Mainstreaming Students With A Physical Disability: Karen Choi, Rochelle Coleman, and Christine Lau
Mainstreaming Students With A Physical Disability: Karen Choi, Rochelle Coleman, and Christine Lau
What is mainstreaming?
Students are mainstreamed while they are enrolled or participating in a regular class In Australia, New Zealand and other developed countries, mainstreaming is regarded as the most culturally normative school placement. (Foreman, 2011, p16) The terms mainstreaming, integration, and inclusion are sometimes substituted for each other.
Why mainstream?
Social justice
Why mainstream?
It normalises disabilities in the classroom and makes students with a disability part of the community.
Students with disabilities also have regular peers as models of behaviour, problem solving and other cognitive skills in cooperative groupings. (Wills & Jackson, 2008) Changing attitudes towards people with disabilities requires, both, information about these disabilities and experience with people with disabilities. (Bandy & Boyer, 1994; Caroll et. al. 2003)
Time demands; balancing the need for constant supervision, development of individualised programming and complex behaviour management with the needs of the whole class.
Think-pair-share
Visual impairment
Mobility impairment
Case Study
Daryl is re-commencing Year 11 after having nearly a year off school following a car accident which left him with quadriplegia. He has some of the use of his hands and uses an electric wheelchair for mobility. He has no impairment of cognitive ability. He writes using a laptop computer. What adjustments might need to be made to: attitudes/knowledge of staff? attitudes of students? physical characteristics of the school? timetable? curriculum? available resources and equipment? teaching/learning arrangements?
Foreman, 2011
References
Ashman, A. and Elkins, J. 2012. Education for Inclusion and Diversity. Fourth ed. Pearson Australia: Frenchs Forest, NSW. Avramidis, E., Bayliss, P., & Burden, R. (2000). A survey into mainstream teachers' attitudes towards the inclusion of children with special educational needs in the ordinary school in one local education authority. Educational Psychology, 20(2), 191-211. Davies, C., Chau, T., Fehlings, D., Ameratunga, A., Stott, S. (2010). Youth with Cerebral Palsy with Differing Upper Limb Abilities: How do they access computers?. Archives of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, 91, 1952- 1956. Ewing, R. (2001). Keeping beginning teachers in the profession. Independent Education, 31(3), 30-32. Foreman, P. 2011. Inclusion in Action. Third ed. Cengage Learning: South Melbourne, VIC. Forlin, C., Jobling, A., & Carroll, A. (2001). Preservice Teachers' Discomfort Levels toward People with Disabilities. Journal of International Special Needs Education, 4, 32-38. Hastings, R. P., & Oakford, S. (2003). Student teachers' attitudes towards the inclusion of children with special needs. Educational Psychology, 23(1), 87-94. Knight, D., & Wadsworth, D. (1993). Inclusion Classrooms: Physically Challenged Students. Childhood Education, 69(4), 211-215. Konza, D. (2008). Inclusion of students with disabilities in new times: responding to the challenge. Rose, C. & Monda-Amaya, L. (2011). Bullying and Victimization Among Students with Disabilities: Effective Strstegies for Classroom Teachers. Intervention in School and Clinic, 48(2), 99 - 107. United Nations (1989). Conventions on the Rights of the Child. New York: UN. Westwood, P., & Graham, L. (2003). Inclusion of students with special needs: Benefits and obstacles perceived by teachers in New South Wales and South Australia. Australian Journal of Learning Difficulties, 8(1), 3-15. Wills, D., & Jackson, R. (2000). Report card on inclusive education in Australia. Interaction, 14, 5-12. Yanoff, J. C. (2007). The Classroom Teacher's Inclusion Handbook: Practical Methods for Integrating Students with Special Needs. Arthur Coyle Press, Chicago, Illinois.