsibilities that others have
dropped

Recognition that responsibilities can and should be
shared

Hitting the volleyball between different players or
between front and back row
Responsibility as a Virtue
Taking responsibility can be understood
as a virtue

Publicity Test
Computing specialists choose actions and designs
that reveal them as responsible
These actions and designs would be chosen by
MECP (=morally responsible computing
professional)
Virtue Ethics
Virtue comes from the Greek word, arete, which
means excellence

Represent characteristics that exemplify human excellences

Stem from dispositions that are refined by moral reason and
appropriate emotion

Especially suited to promoting the common goods around
which professional roles are constituted
Preventing harm, Promoting safety & health, Enhancing well-being,
Maintaining/promoting client trust
Virtue as the mean between two
extremes
Aristotle characterizes virtue as the skill of
identifying and acting from the mean between
two extremes, excess and defect

Courage is the skill of identifying the mean
between two extremes in facing danger
Recklessnesstaking too great a risk
Cowardicetaking too little risk
Responsibility as a Virtue
Defect:
Irresponsibility
Mean: Taking
Responsibility
Excess:
Carrying the
World on Your
Shoulders
1. Negligence and
recklessness
2. Egocentric or
egoistic attitude

3. Retreating to avoid
blame
4. Apathy &
Indifference
5. Mapping RR into
separate domains
1. Uncovering risk and
preventing harm
2. Recognizing and
exploiting oppor-
tunities to do good
3. Extending causal
control
4. Attitude of care for
region of RR
5. Overlapping
mapping of RR
1. Paralysis of
analysis and action
2. Telescopic
Philanthropy

3. Trying to control
everything
4. Too much care

5. Mapping includes
everything