Measuring and Scaling of Quantitative Data: UNIT - III

Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
Download as ppt, pdf, or txt
You are on page 1of 28

Measuring and Scaling of Quantitative Data

UNIT -iii

Agenda
What are measuring and scaling? Levels of measurement Process of measurement Methods of scaling Types of scales Reliability and validity of scales

What are measuring and scaling?


Measurement: The process of describing some
property of a phenomenon by assigning numbers. Scale: A type of composite measure composed of several items that have a logical or empirical structure among them. It allows to measure the intensity or direction of a construct by aligning the responses on a continuum.

If a thing exists, it exists in some amount; and if it exists in some amount, it can be measured.
E. L. Thorndike (1914)

Levels of measurement
Nominal Ordinal Interval Ratio

Nominal
A categorical variable, also called a nominal
variable, is for mutual exclusive, but not ordered, categories.

Nominal scales are mere codes assigned to objects


as labels, they are not measurements.

Not a measure of quantity. Measures identity and


difference. People either belong to a group or they do not.

Sometimes numbers are used to designate


category membership.

Examples: Gender, eye color, marital status

Ordinal
This scale has the ability to rank the individual
attributes of two items in same group but unit of measurement is not available in this scale, like student A is taller than student B but their actual heights are not available.

Designates an ordering: greater than, less


than.

Does not assume that the intervals between


numbers are equal.

Interval
Classifies data into groups or categories Designates an equal-interval ordering The difference in temperature between 20 degrees
F and 25 degrees F is the same as the difference o o between 76 degrees F and 81 degrees F
o o

Zero point on the interval scale is arbitrary zero, it


is not the true zero point

Common IQ tests are assumed to be interval


measures

Ratio
This is the highest level of measurement and has
the properties of other three levels; coupled with fixed origin or zero point.

Measurements of heights of students in a class


(zero means complete lack of height).

Someone 6 ft tall is twice as tall as someone 3 feet


tall.

Heart beats per minute has a very natural zero


point. Zero means no heart beats.

Process of measurement

Define concepts to be measured Define attributes of the concepts Select level of measurement (data type) Generate items/questions
Wording Response format

Layout and design questionnaire Pretest and refine

Methods of scaling
Rating scales

Have several response categories and are used to obtain responses with regard to the object, event, or person studied. Make comparisons between or among objects, events, persons and obtain the preferred choices and ranking among them.

Ranking scales

Types of scales

Likert scale Semantic differential scale Stapel scale Graphic rating scale Thurstone scale Guttman scale Paired comparison scale Forced choice Comparative scale

Likert scale
Is designed to examine how strongly subjects agree or
disagree with statements on a 5-point scale.

Semantic differential scale


Several bipolar attributes are identified at the
extremes of the scale, and respondents are asked to indicate their attitudes.

Stapel scale
This scale simultaneously measure both
the direction and intensity of the attitude toward the items under study. It is a slight modification of semantic differential scale. The scale consists of a single adjective in the middle of positive and negative numbers

Stapel scale

Graphic rating scale


A graphical representation helps the
respondents to indicate their answers to particular question by placing a mark at the appropriate point on the line.

Thurstone scale
This technique assesses the extent of agreement
among a group of judges about the proposed items for a scale. For example, one might ask a group of persons to judge how closely 25 different items come to measuring self-esteem. Then, one might select the 10 items that received the highest average scores for having content validity with self-esteem. It can help find the best questions to ask to measure an abstract concept. It does not specify how a question or set of questions should be formatted on a questionnaire.

Guttman scale
Who agrees with an item will also agree with all other
items expressing a less extreme position Using a series of statements to reflect the strength of attitudes

I think the following contains pornographic materials. Subject A B C Scale Value


Adult movies rated XXX Playboy magazine Lingerie ads New York Times [Yes] [Yes] [Yes] [No] [Yes] [Yes] [No] [No] [Yes] [No] [No] [No] 4 3 2 1

Paired comparison scale


The respondents are asked to
choose between two objects at a time.

Forced choice
Enables respondents to rank
objects relative to one another, among the alternatives provided.

Comparative scale
Provides a benchmark or a point of
reference to assess attitudes toward the current object, event, or situation under study.

Reliability of scale
Indicates the extent to which it is
without bias (error free) and hence ensures consistent measurement across time and across the various items in the instrument.

Types of reliability
Stability of measures

Test-retest reliability Parallel-form reliability Inter-item consistency reliability


Cronbachs alpha

Internal consistency of measures

Split-half reliability

Validity of scale
Ensures the ability of a scale to indeed
measure the concept we want to measure and not something else.
Content validity Criterion related validity Construct validity

Content validity
Ensures that the measure includes an
adequate and representative set of items that tap the concept.
A panel of judges

Criterion related validity


Is established when the measure
differentiates individuals on a criterion it is expected to predict.
Concurrent validity: established when the

scale differentiates individuals who are known to be different Predictive validity: indicates the ability of measuring instrument to differentiate among individuals with reference to future criterion

Construct validity
Testifies to how well the results obtained from
the use of the measure fit the theories around which the test is designed.
Convergent validity: established when the scores
obtained with two different instruments measuring the same concept are highly correlated Discriminant validity: established when, based on theory, two variables are predicted to be uncorrelated, and the scores obtained by measuring them are indeed empirically found to be so

THANKS A LOT

You might also like